By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Depends who is wearing it and where you are. If you’re a well dressed bloke in a nice wine bar on a roof terrace in Rome then definitely the latter, it’s a well regarded fashion brand.
If you’re Dave at Charlton away with your fake Stone island hoody and black Lacoste trainers then you probably look like a massive bell end.
Stone Island - immediate associations on 11:09 - Jan 8 by onceablue
I think you are taking this a little bit too far
Trying to assert your opinion on the whole of the forum also gives me an impression of you too
I leave what that impression is to you but it ain’t good
I took it as a poll about brand perception, rather than a specific comment on the people who actually wear it.
It's the old thing where the fact that some idiots favour the brand creates the false correlation (but common impression) that everyone who wears it is an idiot. Which is not the fault of the clothes, but of the human tendency to generalise.
Stone Island - immediate associations on 11:17 - Jan 8 by Guthrum
I took it as a poll about brand perception, rather than a specific comment on the people who actually wear it.
It's the old thing where the fact that some idiots favour the brand creates the false correlation (but common impression) that everyone who wears it is an idiot. Which is not the fault of the clothes, but of the human tendency to generalise.
You need to see this thread in conjunction with the other Stone Island thread this morning Guthers.
I was born underwater, I dried out in the sun.
I started humping volcanoes baby, when I was too young.
Stone Island - immediate associations on 11:17 - Jan 8 by Guthrum
I took it as a poll about brand perception, rather than a specific comment on the people who actually wear it.
It's the old thing where the fact that some idiots favour the brand creates the false correlation (but common impression) that everyone who wears it is an idiot. Which is not the fault of the clothes, but of the human tendency to generalise.
A bit like when Burberry went from horsey Cassandras and Jemimas to quintessential "chav" wear you mean?