| Szmodics “lies” according to some 09:23 - Feb 6 with 4269 views | bluesbrothers |
Admit I got it wrong as I thought he wouldn’t play again. But some people absolutely slated me and others for sharing Szmodics news on here… well what have you got to say about McKennas comments regarding group dynamics…? Will you also show some humility and admit you were wrong? |  | | |  |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:27 - Feb 6 with 3522 views | yesjohn99 |
This is the wrong place to come for apologies! | | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:29 - Feb 6 with 3492 views | bluesbrothers |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:27 - Feb 6 by yesjohn99 |
This is the wrong place to come for apologies! |
Haha not even looking for that! Can’t remember the persons user name but they were pretty shitty about it at the time | | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:31 - Feb 6 with 3447 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:29 - Feb 6 by bluesbrothers |
Haha not even looking for that! Can’t remember the persons user name but they were pretty shitty about it at the time |
Was it PhilTWTD or GavTWTD? They’re always causing trouble. |  |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:34 - Feb 6 with 3404 views | Wright1 |
I don't have a horse in this race because honestly, I have no idea what was said by you or anyone else... but it's a bit weird to care enough about it to post an entire "I told you so" thread. | | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:37 - Feb 6 with 3342 views | Waig |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:34 - Feb 6 by Wright1 |
I don't have a horse in this race because honestly, I have no idea what was said by you or anyone else... but it's a bit weird to care enough about it to post an entire "I told you so" thread. |
Because when anyone says anything on here that doesn’t toe the official line get hounded by more established users on here. | | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:47 - Feb 6 with 3194 views | Steve_M |
I think that's an unnecessary post. You weren't the only one to be aware of the claims against Szmodics but if you can't understand why a) it's best kept off the board and b) why people might be reluctant to accept it then that's your problem not theirs. |  |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:48 - Feb 6 with 3184 views | Guthrum |
Tho there's still nothing conclusive that it was a bust-up or bad attitude, rather than simply letting a player who wanted to leave (having found himself on the outer edges of the club's plans) do so with minimum fuss.
Listening to Szmodics' joining interview at Derby, there were no comments hinting at any kind of falling out or dissatisfaction with Ipswich (unlike Woolfenden at Cov). Just that he wanted to play and to join up again with Eustace (under whom he'd had much success) and some of his mates. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:59 - Feb 6 with 3034 views | ghostofescobar |
I’d heard, probably, the same rumours about him as well. Thought there might be something up when he was “ill”, although he could of course have genuinely been ill, but the rumours I heard were at the same time. Thing is, I’ve been caught out with social media based tittle tattle before, so kind of shrugged it off, and definitely didn’t want to post anything about it, because this kind of thing is so often complete and utter rubbish. |  |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:00 - Feb 6 with 3001 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:48 - Feb 6 by Guthrum |
Tho there's still nothing conclusive that it was a bust-up or bad attitude, rather than simply letting a player who wanted to leave (having found himself on the outer edges of the club's plans) do so with minimum fuss.
Listening to Szmodics' joining interview at Derby, there were no comments hinting at any kind of falling out or dissatisfaction with Ipswich (unlike Woolfenden at Cov). Just that he wanted to play and to join up again with Eustace (under whom he'd had much success) and some of his mates. |
I think Mckennas comments this morning are fairly clear. |  |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:08 - Feb 6 with 2834 views | Benters |
Does it really matter ?
Wanting divs on a football forum to apologise, you will have a long wait buh! |  |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:13 - Feb 6 with 2755 views | gtsb1966 |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:48 - Feb 6 by Guthrum |
Tho there's still nothing conclusive that it was a bust-up or bad attitude, rather than simply letting a player who wanted to leave (having found himself on the outer edges of the club's plans) do so with minimum fuss.
Listening to Szmodics' joining interview at Derby, there were no comments hinting at any kind of falling out or dissatisfaction with Ipswich (unlike Woolfenden at Cov). Just that he wanted to play and to join up again with Eustace (under whom he'd had much success) and some of his mates. |
He had no dissatisfaction with Ipswich and after what happened he has acted very sensibly. The dissatisfaction is, and rightly so, with the club's feelings for Szmodics. I too said I didn't think he would play again and was surprised he did but definitely not surprised with todays comments. |  | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:13 - Feb 6 with 2748 views | mellowblue |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:48 - Feb 6 by Guthrum |
Tho there's still nothing conclusive that it was a bust-up or bad attitude, rather than simply letting a player who wanted to leave (having found himself on the outer edges of the club's plans) do so with minimum fuss.
