| No more rainbow armbands on 11:16 - Aug 8 with 1375 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Shame. |  |
|  |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:17 - Aug 8 with 1372 views | itfcjoe |
It's a shame that the campaign is ending, but can see why big organisations wouldn't want anything to do with Stonewall currently.
Hopefully it can come again in some form |  |
| |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:22 - Aug 8 with 1292 views | J2BLUE |
Good to see the connection with Stonewall being dropped.
They should still wear unaffiliated rainbow armbands if they wish though. |  |
| |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:39 - Aug 8 with 1148 views | Chris_ITFC |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:17 - Aug 8 by itfcjoe |
It's a shame that the campaign is ending, but can see why big organisations wouldn't want anything to do with Stonewall currently.
Hopefully it can come again in some form |
Yeah, the article suggests so - not until February though. |  |
| |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:45 - Aug 8 with 1088 views | Rimsy |
Should never have been an issue in the first, putting players like Morsy with their beliefs in an impossible situation. Black armband with 'captain' should be standard. |  |
| |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:57 - Aug 8 with 1025 views | urbanpenguin |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:45 - Aug 8 by Rimsy |
Should never have been an issue in the first, putting players like Morsy with their beliefs in an impossible situation. Black armband with 'captain' should be standard. |
Human rights are not a belief. |  | | |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:59 - Aug 8 with 1003 views | BuffaloBill |
The world is finally healing, what an evil organisation they are |  |
| |
| No more rainbow armbands on 12:15 - Aug 8 with 873 views | bsw72 |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:57 - Aug 8 by urbanpenguin |
Human rights are not a belief. |
Does not actively supporting something (in this case choosing not to wear a rainbow armband) that goes against someone’s personal beliefs impinge on human rights any more than making them wear it.
Sexuality is not a choice, and someone should be free to live how they see fit. People should not be discriminated against for their sexuality and the countries that actively persecute the individuals for it are archaic and horrendous.
However if someone does not approve personally for religious or any other reason, why should they be made to actively act in favour of it, that’s not right either. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| No more rainbow armbands on 12:22 - Aug 8 with 809 views | BuffaloBill |
| No more rainbow armbands on 12:15 - Aug 8 by bsw72 |
Does not actively supporting something (in this case choosing not to wear a rainbow armband) that goes against someone’s personal beliefs impinge on human rights any more than making them wear it.
Sexuality is not a choice, and someone should be free to live how they see fit. People should not be discriminated against for their sexuality and the countries that actively persecute the individuals for it are archaic and horrendous.
However if someone does not approve personally for religious or any other reason, why should they be made to actively act in favour of it, that’s not right either. |
Like Egypt or Palestine as examples | |
| |
| No more rainbow armbands on 12:30 - Aug 8 with 746 views | bartyg |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:59 - Aug 8 by BuffaloBill |
The world is finally healing, what an evil organisation they are |
I'll bite- what are you talking about |  | | |
| No more rainbow armbands on 12:32 - Aug 8 with 721 views | bsw72 |
| No more rainbow armbands on 12:22 - Aug 8 by BuffaloBill |
Like Egypt or Palestine as examples |
Not sure, my point was more about passive individual choice rather than state mandated legislation. | | | |
| No more rainbow armbands on 12:40 - Aug 8 with 619 views | BlueBadger |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:45 - Aug 8 by Rimsy |
Should never have been an issue in the first, putting players like Morsy with their beliefs in an impossible situation. Black armband with 'captain' should be standard. |
It's just colours, snowflake. |  |
| |
| No more rainbow armbands on 12:53 - Aug 8 with 531 views | tractorboy7777 |
I’ve not personally seen what has caused Stonewall to be disliked so much, however by removing this campaign in the Premier League alongside stonewall to include different sexualities, the Premier League do need to be careful that they do have a campaign in February that they say they will do.
There have been no openly gay premier league players still, which doesn’t help those growing up to feel included in football. Like I said, I don’t know if Stonewall is the problem, but it comes across as they are removing the campaign because a couple of Captains won’t contribute to the campaign because of their beliefs or agree with being gay. That to me, makes it worse for the young gay footballers who are hiding who they are and don’t feel included.
In my opinion, if they remove one type of inclusive campaign, they should remove all. Football is very diverse now. Religion should not be part of this either, religion is a choice, being gay, black, female isn’t. |  |
| |
| No more rainbow armbands on 13:40 - Aug 8 with 366 views | Rimsy |
| No more rainbow armbands on 12:40 - Aug 8 by BlueBadger |
It's just colours, snowflake. |
No it's not. It would just be colours if such a big thing wasn't made about it. Trying to shame someone in supporting a cause that they don't agree with is wrong. My point was it has no place in football. It's always been a black armband till someone decided to foist the rainbow on people. | |
| |
| No more rainbow armbands on 13:48 - Aug 8 with 322 views | Mullet |
| No more rainbow armbands on 13:40 - Aug 8 by Rimsy |
No it's not. It would just be colours if such a big thing wasn't made about it. Trying to shame someone in supporting a cause that they don't agree with is wrong. My point was it has no place in football. It's always been a black armband till someone decided to foist the rainbow on people. |
That's completely untrue https://www.footyheadlines.com/2019/05/20-most-iconic-captain-armbands-in-footba |  |
| |
| No more rainbow armbands on 13:54 - Aug 8 with 279 views | Libero |
| No more rainbow armbands on 13:40 - Aug 8 by Rimsy |
No it's not. It would just be colours if such a big thing wasn't made about it. Trying to shame someone in supporting a cause that they don't agree with is wrong. My point was it has no place in football. It's always been a black armband till someone decided to foist the rainbow on people. |
‘supporting a cause’ - what do you perceive the ‘cause’ to be? |  | | |
| No more rainbow armbands on 14:36 - Aug 8 with 50 views | Kropotkin123 |
| No more rainbow armbands on 11:17 - Aug 8 by itfcjoe |
It's a shame that the campaign is ending, but can see why big organisations wouldn't want anything to do with Stonewall currently.
Hopefully it can come again in some form |
Maybe we could have rainbow-coloured penalty spots. The Stonewall Penalty campaign? |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
