Another Thread Gone 16:51 - Jun 27 with 8015 views | PhilTWTD | Many of the same posters involved as usual. Really getting very sick of it, got other things to do other than deal with that sort of nonsense day after day. Think this can be taken as a final warning that the kind of deliberate pressing people's buttons, winding up, piling on etc which has gone on over the last couple of days will mean posters are no longer welcome. |  | | |  |
Another Thread Gone on 16:52 - Jun 27 with 4998 views | wkj | I'll meet you behind the bike sheds Phil, I have a couple of things in stock that will help relax things a bit. [Post edited 27 Jun 2024 16:53]
|  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 16:53 - Jun 27 with 4965 views | _clive_baker_ | Presume it was the egg one. Vile thread. |  | |  |
Another Thread Gone on 16:54 - Jun 27 with 4943 views | wkj |
Another Thread Gone on 16:53 - Jun 27 by _clive_baker_ | Presume it was the egg one. Vile thread. |
It certainly included talk about avian things |  |
|  |
Kohli gone too! (n/t) on 16:55 - Jun 27 with 4920 views | Bloots | |  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 16:56 - Jun 27 with 4930 views | SitfcB | Thought there was some good discussion on there until some sniping started. Should’ve made use of your padlock. |  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:00 - Jun 27 with 4853 views | wkj |
Another Thread Gone on 16:56 - Jun 27 by SitfcB | Thought there was some good discussion on there until some sniping started. Should’ve made use of your padlock. |
I'm not sure it is very grown up to insinuate that Phil has a BDSM fetish, fuzzy padlocks or otherwise |  |
|  |
Should lock this one now! (n/t) on 17:01 - Jun 27 with 4832 views | Bloots |
Another Thread Gone on 16:56 - Jun 27 by SitfcB | Thought there was some good discussion on there until some sniping started. Should’ve made use of your padlock. |
|  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:03 - Jun 27 with 4788 views | mutters | Which thread was it? |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Another Thread Gone on 17:05 - Jun 27 with 4766 views | wkj |
Another Thread Gone on 17:03 - Jun 27 by mutters | Which thread was it? |
Female pundits discussion |  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:08 - Jun 27 with 4710 views | hype313 |
Another Thread Gone on 17:05 - Jun 27 by wkj | Female pundits discussion |
Had a cursory glance, saw the usual suspects, thought this has got 5 before being pulled. |  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:08 - Jun 27 with 4706 views | mutters |
Another Thread Gone on 17:05 - Jun 27 by wkj | Female pundits discussion |
Oh missed that one. No idea what was said but I can imagine it kicked off |  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:15 - Jun 27 with 4646 views | leitrimblue | I didn't see the demise of that thread so don't know the ins and outs of it. But can you not just issue imaginary yellow cards to those you believe to be the culprits? Next time they cross the line red card and a months suspension. 2 red cards and gone for good You shouldn't have to do it but at least you will get some peace and can get on with whatever you need to do in the real world |  | |  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:21 - Jun 27 with 4564 views | witchdoctor | hope you keep your word and kick the usual suspects into touch….for good…this place will be a far better place for their absence..👍 |  | |  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:25 - Jun 27 with 4505 views | Chris_ITFC | Fully-entitled to ban them - there have been warnings aplenty, but even those are generous. People know they’re on the wind up. It’s all very deliberate and conscious, so there can’t be any complaints or excuse. |  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone (n/t) on 17:26 - Jun 27 with 4504 views | NthYorkshireBlue | [Post edited 2 Jul 2024 12:08]
|  | |  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:34 - Jun 27 with 4391 views | wkj |
Another Thread Gone (n/t) on 17:26 - Jun 27 by NthYorkshireBlue | [Post edited 2 Jul 2024 12:08]
|
Just go full twitter and get rid of editing, except for those who buy a monthly subscription. Proactive and makes money. |  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:36 - Jun 27 with 4366 views | muhrensleftfoot | Just wipe their accounts. No loss. I enjoy TWTD for football matters and use your news bulletins above any other ITFC media. Adults can have sensible debates and even disagree without being personal on the forum. |  | |  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:37 - Jun 27 with 4334 views | FrimleyBlue |
Another Thread Gone (n/t) on 17:26 - Jun 27 by NthYorkshireBlue | [Post edited 2 Jul 2024 12:08]
|
