Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan 10:52 - Jun 19 with 4795 views | BryanPlug | [content removed at the owner's request] |  |
| |  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 10:55 - Jun 19 with 3957 views | WeirdFishes | Not sure how accurate that can be. I’m sure the rumours were Norwood was on about £10k a week. |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 10:56 - Jun 19 with 3939 views | chrismakin | Staggering amount of wasted £ in the list wasnt there. |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 10:58 - Jun 19 with 3924 views | BlueandTruesince82 | Surely we wernt contributing 18k a week for Bennets? |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 10:59 - Jun 19 with 3906 views | chrismakin |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 10:58 - Jun 19 by BlueandTruesince82 | Surely we wernt contributing 18k a week for Bennets? |
That's his known wage. We prob paid 5-10% of it maybe? |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:02 - Jun 19 with 3873 views | BryanPlug |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 10:58 - Jun 19 by BlueandTruesince82 | Surely we wernt contributing 18k a week for Bennets? |
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:10 - Jun 19 with 3789 views | WestStanderLaLaLa | Do people actually believe these type of sites? |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:11 - Jun 19 with 3778 views | WD19 | So Downes was our 23rd most valued player….. …..and we wonder why he was sad we wouldn’t let him transfer to a premier league club…. |  | |  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:20 - Jun 19 with 3700 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:11 - Jun 19 by WD19 | So Downes was our 23rd most valued player….. …..and we wonder why he was sad we wouldn’t let him transfer to a premier league club…. |
There is no way that Nsiala is our highest wage earner. This site is called salarysport.com What are the sources for its information? It has taken some information from some unspecified source, sorted the squad somehow and taken a complete (and rather random) guess at the wages. EDIT: It has even managed to include Bennetts as our highest wage earner but failed to include Parrott at all. Do we honestly believe that Kenlock and Jackson are on pretty much the same wage and that it is lower than Lankester's? [Post edited 19 Jun 2021 11:24]
|  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:37 - Jun 19 with 3585 views | BryanPlug |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:20 - Jun 19 by Nthsuffolkblue | There is no way that Nsiala is our highest wage earner. This site is called salarysport.com What are the sources for its information? It has taken some information from some unspecified source, sorted the squad somehow and taken a complete (and rather random) guess at the wages. EDIT: It has even managed to include Bennetts as our highest wage earner but failed to include Parrott at all. Do we honestly believe that Kenlock and Jackson are on pretty much the same wage and that it is lower than Lankester's? [Post edited 19 Jun 2021 11:24]
|
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:38 - Jun 19 with 3572 views | The_Last_Baron | Going by this we have already knocked over 60k a week off the wage bill. |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:47 - Jun 19 with 3522 views | BryanPlug |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:38 - Jun 19 by The_Last_Baron | Going by this we have already knocked over 60k a week off the wage bill. |
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 13:11 - Jun 19 with 3219 views | Guthrum |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:37 - Jun 19 by BryanPlug | [content removed at owner's request] |
Given that player wage information* is highly confidential and unlikely to be known by many people (especially outside the top level), how would those sources obtain reliable information? Sure, you can apply models of likely pay structures to each club, but things vary so much (with each contract negotiated in isolation) categorising individual players becomes little more than a guess. Doesn't negate your original point that Drinan is likely to be quite a cheap option. * Except as an aggregate for the whole squad. |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 13:54 - Jun 19 with 3065 views | FoghornGleghorn | £800 a week is still quite a lot to pay someone to be really bad at their job. |  | |  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 14:07 - Jun 19 with 2985 views | Swansea_Blue |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 10:58 - Jun 19 by BlueandTruesince82 | Surely we wernt contributing 18k a week for Bennets? |
I think we got that from BM. Still nowhere near enough |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 16:00 - Jun 19 with 2792 views | BryanPlug |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 13:11 - Jun 19 by Guthrum | Given that player wage information* is highly confidential and unlikely to be known by many people (especially outside the top level), how would those sources obtain reliable information? Sure, you can apply models of likely pay structures to each club, but things vary so much (with each contract negotiated in isolation) categorising individual players becomes little more than a guess. Doesn't negate your original point that Drinan is likely to be quite a cheap option. * Except as an aggregate for the whole squad. |
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 16:08 - Jun 19 with 2754 views | HARRY10 |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:10 - Jun 19 by WestStanderLaLaLa | Do people actually believe these type of sites? |
yes, some are daft enough to though the question of why the club makes otherwise confidential contracts freely available does not seem to have entered their gullible heads |  | |  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 17:05 - Jun 19 with 2612 views | cressi |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 16:08 - Jun 19 by HARRY10 | yes, some are daft enough to though the question of why the club makes otherwise confidential contracts freely available does not seem to have entered their gullible heads |