Listening to Szmodics' joining interview at Derby, there were no comments hinting at any kind of falling out or dissatisfaction with Ipswich (unlike Woolfenden at Cov). Just that he wanted to play and to join up again with Eustace (under whom he'd had much success) and some of his mates. |
McKenna has been pretty open and frank here, more so than I would have expected. Would have been much easier to talk in terms of Szmodics wanting regular football etc. Does not sound as if he will be welcomed back into the squad in July. | | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:15 - Feb 6 with 2694 views | GlasgowBlue |
I don’t recall the word “lies” being used. Fir my part, I said that posting unsubstantiated rumours is unhelpful and until confirmed by the club we shouldn’t be speculating. |  |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:18 - Feb 6 with 2655 views | Guthrum |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:13 - Feb 6 by mellowblue |
McKenna has been pretty open and frank here, more so than I would have expected. Would have been much easier to talk in terms of Szmodics wanting regular football etc. Does not sound as if he will be welcomed back into the squad in July. |
No, I can't see him back at Town again. We did, after all, try for a permanent transfer last month. | |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:23 - Feb 6 with 2582 views | baxterbasics |
Something clearly up with Szmods dressing room wise after KMs comments.
But this doesn't confirm any detail about the rumours flying around a few weeks back. Those remain unsubstantiated. We have only seen a bit more smoke now. |  |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:29 - Feb 6 with 2484 views | Meadowlark |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 09:27 - Feb 6 by yesjohn99 |
This is the wrong place to come for apologies! |
.....or talk about humility? |  | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:29 - Feb 6 with 2478 views | _CliveBaker_ |
Cringe |  | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:30 - Feb 6 with 2466 views | MattinLondon |
I can’t recall what you said about SS.
But if you’re alluding to his character then it seems odd that Jon Eustace wants him back having worked with him before. Plus, when at Blackburn, he didn’t throw his toys out when his move down here was stalling.
As I said, no idea what you said about SS and so I could well be miles off. |  | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:39 - Feb 6 with 2338 views | SitfcB |
Blub. |  |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:43 - Feb 6 with 2282 views | baxterbasics |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:23 - Feb 6 by baxterbasics |
Something clearly up with Szmods dressing room wise after KMs comments.
But this doesn't confirm any detail about the rumours flying around a few weeks back. Those remain unsubstantiated. We have only seen a bit more smoke now. |
Just to follow up with some interesting detail - being careful not to post too much...
There's a discussion on FB group "ITFC Fans Page" regarding the rumours we are discussing here.
There's a comment in the thread from an 'Ann McAteer' - middle aged lady in the profile pic - her words: "nothing 'allegedly' about it"
Realise this isn't 'beyond reasonable doubt' level of evidence but interesting nonetheless. | |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:46 - Feb 6 with 2232 views | Waig |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:43 - Feb 6 by baxterbasics |
Just to follow up with some interesting detail - being careful not to post too much...
There's a discussion on FB group "ITFC Fans Page" regarding the rumours we are discussing here.
There's a comment in the thread from an 'Ann McAteer' - middle aged lady in the profile pic - her words: "nothing 'allegedly' about it"
Realise this isn't 'beyond reasonable doubt' level of evidence but interesting nonetheless. |
When Szmodics came back into the squad for his final game, was McAteer missing? | | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:57 - Feb 6 with 2096 views | NthQldITFC |
Poor you. |  |
| |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 11:21 - Feb 6 with 1967 views | IP1Blue |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 10:43 - Feb 6 by baxterbasics |
Just to follow up with some interesting detail - being careful not to post too much...
There's a discussion on FB group "ITFC Fans Page" regarding the rumours we are discussing here.
There's a comment in the thread from an 'Ann McAteer' - middle aged lady in the profile pic - her words: "nothing 'allegedly' about it"
Realise this isn't 'beyond reasonable doubt' level of evidence but interesting nonetheless. |
Doesn’t take a lot of looking to see that he is related to her.
You’ve got to be very stupid to have done what he done!
Don’t think she would comment that if she didn’t know about it | | | |
| Szmodics “lies” according to some on 11:27 - Feb 6 with 1915 views | Vic |
But you said, categorically, that he wouldn't play again. But he did.
So yes, you had some ITK, but made the mistake of thinking you knew what it would mean. No problem, we all do it - but usually it's best to put an 'IMO' or similar! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
