Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Cycling infrastructure 19:35 - May 2 with 8783 viewsStokieBlue

It's been a growing issue for a while now with ever more people taking to bikes for their commute.

So having just been knocked off my bike by a clueless driver pulling out from a parked position (only cuts and bruises, not enough to stop me annoying you all on here) I got thinking about how cycling could be made safer.

Now obviously there is nothing that can be done about a driver not looking and pulling out into a stream of cyclists (perhaps raise awareness that they are on a cycling highway and they need to look more than once) but the dedicated cycle highways which are separated from the motorised traffic work well. Unfortunately our cities don't tend to have the space of some European cities where they have far more dedicated cycle routes.

So with more and more people cycling is there a solution or are cyclists just going to get knocked off occasionally?

I thought this looked great when it was first mooted but I guess it's not really that feasible:

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/architecture-design-blog/2014/jan/02/no



Any suggestions from the hive mind?

SB
[Post edited 2 May 2019 19:36]

Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula

0
Cycling infrastructure on 19:43 - May 2 with 3906 viewsMullet

Cyclists should be driven underground.

Poll: If Cook had the full season where would we have finished?
Blog: When the Fanzine Comes Around

-2
Cycling infrastructure on 19:43 - May 2 with 3904 viewsLord_Lucan

Wasn’t that a Boris idea?

“Hello, I'm your MP. Actually I'm not. I'm your candidate. Gosh.” Boris Johnson canvassing in Henley, 2005.
Poll: How will you be celebrating Prince Phils life today

0
Cycling infrastructure on 19:47 - May 2 with 3897 viewsbournemouthblue

Education for cyclists and drivers certainly could be improved

There's an argument cyclists should do a test so they are compliant with the highway code.

Modern driving tests and teaching probably do accomodate cyclists better than in the past but it's quite clear some drivers to do not know the rules on rights of way, what constitutes a hazard etc.

I think in reality, there are some bits of road, crossings, narrower roads and busier roads which are frankly not safe for cyclists and they are better being on the pavement. There's a grey area here imho.

One advantage of being on a bike is that you can bend the rules a bit, the likelihood of being penalised is low provided you don't endanger others doing so.

Alcohol is the answer but I can't remember the question!
Poll: Rate this transfer window

0
Cycling infrastructure on 19:57 - May 2 with 3881 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

Cyclists will always continue to get knocked off occasionally. thats part of being a road user.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
Cycling infrastructure on 20:10 - May 2 with 3866 viewseireblue

Bring in the rule they have in many European countries, presumption of blame is on the driver of a vehicle.
3
Cycling infrastructure on 20:25 - May 2 with 3846 viewsstonojnr

Cycling infrastructure on 19:47 - May 2 by bournemouthblue

Education for cyclists and drivers certainly could be improved

There's an argument cyclists should do a test so they are compliant with the highway code.

Modern driving tests and teaching probably do accomodate cyclists better than in the past but it's quite clear some drivers to do not know the rules on rights of way, what constitutes a hazard etc.

I think in reality, there are some bits of road, crossings, narrower roads and busier roads which are frankly not safe for cyclists and they are better being on the pavement. There's a grey area here imho.

One advantage of being on a bike is that you can bend the rules a bit, the likelihood of being penalised is low provided you don't endanger others doing so.


No theres alot of whataboutery about cyclists doing a test but most of us are actually motorists as well & we passed a driving test that everyone is more than happy means you can drive a multi tonne vehicle at upto 70mph and which is often capable of far in excess of that speed,for the rest of your life,no questions asked

I just apply the same learning and rules from a car to riding a bike. It would be far more sensible for everyone wanting to drive a car to be forced to take a cycling test instead first.
3
Cycling infrastructure on 20:36 - May 2 with 3827 viewsLord_Lucan

Cycling infrastructure on 20:25 - May 2 by stonojnr

No theres alot of whataboutery about cyclists doing a test but most of us are actually motorists as well & we passed a driving test that everyone is more than happy means you can drive a multi tonne vehicle at upto 70mph and which is often capable of far in excess of that speed,for the rest of your life,no questions asked

I just apply the same learning and rules from a car to riding a bike. It would be far more sensible for everyone wanting to drive a car to be forced to take a cycling test instead first.


Why don’t cyclists observe the rules they obey when driving a motor vehicle then?

Genuine question.

