| Davis = Draught Excluder??? 17:56 - Aug 24 with 115838 views | Whos_blue |
Eh?
Some auto correct issues in the match report?!?
 |  |
| Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness. |
| |  |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 09:03 - Aug 25 with 4712 views | solemio |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 23:43 - Aug 24 by Whos_blue |
Gits.
The lot of ya! |
I am not illegitimate. Possibly I may be in a minority on here.
Did I hear a noise that sounded rather like a sort of bump? |  | | |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 11:34 - Aug 25 with 4631 views | Len_Brennan |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 00:26 - Aug 25 by Len_Brennan |
Does anyone know where I left my car keys? 🤔 |
It's ok, panic over, I've found them. | | | |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 11:36 - Aug 25 with 4621 views | Wickets |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 18:23 - Aug 24 by Whos_blue |
Never heard it called that before!
I understand why players do it, but I don't like to see it. I worry a well struck ball against the back of the head would cause a serious injury.
Thought it was some crazy auto correct on "defender".
Every day is a school day!
Literally! |
Being saying it for a couple of season in Premier league games . |  | | |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 13:29 - Aug 25 with 4558 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 23:43 - Aug 24 by Whos_blue |
Gits.
The lot of ya! |
I object to being called a git. Although, I can see your point so I will reflect on it and let you know later today ... or maybe tomorrow. |  |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 13:42 - Aug 25 with 4547 views | norfsufblue |
Glad to see this has stopped being bumped now😉 |  | | |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 13:59 - Aug 25 with 4523 views | WeWereZombies |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 13:42 - Aug 25 by norfsufblue |
Glad to see this has stopped being bumped now😉 |
I wouldn't be so sure... |  |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 14:21 - Aug 25 with 4507 views | Meadowlark |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 18:23 - Aug 24 by Whos_blue |
Never heard it called that before!
I understand why players do it, but I don't like to see it. I worry a well struck ball against the back of the head would cause a serious injury.
Thought it was some crazy auto correct on "defender".
Every day is a school day!
Literally! |
I personally think it's the most stupid tim pot thing you can witness at a football match. Whoever dreamed it up must be laughing their heads off that such a daft thing has been widely copied. |  | | |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 14:46 - Aug 25 with 4482 views | RobTheMonk |
It's something that I don't like and would outlaw. A free kick from close in doesn't become quite a big advantage as it should be. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 15:01 - Aug 25 with 4437 views | NeedhamChris |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 14:46 - Aug 25 by RobTheMonk |
It's something that I don't like and would outlaw. A free kick from close in doesn't become quite a big advantage as it should be. |
I disagree completely. I don't like it - but it's completely legitimate.
Next thing we will be outlawing a man on the line etc... | |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 15:51 - Aug 25 with 4418 views | WeWereZombies |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 15:01 - Aug 25 by NeedhamChris |
I disagree completely. I don't like it - but it's completely legitimate.
Next thing we will be outlawing a man on the line etc... |
And these footballers who ostensibly wear masks because of injury, they should be called out as outlaws. | |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 17:05 - Aug 25 with 4378 views | Ryorry |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 13:29 - Aug 25 by Nthsuffolkblue |
I object to being called a git. Although, I can see your point so I will reflect on it and let you know later today ... or maybe tomorrow. |
I also object to being called a git.
It should be’gitess’. |  |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 17:22 - Aug 25 with 4359 views | WeWereZombies |
Clotheslined: commentator on Sportscene used this last night when a St Johnstone defender put his arm out and back to almost lift a Dundee United attacker up by the nose. | |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 17:53 - Aug 25 with 4339 views | Swailsey |
Really glad that people have let this one settle and stopped drawing attention to it. |  |
| Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 17:58 - Aug 25 with 4331 views | FoghornGleghorn |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 17:05 - Aug 25 by Ryorry |
I also object to being called a git.
It should be’gitess’. |
"Gette" | | | |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 18:18 - Aug 25 with 4294 views | WestStanderLaLaLa |
Anyone else notice the ref made Davis move from his original position . It appeared his feet were in the way of where Haaland wanted to stand. |  |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 19:25 - Aug 25 with 4267 views | Asa |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 18:18 - Aug 25 by WestStanderLaLaLa |
Anyone else notice the ref made Davis move from his original position . It appeared his feet were in the way of where Haaland wanted to stand. |
Yeah what was that about.
