| Red card 21:32 - Jan 16 with 10613 views | StockholmBlue |
In my view that is a clear red card when they hockey tackle Walton. Would have changed the game. |  |
| Ipswich Town FC since 1981 |
| |  |
| Red card on 21:33 - Jan 16 with 6225 views | WicklowBlue |
Didn't think it was a red at all, deserved yellow.
As the old saying goes, goals change games and certainly did tonight. We had no response at all which is concerning |  | | |
| Red card on 21:33 - Jan 16 with 6164 views | FrimleyBlue |
If that's a red then so is delap which was off the ball and needless |  |
| |
| Red card on 21:35 - Jan 16 with 6136 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Red for me.
Eyes were on Walton the whole time. Jumped only after the ball had gone.
Was still watching Walton when in the air. |  |
| |
| Red card on 21:36 - Jan 16 with 6127 views | EJP |
|  | | |
| Red card on 21:37 - Jan 16 with 6035 views | StockholmBlue |
| Red card on 21:33 - Jan 16 by FrimleyBlue |
If that's a red then so is delap which was off the ball and needless |
Could have been if it was mor violent. Very unecisery though. I think it is a clear difference in level of violence and risking the opponents health | |
| Ipswich Town FC since 1981 |
| |
| Red card on 21:39 - Jan 16 with 5988 views | iamatractorboy |
| Red card on 21:35 - Jan 16 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Red for me.
Eyes were on Walton the whole time. Jumped only after the ball had gone.
Was still watching Walton when in the air. |
Awful 'challenge'. Virgo on co-comms saying 'when you challenge like that you're going to follow through into the opponent', or words to that effect. Newsflash: that is your responsibility. Is it endangering an opponent? Absolutely. |  | | |
| Red card on 21:48 - Jan 16 with 5785 views | bournemouthblue |
| Red card on 21:39 - Jan 16 by iamatractorboy |
Awful 'challenge'. Virgo on co-comms saying 'when you challenge like that you're going to follow through into the opponent', or words to that effect. Newsflash: that is your responsibility. Is it endangering an opponent? Absolutely. |
If his arm is a bit higher, it's a straight red
I think he just about gets away with it but he is slightly fortunate |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Red card on 21:49 - Jan 16 with 5786 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Red card on 21:48 - Jan 16 by bournemouthblue |
If his arm is a bit higher, it's a straight red
I think he just about gets away with it but he is slightly fortunate |
Turns to make sure his shoulder goes in first though doesn't he.
Theres a hell of a lot of intent there. | |
| |
| Red card on 21:50 - Jan 16 with 5781 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| Red card on 21:35 - Jan 16 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Red for me.
Eyes were on Walton the whole time. Jumped only after the ball had gone.
Was still watching Walton when in the air. |
Nope, not dangerous, just momentum.
As the proper experts said.
Yellow completely fair. |  |
| |
| Red card on 21:51 - Jan 16 with 5744 views | BlueForYou |
Unless I'm seeing things, that's a shoulder to head challenge. Surely that's a red card? How can anyone seriously argue against? |  | | |
| Red card on 21:52 - Jan 16 with 5694 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Red card on 21:50 - Jan 16 by Wallingford_Boy |
Nope, not dangerous, just momentum.
As the proper experts said.
Yellow completely fair. |
"As the proper experts said"
Ooooh get you. | |
| |
| Red card on 21:52 - Jan 16 with 5699 views | mo_itfc |
Absolute clear red!!!
But only because I'm a town fan and a bit biased... | |
| |
| Red card on 21:53 - Jan 16 with 5668 views | WicklowBlue |
| Red card on 21:51 - Jan 16 by BlueForYou |
Unless I'm seeing things, that's a shoulder to head challenge. Surely that's a red card? How can anyone seriously argue against? |
Wasn't shoulder to head... | | | |
| Red card on 21:55 - Jan 16 with 5611 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Red card on 21:53 - Jan 16 by WicklowBlue |
Wasn't shoulder to head... |
...near as damn it, watch the movement of Waltons head immediately after the impact and tell me it wasn't dangerous play. | |
| |
| Red card on 21:55 - Jan 16 with 5601 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Red card on 21:53 - Jan 16 by WicklowBlue |
Wasn't shoulder to head... |
Watched it again. Disgraceful. Clear red. Why has he jumped? Its not to get out of the way.