“Hello, I'm your MP. Actually I'm not. I'm your candidate. Gosh.” Boris Johnson canvassing in Henley, 2005.
Poll: How will you be celebrating Prince Phils life today

0
Cycling infrastructure on 20:44 - May 2 with 3817 viewsdavblue

Cycling infrastructure on 20:36 - May 2 by Lord_Lucan

Why don’t cyclists observe the rules they obey when driving a motor vehicle then?

Genuine question.


That is a massive issue.

In London I see cyclists going through red lights, Zebra crossings and when it’s green to cross the road for pedestrians very often.
0
Login to get fewer ads

Cycling infrastructure on 20:49 - May 2 with 3788 viewsgtsb

Cycling infrastructure on 20:44 - May 2 by davblue

That is a massive issue.

In London I see cyclists going through red lights, Zebra crossings and when it’s green to cross the road for pedestrians very often.


Whilst dressed as a Tour de France participant.
0
Cycling infrastructure on 20:50 - May 2 with 3791 viewsBasuco

Cycling infrastructure on 19:57 - May 2 by Marshalls_Mullet

Cyclists will always continue to get knocked off occasionally. thats part of being a road user.


When I cycled 12 miles each way to work a good few years ago I had a very near miss with a car once a month and got hit by a car once a year, something has to be done to make cycling safer as motorist's are killing and injuring far too many pedestrians and cyclist's and just saying "I did not see them" is not a good enough.
[Post edited 2 May 2019 20:53]
4
Cycling infrastructure on 20:54 - May 2 with 3765 viewseireblue

Cycling infrastructure on 20:44 - May 2 by davblue

That is a massive issue.

In London I see cyclists going through red lights, Zebra crossings and when it’s green to cross the road for pedestrians very often.


We haven’t had a decent cycling thread on here for years.

Back in the day I posted a couple of statistics from a couple of sources that demonstrated the percentage of rule breaking between car drivers and cyclists was about the same.
0
Cycling infrastructure on 20:59 - May 2 with 3739 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

Cycling infrastructure on 20:50 - May 2 by Basuco

When I cycled 12 miles each way to work a good few years ago I had a very near miss with a car once a month and got hit by a car once a year, something has to be done to make cycling safer as motorist's are killing and injuring far too many pedestrians and cyclist's and just saying "I did not see them" is not a good enough.
[Post edited 2 May 2019 20:53]


I'm not condoning it, just being a realist.

Cyclists will get hit by cars, as will pedestrians, motorcyclists and other cars. Cyclists just happen to be the most vulnerable.

Some cyclists don't help themselves, but drivers need to be more careful too.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
Cycling infrastructure on 21:02 - May 2 with 3720 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

Cycling infrastructure on 20:10 - May 2 by eireblue

Bring in the rule they have in many European countries, presumption of blame is on the driver of a vehicle.


Doesn't seem to make much sense.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
Cycling infrastructure on 21:04 - May 2 with 3716 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

Cycling infrastructure on 20:44 - May 2 by davblue

That is a massive issue.

In London I see cyclists going through red lights, Zebra crossings and when it’s green to cross the road for pedestrians very often.


Yep, was nearly hit by a cyclist in London going through a red light. I was a pedestrian at the time.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
Cycling infrastructure on 21:07 - May 2 with 3709 viewsBasuco

Cycling infrastructure on 20:59 - May 2 by Marshalls_Mullet

I'm not condoning it, just being a realist.

Cyclists will get hit by cars, as will pedestrians, motorcyclists and other cars. Cyclists just happen to be the most vulnerable.

Some cyclists don't help themselves, but drivers need to be more careful too.


When I was cycling in France many years ago I noticed it was much safer and cars were giving more room and giving way, when I asked my French friends why they explained the law change to make the driver guilty of dangerous driving if in a collision with a cyclist or pedestrian unless they could prove themselves innocent. When I said I couldn't see this being introduced in England they replied "we were killing too many of our children". Hard to argue with that.
0
Cycling infrastructure on 21:09 - May 2 with 3696 viewsDistantBlue

There is no quick fix here. Improving the cyclists situation in the UK (and yes, I do live in Holland) is all about infrastructure…..and new infrastructure takes time. But it does need serious commitment, although maybe not quiet as serious as in Stokie's original post. I am able to live in a Dutch town, where I have never owned a car, and do pretty much all my journey's of up to five miles on my bike. The reason for that is because it is safe to do so.

Safe routes for bikes is the key, both in and out of town. When I'm over in the UK I often travel along the A10 between Cambridge and Ely and see the makeshift arrangements for cyclists, one minute they're on a cycle track, next minute its the road and then a shared footpath and bike route. The moments when they are on the road on a grey, wet day in winter I hardly dare watch.

