| Does anybody else think we should go back in for 17:08 - May 28 with 6029 views | itfc1108 |
Ellis Simms.
Gave Man Utd a torrid time, and really looked the part in the 2nd half of the season.
I can see him fitting into our system, and having a good battle with Hirst for a starting role. |  | | |  |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:08 - May 28 with 5056 views | footers |
No.
He's £8m worth of pony. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:15 - May 28 with 4960 views | itfc1108 |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:08 - May 28 by footers |
No.
He's £8m worth of pony. |
Maybe Latte Lathe instead.
Might cost a bit more than Simms. | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:17 - May 28 with 4908 views | PhilTWTD |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:08 - May 28 by footers |
No.
He's £8m worth of pony. |
He actually cost £3.5m, £8m was if he plays for England, scores the winning goal in the World Cup final, is first man on Mars etc. |  | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:18 - May 28 with 4850 views | footers |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:17 - May 28 by PhilTWTD |
He actually cost £3.5m, £8m was if he plays for England, scores the winning goal in the World Cup final, is first man on Mars etc. |
Ah, standard add-ons then.
Fair enough. | |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:19 - May 28 with 4847 views | Perublue |
It’s a yea from me … big fan boy of him. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:20 - May 28 with 4814 views | wkj |
If he can blossom under the McKenna effect, sure - but I felt like it was a bullet dodged in the end. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:30 - May 28 with 4675 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Not a bad shout. Our kind of player. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:31 - May 28 with 4664 views | BloomBlue |
No, Dyche let him go because his work rate was too inconsistent, we don't need a player who will press the defenders for 1 game in 3. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:33 - May 28 with 4620 views | MaySixth |
No |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:35 - May 28 with 4605 views | Clutch |
No - he's inconsistent, and can be super lazy. |  | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:35 - May 28 with 4602 views | Churchman |
No. Not good enough.
He had a better second half to the season but still was not too impressed. Coventry paid over the odds for him. |  | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:38 - May 28 with 4560 views | Stu_boy |
I actually preferred the look of haji wright | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:42 - May 28 with 4500 views | MK1 |
Think Latte Latt would be a better choice. Wouldn't say no to Simms as McKenna would improve him. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 20:55 - May 28 with 4117 views | cressi |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:42 - May 28 by MK1 |
Think Latte Latt would be a better choice. Wouldn't say no to Simms as McKenna would improve him. |
A No from me.I prefer the Latte or cappuccino from Boro. | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:10 - May 28 with 4036 views | Wakh |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:17 - May 28 by PhilTWTD |
He actually cost £3.5m, £8m was if he plays for England, scores the winning goal in the World Cup final, is first man on Mars etc. |
Mars! Really? I saw a post from a QPR fan once saying something like. “Where was Dozell, abducted by Aliens again.” Are you suggesting that might trigger another payout for us? | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:16 - May 28 with 3986 views | itfckenty |
No, I'd rather see my dog in a town shirt than him. He is so inconsistent, and in some of the games I've seen him play in, no urgency and very slow and lazy. |  | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:27 - May 28 with 3893 views | LeoMuff |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:16 - May 28 by itfckenty |
No, I'd rather see my dog in a town shirt than him. He is so inconsistent, and in some of the games I've seen him play in, no urgency and very slow and lazy. |
He does look surprisingly slow |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:40 - May 28 with 3825 views | Europablue |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:20 - May 28 by wkj |
If he can blossom under the McKenna effect, sure - but I felt like it was a bullet dodged in the end. |
It definitely wasn't a bullet dodged, he just took a while to settle in at Coventry. It seemed way too much money at time, so it was for the best that we didn't sign him. | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:42 - May 28 with 3805 views | Europablue |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:27 - May 28 by LeoMuff |
He does look surprisingly slow |
In the end, whatever KM thinks is what matters, but it does seem that we moved on and we are looking at a higher level of player now. Not one that would move to the Championship. | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 21:50 - May 28 with 3738 views | ibbleobble |
I think VAR was more effective than Simms. [Post edited 28 May 2024 21:51]
| | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 07:43 - May 29 with 3249 views | Nutkins_Return |
Definitely not. Dodged a bullet in my opinion. Seen quite a lot of him. First half of the season he was awful. He's definitely improved in terms of goals second half but his contribution in games is so low. His mobility and work rate is really poor. Can't see how he fits as our style of play demands pressing which he just hasn't done all season. He has some talent. He is a player you have to get and keep super fit. If he has an injury I could see him struggling. | |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 07:49 - May 29 with 3204 views | BondiBlue |
McKenna has a history of going back in for players he's tried to sign before. Hirst, Taylor, Sarmiento. Can't imagine he thinks less of simms now he's scored a lot of goals in the championship. | |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 08:04 - May 29 with 3123 views | GavTWTD |
Any chance of O'hare? |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 08:19 - May 29 with 3038 views | footers |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 08:04 - May 29 by GavTWTD |
Any chance of O'hare? |
Diversion into Chicago? | |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 08:54 - May 29 with 2911 views | Yppswyche |
We should be going all out for Jack Clarke, Southampton supposedly sniffing around him now |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