Unfortunately, that's not the best idea imo as you will only then get people copying and pasting the original post. I don't personally see especially in that thread that that would have helped anyway, both posters who edited their posts, held their hands up about the original posts, so i don't see how showing the original posts would have helped with how that thread degressed. |  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:42 - Jun 27 with 4274 views | Ryorry |
Another Thread Gone (n/t) on 17:26 - Jun 27 by NthYorkshireBlue | [Post edited 2 Jul 2024 12:08]
|
That's all very well, but could be a lot of extra work for Gav? Some sites put a time limit as to how long after posting, authors are permitted to edit - say 5 minutes? Might be less work for Gv? (dunno myself, am no techie). Meanwhile, it's the hypocrisy that really gets me - those who piously plead for decency one minute; then a minute later are deliberately posting something derogatory about someone. |  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:45 - Jun 27 with 4239 views | Herbivore |
Another Thread Gone on 17:21 - Jun 27 by witchdoctor | hope you keep your word and kick the usual suspects into touch….for good…this place will be a far better place for their absence..👍 |
Thing is, I suspect who you see as being the usual suspects may be different from who others (including Phil potentially) view as being the usual suspects. |  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone (n/t) on 17:47 - Jun 27 with 4192 views | NthYorkshireBlue |
Another Thread Gone on 17:37 - Jun 27 by FrimleyBlue | Unfortunately, that's not the best idea imo as you will only then get people copying and pasting the original post. I don't personally see especially in that thread that that would have helped anyway, both posters who edited their posts, held their hands up about the original posts, so i don't see how showing the original posts would have helped with how that thread degressed. |
[Post edited 2 Jul 2024 12:08]
|  | |  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:48 - Jun 27 with 4167 views | SitfcB |
Another Thread Gone (n/t) on 17:26 - Jun 27 by NthYorkshireBlue | [Post edited 2 Jul 2024 12:08]
|
There’s not much need. Sometimes people edit because they’re asked too by boss man, keeping the original up would just throw more fuel on the fire. On that thread earlier, edits were clarified and explained, so there was no problem with that. There was no re writing of the narrative. |  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:52 - Jun 27 with 4016 views | GlasgowBlue |
Another Thread Gone on 17:15 - Jun 27 by leitrimblue | I didn't see the demise of that thread so don't know the ins and outs of it. But can you not just issue imaginary yellow cards to those you believe to be the culprits? Next time they cross the line red card and a months suspension. 2 red cards and gone for good You shouldn't have to do it but at least you will get some peace and can get on with whatever you need to do in the real world |
First ban 3 months Second ban 6 Months 3rd ban 1 year 4th ban, sneaking back on here under a different username whilst banned, and serious abuse, libel etc life ban Without wanting to open up any debate and cause Phil to delete another thread, Ithink that a lot of fractiousness on here has been low level rather than the vicious nastiness we’ve seen in the past involving libel , posts aimed at peoples family members, homophobia, racism, threats of violence etc. Basically it’s been schoolyard stuff. I changed an avatar because I knew it would wind a certain poster up. That was childish and wrong. Posters are getting threads removed because they have referred to women as “birds” or “chicks”. Not the sort of language I would use (I have in the past) but really not the sort of thing that people need to trouble admin over just to score a point against another poster. There have been far too many instances of needless low level sniping of which some of us have been guilty of. Perhaps we could all make an effort to not engage in it or report silly harmless stuff to admin. Edit. I’ll also throw in using downvotes just because you don’t like a poster. Two posters could make identical posts but you just know that one of those posts is going to be downvoted and not the other simply based in who posted it. Perhaps downvotes could be limited? [Post edited 27 Jun 2024 18:00]
|  |
|  |
Another Thread Gone on 17:52 - Jun 27 with 4011 views | Herbivore |
Another Thread Gone on 17:48 - Jun 27 by SitfcB | There’s not much need. Sometimes people edit because they’re asked too by boss man, keeping the original up would just throw more fuel on the fire. On that thread earlier, edits were clarified and explained, so there was no problem with that. There was no re writing of the narrative. |
We all saw what you said about Gav, mate. |  |
|  |
| |