A proper, dedicated surface between the two towns in this example would surely:
a) make more people want to use the bike route
b) make the situation safer for all road users
It all costs money, I get that, but it has to be a rolling process that when a road is being dug up or redesigned proper consideration is given to doing it properly…..and not just half measures.

As for all the posts about cyclists behaving badly? Yes, we have those in NL too…….especially in Amsterdam as anyone who has visited will surely have noticed. But by getting the cyclists properly off the roads you do have so much less of that sort of aggravation in general.
0
Cycling infrastructure on 21:09 - May 2 with 3692 viewsMVBlue

Cycling infrastructure on 20:50 - May 2 by Basuco

When I cycled 12 miles each way to work a good few years ago I had a very near miss with a car once a month and got hit by a car once a year, something has to be done to make cycling safer as motorist's are killing and injuring far too many pedestrians and cyclist's and just saying "I did not see them" is not a good enough.
[Post edited 2 May 2019 20:53]


Modern progressive cultures have taken cycling to good levels.
Are we modern and progressive, or skint and stalling?
In Melbourne they had good cycle lanes in relatively back path type places, alongside railway lines and alongside creeks/canals. Those back street type thorough fares are the best place for them.

We’ll never be like Holland or Denmark with all ages on bikes, until they force vehicles in big cities to be level 5 automated and electric, maybe 15 years.

Poll: Whats the best league to watch outside of England?

0
Cycling infrastructure on 21:13 - May 2 with 3680 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

Cycling infrastructure on 21:07 - May 2 by Basuco

When I was cycling in France many years ago I noticed it was much safer and cars were giving more room and giving way, when I asked my French friends why they explained the law change to make the driver guilty of dangerous driving if in a collision with a cyclist or pedestrian unless they could prove themselves innocent. When I said I couldn't see this being introduced in England they replied "we were killing too many of our children". Hard to argue with that.


It's a very rare occurrence for a child cyclist to be killed, and I think any blame needs to be evidence based.

Imagine if you were jailed for a child cyclist crossing without looking, but you couldn't prove your innocence? That just makes a tragic incident even worse for all parties.

I agree that drivers should be careful and give space, I don't agree with a presumption of guilt.
[Post edited 2 May 2019 21:14]

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

1
Cycling infrastructure on 21:14 - May 2 with 3673 viewsLord_Lucan

Cycling infrastructure on 21:09 - May 2 by DistantBlue

There is no quick fix here. Improving the cyclists situation in the UK (and yes, I do live in Holland) is all about infrastructure…..and new infrastructure takes time. But it does need serious commitment, although maybe not quiet as serious as in Stokie's original post. I am able to live in a Dutch town, where I have never owned a car, and do pretty much all my journey's of up to five miles on my bike. The reason for that is because it is safe to do so.

Safe routes for bikes is the key, both in and out of town. When I'm over in the UK I often travel along the A10 between Cambridge and Ely and see the makeshift arrangements for cyclists, one minute they're on a cycle track, next minute its the road and then a shared footpath and bike route. The moments when they are on the road on a grey, wet day in winter I hardly dare watch.

A proper, dedicated surface between the two towns in this example would surely:
a) make more people want to use the bike route
b) make the situation safer for all road users
It all costs money, I get that, but it has to be a rolling process that when a road is being dug up or redesigned proper consideration is given to doing it properly…..and not just half measures.

As for all the posts about cyclists behaving badly? Yes, we have those in NL too…….especially in Amsterdam as anyone who has visited will surely have noticed. But by getting the cyclists properly off the roads you do have so much less of that sort of aggravation in general.


The thing about Amsterdam though is everyone rides those bone shakers with a bell, over here they cycle on pedal powered rockets.

Must admit I’m often in near death collisions in Amsterdam but I find trams the most dangerous obstacle

“Hello, I'm your MP. Actually I'm not. I'm your candidate. Gosh.” Boris Johnson canvassing in Henley, 2005.
Poll: How will you be celebrating Prince Phils life today

0
Cycling infrastructure on 21:16 - May 2 with 3664 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

Cycling infrastructure on 21:09 - May 2 by DistantBlue

There is no quick fix here. Improving the cyclists situation in the UK (and yes, I do live in Holland) is all about infrastructure…..and new infrastructure takes time. But it does need serious commitment, although maybe not quiet as serious as in Stokie's original post. I am able to live in a Dutch town, where I have never owned a car, and do pretty much all my journey's of up to five miles on my bike. The reason for that is because it is safe to do so.

