| Trump....all you need to know. 06:58 - Jan 21 with 23667 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
Trump also signed an executive order temporarily delaying the enforcement of a federal ban on TikTok for at least 75 days. “I guess I have a warm spot for TikTok that I didn’t have originally,” Trump said at the White House. |  |
| |  |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 13:33 - Jan 22 with 1574 views | leitrimblue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:14 - Jan 21 by lowhouseblue |
energy spent listing, and vehemently agreeing about, the ways in which trump is a very bad thing is also wasted. more useful would be to consider why a very large number of blue collar voters backed trump and why they decided that the democrats in washington were elitist, corrupt, out of touch and didn't care about the things that mattered to working class americans. america is currently giving us in the uk an opportunity to avoid having farage as pm - but only if we learn their lessons. or we could decide instead to just slag off trump, call him a fascist, and despise the people who voted for him. |
I think there use to be a political party in the UK that represented and cared about the things that mattered to the working class.
Lab something, not sure what happened to them. But perhaps if they would return to representing the poorest and weakest in society rather then perversely courting Daily Mail readers there wouldn't be such a vacuum for the likes of man of the people Farage to fill? |  | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 13:36 - Jan 22 with 1569 views | DanTheMan |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 13:10 - Jan 22 by lowhouseblue |
?? ok, i don't get that one. |
They're talking about Hitler. |  |
| |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 13:41 - Jan 22 with 1542 views | Europablue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 12:35 - Jan 22 by redrickstuhaart |
This isnt true. Trump has actively loaded the court with religious conservative judges who are inclined to particular biases in order to further his agendas. Judges should never be political appointments. In the us now , they are. |
In America judges have always been appointed in the same way. Saying "now , they are" suggests that something has changed. |  | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:08 - Jan 22 with 1472 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 10:07 - Jan 22 by Europablue |
I don't think you understand the role of the supreme court judges. They are independent and they don't do what the person who appointed them wants them to. The person who appoints them just chooses the qualified judge who has a similar philosophy to the constitution. They broadly fall into judges who follow the constitution and those who like to interpret what the constitution means.
Changing the 2 term limit would be so incredibly divisive that it would certainly spark armed conflict. |
I'm pretty sure he understands it more than you do with your rosy picture of the process |  | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:12 - Jan 22 with 1453 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 13:41 - Jan 22 by Europablue |
In America judges have always been appointed in the same way. Saying "now , they are" suggests that something has changed. |
I dont believe it was always so cynically overt. But as usual you are diverting from the key point. | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:15 - Jan 22 with 1443 views | DJR |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 13:41 - Jan 22 by Europablue |
In America judges have always been appointed in the same way. Saying "now , they are" suggests that something has changed. |
It has certainly been going on for a very long time, and I think that the problem is that the constitution was drafted at a time when political parties weren't envisaged.
Political parties are not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, which predates the party system, and had they been envisaged, it strikes me that something would have been put in place to prevent political judges etc.
As regards Roe v Wade, that was reached when there was a Democrat majority on the Supreme Court, and reversed with a Republican majority. Both setups, in my view, are wrong because it suggests political judgment is influencing legal judgment. [Post edited 22 Jan 15:38]
|  | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:25 - Jan 22 with 1408 views | lowhouseblue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 13:36 - Jan 22 by DanTheMan |
They're talking about Hitler. |
ah, thanks. i clearly hadn't set my expectations low enough. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:26 - Jan 22 with 1405 views | bluebud |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 07:37 - Jan 21 by StokieBlue |
Of course, who do you think was buying all the Trump coins the other day.
Much easier to pay bribes in near-anonymous crypto.
SB |
Lol
You think crypto is anonymous? :-) There is only one coin which is and thats Monero. All the rest are easily tracked.
