Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months 14:28 - Nov 9 with 3444 viewsBasingstokeBlue

About 7 years until released on license.

Edit: added time so be served until allowed out on license.
[Post edited 9 Nov 14:32]

Poll: What do you think of the three stars being relocated?

0
Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 15:43 - Nov 9BlueBadger

.....
....
...
..
.
Ask for consent.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: How did you do the England game?
Blog: From Despair to Where?

2
Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 17:32 - Nov 9Cheltenham_Blue

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 15:43 - Nov 9 by BlueBadger

.....
....
...
..
.
Ask for consent.


Think his brief needs investigating too. Some of the stuff he has said, and done during the trial, tells me he's cut from a similar cloth.

1. He said it occurred after "fully consensual vaginal intercourse" and "was quite a short... momentary total failure to respect her consent"

2. He argues that being "tipsy" shouldn’t be considered as being vulnerable.

3. The defence barrister now argues the woman who Brand anally raped was "not particularly vulnerable - she must have felt sufficiently confident [going to his house], considering the sort of persona, and the sort of sex he would engage in".

4. These incidents occurred at a point in his career when Brand was very famous, Winter says. He adds that Brand's crimes were connected to that exposure to fame.

Add into all of that, calling the investigative journalist "You B*tch", after the verdict
[Post edited 9 Nov 17:35]

Poll: If we were to spend £200m would you rather

0
Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 17:35 - Nov 9redrickstuhaart

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 17:32 - Nov 9 by Cheltenham_Blue

Think his brief needs investigating too. Some of the stuff he has said, and done during the trial, tells me he's cut from a similar cloth.

1. He said it occurred after "fully consensual vaginal intercourse" and "was quite a short... momentary total failure to respect her consent"

2. He argues that being "tipsy" shouldn’t be considered as being vulnerable.

3. The defence barrister now argues the woman who Brand anally raped was "not particularly vulnerable - she must have felt sufficiently confident [going to his house], considering the sort of persona, and the sort of sex he would engage in".

4. These incidents occurred at a point in his career when Brand was very famous, Winter says. He adds that Brand's crimes were connected to that exposure to fame.

Add into all of that, calling the investigative journalist "You B*tch", after the verdict
[Post edited 9 Nov 17:35]


Has to put the clients case and make the arguments.

Poll: Spectrum or C64 / Pablo or Kuqi- your preferences?

0
Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 17:38 - Nov 9Cheltenham_Blue

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 17:35 - Nov 9 by redrickstuhaart

Has to put the clients case and make the arguments.


Which of his arguments do you agree with?

You can set out mitigation without victim blaming.

Poll: If we were to spend £200m would you rather

-1
Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 19:05 - Nov 9redrickstuhaart

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 17:38 - Nov 9 by Cheltenham_Blue

Which of his arguments do you agree with?

You can set out mitigation without victim blaming.


Absolutely irrelevant to what I said.

And if vulnerability is argued by the other side, he has to address it. Whether you, or I, or he agree with the argument or not.

Poll: Spectrum or C64 / Pablo or Kuqi- your preferences?

1
Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 19:20 - Nov 9J2BLUE

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 17:38 - Nov 9 by Cheltenham_Blue

Which of his arguments do you agree with?

You can set out mitigation without victim blaming.


How did you read that and think he agreed?
3
Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 19:26 - Nov 9Dubtractor

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 19:05 - Nov 9 by redrickstuhaart

Absolutely irrelevant to what I said.

And if vulnerability is argued by the other side, he has to address it. Whether you, or I, or he agree with the argument or not.


I'd imagine if you were to review the defence case in pretty much any case along these lines, it would seem pretty appalling, but as you state the role of the defence is to counter the claims made. And that counter will largely be based on the case made to them by the defendant.

The comments he made outside the court are indefensible though.
[Post edited 9 Nov 19:26]

I was born underwater, I dried out in the sun. I started humping volcanoes baby, when I was too young.
Poll: Correct Ketchup Distribution on Chips?

0
Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 20:38 - Nov 9GlasgowBlue

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 19:26 - Nov 9 by Dubtractor

I'd imagine if you were to review the defence case in pretty much any case along these lines, it would seem pretty appalling, but as you state the role of the defence is to counter the claims made. And that counter will largely be based on the case made to them by the defendant.

The comments he made outside the court are indefensible though.
[Post edited 9 Nov 19:26]


Brand's father is also a nasty piece of work. Claiming his son was the real victim and that the women were throwing themselves at him.

Antisemites, Jew haters and crashing bores will be put on ignore.
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

4
Login to get fewer ads

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 20:59 - Nov 9The_Flashing_Smile

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 20:38 - Nov 9 by GlasgowBlue

Brand's father is also a nasty piece of work. Claiming his son was the real victim and that the women were throwing themselves at him.


