By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Not just because of the recent grok AI malarkey, but because the owner has such disrespect for democratic governments that he refuses to make his hate filled platform a safe place for the users. It could easily be claimed that using it generates reputational damage. Football clubs in general still seem keen to use it and that is all I use it for - e.g. team news. Perhaps there should be a mass transfer of clubs to an alternative medium. I haven't done this as a poll as I am more interested in seeing a discussion than just a count of yesses and noes.
1
Should ITFC leave x? on 19:08 - Jan 14 with 1335 views
The club will serve the fans. It's easy to say they should leave X (has ANY club in the top 4 leagues in England left?). It's harder to say I won't use X and you will find me on Bluesky.
If enough fans do that then they will go to Bluesky as well. While you all sit on X having the best of both worlds by engaging on there AND complaining about it they will continue to serve you on X.
regardless of the bile that is on that site, I personally think ITFC should leave it purely on morals because of what M*sk stands for and what he is promoting. Twitter was glorious but 'X' is hate.
2
Should ITFC leave x? on 21:21 - Jan 14 with 564 views
I do note TWTD has 19800+ followers on twitter and on blue sky 923 so I imagine that football clubs will seek maximum outreach similar to the powers that be at TWTD and the vast majority of all organisations.
No idea why grok is not amended as this seems to be the present issue, heard varying sources indicating outlets such as Snapchat, WhatsApp, Gemini and Chat are all offering similar undesirable content. Assume Musk is being stubborn about adapting Grok which is a poor position to adopt.
0
Should ITFC leave x? on 21:28 - Jan 14 with 520 views
Should ITFC leave x? on 21:21 - Jan 14 by management
I do note TWTD has 19800+ followers on twitter and on blue sky 923 so I imagine that football clubs will seek maximum outreach similar to the powers that be at TWTD and the vast majority of all organisations.
No idea why grok is not amended as this seems to be the present issue, heard varying sources indicating outlets such as Snapchat, WhatsApp, Gemini and Chat are all offering similar undesirable content. Assume Musk is being stubborn about adapting Grok which is a poor position to adopt.
stubborn or an amoral n*zi? You decide.
1
Should ITFC leave x? on 21:32 - Jan 14 with 487 views
Phil keeps us all informed. Phil is all us fans need. The club needs exposure to as many as possible. If that's x, then so be it. You don't need to go on there for ITFC news. We have Phil for that.
Yes, nobody in their right mind should use Twitter as their primary platform anymore. But if they refuse to leave it for commercial reasons (it's still the biggest micro-blogging site), they should at least cross-post to Blue Sky. Way things are going, only posting on Twitter will become like refusing to give interviews except to the Daily Express. Learning team news is the only reason I still go on Twitter, and I resent the club for that. BlueSky now has > 40m users and is growing at a much faster rate than Twitter.
[Post edited 14 Jan 22:16]
3
Should ITFC leave x? on 22:35 - Jan 14 with 201 views
Should ITFC leave x? on 19:44 - Jan 14 by BloomBlue
Maybe they could all move to Truth Social?
Ooh hold on....
I think BlueSky Social is meant to be the safe alternative which many have moved to. I set up an account about a year or so ago but it just hasn’t taken off enough yet. Still potential though.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
