| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) 20:52 - Dec 4 with 958 views | SitfcB |
|  |
| |  |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 with 926 views | NeedhamChris |
Phil trying to unite the board with a less popular decision?
Boo |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 with 906 views | N2_Blue |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 by NeedhamChris |
Phil trying to unite the board with a less popular decision?
Boo |
noo i was just reading the third page and it went :( |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 with 906 views | SitfcB |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 by NeedhamChris |
Phil trying to unite the board with a less popular decision?
Boo |
PHIL AND GAV OUT BOOOOOO TIME TO GO | |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:54 - Dec 4 with 858 views | Steve_M |
Oh FFS. Nooooooo. |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:55 - Dec 4 with 809 views | timothyeo |
Deserved to be pinned to the top for the next 2 years. | | | |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:55 - Dec 4 with 814 views | Coastalblue |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 by N2_Blue |
noo i was just reading the third page and it went :( |
Same, that should have gone into a TWTD hall of fame archive, up there with Joe ruined my wedding. |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:56 - Dec 4 with 805 views | The_Romford_Blue |
What did I miss? |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:56 - Dec 4 with 789 views | GlasgowBlue |
FFS Phil. Although it was probably Gav. He's more of a peace and love sort of guy.
Phil would have simply posted an "Ahem". |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:56 - Dec 4 with 772 views | WestStanderLaLaLa |
Boooooooooooooooo |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:57 - Dec 4 with 762 views | Herbivore |
Honestly, which jeb-end reported it as abuse? That thread deserved to live forever. Never seen someone lose their head quite so spectacularly as that. |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:57 - Dec 4 with 733 views | footers |
Missed the thread but saw the OP. Classic.
 |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:57 - Dec 4 with 724 views | SitfcB |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:56 - Dec 4 by GlasgowBlue |
FFS Phil. Although it was probably Gav. He's more of a peace and love sort of guy.
Phil would have simply posted an "Ahem". |
Gav hates a sweary in the title. | |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 with 643 views | SuperCoops |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:57 - Dec 4 by footers |
Missed the thread but saw the OP. Classic.
|
Same here. Was just clicking for the third page and it went. Was going to post "I'm glad Blubfish isn't around as there wouldn't be enough loo roll to go round!" |  | | |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 with 641 views | Ryorry |
Anyone screen-shot it?  |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 with 636 views | N2_Blue |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:57 - Dec 4 by SitfcB |
Gav hates a sweary in the title. |
he could have just edited the swearing
That was genuinely the best meltdown thread i'd ever seen! | |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 with 602 views | Swansea_Blue |
Far too trigger happy. Just because someone reports it as abuse shouldn’t mean they get twitchy and jump. There was nothing abusive about it.
Tbf they normally do a good job of finding the balance, but that was soft. |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 21:00 - Dec 4 with 565 views | footers |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 by SuperCoops |
Same here. Was just clicking for the third page and it went. Was going to post "I'm glad Blubfish isn't around as there wouldn't be enough loo roll to go round!" |
At least Blubbers isn't a 9/11 'truther' that hasn't even read the official report because it's too long... | |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 21:02 - Dec 4 with 516 views | Seablu |
Did anyone get a screenshot?
I’d sacrifice the Magna Carta for a lasting record of that utterly remarkable blub-flounce.
In years to come, embarrassed parents in supermarkets, witnessing floor thumping tantrums from 3 year olds over refused Curly Wurlys, will simply apologise to astounded onlookers thus…
‘Sorry, Timmy’s just having a bit of a keanish’ |  | | |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 21:03 - Dec 4 with 497 views | Herbivore |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 by Swansea_Blue |
Far too trigger happy. Just because someone reports it as abuse shouldn’t mean they get twitchy and jump. There was nothing abusive about it.
Tbf they normally do a good job of finding the balance, but that was soft. |
I made a perfectly innocuous observation about wanting to watch Dumb and Dumber the other day and it got reported as abuse and deleted. Cancel culture innit. [Post edited 4 Dec 2021 21:06]
| |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 21:05 - Dec 4 with 454 views | OriginalMarkyP |
was it the Hang your heads in shame post? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
