| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition 11:36 - Oct 9 with 7150 views | artsbossbeard |
ludavizzle's reply had me spitting my tea out. |  |
| Please note: prior to hitting the post button, I've double checked for anything that could be construed as "Anti Semitic" and to the best of my knowledge it isn't. Anything deemed to be of a Xenophobic nature is therefore purely accidental or down to your own misconstruing. | | Poll: | Raining in IP8 - shall I get the washing in? |
| |  |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 14:37 - Oct 9 with 2657 views | Swansea_Blue |
Good grief.
Why?
Why whatever in the first place?
Why conduct this on social media?
What are people, grown men and all, posting about it?
Why have I added to the thread?
Why?
Our educational system is obviously screwed. |  |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 15:06 - Oct 9 with 2594 views | hoppy |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 12:21 - Oct 9 by J2BLUE |
'I'm not being funny but I don't need the money'
*cringe* Coming from a wag... |
I think what she meant to say was "I'm not being funny but I don't need the money now"... |  |
| |
| Strange response..... on 15:11 - Oct 9 with 2578 views | Superblue95 |
| Strange response..... on 13:19 - Oct 9 by Bloots |
.....but just to be clear, the post didn't say that he "thought" she was a horrible person, it said that she was a horrible person.
Thanks for your remarkable comparison though. |
Admittedly my post was intended to be rather more tongue in cheek than it came across |  |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 15:27 - Oct 9 with 2562 views | artsbossbeard |
| |
| Please note: prior to hitting the post button, I've double checked for anything that could be construed as "Anti Semitic" and to the best of my knowledge it isn't. Anything deemed to be of a Xenophobic nature is therefore purely accidental or down to your own misconstruing. | | Poll: | Raining in IP8 - shall I get the washing in? |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 15:39 - Oct 9 with 2526 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 14:31 - Oct 9 by hampstead_blue |
That Vardy's missus has had some work done and way too much slap on her face.
Looks awful! |
Ooh you bitch! 
 | |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 15:52 - Oct 9 with 2506 views | giant_stow |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 15:27 - Oct 9 by artsbossbeard |
|
That's uncanny. |  |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:10 - Oct 9 with 2480 views | PrideOfTheEast |
Doesn't Coleen look daft regardless of whether Vardy has leaked stuff?
It's instagram so whilst you might only want a limited number of people to see something, if you were that bothered you just wouldn't post it at all, surely? |  | | |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:19 - Oct 9 with 2458 views | LankHenners |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:10 - Oct 9 by PrideOfTheEast |
Doesn't Coleen look daft regardless of whether Vardy has leaked stuff?
It's instagram so whilst you might only want a limited number of people to see something, if you were that bothered you just wouldn't post it at all, surely? |
It probably goes for everyone that there are some things you’re comfortable with friends knowing but nobody outside of that, Coleen being no different.
Not sure if she’s said exactly what the leaked things were but regardless it’s still a breach of trust which is sh!tty anyway but especially if it then means your personal life gets laid bare in the tabloids. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:21 - Oct 9 with 2452 views | PrideOfTheEast |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:19 - Oct 9 by LankHenners |
It probably goes for everyone that there are some things you’re comfortable with friends knowing but nobody outside of that, Coleen being no different.
Not sure if she’s said exactly what the leaked things were but regardless it’s still a breach of trust which is sh!tty anyway but especially if it then means your personal life gets laid bare in the tabloids. |
Right but in her position she must appreciate there's a relatively high risk that whatever she posts anywhere might end up in the tabloids, i.e. you'd only post stuff you might not be too bothered about. | | | |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:28 - Oct 9 with 2436 views | LankHenners |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:21 - Oct 9 by PrideOfTheEast |
Right but in her position she must appreciate there's a relatively high risk that whatever she posts anywhere might end up in the tabloids, i.e. you'd only post stuff you might not be too bothered about. |
Yes but even if it’s something fairly mundane and it gets leaked, it means there’s the potential for something ‘juicier’ to get leaked by someone you thought you could trust.
There’s probably a part of trying to lead a relatively normal life rather than constant fear of stuff being splashed across the media. | |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:34 - Oct 9 with 2424 views | PrideOfTheEast |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:28 - Oct 9 by LankHenners |
Yes but even if it’s something fairly mundane and it gets leaked, it means there’s the potential for something ‘juicier’ to get leaked by someone you thought you could trust.
There’s probably a part of trying to lead a relatively normal life rather than constant fear of stuff being splashed across the media. |
So just accept instagram probably isn't sensible and don't use it for anything other than making money, which I assume is the purpose of her public account. | | | |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:45 - Oct 9 with 2399 views | SamWhiteUK |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:10 - Oct 9 by PrideOfTheEast |
Doesn't Coleen look daft regardless of whether Vardy has leaked stuff?
It's instagram so whilst you might only want a limited number of people to see something, if you were that bothered you just wouldn't post it at all, surely? |
Don't understand this logic at all.
You can want to share something with friends without having the whole world know. |  | | |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 16:45 - Oct 9 with 2404 views | baxterbasics |
The moral of the story is do not post anything online unless you are prepared for it to become public domain. Privacy settings are a con. |  |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 17:23 - Oct 9 with 2364 views | Mullet |
Which one of them has a book/fitness regime/handbag range coming out for Xmas then? |  |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 17:27 - Oct 9 with 2350 views | LankHenners |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:34 - Oct 9 by PrideOfTheEast |
So just accept instagram probably isn't sensible and don't use it for anything other than making money, which I assume is the purpose of her public account. |
It was a private account with only friends allowed to view it. Be like if someone leaked messages from a WhatsApp group. | |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 17:38 - Oct 9 with 2326 views | manchego |
| Rooney v Vardy - Missus' edition on 16:10 - Oct 9 by PrideOfTheEast |
Doesn't Coleen look daft regardless of whether Vardy has leaked stuff?
It's instagram so whilst you might only want a limited number of people to see something, if you were that bothered you just wouldn't post it at all, surely? |
That's not the point.
That group was to be for friends.
A friend was being a douche. |  | | |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 18:06 - Oct 9 with 2295 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 16:45 - Oct 9 by baxterbasics |
The moral of the story is do not post anything online unless you are prepared for it to become public domain. Privacy settings are a con. |
Why on earth has this been reported as abuse. |  |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 14:47 - Oct 10 with 2052 views | GlasgowBlue |
And it continues. Another wag wades in........
And another
[Post edited 10 Oct 2019 14:49]
| |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 11:47 - Oct 14 with 1778 views | J2BLUE |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 18:06 - Oct 9 by GlasgowBlue |
Why on earth has this been reported as abuse. |
Just seen it was me! Complete accident and had no idea until I just checked my PM sent box.
Apologies Phil/Gav |  |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 12:52 - Oct 14 with 1692 views | Tangledupin_Blue |
How tf has a tedious spat between two vapid nonentities made the BBC national news broadcasts for the best part of a week? |  |
| |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 12:54 - Oct 14 with 1688 views | Bluefish |
| Rooney v Vardy -Missus' edition on 12:52 - Oct 14 by Tangledupin_Blue |
How tf has a tedious spat between two vapid nonentities made the BBC national news broadcasts for the best part of a week? |
I think the BBC are duty bound to report on her majesty's opposition |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