Don't know if you can read this but you're spot on. Brand's father has a lot to answer for, not just during this trial.. He took his son to prostitutes when he was only a kid and forced him to lose his virginity to one. I suspect a lot of Brand's lack of respect for women stems from that.

Trust the process. Trust Phil.
Blog: Between The Lines 2, The Irreverent PREM Poetry Of ITFC - Match 9 - “Hulloween”

1
Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 21:27 - Nov 9catch74

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 20:38 - Nov 9 by GlasgowBlue

Brand's father is also a nasty piece of work. Claiming his son was the real victim and that the women were throwing themselves at him.


Barred from all the pubs in Farnham when I worked there. Not
a pleasant man.

Poll: Who are the Numbskulls?

0
Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 22:14 - Nov 9Swansea_Blue

Going to jail for something he didn't do..... on 17:32 - Nov 9 by Cheltenham_Blue

Think his brief needs investigating too. Some of the stuff he has said, and done during the trial, tells me he's cut from a similar cloth.

1. He said it occurred after "fully consensual vaginal intercourse" and "was quite a short... momentary total failure to respect her consent"

2. He argues that being "tipsy" shouldn’t be considered as being vulnerable.

3. The defence barrister now argues the woman who Brand anally raped was "not particularly vulnerable - she must have felt sufficiently confident [going to his house], considering the sort of persona, and the sort of sex he would engage in".

4. These incidents occurred at a point in his career when Brand was very famous, Winter says. He adds that Brand's crimes were connected to that exposure to fame.

Add into all of that, calling the investigative journalist "You B*tch", after the verdict
[Post edited 9 Nov 17:35]


I know it’s his job to defend, but are borderline illegal acts normally considered a valid defence? Was it just because he had so little to work with or a genuine belief that Brand’s actions weren’t much of an issue? I suppose that’s a rhetorical question.

Poll: Escaped Goat of the day. Who’s it going to be?

0
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 07:12 - Nov 10Ftnfwest

Shouldn’t it just be a leaflet?
0
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 18:58 - Nov 10Ryorry

Not long enough imho.

https://sentencingcouncil.org.

Poll: Do you find minor cuts & grazes heal better

0
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:21 - Nov 10OldFootball

It's interesting how he got a longer sentence than most of the convictions for the rape gangs. I wonder why that was.
-7
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:27 - Nov 10redrickstuhaart

Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:21 - Nov 10 by OldFootball

It's interesting how he got a longer sentence than most of the convictions for the rape gangs. I wonder why that was.


Rochdale
• Mohammed Zahid (Ringleader): 35 years (for 20 offences)
• Kasir Bashir: 29 years (for 4 offences, sentenced in absentia)
• Mushtaq Ahmed: 27 years (for 9 offences)
• Mohammed Shahzad: 26 years (for 6 offences)
• Naheem Akram: 26 years (for 7 offences)
• Nisar Hussain: 19 years (for 3 offences)
• Roheez Khan: 12 years (for 1 offence)


Oh.
[Post edited 10 Nov 21:28]

Poll: Spectrum or C64 / Pablo or Kuqi- your preferences?

8
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:30 - Nov 10MattinLondon

Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:21 - Nov 10 by OldFootball

It's interesting how he got a longer sentence than most of the convictions for the rape gangs. I wonder why that was.


This thread has certainly brought out the c**ts tonight. A quick google search - and I mean thirty secs - highlighted that OldFootball’s post is complete rubbish.

Recent UK court cases and police investigations into non-recent child sexual exploitation and grooming rings have resulted in significant convictions and lengthy prison sentences:

Rochdale Grooming Gang (Sentenced October 2025)

• Overview: Seven men were convicted by a jury of 50 child sexual offences involving two vulnerable schoolgirls between 2001 and 2006 following a Greater Manchester Police investigation.
• Sentences: Totalled 174 years in prison:
• Mohammed Zahid (Ringleader): 35 years
• Kasir Bashir: 29 years
• Mushtaq Ahmed: 27 years
• Mohammed Shahzad: 26 years
• Naheem Akram: 26 years
• Nisar Hussain: 19 years
• Roheez Khan: 12 years

Kirklees / West Yorkshire Sexual Abuse Cases (Sentenced 2025–May 2026)

• Overview: Twenty men were convicted for historical child sexual abuse committed decades ago, with the final sentencing concluded by West Yorkshire Police.
• Sentences: Ranged up to 28 years for individual members:
• Sajid Majid: 28 years
• Manaf Hussain: 25 years
• Tariq Azam: 24 years
• Zulfiqar Ali: 22 years, 6 months
• Aurrangzeb Azam: 20 years
• Other defendants received custodial sentences ranging from 11 to 30 years (including added consecutive terms).

