Embarrassing 02:13 - Jan 7 with 3926 views | suffolkpunch1978 | This site is full of blue tinted glasses. I've been going to watch this club for 40 years and I have to say this Davis should have been sent off and it wasn't a pen in both Fulham and Chelsea.... If it was the other way around you would all say the same. |  | | |  |
Embarrassing on 02:47 - Jan 7 with 3807 views | Hciwspi | Cool story bro. Time for your meds and bed. |  | |  |
Embarrassing on 04:16 - Jan 7 with 3693 views | SitfcB | You can’t be worrying about us when your boys are just mid table Championship fodder. |  |
|  |
Embarrassing on 04:50 - Jan 7 with 3657 views | Len_Brennan | An Ipswich fans forum, having a pro Ipswich bias - well I never! The contentious incidents that you speak of could have gone either way, there is no doubt about that, so yes, if we were on the other side of those decisions we would be upset with them, just like the supporters of every other club would be in the same circumstances. But, none of those incidents were clearcut based on current interpretation of the rules, so debate & the defence of our biased position on them is justified. The.potential Davis sending off happens well outside the box, with Wilson's touch being a bit heavy, O'Shea (who is a pacy defender) coming across to cover & Walton already well off his line, so there is a question mark as to it being a clear goal scoring opportunity. Having said that, we were happy to see Bree sent off v Southampton last season, which they vehemently argued against, as you would expect them to do. Both penalties were very soft, and in my mind should not have been classed as penalties, due to the fact that this recent enough interpretation whereby any 'contact' in the box allows the attacker go down & a penalty awarded, is a load of b#$$#×; but I'm not writing the laws of the game & this interpretation is applied pretty much across the board, so of course Delap is going to 'buy' the foul & hit the deck when he feels the contact. I don't like it, but unless the rule/interpretation is changed, those challenges are going to result in penalties, for us & against us; we'll take them when we get them, & we'll point out how ludicrous the rule is when they go against us, just like supporters of all other clubs will do. |  | |  |
Embarrassing on 04:53 - Jan 7 with 3641 views | MK1 | 40 years you say ? You sound about 6. |  |
|  |
Embarrassing on 06:15 - Jan 7 with 3493 views | billabasblue | Interesting as the general consensus from almost everything I’ve read and seen is that Davis incident was just about correct as a yellow due to Osheas pace as the covering defender and everyone was sure Delaps was a penalty including sky and the bbc , the ref, Var etc for me the penalty is clear. The Chelsea penalty I actually felt was a little soft in truth however with some of the ridiculous ones we have been denied this season nobody can begrudge us getting a 50-50 penalty |  | |  |
Embarrassing on 06:37 - Jan 7 with 3407 views | BlueBadger | Obvious budgie is obvious. |  |
|  |
Embarrassing on 07:26 - Jan 7 with 3121 views | BlueBadger |
Embarrassing on 02:47 - Jan 7 by Hciwspi | Cool story bro. Time for your meds and bed. |
The nominative determinism of the OP's header is incredible though. |  |
|  |
Embarrassing on 07:29 - Jan 7 with 3100 views | Dubtractor | I tell you what is embarrassing - setting up a login on a rival team's forum at 2:13 in the morning to make a piss poor attempt at trolling. The phrase 'get a life' doesn't even touch the sides. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Embarrassing on 07:36 - Jan 7 with 3024 views | Crawfordsboot |
Embarrassing on 07:26 - Jan 7 by BlueBadger | The nominative determinism of the OP's header is incredible though. |
Nice one! 😁 |  | |  |
Embarrassing on 07:39 - Jan 7 with 2991 views | catch74 |
Embarrassing on 07:29 - Jan 7 by Dubtractor | I tell you what is embarrassing - setting up a login on a rival team's forum at 2:13 in the morning to make a piss poor attempt at trolling. The phrase 'get a life' doesn't even touch the sides. |
I wonder how long it took agonising over the name, ‘how can I go in undetected.’ True genius at work. |  |
|  |
Embarrassing on 07:39 - Jan 7 with 2994 views | DanTheMan |
Embarrassing on 07:29 - Jan 7 by Dubtractor | I tell you what is embarrassing - setting up a login on a rival team's forum at 2:13 in the morning to make a piss poor attempt at trolling. The phrase 'get a life' doesn't even touch the sides. |
I initially thought this but they have new comments from when Chopra was here. Being wound up by Ipswich fans being biased about Ipswich on some marginal decisions sure is odd though. I think as a comment above says, most of the decisions were right although I think the Delap Chelsea penalty was very soft. |  |
|  |
Embarrassing on 07:52 - Jan 7 with 2878 views | Dubtractor |
Embarrassing on 07:39 - Jan 7 by DanTheMan | I initially thought this but they have new comments from when Chopra was here. Being wound up by Ipswich fans being biased about Ipswich on some marginal decisions sure is odd though. I think as a comment above says, most of the decisions were right although I think the Delap Chelsea penalty was very soft. |
If they are an Ipswich fan, then I'd say the 2:13am post trolling their fellow supporters is even sadder tbh. |  |
|  |
Embarrassing on 08:57 - Jan 7 with 2391 views | Stewart27 | Why have one full stop when you can have four? Forever in our shadow. |  | |  |
Embarrassing on 08:58 - Jan 7 with 2383 views | artsbossbeard | I actually agree with you and I've been going 46yrs - although I've not shown my arse on a football forum. |  |
| Please note: prior to hitting the post button, I've double checked for anything that could be construed as "Anti Semitic" and to the best of my knowledge it isn't. Anything deemed to be of a Xenophobic nature is therefore purely accidental or down to your own misconstruing. | Poll: | Raining in IP8 - shall I get the washing in? |
|  |
Embarrassing on 09:08 - Jan 7 with 2232 views | WeWereZombies |
Embarrassing on 08:57 - Jan 7 by Stewart27 | Why have one full stop when you can have four? Forever in our shadow. |
Three would be the correct form for an ellipsis... [Edit: Confused spelling of a mathematical term with a grammatical one, how embarrassing...] [Post edited 7 Jan 9:24]
|  |
|  |
Embarrassing on 09:17 - Jan 7 with 2104 views | GeoffSentence | News commentor introduces themself to the Forum in the most news commentor way possible. Nicely done. |  |
|  |
Embarrassing on 09:30 - Jan 7 with 1971 views | Meadowlark |
Embarrassing on 09:08 - Jan 7 by WeWereZombies | Three would be the correct form for an ellipsis... [Edit: Confused spelling of a mathematical term with a grammatical one, how embarrassing...] [Post edited 7 Jan 9:24]
|
I was impressed with "should have" though. I've seen worse. |  | |  |
Embarrassing on 09:37 - Jan 7 with 1908 views | The_Flashing_Smile | It's taken you a bloody long time to find the forum! |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
|  |
Embarrassing on 09:48 - Jan 7 with 1774 views | lazyblue | Davis had cover and Fulham he belted Delaps foot. |  | |  |
Embarrassing on 09:48 - Jan 7 with 1776 views | Trequartista | Are you saying Delap felt contact and then threw himself down? That's a perfectly legitimate position as long as you say both Fulham players felt contact and threw themselves down as well? |  |
|  |
Embarrassing on 09:49 - Jan 7 with 1761 views | Scuzzer | Ha ha ha ha...you are Delia and I claim my prize. |  |
|  |
| |