Nors off then 11:53 - Sep 7 with 8320 views | Father_Jack | Shame. |  |
| |  |
Nors off then on 11:55 - Sep 7 with 6647 views | Guthrum | If true, would suggest that things really haven't worked out for him at Town. From the perspective of player, club or both. |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 11:55 - Sep 7 with 6620 views | Herbivore | Sounds legit. |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 11:57 - Sep 7 with 6592 views | flimflam | Not sure on this as that account is a usually a crock of shiiite. |  |
| All men and women are created, by the, you know the, you know the thing. |
|  |
Nors off then on 11:57 - Sep 7 with 6586 views | Jon_456 |
Nors off then on 11:55 - Sep 7 by Herbivore | Sounds legit. |
Surely people dont actually believe these accounts? Laughable.. |  | |  |
Nors off then on 11:58 - Sep 7 with 6560 views | Matt_Netherlands |
Nors off then on 11:57 - Sep 7 by flimflam | Not sure on this as that account is a usually a crock of shiiite. |
That’s an insult to crocks everywhere. |  | |  |
Nors off then on 11:58 - Sep 7 with 6563 views | Wallingford_Boy | Swindon mate I know did say over the weekend that they are still in talks with him, so might be legit. |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 12:02 - Sep 7 with 6490 views | monty_radio | If that were to be true, and a signing rather than loan, that would be Norwood presumably taking a hefty wage cut under the new rules, no? |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 12:05 - Sep 7 with 6438 views | TheTrueBlue1878 | Would be scandalous to let him go as a club, especially to another League 1 club. Can you rest your hat on Drinan, Hawkins, Jackson as lone strikers to get you enough goals, probably not. Thought Drinan was outstanding on Saturday mind you, but over the course of a season, who knows. Feel it hasn't worked for him or club here though, can guarantee wherever he goes next he will bang in goals. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Nors off then on 12:05 - Sep 7 with 6436 views | abracaDOBRA_ | That account is full of sh*ite. Never get anything right. I wouldn't be worried, trust me. |  | |  |
Nors off then on 12:06 - Sep 7 with 6408 views | ElderGrizzly |
Nors off then on 11:58 - Sep 7 by Wallingford_Boy | Swindon mate I know did say over the weekend that they are still in talks with him, so might be legit. |
Swindon have just signed Brett Pitman, so do they need Norwood as well? The deal would have to be phenomenal for us to let him go on loan, as our replacement options are very limited. Things would need to be very bad here between Lambert and Norwood for Evans to sanction it given we would probably have to cover a significant part of his £8k a week wages. |  | |  |
Nors off then on 12:06 - Sep 7 with 6413 views | IpswichKnight |
Nors off then on 12:02 - Sep 7 by monty_radio | If that were to be true, and a signing rather than loan, that would be Norwood presumably taking a hefty wage cut under the new rules, no? |
Will depend on how much Cap space Swindon have I guess. Were not going to loan him so it would have to be a full transfer. |  | |  |
Nors off then on 12:10 - Sep 7 with 6361 views | Illinoisblue | Days-old nonsense from a twitter account that’s full of sheeeite. |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 12:26 - Sep 7 with 6158 views | Coco | YOU'RE DRUNK! |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:04 - Sep 7 with 5893 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Nors off then on 12:05 - Sep 7 by abracaDOBRA_ | That account is full of sh*ite. Never get anything right. I wouldn't be worried, trust me. |
Uppie for the sentiment (EFL Hub seems to be the new Football Whispers in terms of reliability), but more importantly the username |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:08 - Sep 7 with 5843 views | geg1992 | This is BS. * Swindon can't afford him. * He'd have to take a huge pay cut to fall in life with salary cap. * The account is known for making things up, then deleting if they're wrong. * They have signed Brett Pitman. |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:10 - Sep 7 with 5813 views | BryanPlug |
Nors off then on 13:04 - Sep 7 by C_HealyIsAPleasure | Uppie for the sentiment (EFL Hub seems to be the new Football Whispers in terms of reliability), but more importantly the username |
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:10 - Sep 7 with 5801 views | clive_baker | Absolute nonsense. |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:11 - Sep 7 with 5786 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
Nors off then on 13:08 - Sep 7 by geg1992 | This is BS. * Swindon can't afford him. * He'd have to take a huge pay cut to fall in life with salary cap. * The account is known for making things up, then deleting if they're wrong. * They have signed Brett Pitman. |
That account is utter BS, agreed. Has no real credibility to be fair. |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:13 - Sep 7 with 5764 views | radiogaga | Is this the same EFL Hub Twitter page that was adamant that a bid of £750k has been accepted for Gwion Edwards but couldn't name the team? I think we are okay for now. [Post edited 7 Sep 2020 13:13]
|  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:17 - Sep 7 with 5708 views | JammyDodgerrr | Yeah, nonsense as most already said. No sense for us to do it and ME has shown he doesn't just let important players go, no way we would loan him out. |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:42 - Sep 7 with 5551 views | BryanPlug |
Nors off then on 13:17 - Sep 7 by JammyDodgerrr | Yeah, nonsense as most already said. No sense for us to do it and ME has shown he doesn't just let important players go, no way we would loan him out. |
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:44 - Sep 7 with 5527 views | JammyDodgerrr |
Nors off then on 13:42 - Sep 7 by BryanPlug | [content removed at owner's request] |
What i should've put is, We got the fees we wanted. We are sticking to our guns on Downes - the method is clear, we have a price(which we can disagree is right or not) but we don't seem to move on that, maybe Waghorn is the exception to that. But there is no reason to let Norwood go out on loan unless he is destructive to the dressing room. [Post edited 7 Sep 2020 13:44]
|  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:48 - Sep 7 with 5485 views | BryanPlug |
Nors off then on 13:44 - Sep 7 by JammyDodgerrr | What i should've put is, We got the fees we wanted. We are sticking to our guns on Downes - the method is clear, we have a price(which we can disagree is right or not) but we don't seem to move on that, maybe Waghorn is the exception to that. But there is no reason to let Norwood go out on loan unless he is destructive to the dressing room. [Post edited 7 Sep 2020 13:44]
|
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 13:49 - Sep 7 with 5469 views | Herbivore |
Nors off then on 13:42 - Sep 7 by BryanPlug | [content removed at owner's request] |
The same McGoldrick we turned down a £7m bid for? |  |
|  |
Nors off then on 14:36 - Sep 7 with 5262 views | Ace_High1 | Who cares, he is not good enough. Lower league journeymen that got a break at the biggest club he will ever play for. Hardly set the world alight last year did he and seems to have fitness issues. Also seems to think he is a LAD, so move him on and let Folami take his place in the squad. |  | |  |
| |