| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) 09:45 - Aug 4 with 6046 views | Korrupt |
|  | | |  |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:46 - Aug 4 with 3467 views | Kieran_Knows |
[Post edited 4 Aug 9:50]
|  |
| |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:49 - Aug 4 with 3295 views | le2blue |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:46 - Aug 4 by Kieran_Knows |
[Post edited 4 Aug 9:50]
|
Hmmm, maybe as a result of Broadhead being given permission to go. Akpom isn’t a 9, more of a left sided 10 I’d have thought. |  | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:50 - Aug 4 with 3245 views | itfcsuth |
This sort of late action run around action really makes me scratch my head about the way we are conducting our business.
Akpom has been available all summer, he's a very well known operator in the English game, especially at Championship level, and a decent one.
If we wanted him, why have we waited until Birmingham agree a deal to make a last minute hijack approach.
Good player though, especially at this level, would take him. |  | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:51 - Aug 4 with 3203 views | portmanking |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:49 - Aug 4 by le2blue |
Hmmm, maybe as a result of Broadhead being given permission to go. Akpom isn’t a 9, more of a left sided 10 I’d have thought. |
Akpom is *very much* a centre forward, no? |  | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:52 - Aug 4 with 3141 views | portmanking |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:50 - Aug 4 by itfcsuth |
This sort of late action run around action really makes me scratch my head about the way we are conducting our business.
Akpom has been available all summer, he's a very well known operator in the English game, especially at Championship level, and a decent one.
If we wanted him, why have we waited until Birmingham agree a deal to make a last minute hijack approach.
Good player though, especially at this level, would take him. |
I dislike your negative view on pretty much everything these days, but I do tend to agree that this last-ditch move feels a tad scattergun. Although, how do we know he hasn't only been made available for loan in the last 5 days or so? | | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:53 - Aug 4 with 3102 views | waveneyblue |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:50 - Aug 4 by itfcsuth |
This sort of late action run around action really makes me scratch my head about the way we are conducting our business.
Akpom has been available all summer, he's a very well known operator in the English game, especially at Championship level, and a decent one.
If we wanted him, why have we waited until Birmingham agree a deal to make a last minute hijack approach.
Good player though, especially at this level, would take him. |
Have a day off, please |  | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:53 - Aug 4 with 3097 views | homer_123 |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:50 - Aug 4 by itfcsuth |
This sort of late action run around action really makes me scratch my head about the way we are conducting our business.
Akpom has been available all summer, he's a very well known operator in the English game, especially at Championship level, and a decent one.
If we wanted him, why have we waited until Birmingham agree a deal to make a last minute hijack approach.
Good player though, especially at this level, would take him. |
Maybe he wasn't open to a Champ move earlier in the window? Maybe, like others, he was wanting a Prem move when coming back home. It hasn't materialised and therefore is now open to a Champ move. |  |
| |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:53 - Aug 4 with 3077 views | FromReuserWithLove |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:50 - Aug 4 by itfcsuth |
This sort of late action run around action really makes me scratch my head about the way we are conducting our business.
Akpom has been available all summer, he's a very well known operator in the English game, especially at Championship level, and a decent one.
If we wanted him, why have we waited until Birmingham agree a deal to make a last minute hijack approach.
Good player though, especially at this level, would take him. |
One freak season, the rest mediocre. No, not Szmodics, Akpom. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:53 - Aug 4 with 3050 views | homer_123 |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:52 - Aug 4 by portmanking |
I dislike your negative view on pretty much everything these days, but I do tend to agree that this last-ditch move feels a tad scattergun. Although, how do we know he hasn't only been made available for loan in the last 5 days or so? |
Or, more likely, is now open to a Champ move, whereas earlier in the window wasn't. | |
| |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:55 - Aug 4 with 2960 views | portmanking |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:53 - Aug 4 by homer_123 |
Or, more likely, is now open to a Champ move, whereas earlier in the window wasn't. |
Yeah, another plausible scenario, for sure. Olympiakos would be an interesting move for him too.
Although if he wants a final shot at playing in the Prem, one would assume it's a straight fight between us and Brum. | | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:55 - Aug 4 with 2956 views | pablo_canooga |
Imagine if he plumps for Brum over us - meltdown incoming! Ashton Out, McKenna Out, Schwarz Out!!!!!!! |  | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:57 - Aug 4 with 2848 views | itfcsuth |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:51 - Aug 4 by portmanking |
Akpom is *very much* a centre forward, no? |
Very much so, could play a 10 with another centre forward, but certainly don't think he's a left sided operator. | | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:01 - Aug 4 with 2660 views | portmanking |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:57 - Aug 4 by itfcsuth |
Very much so, could play a 10 with another centre forward, but certainly don't think he's a left sided operator. |
Hirst, Akpom and Azon would be three very strong, physical number 9s for a Championship front line. | | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:01 - Aug 4 with 2655 views | dirtyboy |
Maybe we're just playing games and trying to ensure Birmingham don't have him through the door for the game with us. |  | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:03 - Aug 4 with 2541 views | ReusersTown |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:50 - Aug 4 by itfcsuth |
This sort of late action run around action really makes me scratch my head about the way we are conducting our business.