Better to pay for extra bar staff with that 800 pounds at least they would be useful |  | |  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 18:05 - Jun 19 with 2515 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 16:00 - Jun 19 by BryanPlug | [content removed at owner's request] |
Indeed and about 10% of it is accurate. The figures on the site are incomplete and clearly wrong. I am sure there is a balance sheet somewhere that will give the total wage bill and that probably differs from this site. |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 18:14 - Jun 19 with 2487 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 11:37 - Jun 19 by BryanPlug | [content removed at owner's request] |
What do you think each of those mean? - Team/player press releases = press speculation. - Confirmed by widely circulate articles from top tier publications = media speculation still - Industry experts & team insiders = people who have worked in football taking a guess - Accurately and reliably sourced encyclopedias [sic] & databases = the sort of thing a student who was supposed to supply references to a report writes when they haven't bothered doing any proper research. Please link me one encyclopaedia or database that gives any of our player's wages. |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 18:55 - Jun 19 with 2366 views | BryanPlug |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 18:05 - Jun 19 by Nthsuffolkblue | Indeed and about 10% of it is accurate. The figures on the site are incomplete and clearly wrong. I am sure there is a balance sheet somewhere that will give the total wage bill and that probably differs from this site. |
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 18:58 - Jun 19 with 2340 views | SpruceMoose |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 18:55 - Jun 19 by BryanPlug | [content removed at owner's request] |
The drink is talking here I think. |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | Poll: | Selectamod |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 19:07 - Jun 19 with 2308 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 18:55 - Jun 19 by BryanPlug | [content removed at owner's request] |
Just curious why anyone would believe anything that is so obviously speculation supported with spurious vague statements. How much was Parrott on? Why are his wages not on there? What is the club's total wage bill on any accounts that are in the public domain and do these match up? Why, do you think, Nsiala was given higher wages than the rest of the squad? Why do you think Kenlock and Lankester were given contracts on higher wages than Jackson? There is too much that is clearly wrong within an article that has no credibility either. |  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 19:19 - Jun 19 with 2277 views | chrismakin |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 19:07 - Jun 19 by Nthsuffolkblue | Just curious why anyone would believe anything that is so obviously speculation supported with spurious vague statements. How much was Parrott on? Why are his wages not on there? What is the club's total wage bill on any accounts that are in the public domain and do these match up? Why, do you think, Nsiala was given higher wages than the rest of the squad? Why do you think Kenlock and Lankester were given contracts on higher wages than Jackson? There is too much that is clearly wrong within an article that has no credibility either. |
Just to play devils advocate here, now not saying each salary is 100% accurate But what are the timings of the contracts? for example Nsiala, he signed his following hurst when he came to us in the champ... didn't some of our side sign extensions when we got relegated or the season after which then included a reduction in the new contract. Jackson, signed from league 2 - non hurst side, so probably wouldn't have been on that high a wage - possibly... I don't think they are spot on salaries, but some of the differences between who gets what could be explained maybe by timing of extensions etc?? league they came from? I think Bennets inclusion as the only loanee is probably as his salary has been well known for a while - not sure where from mind you. [Post edited 19 Jun 2021 19:23]
|  |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 19:42 - Jun 19 with 2220 views | SpruceMoose |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 19:19 - Jun 19 by chrismakin | Just to play devils advocate here, now not saying each salary is 100% accurate But what are the timings of the contracts? for example Nsiala, he signed his following hurst when he came to us in the champ... didn't some of our side sign extensions when we got relegated or the season after which then included a reduction in the new contract. Jackson, signed from league 2 - non hurst side, so probably wouldn't have been on that high a wage - possibly... I don't think they are spot on salaries, but some of the differences between who gets what could be explained maybe by timing of extensions etc?? league they came from? I think Bennets inclusion as the only loanee is probably as his salary has been well known for a while - not sure where from mind you. [Post edited 19 Jun 2021 19:23]
|
No. |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | Poll: | Selectamod |
|  |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 19:51 - Jun 19 with 2179 views | StokieBlue |
Now it makes more sense why we are keeping Drinan on 19:19 - Jun 19 by chrismakin | Just to play devils advocate here, now not saying each salary is 100% accurate But what are the timings of the contracts? for example Nsiala, he signed his following hurst when he came to us in the champ... didn't some of our side sign extensions when we got relegated or the season after which then included a reduction in the new contract. Jackson, signed from league 2 - non hurst side, so probably wouldn't have been on that high a wage - possibly... I don't think they are spot on salaries, but some of the differences between who gets what could be explained maybe by timing of extensions etc?? league they came from? I think Bennets inclusion as the only loanee is probably as his salary has been well known for a while - not sure where from mind you. [Post edited 19 Jun 2021 19:23]
|
It's clearly total guesswork given the contracts are confidential between the parties. You'll get analysis paralysis if you keep over-analysing anything you can get your hands on about ITFC. SB |  | |  |
| |