Blackrod Grooming Gang, Bolton (Sentenced April 2025)

• Overview: Ten men were sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court following a Crown Prosecution Service investigation into the grooming and sexual exploitation of underage girls in Greater Manchester.
• Sentences: Ranged from suspended sentences to 15 years in prison.
• Ashley Darbyshire (Primary Offender): 15 years in prison (serving 10 years in custody) plus a lifetime on the Sex Offenders' Register
4
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:34 - Nov 10MattinLondon

Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:27 - Nov 10 by redrickstuhaart

Rochdale
• Mohammed Zahid (Ringleader): 35 years (for 20 offences)
• Kasir Bashir: 29 years (for 4 offences, sentenced in absentia)
• Mushtaq Ahmed: 27 years (for 9 offences)
• Mohammed Shahzad: 26 years (for 6 offences)
• Naheem Akram: 26 years (for 7 offences)
• Nisar Hussain: 19 years (for 3 offences)
• Roheez Khan: 12 years (for 1 offence)


Oh.
[Post edited 10 Nov 21:28]


Apologies, you posted this in reply just before I did.

I wonder why that poster made the comparison and also wrote complete rubbish.
3
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:36 - Nov 10redrickstuhaart

Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:34 - Nov 10 by MattinLondon

Apologies, you posted this in reply just before I did.

I wonder why that poster made the comparison and also wrote complete rubbish.


Because its culture war nonsense propagated on social media which he has probably absorbed over time, within a Reform / Restore echo chamber.

Poll: Spectrum or C64 / Pablo or Kuqi- your preferences?

1
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:41 - Nov 10The_Romford_Blue

Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:21 - Nov 10 by OldFootball

It's interesting how he got a longer sentence than most of the convictions for the rape gangs. I wonder why that was.


Make that two disgusting posts.

Wtf is wrong with you

Poll: Ashton Out? Yes or no

3
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 23:15 - Nov 10alexlanark64

Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 21:27 - Nov 10 by redrickstuhaart

Rochdale
• Mohammed Zahid (Ringleader): 35 years (for 20 offences)
• Kasir Bashir: 29 years (for 4 offences, sentenced in absentia)
• Mushtaq Ahmed: 27 years (for 9 offences)
• Mohammed Shahzad: 26 years (for 6 offences)
• Naheem Akram: 26 years (for 7 offences)
• Nisar Hussain: 19 years (for 3 offences)
• Roheez Khan: 12 years (for 1 offence)


Oh.
[Post edited 10 Nov 21:28]


• 2012 Rochdale Trial (Operation Doublet / First Major Trial):
• Kabeer Hassan: 9 years (for rape and conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with children).
• Abdul Aziz: 9 years (for trafficking for sexual exploitation and conspiracy).
• Adil Khan: 8 years.
• Abdul Rauf: 6 years (for trafficking and conspiracy).
• Mohammed Sajid: 12 years (higher, noted for comparison).
• Mohammed Amin: 5 years (for sexual assault and conspiracy).
• Abdul Qayyum: 5 years (for conspiracy).
• Hamid Safi: 4 years (for trafficking and conspiracy).
• 2016 Rochdale Trial (Operation Doublet follow-up):
• Kutab Miah: 9 years
• Rehan Ali: 7 years
• Abid Khan: 6.5 years
• Mohammed Zahid: 5 years
• Mahfuz Rahman: 5.5 years
0
Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 23:24 - Nov 10redrickstuhaart

Brand gets 10 years and 6 months on 23:15 - Nov 10 by alexlanark64

• 2012 Rochdale Trial (Operation Doublet / First Major Trial):
• Kabeer Hassan: 9 years (for rape and conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with children).
• Abdul Aziz: 9 years (for trafficking for sexual exploitation and conspiracy).
• Adil Khan: 8 years.
• Abdul Rauf: 6 years (for trafficking and conspiracy).
• Mohammed Sajid: 12 years (higher, noted for comparison).
• Mohammed Amin: 5 years (for sexual assault and conspiracy).
• Abdul Qayyum: 5 years (for conspiracy).
• Hamid Safi: 4 years (for trafficking and conspiracy).
• 2016 Rochdale Trial (Operation Doublet follow-up):
• Kutab Miah: 9 years
• Rehan Ali: 7 years
• Abid Khan: 6.5 years
• Mohammed Zahid: 5 years
• Mahfuz Rahman: 5.5 years


Before changes to sentencing guidelines. It's not difficult.

Poll: Spectrum or C64 / Pablo or Kuqi- your preferences?

2
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026