| Does anybody else think we should go back in for 17:08 - May 28 with 6024 views | itfc1108 |
Ellis Simms.
Gave Man Utd a torrid time, and really looked the part in the 2nd half of the season.
I can see him fitting into our system, and having a good battle with Hirst for a starting role. |  | | |  |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:08 - May 28 with 5051 views | footers |
No.
He's £8m worth of pony. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:15 - May 28 with 4955 views | itfc1108 |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:08 - May 28 by footers |
No.
He's £8m worth of pony. |
Maybe Latte Lathe instead.
Might cost a bit more than Simms. | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:17 - May 28 with 4903 views | PhilTWTD |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:08 - May 28 by footers |
No.
He's £8m worth of pony. |
He actually cost £3.5m, £8m was if he plays for England, scores the winning goal in the World Cup final, is first man on Mars etc. |  | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:18 - May 28 with 4845 views | footers |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:17 - May 28 by PhilTWTD |
He actually cost £3.5m, £8m was if he plays for England, scores the winning goal in the World Cup final, is first man on Mars etc. |
Ah, standard add-ons then.
Fair enough. | |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:19 - May 28 with 4842 views | Perublue |
It’s a yea from me … big fan boy of him. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:20 - May 28 with 4809 views | wkj |
If he can blossom under the McKenna effect, sure - but I felt like it was a bullet dodged in the end. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:30 - May 28 with 4670 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Not a bad shout. Our kind of player. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:31 - May 28 with 4659 views | BloomBlue |
No, Dyche let him go because his work rate was too inconsistent, we don't need a player who will press the defenders for 1 game in 3. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:33 - May 28 with 4615 views | MaySixth |
No |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:35 - May 28 with 4600 views | Clutch |
No - he's inconsistent, and can be super lazy. |  | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:35 - May 28 with 4597 views | Churchman |
No. Not good enough.
He had a better second half to the season but still was not too impressed. Coventry paid over the odds for him. |  | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:38 - May 28 with 4555 views | Stu_boy |
I actually preferred the look of haji wright | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:42 - May 28 with 4495 views | MK1 |
Think Latte Latt would be a better choice. Wouldn't say no to Simms as McKenna would improve him. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 20:55 - May 28 with 4112 views | cressi |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:42 - May 28 by MK1 |
Think Latte Latt would be a better choice. Wouldn't say no to Simms as McKenna would improve him. |
A No from me.I prefer the Latte or cappuccino from Boro. | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:10 - May 28 with 4031 views | Wakh |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:17 - May 28 by PhilTWTD |
He actually cost £3.5m, £8m was if he plays for England, scores the winning goal in the World Cup final, is first man on Mars etc. |
Mars! Really? I saw a post from a QPR fan once saying something like. “Where was Dozell, abducted by Aliens again.” Are you suggesting that might trigger another payout for us? | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:16 - May 28 with 3981 views | itfckenty |
No, I'd rather see my dog in a town shirt than him. He is so inconsistent, and in some of the games I've seen him play in, no urgency and very slow and lazy. |  | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:27 - May 28 with 3888 views | LeoMuff |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:16 - May 28 by itfckenty |
No, I'd rather see my dog in a town shirt than him. He is so inconsistent, and in some of the games I've seen him play in, no urgency and very slow and lazy. |
He does look surprisingly slow |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:40 - May 28 with 3820 views | Europablue |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:20 - May 28 by wkj |
If he can blossom under the McKenna effect, sure - but I felt like it was a bullet dodged in the end. |
It definitely wasn't a bullet dodged, he just took a while to settle in at Coventry. It seemed way too much money at time, so it was for the best that we didn't sign him. | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:42 - May 28 with 3800 views | Europablue |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:27 - May 28 by LeoMuff |
He does look surprisingly slow |
In the end, whatever KM thinks is what matters, but it does seem that we moved on and we are looking at a higher level of player now. Not one that would move to the Championship. | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:50 - May 28 with 3733 views | ibbleobble |
I think VAR was more effective than Simms. [Post edited 28 May 2024 21:51]
| | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 07:43 - May 29 with 3244 views | Nutkins_Return |
Definitely not. Dodged a bullet in my opinion. Seen quite a lot of him. First half of the season he was awful. He's definitely improved in terms of goals second half but his contribution in games is so low. His mobility and work rate is really poor. Can't see how he fits as our style of play demands pressing which he just hasn't done all season. He has some talent. He is a player you have to get and keep super fit. If he has an injury I could see him struggling. | |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 07:49 - May 29 with 3199 views | BondiBlue |
McKenna has a history of going back in for players he's tried to sign before. Hirst, Taylor, Sarmiento. Can't imagine he thinks less of simms now he's scored a lot of goals in the championship. | |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 08:04 - May 29 with 3118 views | GavTWTD |
Any chance of O'hare? |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 08:19 - May 29 with 3033 views | footers |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 08:04 - May 29 by GavTWTD |
Any chance of O'hare? |
Diversion into Chicago? | |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 08:54 - May 29 with 2906 views | Yppswyche |
We should be going all out for Jack Clarke, Southampton supposedly sniffing around him now |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