You think all the prisoners (they were at the time of release and without internet) were the only people who bought the $50 billion market cap Trump coin? Ok mate. [Post edited 22 Jan 14:27]
|  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:29 - Jan 22 with 1396 views | lowhouseblue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 13:41 - Jan 22 by Europablue |
In America judges have always been appointed in the same way. Saying "now , they are" suggests that something has changed. |
the american system is bonkers. the number of essentially admin roles which are politically appointed is ridiculous. trump has sacked the director of the coast guard - which seems very odd until you realise that she was a political appointment by the democrats. why does directing the coast guard ever need to be a political appointment. surely knowing about coasts, and ships and relevant laws and duties ought to be the thing. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:37 - Jan 22 with 1337 views | StokieBlue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:26 - Jan 22 by bluebud |
Lol
You think crypto is anonymous? :-) There is only one coin which is and thats Monero. All the rest are easily tracked.
You think all the prisoners (they were at the time of release and without internet) were the only people who bought the $50 billion market cap Trump coin? Ok mate. [Post edited 22 Jan 14:27]
|
You've missed the point.
Doesn't even need to be anonymous, if someone (Trump) holds N amount of his coin and someone else says they will drive the price up in exchange for something (you can use your imagination here) so that Trump makes X from the volume he holds then it's an easy way to formulate a bribe.
SB [Post edited 22 Jan 14:38]
|  | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:55 - Jan 22 with 1282 views | bluebud |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:37 - Jan 22 by StokieBlue |
You've missed the point.
Doesn't even need to be anonymous, if someone (Trump) holds N amount of his coin and someone else says they will drive the price up in exchange for something (you can use your imagination here) so that Trump makes X from the volume he holds then it's an easy way to formulate a bribe.
SB [Post edited 22 Jan 14:38]
|
I haven't missed the point...you haven't answered and swerved and gone against your original...dream basically. You said "Much easier to pay bribes in near-anonymous crypto". Suddenly the anonymity isn't important you say.
You think Trump coordinated with 1600 prisoners, in varying states of imprisonment but certainly unlikely to have internet and definitely not allowed to use VPN's. Sure thing mate.
If there have been payments I think its more realsitic they were done 3 or 4 years ago, probably cash and to support the families. | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:01 - Jan 22 with 1246 views | StokieBlue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:55 - Jan 22 by bluebud |
I haven't missed the point...you haven't answered and swerved and gone against your original...dream basically. You said "Much easier to pay bribes in near-anonymous crypto". Suddenly the anonymity isn't important you say.
You think Trump coordinated with 1600 prisoners, in varying states of imprisonment but certainly unlikely to have internet and definitely not allowed to use VPN's. Sure thing mate.
If there have been payments I think its more realsitic they were done 3 or 4 years ago, probably cash and to support the families. |
Sigh.
Where have I mentioned prisoners? You've completely come up with this on your own and it certainly wasn't implied by me. This thread is about Tik Tok and my post was made right after the initial comment about Tik Tok.
I suggest you go back and read it again and then have another think about the posts.
SB | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:07 - Jan 22 with 1226 views | bluebud |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 07:37 - Jan 21 by StokieBlue |
Of course, who do you think was buying all the Trump coins the other day.
Much easier to pay bribes in near-anonymous crypto.
SB |
No, the previous post to your one talked about the 1600 proud boyz, of which you then replied and invented that they were bribed on the day of Trump coin release by aNonYmoUs crypto. I told you they were still prisoners at the time (hadn/'t been released)
So do you still think the proud boyz (prisoners) were bribed when the Trump coin was released. Thats what you implied/said? | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:25 - Jan 22 with 1163 views | Herbivore |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:07 - Jan 22 by bluebud |
No, the previous post to your one talked about the 1600 proud boyz, of which you then replied and invented that they were bribed on the day of Trump coin release by aNonYmoUs crypto. I told you they were still prisoners at the time (hadn/'t been released)
So do you still think the proud boyz (prisoners) were bribed when the Trump coin was released. Thats what you implied/said? |
His first reply (which you've quoted) was to the thread, which is about Tik Tok, not about the treasonous criminals that Trump pardoned. |  |
| |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:27 - Jan 22 with 1152 views | StokieBlue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:07 - Jan 22 by bluebud |
No, the previous post to your one talked about the 1600 proud boyz, of which you then replied and invented that they were bribed on the day of Trump coin release by aNonYmoUs crypto. I told you they were still prisoners at the time (hadn/'t been released)
So do you still think the proud boyz (prisoners) were bribed when the Trump coin was released. Thats what you implied/said? |
Sigh, you're making yourself look a bit silly now.
