| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) 20:52 - Dec 4 with 1031 views | SitfcB |
|  |
| |  |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 with 999 views | NeedhamChris |
Phil trying to unite the board with a less popular decision?
Boo |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 with 979 views | N2_Blue |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 by NeedhamChris |
Phil trying to unite the board with a less popular decision?
Boo |
noo i was just reading the third page and it went :( |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 with 979 views | SitfcB |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 by NeedhamChris |
Phil trying to unite the board with a less popular decision?
Boo |
PHIL AND GAV OUT BOOOOOO TIME TO GO | |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:54 - Dec 4 with 931 views | Steve_M |
Oh FFS. Nooooooo. |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:55 - Dec 4 with 882 views | timothyeo |
Deserved to be pinned to the top for the next 2 years. | | | |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:55 - Dec 4 with 887 views | Coastalblue |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:53 - Dec 4 by N2_Blue |
noo i was just reading the third page and it went :( |
Same, that should have gone into a TWTD hall of fame archive, up there with Joe ruined my wedding. |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:56 - Dec 4 with 878 views | The_Romford_Blue |
What did I miss? |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:56 - Dec 4 with 862 views | GlasgowBlue |
FFS Phil. Although it was probably Gav. He's more of a peace and love sort of guy.
Phil would have simply posted an "Ahem". |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:56 - Dec 4 with 845 views | WestStanderLaLaLa |
Boooooooooooooooo |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:57 - Dec 4 with 835 views | Herbivore |
Honestly, which jeb-end reported it as abuse? That thread deserved to live forever. Never seen someone lose their head quite so spectacularly as that. |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:57 - Dec 4 with 806 views | footers |
Missed the thread but saw the OP. Classic.
 |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:57 - Dec 4 with 797 views | SitfcB |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:56 - Dec 4 by GlasgowBlue |
FFS Phil. Although it was probably Gav. He's more of a peace and love sort of guy.
Phil would have simply posted an "Ahem". |
Gav hates a sweary in the title. | |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 with 716 views | SuperCoops |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:57 - Dec 4 by footers |
Missed the thread but saw the OP. Classic.
|
Same here. Was just clicking for the third page and it went. Was going to post "I'm glad Blubfish isn't around as there wouldn't be enough loo roll to go round!" |  | | |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 with 714 views | Ryorry |
Anyone screen-shot it?  |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 with 709 views | N2_Blue |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:57 - Dec 4 by SitfcB |
Gav hates a sweary in the title. |
he could have just edited the swearing
That was genuinely the best meltdown thread i'd ever seen! | |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 with 675 views | Swansea_Blue |
Far too trigger happy. Just because someone reports it as abuse shouldn’t mean they get twitchy and jump. There was nothing abusive about it.
Tbf they normally do a good job of finding the balance, but that was soft. |  |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 21:00 - Dec 4 with 638 views | footers |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 by SuperCoops |
Same here. Was just clicking for the third page and it went. Was going to post "I'm glad Blubfish isn't around as there wouldn't be enough loo roll to go round!" |
At least Blubbers isn't a 9/11 'truther' that hasn't even read the official report because it's too long... | |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 21:02 - Dec 4 with 589 views | Seablu |
Did anyone get a screenshot?
I’d sacrifice the Magna Carta for a lasting record of that utterly remarkable blub-flounce.
In years to come, embarrassed parents in supermarkets, witnessing floor thumping tantrums from 3 year olds over refused Curly Wurlys, will simply apologise to astounded onlookers thus…
‘Sorry, Timmy’s just having a bit of a keanish’ |  | | |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 21:03 - Dec 4 with 570 views | Herbivore |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 20:59 - Dec 4 by Swansea_Blue |
Far too trigger happy. Just because someone reports it as abuse shouldn’t mean they get twitchy and jump. There was nothing abusive about it.
Tbf they normally do a good job of finding the balance, but that was soft. |
I made a perfectly innocuous observation about wanting to watch Dumb and Dumber the other day and it got reported as abuse and deleted. Cancel culture innit. [Post edited 4 Dec 2021 21:06]
| |
| |
| No no no ffs that was a classic (n/t) on 21:05 - Dec 4 with 527 views | OriginalMarkyP |
was it the Hang your heads in shame post? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
