| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna 17:36 - Feb 1 with 3179 views | onceablue |
Things he has got right these season
Signed Delap
Signed O’Shea
Things has got wrong
Signed Philogene
Signed Obegne
Signed Jack Clarke
Has shown too much loyalty to Morsy and Hutchinson at times
Persevered with Muric too long he has cost us at least 10 points
Has changed the side too much players don’t know if they are coming or going
Substitutions have been awful at times Broadhead today should never have come off
He has got far more things wrong than right and that’s why we are where we are
|  | | |  |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:37 - Feb 1 with 3141 views | Vic |
We can, but tonight might not be the time to do it if we want a reasonable discussion! |  |
| |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:40 - Feb 1 with 3045 views | jaseitfc2015 |
How can Ogbenne be decided as a bad move by McKenna? He can’t help him being injured , thought he looked decent before his injury | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:41 - Feb 1 with 2992 views | FoghornGleghorn |
Sorry, to be clear, we're writing off Philogene based on a promising cameo against Man City, a nothing performance against Liverpool in a game where absolutely everything was stifled and a poor sub appearance today? And it's also McK's fault Ogbene suffered a horror injury? Stop being such a berk. | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:44 - Feb 1 with 2928 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
Strange take tbh.
Ogbene showed promise before he was injured. How are you making a judgement on him?
Philagene has just arrived. On what basis are you writing him off? | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:48 - Feb 1 with 2790 views | TractorWood |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:44 - Feb 1 by SuffolkPunchFC |
Strange take tbh.
Ogbene showed promise before he was injured. How are you making a judgement on him?
Philagene has just arrived. On what basis are you writing him off? |
Agree it's early on Philogene but such an unnecessary signing.
- Villa said he's not up to it
- One good season in the championship
- Looks lost at Town when either pushed off the ball or just runs aimlessly with the ball and loses possession
See Jack Clarke too [Post edited 1 Feb 17:49]
|  |
| |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:49 - Feb 1 with 2745 views | Tonytown |
Broadhead was probably knackered you know | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:49 - Feb 1 with 2742 views | Mullet |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:44 - Feb 1 by SuffolkPunchFC |
Strange take tbh.
Ogbene showed promise before he was injured. How are you making a judgement on him?
Philagene has just arrived. On what basis are you writing him off? |
Yeah the ogbene thing makes no sense at all. It’s not anyone’s fault his leg exploded |  |
| |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:51 - Feb 1 with 2679 views | Parky |
Forget the signings, his inability this season to impact games with subs will cost us. Every single person in the stadium could see what we were doing wasn’t working, and then he changed shape after they scored. (Should have been done before Kieran). | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:54 - Feb 1 with 2615 views | pointofblue |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:49 - Feb 1 by Tonytown |
Broadhead was probably knackered you know |
The thing I didn't like about that sub is it upset the balance of our attack. Hutch and Enciso were having an impact on the right and in the ten role, but they shuffled across so Philogene could play on the right. I would have preferred Clarke to have come on in that scenario. | |
| |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:55 - Feb 1 with 2572 views | Blue_Heath |
I agree that we are allowed to but my take on it is given what he has achieved and also a young manager if he takes us down so be it. He should be given the chance so he choose to stay to rebuild and take us up again given that he's the only manager in 20 years to give us success.
That said he does need to start learning from his mistakes. | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:58 - Feb 1 with 2523 views | CrockerITFC |
Did you intend for your username to make you sound like you used to be a blue in the past but you aren't any more
Onceablue scans as "I was once a blue" |  | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 18:00 - Feb 1 with 2478 views | Simonds92 |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:41 - Feb 1 by FoghornGleghorn |
Sorry, to be clear, we're writing off Philogene based on a promising cameo against Man City, a nothing performance against Liverpool in a game where absolutely everything was stifled and a poor sub appearance today? And it's also McK's fault Ogbene suffered a horror injury? Stop being such a berk. |
Hmmm not wanting to write him off but he was missing today and wasn't brave enough to want the ball and try and affect the game. Players going missing when things are tough is a horrible trait. 'Promising cameo' against City, is a massive stretch. | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 18:01 - Feb 1 with 2457 views | BouncebackIpswich |
It's certainly hard to comprehend the signings of Jack Clarke and Philogene. Muric - no need to even go there.