Haaland was moaning and the ref even sprayed around Davis.
As for the whole Davis was already going down, let’s say he was, how does that then cancel out the blatant foul on him? | | | |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 20:14 - Aug 25 with 4215 views | ronnyd |
Let's try and make it a ten pager.  | | | |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 22:16 - Aug 25 with 4159 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 17:05 - Aug 25 by Ryorry |
I also object to being called a git.
It should be’gitess’. |
And, if you don't object to gitess, I feel I shouldn't object to git really.
However, surely it should be gittess?
I still feel I need longer to think on it and let you all know tomorrow ... or some time after. | |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 22:18 - Aug 25 with 4135 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 20:14 - Aug 25 by ronnyd |
Let's try and make it a ten pager. |
Boobs. |  |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 01:36 - Aug 26 with 4019 views | Vic |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 17:05 - Aug 25 by Ryorry |
I also object to being called a git.
It should be’gitess’. |
Gite?
Dang, I just bumped this again, sorry. |  |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 08:29 - Aug 26 with 3927 views | WeWereZombies |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 01:36 - Aug 26 by Vic |
Gite?
Dang, I just bumped this again, sorry. |
I suppose mention of a French hideaway would cause things to go a bit quiet on this thread.
Mind you, I'm quite glad that no one has inadvertently bumped it for the last seven hours or so... | |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 08:48 - Aug 26 with 3919 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 14:46 - Aug 25 by RobTheMonk |
It's something that I don't like and would outlaw. A free kick from close in doesn't become quite a big advantage as it should be. |
You can't outlaw lying down on the pitch, Jack Grealish would be booked every game.
Oh, actually, you have a point. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 09:03 - Aug 26 with 3906 views | RobTheMonk |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 08:48 - Aug 26 by The_Flashing_Smile |
You can't outlaw lying down on the pitch, Jack Grealish would be booked every game.
Oh, actually, you have a point. |
Haha indeed.
In all seriousness I think it gives the defending team a slight unfair advantage as from that close in your wall can jump and in essence gives at least an extra foot to the wall.
Perhaps me saying outlaw it was a bit far, but I hate it. | | | |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 09:12 - Aug 26 with 3895 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 09:03 - Aug 26 by RobTheMonk |
Haha indeed.
In all seriousness I think it gives the defending team a slight unfair advantage as from that close in your wall can jump and in essence gives at least an extra foot to the wall.
Perhaps me saying outlaw it was a bit far, but I hate it. |
Is it fair that the goalkeeper can use his hands? Or that the attackers (other than the taker) don't have to be 10 yards away from the free kick? Or that the goalkeeper can't use his hands in the attacking area too?
Ultimately for every attacking player in the wall, that is one fewer defender marking, etc. With one player laying down that is one player's width narrower a wall too. I don't see the problem. It looked strange when they started doing it but I understand why and it is fine with me.
I am waiting for other new innovations like the attacker on the shoulders of a team mate to gain a height advantage from a corner (rugby line-out style). I guess this must be against the rules or would have happened by now! | |
| |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 09:21 - Aug 26 with 3883 views | RobTheMonk |
| Davis = Draught Excluder??? on 09:12 - Aug 26 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Is it fair that the goalkeeper can use his hands? Or that the attackers (other than the taker) don't have to be 10 yards away from the free kick? Or that the goalkeeper can't use his hands in the attacking area too?
Ultimately for every attacking player in the wall, that is one fewer defender marking, etc. With one player laying down that is one player's width narrower a wall too. I don't see the problem. It looked strange when they started doing it but I understand why and it is fine with me.
I am waiting for other new innovations like the attacker on the shoulders of a team mate to gain a height advantage from a corner (rugby line-out style). I guess this must be against the rules or would have happened by now! |
Imagine Tuanzebe and Wolfie launching Chappers into the air hahaha. He'd end up in orbit! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
