| In house legal team? 13:06 - Sep 23 with 1340 views | Vic |
Blimey - must be expecting the worst from the EFL re Blackburn game. Quick work though getting this in place so soon! |  |
| |  |
| In house legal team? on 13:08 - Sep 23 with 1291 views | homer_123 |
Laura is the name of ChatGPT? |  |
| |
| In house legal team? on 13:09 - Sep 23 with 1263 views | NthQldITFC |
They've had a tip off that someone is considering throwing a crisp packet quite close to Delia's car on the fifth of October, and are getting ready deal with the inevitable backlash. |  |
| |
| In house legal team? on 13:17 - Sep 23 with 1141 views | J2BLUE |
I assume you are joking? Genuinely hard to tell! |  |
| |
| In house legal team? on 13:21 - Sep 23 with 1087 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| In house legal team? on 13:17 - Sep 23 by J2BLUE |
I assume you are joking? Genuinely hard to tell! |
Not that much of a stretch is it? Very coincidental timing otherwise! Why else would we suddenly need an in-house lawyer? |  |
| |
| In house legal team? on 13:22 - Sep 23 with 1068 views | Vic |
| In house legal team? on 13:17 - Sep 23 by J2BLUE |
I assume you are joking? Genuinely hard to tell! |
I am! | |
| |
| In house legal team? on 13:26 - Sep 23 with 985 views | Illinoisblue |
| In house legal team? on 13:21 - Sep 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Not that much of a stretch is it? Very coincidental timing otherwise! Why else would we suddenly need an in-house lawyer? |
You don’t recruit and appoint someone to that level of a position in two days. |  |
| |
| In house legal team? on 13:28 - Sep 23 with 940 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
| In house legal team? on 13:21 - Sep 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Not that much of a stretch is it? Very coincidental timing otherwise! Why else would we suddenly need an in-house lawyer? |
These appointments don't happen in days, so I'd assume it's been in the works for months.
Most top clubs have in-house council these days, due to the complexities of modern football legal requirements - much more of a full time job than it ever used to be. Even Norwich (not a top club) have in-house legal council. |  | | |
| In house legal team? on 13:29 - Sep 23 with 923 views | chantryblueboy |
| In house legal team? on 13:21 - Sep 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Not that much of a stretch is it? Very coincidental timing otherwise! Why else would we suddenly need an in-house lawyer? |
Do well to get one appointed by Tuesday to deal with a problem that occurred on Saturday | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| In house legal team? on 13:30 - Sep 23 with 885 views | davblue |
| In house legal team? on 13:26 - Sep 23 by Illinoisblue |
You don’t recruit and appoint someone to that level of a position in two days. |
No but it’s a coincidence that it’s happened or something like that…. |  | | |
| In house legal team? on 13:30 - Sep 23 with 887 views | J2BLUE |
| In house legal team? on 13:21 - Sep 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Not that much of a stretch is it? Very coincidental timing otherwise! Why else would we suddenly need an in-house lawyer? |
Why would you bring in an in house lawyer for something like that? Makes zero sense for a one off event that will likely go in our favour anyway.
Far more likely to be for contracts, planning permission, construction laws etc etc? | |
| |
| In house legal team? on 13:36 - Sep 23 with 781 views | burnbudgiesburn |
| In house legal team? on 13:28 - Sep 23 by SuffolkPunchFC |
These appointments don't happen in days, so I'd assume it's been in the works for months.
Most top clubs have in-house council these days, due to the complexities of modern football legal requirements - much more of a full time job than it ever used to be. Even Norwich (not a top club) have in-house legal council. |
The announcement being made now won't hurt though!
The angst over this decision is amazing tbh, it should be just an open and shut case of following precedent and previous rulings in this situation but because we're Ipswich we fear this weird stuff always happens to us! | | | |
| In house legal team? on 13:39 - Sep 23 with 726 views | PrideOfTheEast |
| In house legal team? on 13:21 - Sep 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Not that much of a stretch is it? Very coincidental timing otherwise! Why else would we suddenly need an in-house lawyer? |
Been in the offing for ages. Makes sense given the amount going on - development, commercial, multiple owners etc. | | | |
| In house legal team? on 13:40 - Sep 23 with 709 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
| In house legal team? on 13:36 - Sep 23 by burnbudgiesburn |
The announcement being made now won't hurt though!
The angst over this decision is amazing tbh, it should be just an open and shut case of following precedent and previous rulings in this situation but because we're Ipswich we fear this weird stuff always happens to us! |
Agree completely on both of those points  | | | |
| In house legal team? on 13:41 - Sep 23 with 680 views | patrickswell |
Presumably to prosecute darkhorse28 for persistent malicious content. |  | | |
| In house legal team? on 13:42 - Sep 23 with 674 views | lowhouseblue |
| In house legal team? on 13:21 - Sep 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Not that much of a stretch is it? Very coincidental timing otherwise! Why else would we suddenly need an in-house lawyer? |
recruiting someone in 3 days would be going some. in any case, if the outcome is anything other than a full replay - and i think for it not to be a full replay is inconceivable - the first thing the club would do is go out to a kc with expertise in this specific area. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| In house legal team? on 14:17 - Sep 23 with 367 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| In house legal team? on 13:26 - Sep 23 by Illinoisblue |
You don’t recruit and appoint someone to that level of a position in two days. |
Fairy nuff. | |
| |
| In house legal team? on 14:24 - Sep 23 with 291 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| In house legal team? on 13:30 - Sep 23 by J2BLUE |
Why would you bring in an in house lawyer for something like that? Makes zero sense for a one off event that will likely go in our favour anyway.
Far more likely to be for contracts, planning permission, construction laws etc etc? |
Just the timing seemed prescient.
The "far more likely" options you cite have all been and gone haven't they?
Obviously contracts will be signed in the future... but the latest batch have just been completed, so it would be a bit odd timing to hire someone for that right after the transfer window's shut and all contracts signed. Most, if not all, of the planning permission has been approved, hasn't it?
I don't doubt everyone's right that you wouldn't hire a lawyer so quickly, I guess I'm just a little surprised we didn't already have one! | |
| |
| In house legal team? on 14:24 - Sep 23 with 289 views | bluesbrothers |
| In house legal team? on 13:21 - Sep 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Not that much of a stretch is it? Very coincidental timing otherwise! Why else would we suddenly need an in-house lawyer? |
Been hiring for at least 6 months. Someone at my company was headhunted but turned it down as required moving to Ipswich | | | |
| In house legal team? on 14:37 - Sep 23 with 184 views | chantryblueboy |
| In house legal team? on 14:24 - Sep 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Just the timing seemed prescient.
The "far more likely" options you cite have all been and gone haven't they?
Obviously contracts will be signed in the future... but the latest batch have just been completed, so it would be a bit odd timing to hire someone for that right after the transfer window's shut and all contracts signed. Most, if not all, of the planning permission has been approved, hasn't it?
I don't doubt everyone's right that you wouldn't hire a lawyer so quickly, I guess I'm just a little surprised we didn't already have one! |
Or the amount of stuff we’ve had to do identified that this was something we’d need going forward. Planning permission etc likely to be ever more relevant as we look to redevelop the ground where there are far more stakeholders you have to keep at bay | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
