| Poor old Scotland 08:35 - Jun 27 with 4623 views | Dubtractor | First world cup appearance for 50 years or whatever, in a format where it is almost impossible for a halfway competent team to not qualify for the knock out stage, and yet they are going to be getting the first flight home. [Post edited 27 Jun 14:52]
|  |
| |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:06 - Jun 27 with 2982 views | IndependentlyBlue | Oh dear. How sad. Never mind. |  |
| Better to stay silent and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:10 - Jun 27 with 2963 views | Keno | Especially after they won the first game It’s almost funny |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:17 - Jun 27 with 2927 views | tiptreeblue |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:10 - Jun 27 by Keno | Especially after they won the first game It’s almost funny |
Almost? |  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:21 - Jun 27 with 2897 views | bluelagos | Opta index now has gives them a 0.07% chance of making the knockouts. Two shots on target in 3 matches really is a woeful return... |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:23 - Jun 27 with 2891 views | franz_tyson | It would be a helluva blow if the expanded tournament structure was seen as a failure and they decreased the size of the world cup and the number of places available. No prime McTominay, Robertson or McGinn next time around and don't think there's much coming through. They might struggle to make the finals next time around. |  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:35 - Jun 27 with 2796 views | hoppy |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:21 - Jun 27 by bluelagos | Opta index now has gives them a 0.07% chance of making the knockouts. Two shots on target in 3 matches really is a woeful return... |
They're now 10th in the 3rd place table - so how is the Opta index rating their chances even as high as that? |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:36 - Jun 27 with 2781 views | Churchman |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:10 - Jun 27 by Keno | Especially after they won the first game It’s almost funny |
You mean actually funny. There they were giving it the billy big nuts after the first game. Busy puffing themselves up with we are going to do this, do that and everyone but them knew where it would finish up - the departure lounge for the first plane home. Deserve to be on it too. They were easily one of the worst teams in it. [Post edited 27 Jun 9:37]
|  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:42 - Jun 27 with 2730 views | mrfixit426 |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:35 - Jun 27 by hoppy | They're now 10th in the 3rd place table - so how is the Opta index rating their chances even as high as that? |
Teams currently above them could get pumped in their final game and end up with a potentially worse goal difference. Croatia and Algeria I think. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
| Poor old Scotland on 09:50 - Jun 27 with 2688 views | farkenhell |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:23 - Jun 27 by franz_tyson | It would be a helluva blow if the expanded tournament structure was seen as a failure and they decreased the size of the world cup and the number of places available. No prime McTominay, Robertson or McGinn next time around and don't think there's much coming through. They might struggle to make the finals next time around. |
I don't think there's any chance they'll reduce the number of teams in the next world cup. It's all about the money. If anything, they might increase the numbers further. |  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:51 - Jun 27 with 2668 views | strikalite |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:36 - Jun 27 by Churchman | You mean actually funny. There they were giving it the billy big nuts after the first game. Busy puffing themselves up with we are going to do this, do that and everyone but them knew where it would finish up - the departure lounge for the first plane home. Deserve to be on it too. They were easily one of the worst teams in it. [Post edited 27 Jun 9:37]
|
Yep, no surprise is it, just have no creativity at all in open play and trying to go toe to toe with Brazil when they needed a point was just plain daft imo, a Ghana all men beyond the ball performance could have at least given them half a chance of that. |  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:52 - Jun 27 with 2661 views | farkenhell |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:36 - Jun 27 by Churchman | You mean actually funny. There they were giving it the billy big nuts after the first game. Busy puffing themselves up with we are going to do this, do that and everyone but them knew where it would finish up - the departure lounge for the first plane home. Deserve to be on it too. They were easily one of the worst teams in it. [Post edited 27 Jun 9:37]
|
It's almost a repeat of Ally's army in 78. |  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:53 - Jun 27 with 2654 views | hoppy |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:42 - Jun 27 by mrfixit426 | Teams currently above them could get pumped in their final game and end up with a potentially worse goal difference. Croatia and Algeria I think. |