On the other hand, O Shea, Delap and Cajuste have been inspired.
But KM has got more wrong than right agreed. |  | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 18:02 - Feb 1 with 2428 views | pointofblue |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:41 - Feb 1 by FoghornGleghorn |
Sorry, to be clear, we're writing off Philogene based on a promising cameo against Man City, a nothing performance against Liverpool in a game where absolutely everything was stifled and a poor sub appearance today? And it's also McK's fault Ogbene suffered a horror injury? Stop being such a berk. |
Today was a game where you expect signings to make an impact when called upon. Sorry to bring back a good memory, but like Sarmiento. | |
| |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 18:02 - Feb 1 with 2399 views | FoghornGleghorn |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 18:00 - Feb 1 by Simonds92 |
Hmmm not wanting to write him off but he was missing today and wasn't brave enough to want the ball and try and affect the game. Players going missing when things are tough is a horrible trait. 'Promising cameo' against City, is a massive stretch. |
Okay I'll stipulate - so he's had a bad start and a bad cameo against Man City and Liverpool, and a bad game today. Still seems a little early to blame McK for a misjudged signing, no? | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 18:06 - Feb 1 with 2304 views | Simonds92 |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 18:02 - Feb 1 by FoghornGleghorn |
Okay I'll stipulate - so he's had a bad start and a bad cameo against Man City and Liverpool, and a bad game today. Still seems a little early to blame McK for a misjudged signing, no? |
Yes... agree. But as I say, the attitude concerns me more than anything. The complete opposite of Enciso, who was desperate to impact the game and put himself about. | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 18:07 - Feb 1 with 2278 views | Parky |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 18:02 - Feb 1 by FoghornGleghorn |
Okay I'll stipulate - so he's had a bad start and a bad cameo against Man City and Liverpool, and a bad game today. Still seems a little early to blame McK for a misjudged signing, no? |
There’s a lot of players that should be pointed at before Philogene, who’s played about 90 minutes for us.
How Hutchinson keeps starting games and never gets any criticism is absolutely beyond me. | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 18:15 - Feb 1 with 2166 views | bluebud |
Isn't it amazing that Godfrey hasn't been mentioned anywhere in this thread yet. He's seemingly fallen into a black hole and everyone has forgotten him already. |  | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 19:09 - Feb 1 with 1944 views | onceablue |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 17:58 - Feb 1 by CrockerITFC |
Did you intend for your username to make you sound like you used to be a blue in the past but you aren't any more
Onceablue scans as "I was once a blue" |
Onceablue always a blue you d@ck | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 19:18 - Feb 1 with 1865 views | Whos_blue |
You lost me at Ogbene mate.
Baffling statement. |  |
| Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness. |
| |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 19:41 - Feb 1 with 1696 views | smithy69 |
Absolute bedwetter
Imagine writing off Ogbene who was injured instantly . Writing Philogene off after 2 tiny appearances. | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 19:44 - Feb 1 with 1667 views | smithy69 |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 19:09 - Feb 1 by onceablue |
Onceablue always a blue you d@ck |
Your comments give the feeling opposite of what you are saying
Imagine saying ogbene ia a negative when he hasn’t played - and when he did - looked good | | | |
| We are allowed to criticise Mckenna on 22:38 - Feb 1 with 1176 views | Nutkins_Return |
You're allowed to do what you want. It doesn't mean you have a basic grasp of the context of our situation going into the Prem.
You would have a point if we were Brighton and McKenna was 2nd bottom having taken them over. But we're not and he chose to stay here and try and keep a side up who have everything stacked against them. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