Safe routes for bikes is the key, both in and out of town. When I'm over in the UK I often travel along the A10 between Cambridge and Ely and see the makeshift arrangements for cyclists, one minute they're on a cycle track, next minute its the road and then a shared footpath and bike route. The moments when they are on the road on a grey, wet day in winter I hardly dare watch.

A proper, dedicated surface between the two towns in this example would surely:
a) make more people want to use the bike route
b) make the situation safer for all road users
It all costs money, I get that, but it has to be a rolling process that when a road is being dug up or redesigned proper consideration is given to doing it properly…..and not just half measures.

As for all the posts about cyclists behaving badly? Yes, we have those in NL too…….especially in Amsterdam as anyone who has visited will surely have noticed. But by getting the cyclists properly off the roads you do have so much less of that sort of aggravation in general.


Sensible post.

I guess the only way to make cycling safer for cyclists is to take them 'off the road' in a sense.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
Cycling infrastructure on 21:22 - May 2 with 3633 viewsfooters

Do you use the CS1 (?) thing, SB?

I meandered up it from L'pool St to Dalston the other day and must say it looked very good during rush hour. Maybe 20-30 cyclists going along in little groupettes at a time.

That's something they should certainly roll out more where possible but given London is such an ancient and odd city I'm not sure how that would work.

That said, some kamikaze cycle courier nearly ran me over today when crossing on a green light. Either obey the rules or don't complain when you get whacked by a lorry!

footers KC - Prosecution Barrister - Friend to all
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

0
Cycling infrastructure on 21:24 - May 2 with 3623 viewsTractorWood

Cycling infrastructure on 21:16 - May 2 by Marshalls_Mullet

Sensible post.

I guess the only way to make cycling safer for cyclists is to take them 'off the road' in a sense.


Cambridge is decent because cycling is given preference when developing. The quality of cycle lanes, paths etc is excellent. However, out in the sticks I'm very aggressive in road position and telling cars behind it's not safe to pass. As others have said, if you don't, you end up having near misses every time you stick the lycra on because some bloke is running late and can't wait 7 seconds to pass safely.

I know that was then, but it could be again..
Poll: At present who do you think you'll vote for?

1
Cycling infrastructure on 21:24 - May 2 with 3621 viewsBasuco

Cycling infrastructure on 21:13 - May 2 by Marshalls_Mullet

It's a very rare occurrence for a child cyclist to be killed, and I think any blame needs to be evidence based.

Imagine if you were jailed for a child cyclist crossing without looking, but you couldn't prove your innocence? That just makes a tragic incident even worse for all parties.

I agree that drivers should be careful and give space, I don't agree with a presumption of guilt.
[Post edited 2 May 2019 21:14]


Pedestrian and cyclist's being injured and killed by motorist's has decreased significantly in France after the introduction of this law, the motorist is in control of the lethal weapon and presumed guilt makes you focus much more on other road users. I cycle much less these days and drive a lot more so am speaking as a motorist who would like to see many more people out of cars leaving more road space for me. Also encouraging drivers to open the drivers door with their left hand would help them to look for a cyclist coming past before opening the door. (that happened to me once I hit the door went over the handle bars and laid in the road as cars screeched to a halt, bit scary at the time.
1
Cycling infrastructure on 21:34 - May 2 with 3568 viewsBasuco

Cycling infrastructure on 21:22 - May 2 by footers

Do you use the CS1 (?) thing, SB?

I meandered up it from L'pool St to Dalston the other day and must say it looked very good during rush hour. Maybe 20-30 cyclists going along in little groupettes at a time.

That's something they should certainly roll out more where possible but given London is such an ancient and odd city I'm not sure how that would work.

That said, some kamikaze cycle courier nearly ran me over today when crossing on a green light. Either obey the rules or don't complain when you get whacked by a lorry!


I used CS3 for 3 month's and the two big problems were pedestrians walking on the cycle path with headphones on and not looking and a huge variation of cycle speeds on the cycle path, but in general they are very good and very safe.
0
Cycling infrastructure on 21:37 - May 2 with 3560 viewsBrixtonBlue

Cycling infrastructure on 20:36 - May 2 by Lord_Lucan

Why don’t cyclists observe the rules they obey when driving a motor vehicle then?

Genuine question.


Because they don't have registration plates.

Motorists who moan about cyclists breaking the rules would break the exact same rules if they could get away with it so easily.

I bet Bloots will downarrow this.
Poll: If you work in an office, when are you off over Christmas (not booked holiday)?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024