Akpom has been available all summer, he's a very well known operator in the English game, especially at Championship level, and a decent one.
If we wanted him, why have we waited until Birmingham agree a deal to make a last minute hijack approach.
Good player though, especially at this level, would take him. |
So you think it would be a good move, but you're having a whine anyway? | | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:03 - Aug 4 with 2502 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:50 - Aug 4 by itfcsuth |
This sort of late action run around action really makes me scratch my head about the way we are conducting our business.
Akpom has been available all summer, he's a very well known operator in the English game, especially at Championship level, and a decent one.
If we wanted him, why have we waited until Birmingham agree a deal to make a last minute hijack approach.
Good player though, especially at this level, would take him. |
I don’t know maybe because Guiu is off to Sunderland?
The negativity on this board at current is astonishing. [Post edited 4 Aug 10:04]
|  |
| |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:04 - Aug 4 with 2468 views | berkstractorboy |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:50 - Aug 4 by itfcsuth |
This sort of late action run around action really makes me scratch my head about the way we are conducting our business.
Akpom has been available all summer, he's a very well known operator in the English game, especially at Championship level, and a decent one.
If we wanted him, why have we waited until Birmingham agree a deal to make a last minute hijack approach.
Good player though, especially at this level, would take him. |
Maybe we are going to miss out on other targets. Azon may have already told the club his decision. | | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:04 - Aug 4 with 2449 views | Herbivore |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:01 - Aug 4 by portmanking |
Hirst, Akpom and Azon would be three very strong, physical number 9s for a Championship front line. |
I'd imagine Akpom is instead of Azon, surely? The 9 role is Hirst's to lose and I can't see Akpom and Azon both coming in to play second fiddle. |  |
| |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:04 - Aug 4 with 2448 views | SomethingBlue |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:49 - Aug 4 by le2blue |
Hmmm, maybe as a result of Broadhead being given permission to go. Akpom isn’t a 9, more of a left sided 10 I’d have thought. |
He's decent in the Champ but certainly not one of those "ready for the next level up" signings. May just be the agent trying to get someone else to go the extra mile. | |
| |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:05 - Aug 4 with 2414 views | FromReuserWithLove |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:04 - Aug 4 by berkstractorboy |
Maybe we are going to miss out on other targets. Azon may have already told the club his decision. |
so you're suggesting we're getting a bit desperate? Not sure i agree.
Ashton trying to play Boro maybe. [Post edited 4 Aug 10:06]
| | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:06 - Aug 4 with 2324 views | Simonds92 |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:55 - Aug 4 by pablo_canooga |
Imagine if he plumps for Brum over us - meltdown incoming! Ashton Out, McKenna Out, Schwarz Out!!!!!!! |
He's had 1 good season in his entire career and failed to score goals in a team which normally dominates domestically. I hope he does choose Birmingham to be honest.
Edit: 1 in 3 for Ajax isn't as terrible as I initially thought. Still not sold on him and the cost involved. [Post edited 4 Aug 10:11]
| | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:07 - Aug 4 with 2268 views | itfcsuth |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 09:52 - Aug 4 by portmanking |
I dislike your negative view on pretty much everything these days, but I do tend to agree that this last-ditch move feels a tad scattergun. Although, how do we know he hasn't only been made available for loan in the last 5 days or so? |
I disagree.
I think there is an enormous amount positives about the football club, from the ownership support, training ground redevelopment, one of best young managers in Europe I believe, some really good footballers at the club, and an incredible fanbase.
But that doesn't mean everything the club does I believe in correct, or that the club is immune from criticism. I don't think everything we have done since promotion has been how I would have, especially some question marks around recruitment/squad building.
This is a football forum, where we discuss all things ITFC, and you aren't going to agree with everything people post. | | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:08 - Aug 4 with 2235 views | CaptMickMills |
Perhaps late move because of Philogene injury?
SS could play left with Akpom No 10? [Post edited 4 Aug 10:10]
| | | |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:08 - Aug 4 with 2241 views | Kieran_Knows |
This will be the chap to follow on this ... is the top journo for all Ajax related info;
| |
| |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:08 - Aug 4 with 2214 views | portmanking |
| SSN saying we're in for Akpom (n/t) on 10:04 - Aug 4 by SomethingBlue |
He's decent in the Champ but certainly not one of those "ready for the next level up" signings. May just be the agent trying to get someone else to go the extra mile. |
As the Hackney saga has proved, it's clearly not that easy to get people ready for the next level up when they still have the carrot of immediate PL football dangled in front of them. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
