Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Junior Doctors 09:08 - Jul 25 with 7239 viewsChris_ITFC

Yeah, I want a 30% pay rise too mate.

Poll: So, how many league wins did you see in person?

-7
Junior Doctors on 10:38 - Jul 26 with 506 viewsredrickstuhaart

Junior Doctors on 10:32 - Jul 26 by Ryorry

And in the case of the NHS, not having an inefficient, out of date computer system that can’t even keep people’s names and addresses up to date 5 years after they’ve moved house (correct at GP surgery but not at local hospital they’re referred to) resulting in appointment letters arriving the day after appointments etc. (missed appointments are expensive, we are told).

Not to mention other expensive failures to communicate, such as not informing patients they’ll have to stay overnight in hospital after some day procedures - but could have gone home if they’d been told to organise a friend or relative to stay that night with them. How many beds are quite unnecessarily blocked up that way, I wonder.

Not just my experience but that of others I’ve heard on phone-ins such as R5l.
[Post edited 26 Jul 10:35]


Unfortunately public sector IT is absolutely laughable. It is dressed up as positive efficienct reform, but in reality is often very poorly conceived and implemented, at huge cost, in house or by bespoke teams, when it really ought to be put out to large providers who have teh resources expertise and existing products to build on.

Basically they say they are investing X in the new IT, which will reduce staff and wastage. And then the IT is poor and the additional work gets pushed onto people already strecthed and fed up to fill the gap between what the IT was claimed to do and what it actually does, because the "efficiencies" are assumed at the top management tier and the staff reductions are in place regardless.
0
Junior Doctors on 10:40 - Jul 26 with 489 viewsChurchman

Junior Doctors on 09:33 - Jul 26 by redrickstuhaart

There is undoubtedly waste and bureaucracy built into many public sector setups.

But the biggest inefficiences are created by undervaluing the people, and under resourcing things, such that basic tasks take more effort and time than is necessary, have to be corrected, re-done etc etc.


Yes, there is waste and bureaucracy built into many public sector set ups. There is also poor management, lack of expertise in certain areas and a lack of knowledge of the resources it has at its disposal along with limited or no training.

But this is a huge generalisation. The public sector huge, varied in what it does in a way people who’ve not seen it can ever comprehend. CS has many excellent and dedicated people as qualified and in some cases more expert than those in the private sector. Some of them work vocationally and some in extreme danger and are paid a relative pittance for their troubles.

The repeated line of waste and inefficiency is very much a political line. Francis Maude told the Cabinet Office staff to their faces they were ‘dead wood’ and that was the message pumped out thereafter. The current govt use the line ‘waste and inefficiency’ as an excuse for more cuts.

They couldn’t define what waste or where any more than people on here can, but who cares. Anecdotal will fit the narrative. Of course it exists, just as it does in all organisations.

The biggest waste I saw was, in general, caused by government being ripped off by the private sector. They filled their boots and given the government’s inability to write tighter contracts, private companies rightly took the taxpayer to the cleaners - they’re there to maximise profit for shareholders. I’m generalising so three examples. Fujitsu who supplied HMRCs IT - all of it. They must have made a killing. Yours and my taxes, straight into shareholder pockets.

Secondly, an offshore company that paid no U.K. tax to my knowledge who were gifted government buildings on the basis they’d look after the maintenance and associated services. You can guess the rest and if not it’s on public record.

Lastly, the ‘expertise’ brought in from people like CapGem and PwC to bolster armageddon Brexit work. Two elements - a high percentage of fully qualified CS project people had been disposed of as part of austerity. Useless mouths, waste. Dead wood. Get rid. Shame they had to replace them with private sector people at many times the cost of CS people. £1800 a day was the bare minimum charge for a contractor, even if they were just taking minutes.

This ties in with your second paragraph. People are undervalued and part of the reason for this is a complete lack of understanding and investment in management skills as well as the staff themselves.

Having worked for both, I always felt that the public sector should bring in private sector people and visa versa, whether for experience or knowledge swap. A partnership.
0
Junior Doctors on 10:47 - Jul 26 with 464 viewsRyorry

Junior Doctors on 10:35 - Jul 26 by StokieBlue

This isn't true, what you mean is that lots of people have views to the left of you which I suspect, given your views, isn't unusual for a lot of the country.

You'd see more things you agreed with if those people hadn't been banned for posting offensive things.

