| How is that not a penalty? 15:46 - Aug 24 with 4305 views | DanTheMan |
Genuine question? Smacked into and doesn't get the ball. |  |
| |  |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:47 - Aug 24 with 3605 views | belgablue |
Stonewall penalty, if it was for Man City. Awful decision |  |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:47 - Aug 24 with 3580 views | redrickstuhaart |
Bent. Or intimidated by the venue. |  | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:48 - Aug 24 with 3475 views | ArchiRob |
Looked same contact as Lief's but deeper but looks like VA R is only for top teams
disapointing |  |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:48 - Aug 24 with 3410 views | BudapestByBlimp |
Slight touch on Man City player on edge of box analyzed 20 times in order to give penalty, stonewall foul on Ipswich player in box - "Nah, let's not bother". |  | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:49 - Aug 24 with 3341 views | badadski |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:47 - Aug 24 by belgablue |
Stonewall penalty, if it was for Man City. Awful decision |
Exactly the same as what he gave the pen to them for - as if they need any more of an advantage. Disgraceful -
This ref blew whistle on foul against Davis and not stated what for, then just Waited for var - then they had the free kick when shot was advantage and if they had scored you can guarantee it would have stood. Now the stone wall own not given. Absolute shambles | | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:50 - Aug 24 with 3308 views | CBBlue |
On Final Score they are in agreement it should've been a penalty. | |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:50 - Aug 24 with 3246 views | FrimleyBlue |
Think davis started to go down before being touched. |  |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:52 - Aug 24 with 3162 views | Kropotkin123 |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:50 - Aug 24 by FrimleyBlue |
Think davis started to go down before being touched. |
Doesn't matter if it was a foul. Not saying it is, I haven't seen it. Westy is fuming on commentary. |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:53 - Aug 24 with 3028 views | FrimleyBlue |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:52 - Aug 24 by Kropotkin123 |
Doesn't matter if it was a foul. Not saying it is, I haven't seen it. Westy is fuming on commentary. |
Yeah I thought it was a pen. The only thing I can think of for not being given was that reason | |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:54 - Aug 24 with 2985 views | NthQldITFC |
I'd say no, personally. The ball was probably away from him, but yup, marginal. |  |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:55 - Aug 24 with 2932 views | nshearman1 |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:49 - Aug 24 by badadski |
Exactly the same as what he gave the pen to them for - as if they need any more of an advantage. Disgraceful -
This ref blew whistle on foul against Davis and not stated what for, then just Waited for var - then they had the free kick when shot was advantage and if they had scored you can guarantee it would have stood. Now the stone wall own not given. Absolute shambles |
Welcome to the criminal Premiership... | | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:56 - Aug 24 with 2877 views | BarcaBlue |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:50 - Aug 24 by CBBlue |
On Final Score they are in agreement it should've been a penalty. |
Spanish commentators thought it was a pen and were waiting for a VAR check. |  | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:56 - Aug 24 with 2876 views | redrickstuhaart |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:54 - Aug 24 by NthQldITFC |
I'd say no, personally. The ball was probably away from him, but yup, marginal. |
Irrelevant. He was taken out. Its a foul. Clear as dayvand perfect evidence that var does not correct unconscious big club bias. | | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:56 - Aug 24 with 2864 views | Vic |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:54 - Aug 24 by NthQldITFC |
I'd say no, personally. The ball was probably away from him, but yup, marginal. |
So it was for cities! |  |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:59 - Aug 24 with 2757 views | ReusersTown |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:49 - Aug 24 by badadski |
Exactly the same as what he gave the pen to them for - as if they need any more of an advantage. Disgraceful -
This ref blew whistle on foul against Davis and not stated what for, then just Waited for var - then they had the free kick when shot was advantage and if they had scored you can guarantee it would have stood. Now the stone wall own not given. Absolute shambles |
It wasn't exactly the same, it was much worse! | | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:00 - Aug 24 with 2734 views | BlueBoots |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:54 - Aug 24 by NthQldITFC |
I'd say no, personally. The ball was probably away from him, but yup, marginal. |
Didn't get a chance to catch up with the ball after being scythed down! |  |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:00 - Aug 24 with 2699 views | NthQldITFC |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:56 - Aug 24 by Vic |
So it was for cities! |
Good point. My initial reaction was no, and players didn't seem to claim it, but I must admit the more I see it the more I'm edging towards changing my mind. | |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:01 - Aug 24 with 2660 views | WicklowBlue |
Stonewall for me |  | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:01 - Aug 24 with 2660 views | baxterbasics |
I think it may be in part because nobody claimed for it outside of the fans and KM? |  |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:03 - Aug 24 with 2565 views | DanTheMan |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:01 - Aug 24 by baxterbasics |
I think it may be in part because nobody claimed for it outside of the fans and KM? |
Because they were breaking and we had to get back.
I thought this is was VAR was for. I wish they explained some of these decisions | |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:05 - Aug 24 with 2460 views | Vegtablue |
Scratching my head too. Savinho(?) looks to have claimed he's legitimately taken over control of and shielded the ball for his teammate to sweep up, but what I saw was Leif clearly taken out. Leif may have been off-balance a bit or the ball may have slightly overrun, but I don't see how that stops it being a penalty. | | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:05 - Aug 24 with 2434 views | pointofblue |
It's one of those where, if City's hadn't been given, maybe we'd shrug it off. | |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:07 - Aug 24 with 2370 views | Vegtablue |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:03 - Aug 24 by DanTheMan |
Because they were breaking and we had to get back.
I thought this is was VAR was for. I wish they explained some of these decisions |
VAR reviewed it while City were attacking and ruled no foul, or at least that's what my commentary team said. | | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:07 - Aug 24 with 2347 views | stonojnr |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:01 - Aug 24 by baxterbasics |
I think it may be in part because nobody claimed for it outside of the fans and KM? |
its not like cricket, you dont have to appeal to get a penalty :) | | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:08 - Aug 24 with 2298 views | NthQldITFC |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:56 - Aug 24 by Vic |
So it was for cities! |
Yeah, I've fully changed my mind watching it again - sandwiched and still favourite to get to the ball at that point. Pen. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