Was it even var checked?
Shouldnt he have been banned for an equally obnoxious attempt to cause injury the other week anyway? [Post edited 16 Jan 21:56]
| | | |
| Red card on 21:58 - Jan 16 with 5475 views | WicklowBlue |
| Red card on 21:55 - Jan 16 by Cheltenham_Blue |
...near as damn it, watch the movement of Waltons head immediately after the impact and tell me it wasn't dangerous play. |
He got a yellow, I just don't think it was red full stop. The commentator said the pace of the pass allowed the forward to have a go.
Sorry more thing went wrong tonight than looking to having an oppo player sent off. | | | |
| Red card on 21:58 - Jan 16 with 5458 views | NthQldITFC |
Eyes on Walton and a shoulder charge to the head - that's 10 mins in the bin in Rugby League, but football is a bit softer than RL, so I think it's red. Not exactly scientific, like, I admit. |  |
| |
| Red card on 22:00 - Jan 16 with 5384 views | GlasgowBlue |
Could have been avoided had Walton come off his line. a lot quicker. |  |
| |
| Red card on 22:00 - Jan 16 with 5398 views | SouperJim |
| Red card on 21:55 - Jan 16 by redrickstuhaart |
Watched it again. Disgraceful. Clear red. Why has he jumped? Its not to get out of the way.
Was it even var checked?
Shouldnt he have been banned for an equally obnoxious attempt to cause injury the other week anyway? [Post edited 16 Jan 21:56]
|
Was VAR checked. Came up on the scoreboard that (paraphrasing) on field decision of yellow upheld as not violent conduct. |  |
| |
| Red card on 22:00 - Jan 16 with 5379 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Red card on 21:58 - Jan 16 by WicklowBlue |
He got a yellow, I just don't think it was red full stop. The commentator said the pace of the pass allowed the forward to have a go.
Sorry more thing went wrong tonight than looking to having an oppo player sent off. |
I thought that at the time, but watch it again. He makes no effort to avoid and actively jumps into Walton, shoulder first rather than even trying to slow down. Anywhere else on the pitch its a red. Even if there was no intent, its dangerous play. | | | |
| Red card on 22:01 - Jan 16 with 5351 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Red card on 21:58 - Jan 16 by WicklowBlue |
He got a yellow, I just don't think it was red full stop. The commentator said the pace of the pass allowed the forward to have a go.
Sorry more thing went wrong tonight than looking to having an oppo player sent off. |
"Sorry more thing went wrong tonight than looking to having an oppo player sent off."
Absolutely, but, according to the thread title this one is about the potential red card. Theres loads of other threads about the other stuff, so I don't really understand the point you've tried to make there. | |
| |
| Red card on 22:01 - Jan 16 with 5352 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Red card on 22:00 - Jan 16 by SouperJim |
Was VAR checked. Came up on the scoreboard that (paraphrasing) on field decision of yellow upheld as not violent conduct. |
Doesnt have to be violent conduct to be a red of course... Typical var getout. [Post edited 16 Jan 22:01]
| | | |
| Red card on 22:12 - Jan 16 with 5179 views | springfield |
Could’ve been red
Wasn’t a clear red
Move on |  | | |
| Red card on 22:18 - Jan 16 with 5081 views | WicklowBlue |
| Red card on 22:01 - Jan 16 by Cheltenham_Blue |
"Sorry more thing went wrong tonight than looking to having an oppo player sent off."
Absolutely, but, according to the thread title this one is about the potential red card. Theres loads of other threads about the other stuff, so I don't really understand the point you've tried to make there. |
Chelters, my points were clear:
a) Didn't think it was a red from in game and replays
b) That incident did not determine the outcome of the game
Anyways have a good night! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