If I was replying to that post I would have quoted it and it would have been contained at the top of my response like mine is with your response. I was replying to the initial post and that was before the prisoners had even been released.
Nowhere have I said or implied anything about the released January 6th idiots, I've even clarified for you it wasn't about them and was about Tik Tok but you are still persisting which is quite weird.
SB | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:29 - Jan 22 with 1148 views | LeifingLaVidaLoca |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:25 - Jan 22 by Herbivore |
His first reply (which you've quoted) was to the thread, which is about Tik Tok, not about the treasonous criminals that Trump pardoned. |
Seeing as we are having an old timers reunion… Good to see you back Herbie.
SM x | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:34 - Jan 22 with 1116 views | bluebud |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:25 - Jan 22 by Herbivore |
His first reply (which you've quoted) was to the thread, which is about Tik Tok, not about the treasonous criminals that Trump pardoned. |
Lol. of course...Herbivore | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:37 - Jan 22 with 1092 views | StokieBlue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:34 - Jan 22 by bluebud |
Lol. of course...Herbivore |
Which bit are you lolling?
The fact that you've not understood the way the forum works or the fact that Herbs called the treasonous criminals treasonous criminals?
SB | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:39 - Jan 22 with 1078 views | bluebud |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:37 - Jan 22 by StokieBlue |
Which bit are you lolling?
The fact that you've not understood the way the forum works or the fact that Herbs called the treasonous criminals treasonous criminals?
SB |
Sigh
What are you confused about this time? | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:45 - Jan 22 with 1041 views | StokieBlue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:39 - Jan 22 by bluebud |
Sigh
What are you confused about this time? |
I think I'll leave it there.
You're either not reading responses or you're totally ignoring them. There has been nothing complicated here but your posts have been bizarre.
SB | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:46 - Jan 22 with 1038 views | Herbivore |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 15:29 - Jan 22 by LeifingLaVidaLoca |
Seeing as we are having an old timers reunion… Good to see you back Herbie.
SM x |
Outstanding username by the way. | |
| |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 16:02 - Jan 22 with 989 views | DanTheMan |
Sorry to derail slightly but not sure if anyone else has read the text to the "gender ideology" executive order.
There's this bit
(d) “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.
(e) “Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.
Who can spot the amusing issue with this? | |
| |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 16:16 - Jan 22 with 943 views | eireblue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 16:02 - Jan 22 by DanTheMan |
Sorry to derail slightly but not sure if anyone else has read the text to the "gender ideology" executive order.
There's this bit
(d) “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.
(e) “Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.
Who can spot the amusing issue with this? |
At conception, funny time to work out if someone is going to have an innie or outie. |  | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 16:19 - Jan 22 with 899 views | Europablue |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 14:15 - Jan 22 by DJR |
It has certainly been going on for a very long time, and I think that the problem is that the constitution was drafted at a time when political parties weren't envisaged.
Political parties are not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, which predates the party system, and had they been envisaged, it strikes me that something would have been put in place to prevent political judges etc.
As regards Roe v Wade, that was reached when there was a Democrat majority on the Supreme Court, and reversed with a Republican majority. Both setups, in my view, are wrong because it suggests political judgment is influencing legal judgment. [Post edited 22 Jan 15:38]
|
Good points.
I take note of your point in the final paragraph, but would counter that however you feel about the two parties independently you could argue that the Republican appointed judges tend to have a textualist interpretation of the constitution, whereas the Democrat appointed judges tend tend to have an originalist interpretation. In my view you have to follow what the words actually say rather than what you think they mean in the modern context.
Roe v Wade was a poor ruling and was rightly repealed regardless of the moral arguments on either side. The law should be changed, and if that cannot be agreed upon, then this issue is not something that the supreme court should rule on. | | | |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 16:22 - Jan 22 with 884 views | DJR |
| Trump....all you need to know. on 16:16 - Jan 22 by eireblue |
At conception, funny time to work out if someone is going to have an innie or outie. |
This definition no doubt being governed by the pro-life idea that the right to life exists from conception. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
