By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Can I be contraire and say neither? Mick over Lambrt any day. But I'd love it if we could unearth someone who could turn us into a propoer footballing side.
Can I be contraire and say neither? Mick over Lambrt any day. But I'd love it if we could unearth someone who could turn us into a propoer footballing side.
Mick was a success (obvs things went sour with the fans but you cannot argue with what he achieved with the budget).ac
Whatever happens in the future (and would love him to turn it around) but currently you can't say Lambert has been a success. This season started brightly but fallen away spectacularly.
Can see Lambert being here start of next season but he has to deliver or he's gone.
Mick was a success (obvs things went sour with the fans but you cannot argue with what he achieved with the budget).ac
Whatever happens in the future (and would love him to turn it around) but currently you can't say Lambert has been a success. This season started brightly but fallen away spectacularly.
Can see Lambert being here start of next season but he has to deliver or he's gone.
So Mick.
"currently you can't say Lambert has been a success" - so obvious to most it doesn't really need saying. He's been a complete disaster and I hope this season can be concluded if only so we can bin him off.
"currently you can't say Lambert has been a success" - so obvious to most it doesn't really need saying. He's been a complete disaster and I hope this season can be concluded if only so we can bin him off.
So the original post is Mick or Lambert? So i'm just laying it out on both start with Mick was a success and Lambert hasn't been to date. Seems a fairly reasonable comment but apologies it has upset you. Hurst was a disaster. Lambert has been disappointing for sure after it looked like he had us turning a corner first few months of season.
So the original post is Mick or Lambert? So i'm just laying it out on both start with Mick was a success and Lambert hasn't been to date. Seems a fairly reasonable comment but apologies it has upset you. Hurst was a disaster. Lambert has been disappointing for sure after it looked like he had us turning a corner first few months of season.
Lambert has been a disaster too. He took us down without a fight and spaffed a decent chunk of change on expensive loanees when doing so. He's then failed to get us challenging for promotion back to the Championship despite being very well resourced for this level. Did you see that EADT article the other day? More or less every local journo sees him as the biggest managerial failure in the league this season. "Disappointing" doesn't really begin to cover it.
Lambert has been a disaster too. He took us down without a fight and spaffed a decent chunk of change on expensive loanees when doing so. He's then failed to get us challenging for promotion back to the Championship despite being very well resourced for this level. Did you see that EADT article the other day? More or less every local journo sees him as the biggest managerial failure in the league this season. "Disappointing" doesn't really begin to cover it.
Well that's really all we disagree on when push comes to shove - the level of disappointment/disaster. If season ends now or it resumes with no improvement he has to be judged as having failed..It would get my vote as well when you look at table and last few months.The only difference really is we have a better understanding of context. What he inherited and the route Lambert is going down (he knows the only chance is the kids coming through and managing that right). He was getting things more right then wrong at the start of season. The team are mentally much to fragile and have unravelled spectacularly. He may not get the opportunity now as he must be close to sack but i'm not there with ripping up and starting again if we can avoid it. Thats it. Hurst was different for me. If Lambert goes he goes. I'm just giving an opinion.
Well that's really all we disagree on when push comes to shove - the level of disappointment/disaster. If season ends now or it resumes with no improvement he has to be judged as having failed..It would get my vote as well when you look at table and last few months.The only difference really is we have a better understanding of context. What he inherited and the route Lambert is going down (he knows the only chance is the kids coming through and managing that right). He was getting things more right then wrong at the start of season. The team are mentally much to fragile and have unravelled spectacularly. He may not get the opportunity now as he must be close to sack but i'm not there with ripping up and starting again if we can avoid it. Thats it. Hurst was different for me. If Lambert goes he goes. I'm just giving an opinion.
If his only chance is the kids coming through, why has he barely used them? Only 5 sides have given fewer minutes to players under 23 than us. We're not relying on kids, we're hardly giving them game time. Sorry mate, he's been an unmitigated disaster. For me he slots in just below Hurst in our worst ever manager stakes, but there's a bit of daylight to Keane and Jewell. That's how poor a job he's done. You say you don't want to rip it up and start again, that implies he's built something to rip up.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