SB


In the interests of balance, several “lefties” have been banned too (and I don’t mean Phil’s ‘balance’ before anyone starts!).

Poll: Town's most cultured left foot ever?

0
Junior Doctors on 12:06 - Jul 26 with 378 viewsreusersfreekicks

Junior Doctors on 10:29 - Jul 26 by Benters

Oh come of it we all know this is a Labour hardcore site.

I was banned because I had a row with Spruce.


If you think Labour are hard left that says it all.
Mind you for someone who advocated machine gunning refugees coming through the channel tunnel I guess in relative terms everyone is hard left.
Your lack of self awareness and unbridled ignorance is remarkable
2
Junior Doctors on 12:08 - Jul 26 with 375 viewsHerbivore

Junior Doctors on 10:29 - Jul 26 by Benters

Oh come of it we all know this is a Labour hardcore site.

I was banned because I had a row with Spruce.


Labour aren't even left of centre, let alone hard left. And lots of us didn't vote Labour. There's a broad mix of people on here, you just seem to struggle with quite a lot of people not agreeing with your views which, on some issues, could be described as pretty far right.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Junior Doctors on 12:18 - Jul 26 with 333 viewsBlueBadger

Junior Doctors on 07:25 - Jul 26 by DJR

Here is a recent Full Fact article on the pay of resident doctors for anyone who might be interested.

https://fullfact.org/health/resident-doctors-pay-how-much-do-they-earn-and-what-

It includes the following.

"This shows that in practice, resident doctors typically earn roughly a third more than their basic salary from other sources. Most of the extra pay comes from working extra hours and working unsocial hours, but it also includes geographic differences and other things."

So any doctor you see working at night or at weekends will be earning extra pay, not that there are many doctors in a hospital at weekends.
[Post edited 26 Jul 7:27]


Although, thanks to the contract imposed by Jeremy Rhyming-Slang, they won't be earning as much in unsocial hours payments as they should be.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

1
Junior Doctors on 12:32 - Jul 26 with 291 viewsOldFart71

If you want fairness we need something totally different from the Tories or Labour.
The Tories oversee huge increases in bosses pay. Privatised Companies like water pay more to bosses and shareholders and disregard the job they should be doing and that's providing clean drinkable water and not polluting rivers and seas.
Alternatively you have Labour paid for by their Union masters and as soon as they get in every man and his dog are on strike for more pay, which as with the doctors was supressed by the Tories.
The trouble is the Country doesn't have the money to continue on this path of funding huge pay increases, funding HS2, Sizewell C, Millibands mad rush to Net Zero, bringing down NHS waiting lists and servicing debt costing 17 billion a month.
-1
Junior Doctors on 12:35 - Jul 26 with 297 viewsTonytown

Junior Doctors on 10:29 - Jul 26 by Benters

Oh come of it we all know this is a Labour hardcore site.

I was banned because I had a row with Spruce.


You’re a right wing racist which is why people disagree with you.

To describe most people’s views as hard left on here is stupidity of the first order.
[Post edited 26 Jul 13:18]
0
Login to get fewer ads

Junior Doctors on 12:45 - Jul 26 with 267 viewsHerbivore

Junior Doctors on 12:32 - Jul 26 by OldFart71

If you want fairness we need something totally different from the Tories or Labour.
The Tories oversee huge increases in bosses pay. Privatised Companies like water pay more to bosses and shareholders and disregard the job they should be doing and that's providing clean drinkable water and not polluting rivers and seas.
Alternatively you have Labour paid for by their Union masters and as soon as they get in every man and his dog are on strike for more pay, which as with the doctors was supressed by the Tories.
The trouble is the Country doesn't have the money to continue on this path of funding huge pay increases, funding HS2, Sizewell C, Millibands mad rush to Net Zero, bringing down NHS waiting lists and servicing debt costing 17 billion a month.