Ah, gotcha... so if Ghana give Croatia a thrashing, and Austria do the same against Algeria, then they could have a little bit of wind back in their bagpipes? |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 10:15 - Jun 27 with 2551 views | John_Warks_Willy | I’m in no way anti Scotland, so this is based purely on what I’ve seen. But they’ve been ruddy terrible haven’t they? |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 10:24 - Jun 27 with 2479 views | bluelagos |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:35 - Jun 27 by hoppy | They're now 10th in the 3rd place table - so how is the Opta index rating their chances even as high as that? |
From the BBC site: "...their chances of qualifying for the knockout stages for the first time in their history now stands at 0.07% according to Opta following overnight results. They now need an unlikely sequence of results in tonight's matches to go through as one of the best eight third-place finishers: Group L: Croatia to lose to Ghana by at least three goals. Group K: DR Congo v Uzbekistan to be a draw. Or Uzbekistan to win by no more than three goals. Group J: Austria and Algeria are on three points and a draw would send both through. Scotland need Algeria to lose by two or more goals, or Austria to be beaten by at least four goals. " |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 10:27 - Jun 27 with 2457 views | Wacko | I think some of their supporters still think it’s the 1970s when there were only a handful of decent teams around the world |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 10:31 - Jun 27 with 2422 views | Keno |
| Poor old Scotland on 09:17 - Jun 27 by tiptreeblue | Almost? |
Hilarious is almost funny |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 10:43 - Jun 27 with 2346 views | Mark |
| Poor old Scotland on 10:24 - Jun 27 by bluelagos | From the BBC site: "...their chances of qualifying for the knockout stages for the first time in their history now stands at 0.07% according to Opta following overnight results. They now need an unlikely sequence of results in tonight's matches to go through as one of the best eight third-place finishers: Group L: Croatia to lose to Ghana by at least three goals. Group K: DR Congo v Uzbekistan to be a draw. Or Uzbekistan to win by no more than three goals. Group J: Austria and Algeria are on three points and a draw would send both through. Scotland need Algeria to lose by two or more goals, or Austria to be beaten by at least four goals. " |
It seems to me to be a ridiculous format which allows teams' fate to be dragged out over days like this with such complicated scenarios. Football is best when football is simple. There should be 32 teams, eight groups of four, and the top two of each group should qualify for the last 16. [Post edited 27 Jun 10:44]
|  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 10:57 - Jun 27 with 2280 views | BlueBadger | And that is why they are the Norwich City of international football. |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 10:59 - Jun 27 with 2265 views | brazil1982 |
| Poor old Scotland on 10:43 - Jun 27 by Mark | It seems to me to be a ridiculous format which allows teams' fate to be dragged out over days like this with such complicated scenarios. Football is best when football is simple. There should be 32 teams, eight groups of four, and the top two of each group should qualify for the last 16. [Post edited 27 Jun 10:44]
|
60 eams proposed for 2034. |  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 11:00 - Jun 27 with 2260 views | Benters | You fanny about with the ball in front of goal against a team like Brazil what could possibly go wrong 😆😂 |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 11:03 - Jun 27 with 2248 views | patrickswell | At least the fact that Cape Verde are going to go further in the competition than it looks like Scotland will is going to be a boon for all Scottish stand up comedians. |  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 11:19 - Jun 27 with 2152 views | BlueBadger |
| Poor old Scotland on 10:27 - Jun 27 by Wacko | I think some of their supporters still think it’s the 1970s when there were only a handful of decent teams around the world |
The 1970s when they couldn't get out of the group stages then, either. |  |
|  |
| Poor old Scotland on 11:30 - Jun 27 with 2117 views | DJR |
| Poor old Scotland on 11:19 - Jun 27 by BlueBadger | The 1970s when they couldn't get out of the group stages then, either. |
Only 16 teams qualified then, and they missed out on the last 8 in 1974 and 1978 on goal difference, not losing a game in 1974. That was the time when Scotland could claim to be a decent team, given England didn't qualify for either tournament, but they just don't produce the players these days. And this time, giving a stupid early goal away against two teams in the top 10 was just madness, as was going head-to-head with Brazil. |  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 11:45 - Jun 27 with 2009 views | J2BLUE | No real issue with Scotland, and I wish Hirst had played some games, but it's a little reassuring that beating Haiti 1-0 isn't enough to qualify. |  | |  |
| Poor old Scotland on 11:51 - Jun 27 with 1970 views | billlm | Not scottish so couldn't care less tbh, |  | |  |
| |