| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:37 - Apr 5 with 2388 views | Mullet |
Bunch of leeches and hangers on.
Doesn't matter what they call themselves when it's all at a cost to us. |  |
|  |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:40 - Apr 5 with 2374 views | DJR |
God bless you, Ma'am. |  | | |
| GSTK&Q (n/t) on 10:40 - Apr 5 with 2367 views | Bloots |
|  |
| "Trite Sixth-Form Politics” - TWTD User (Sept 2025) |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:42 - Apr 5 with 2348 views | leitrimblue |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:37 - Apr 5 by Mullet |
Bunch of leeches and hangers on.
Doesn't matter what they call themselves when it's all at a cost to us. |
Argh, they give us something to all look up to and strive to be as good has |  | | |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:42 - Apr 5 with 2347 views | Swansea_Blue |
I can't help but think of this:
Sexist if you ask me - she can become a Queen, yet poor old Philip had to be content with being a Prince. First world problems and all that. |  |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:45 - Apr 5 with 2307 views | Guthrum |
Bit ridiculous to call her anything else when the wives of reigning kings have always historically been styled "queen". The only reason George, Albert and Philip were not named "king" was to emphsise the authority of their wives in an era of male primacy. |  |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:46 - Apr 5 with 2294 views | Keno |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:42 - Apr 5 by Swansea_Blue |
I can't help but think of this:
Sexist if you ask me - she can become a Queen, yet poor old Philip had to be content with being a Prince. First world problems and all that. |
Is this a contender for name 3 posters? |  |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:47 - Apr 5 with 2291 views | Swansea_Blue |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:46 - Apr 5 by Keno |
Is this a contender for name 3 posters? |
They're all Blueas | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:49 - Apr 5 with 2255 views | blueasfook |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:47 - Apr 5 by Swansea_Blue |
They're all Blueas |
Who dear? Me dear? No dear! |  |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:51 - Apr 5 with 2234 views | Swansea_Blue |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:45 - Apr 5 by Guthrum |
Bit ridiculous to call her anything else when the wives of reigning kings have always historically been styled "queen". The only reason George, Albert and Philip were not named "king" was to emphsise the authority of their wives in an era of male primacy. |
So is it just convention rather than any constitutional requirement? That would seem remarkably enlightened for an otherwise very conservative and traditionalist royal family. Quite surprising really. | |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:57 - Apr 5 with 2156 views | Ewan_Oozami |
Suprised she doesn't want to be known as Queen Lillets.... |  |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:06 - Apr 5 with 2096 views | Keno |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:49 - Apr 5 by blueasfook |
Who dear? Me dear? No dear! |
I thought we were all your comedy creations?
obviously some are a lot funnier than others!! | |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:08 - Apr 5 with 2096 views | Guthrum |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:51 - Apr 5 by Swansea_Blue |
So is it just convention rather than any constitutional requirement? That would seem remarkably enlightened for an otherwise very conservative and traditionalist royal family. Quite surprising really. |
Convention is how the constitution is guided. But it's also flexible. In 1936 a king was forced to abdicate because he wanted to marry a divorcee*, in 2023 a divorced king is about to be crowned with no questions asked.
* IMO, there was a bit more to it than that, relating to Edward's personality and the influence Simpson had over him. | |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:11 - Apr 5 with 2057 views | Mullet |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:08 - Apr 5 by Guthrum |
Convention is how the constitution is guided. But it's also flexible. In 1936 a king was forced to abdicate because he wanted to marry a divorcee*, in 2023 a divorced king is about to be crowned with no questions asked.
* IMO, there was a bit more to it than that, relating to Edward's personality and the influence Simpson had over him. |
Plus they were Nazi sympathisers innit | |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:21 - Apr 5 with 2012 views | leitrimblue |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:08 - Apr 5 by Guthrum |
Convention is how the constitution is guided. But it's also flexible. In 1936 a king was forced to abdicate because he wanted to marry a divorcee*, in 2023 a divorced king is about to be crowned with no questions asked.
* IMO, there was a bit more to it than that, relating to Edward's personality and the influence Simpson had over him. |
In 2023 a divorced King who cheated on his young family is about to marry his long term mistress who he cheated on his young family for. Where's the Church of England when you need it | | | |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:23 - Apr 5 with 1992 views | MattinLondon |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:37 - Apr 5 by Mullet |
Bunch of leeches and hangers on.
Doesn't matter what they call themselves when it's all at a cost to us. |
Abolish the monarchy and abolish the House of Lords. |  | | |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:39 - Apr 5 with 1929 views | Guthrum |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:11 - Apr 5 by Mullet |
Plus they were Nazi sympathisers innit |
That's one of the "personality weaknesses" I was alluding to. | |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 12:41 - Apr 5 with 1802 views | GlasgowBlue |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:11 - Apr 5 by Mullet |
Plus they were Nazi sympathisers innit |
That's one Heil of an accusation. |  |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 13:17 - Apr 5 with 1735 views | MattinLondon |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:21 - Apr 5 by leitrimblue |
In 2023 a divorced King who cheated on his young family is about to marry his long term mistress who he cheated on his young family for. Where's the Church of England when you need it |
Claiming expenses in the Lords. | | | |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 13:46 - Apr 5 with 1673 views | WeWereZombies |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 13:17 - Apr 5 by MattinLondon |
Claiming expenses in the Lords. |
Nothing to do with the Church of England if she is a Catholic, innit ? |  |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 13:56 - Apr 5 with 1656 views | Guthrum |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 13:46 - Apr 5 by WeWereZombies |
Nothing to do with the Church of England if she is a Catholic, innit ? |
Until recently, that was even more of a problem!
Edit: And by recently, I mean 2013. [Post edited 5 Apr 2023 14:04]
| |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 14:52 - Apr 5 with 1589 views | GeoffSentence |
I bet she's the first Queen Camilla to straddle the throne anywhere in the world. |  |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 14:53 - Apr 5 with 1573 views | HARRY10 |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 10:37 - Apr 5 by Mullet |
Bunch of leeches and hangers on.
Doesn't matter what they call themselves when it's all at a cost to us. |
'King Charles and the late Queen Elizabeth II have received payments equivalent to more than £1bn from two land and property estates that are at the centre of a centuries-old debate over whether their profits should be given to the public instead.'
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-interactive/2023/apr/05/revealed-royals-t
thems our betters, thems is |  | | |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 16:37 - Apr 5 with 1454 views | Mullet |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:11 - Apr 5 by Mullet |
Plus they were Nazi sympathisers innit |
Weird to see this downvoted, but not when Guffers admits he was being polite. Zapers old fruit, fan of Nazis or something too are we? | |
| |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 16:38 - Apr 5 with 1432 views | Mullet |
| It's what she would have wanted? on 11:23 - Apr 5 by MattinLondon |
Abolish the monarchy and abolish the House of Lords. |
Calm down Guy Fawkes. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