Did you miss the constant strike action from a range of sectors under the Tories? I'm guessing so given your characterisation here.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

1
Junior Doctors on 12:52 - Jul 26 with 241 viewsSwansea_Blue

Junior Doctors on 09:17 - Jul 26 by LegendofthePhoenix

There's a lot of talk about the NHS overpaying for various supplies and services. Some truth in it, but mostly as a result of a lack of competition in the market place, so suppliers who have managed to create a monopoly, or duoply in some instances, can rip off. But over the past couple of decades, the NHS has got much better and more rigorous, at procurement.
At a national level, NICE are doing a great job at driving down the cost of phaarmaceuticals.
Probably the worst area for vfm is finding contractors for building works - I'm constantly shocked at how expensive it is to refurbish treatment rooms etc. I suppose with local building contractors, the money remains in the UK, but the costs are so high because of the very high standards that have to be met. For example, if a treatment room is going t have anything more than a lick of paint, the entire room has to be brought up to current HBN (Health Building Note) standards - which means the at handling has to meet strict requirements, often meaning a new AHU has to be installed on the roof, at a cost of £200k - £400k. All NHS equipment has to meet strict CE marks etc. So whilst you can buy a blood pressure monitor off amazon for £40, to buy one that is meets all the standards (including networking etc.) may cost £1200 - £1500. That isn't inefficiency. It's the cost of doing things properly.


I saw similar in the university sector with contractors and it was always around estates. As soon as contractors got on the approved suppliers list it’s almost a licence to print money. All the facilities management contractors would be driving around in new vans. You knew when a new contract had been leased as there were 20 brand spanking new vans around, increasingly electric too so not cheap (even if on leases). Meanwhile the buildings were in a pretty poor state.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Junior Doctors on 12:54 - Jul 26 with 238 viewsSwansea_Blue

Junior Doctors on 10:29 - Jul 26 by Benters

Oh come of it we all know this is a Labour hardcore site.

I was banned because I had a row with Spruce.


You’re going to struggle to find many people on here who are hardcore Labour supporters! Most of the posts about them are slagging them off.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

3
Junior Doctors on 13:54 - Jul 26 with 183 viewsBlueBadger

Junior Doctors on 12:45 - Jul 26 by Herbivore

Did you miss the constant strike action from a range of sectors under the Tories? I'm guessing so given your characterisation here.


It's a shame the doctors are on strike, they could have arranged a dementia screening for OldFart, their memory appears to be appalling.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0
Junior Doctors on 14:03 - Jul 26 with 170 viewsSwansea_Blue

Junior Doctors on 12:32 - Jul 26 by OldFart71

If you want fairness we need something totally different from the Tories or Labour.
The Tories oversee huge increases in bosses pay. Privatised Companies like water pay more to bosses and shareholders and disregard the job they should be doing and that's providing clean drinkable water and not polluting rivers and seas.
Alternatively you have Labour paid for by their Union masters and as soon as they get in every man and his dog are on strike for more pay, which as with the doctors was supressed by the Tories.
The trouble is the Country doesn't have the money to continue on this path of funding huge pay increases, funding HS2, Sizewell C, Millibands mad rush to Net Zero, bringing down NHS waiting lists and servicing debt costing 17 billion a month.


The government can literally ask for money to be created. Indeed, that’s largely what they do for government spending. We’ve also lost out on about £40bn per year in tax revenue because people were daft enough to believe Brexiteer’s lies. So even with Reeves’ unnecessary fiscal rules there is a route back to creating more money by re-joining the EU and getting rid of the trade barriers with our largest nearby trading block. Or they can just create it.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Junior Doctors on 14:03 - Jul 26 with 167 viewspositivity

Junior Doctors on 12:52 - Jul 26 by Swansea_Blue

I saw similar in the university sector with contractors and it was always around estates. As soon as contractors got on the approved suppliers list it’s almost a licence to print money. All the facilities management contractors would be driving around in new vans. You knew when a new contract had been leased as there were 20 brand spanking new vans around, increasingly electric too so not cheap (even if on leases). Meanwhile the buildings were in a pretty poor state.


a more avoidable problem is the underfunding of training doctors and nurses and the subsequent underpayment.

this leads to not enough people available and poor retention of those who have gone through the system, thus having to waste money on agencies where the cost is greater and goes out of the nhs.

ridiculous short-sighted policies which have to be overcome for the common good of the country

Poll: do you do judo and/or do you do voodoo?

1
Junior Doctors on 15:49 - Jul 26 with 91 viewsRyorry

Junior Doctors on 14:03 - Jul 26 by positivity

a more avoidable problem is the underfunding of training doctors and nurses and the subsequent underpayment.

this leads to not enough people available and poor retention of those who have gone through the system, thus having to waste money on agencies where the cost is greater and goes out of the nhs.

ridiculous short-sighted policies which have to be overcome for the common good of the country


It's absolutely tragic - I was saying exactly this to an ex-nurse friend - in the 1980s :(

Poll: Town's most cultured left foot ever?

1




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025