| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! 08:36 - Jan 26 with 2291 views | Wallingford_Boy |
But please, never let him wear a Town shirt ever again! |  |
| |  |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:38 - Jan 26 with 1857 views | EdwardStone |
He did put in a lovely cross....allegedly
It was in the first half |  | | |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:40 - Jan 26 with 1840 views | thebooks |
Thought he played OK — got in behind a few times, linked up pretty well 🤷ðŸ»â€â™‚ï¸ |  | | |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:44 - Jan 26 with 1801 views | wkj |
He had a fair game last night, he didn't dazzle - but he was instrumental in the move that got the first goal. Nowhere near the £3m we wasted on him, but that's hardly Jackson's fault for accepting. |  |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:47 - Jan 26 with 1797 views | BiGDonnie |
Ha, I actually thought he was ok last night. Chased the ball well and put defenders under pressure. I'd still sell him though. |  |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:48 - Jan 26 with 1791 views | StochesStotasBlewe |
We won.
2-0.
Jackson was a cog in the wheel of the team that won 2-0.
By all accounts he ran his nuts off.
He is our player atm.
There appears to be a group of fans that last night were/are on Jacksons back from when the team was announced right until the present.
He's admittedly not the best striker at the club, but he's wearing the Ipswich shirt in a winning team.
Give the guy a break. |  |
| We have no village green, or a shop.
It's very, very quiet.
I can walk to the pub. |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:49 - Jan 26 with 1778 views | hype313 |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:47 - Jan 26 by BiGDonnie |
Ha, I actually thought he was ok last night. Chased the ball well and put defenders under pressure. I'd still sell him though. |
Yep, he wasn't bad last night, if offers come then I'm sure we would look to move him on, but if not then he's not a bad body to have around the place going into the tail end of the season, think he would be better used coming on with 20 to stretch tiring defenders. |  |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:50 - Jan 26 with 1756 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
He certainly wasn't the worst player on the pitch! |  | | |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:56 - Jan 26 with 1708 views | SaleAway |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:50 - Jan 26 by abracaDOBRA_ |
He certainly wasn't the worst player on the pitch! |
wasn't even the worst forward on the pitch |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:57 - Jan 26 with 1680 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:48 - Jan 26 by StochesStotasBlewe |
We won.
2-0.
Jackson was a cog in the wheel of the team that won 2-0.
By all accounts he ran his nuts off.
He is our player atm.
There appears to be a group of fans that last night were/are on Jacksons back from when the team was announced right until the present.
He's admittedly not the best striker at the club, but he's wearing the Ipswich shirt in a winning team.
Give the guy a break. |
The Toto fan club moves in mysterious ways. |  |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:59 - Jan 26 with 1651 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
I very much doubt that was the reason. |  |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:00 - Jan 26 with 1627 views | ChateauWines |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:48 - Jan 26 by StochesStotasBlewe |
We won.
2-0.
Jackson was a cog in the wheel of the team that won 2-0.
By all accounts he ran his nuts off.
He is our player atm.
There appears to be a group of fans that last night were/are on Jacksons back from when the team was announced right until the present.
He's admittedly not the best striker at the club, but he's wearing the Ipswich shirt in a winning team.
Give the guy a break. |
Was in corner last night and 3 muppets behind me constantly telling Jackson he was fxxking shxt. Brilliant support lol. When Jackson and Norwood first signed they were scoring for fun and we were flying. Then Lambert split them up. Neither are a line striker. They combined well for opening goal which was desperately needed. We played him because our player. | |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:03 - Jan 26 with 1593 views | Mookamoo |
McKenna did say he got his chance due to the work he was putting in during training. No reason to suggest otherwise.
Also says a lot for Pigott. |  | | |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:06 - Jan 26 with 1572 views | Darth_Koont |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:40 - Jan 26 by thebooks |
Thought he played OK — got in behind a few times, linked up pretty well 🤷ðŸ»â€â™‚ï¸ |
Same here.
Thought his pace and movement made us fairly threatening down the left for once. Certain stuff didn’t come off but his injection of pace down the left and quick ball inside to Norwood was a major part in Burns’s first goal. |  |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:19 - Jan 26 with 1449 views | jayessess |
McKenna said he was in the side because he'd impressed in training. I did wonder how Pigott or Edwards didn't get the spot if we're rotating the front 3, but maybe we specifically wanted something in the middle between a striker and a winger?
From what's actually been said I think it's far from certain he's going anywhere. |  |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:23 - Jan 26 with 1420 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:59 - Jan 26 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I very much doubt that was the reason. |
Really?!?! | |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:27 - Jan 26 with 1387 views | jayessess |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:23 - Jan 26 by Wallingford_Boy |
Really?!?! |
You genuinely think McKenna would pick a player in a competitive league away game, against a side that have lost at home twice all season, "to put him in the shop window". Behave. | |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:27 - Jan 26 with 1380 views | LeoMuff |
Thought he was ok, as others have said not the worst on the pitch,clearly picked for a plan to pull off and overload the left to use his pace, tbf it worked for the first goal.
I would definitely offload him if someone is interested. |  |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:31 - Jan 26 with 1338 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:27 - Jan 26 by jayessess |
You genuinely think McKenna would pick a player in a competitive league away game, against a side that have lost at home twice all season, "to put him in the shop window". Behave. |
Against that team, I could have started and we still win.
He will be sold this week I reckon.
My god I hope so. | |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:32 - Jan 26 with 1334 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:27 - Jan 26 by jayessess |
You genuinely think McKenna would pick a player in a competitive league away game, against a side that have lost at home twice all season, "to put him in the shop window". Behave. |
btw nobody in the league has won fewer games at home than Wimbledon.
They are awful. | |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 10:26 - Jan 26 with 1205 views | SaleAway |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 09:32 - Jan 26 by Wallingford_Boy |
btw nobody in the league has won fewer games at home than Wimbledon.
They are awful. |
on the flip side, before last night, only Wigan and Plymouth had gone there and won.. they are hard to beat at home, and we did it with a much changed team. | |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 10:38 - Jan 26 with 1129 views | MerseyBlue |
He was pretty poor for the majority of the game. That said he deserves credit for one pretty good ball into the box in the first half, and the pass to Norwood before the first goal. I haven't ever rated him but I was optimistic we might see a change from him yesterday. He seemed to be pleased with his involvement in the goal but that was about the strength of his enthusiasm. He's a frustrating player to watch.
Other than that though he is so static, and doesn't seem to react to the play around him. Contrast that with Burns or Bakinson and how they moved and read the game (particularly in the first half) and he looked like the obvious weak link. I remember when people used to say Jackson was quick. Well his footballing brain certainly isn't, and he very rarely moves with enough purpose to determine if he is actually pacy on the pitch.
We won and he played a part, so definitely a better performance from him for us. I won't miss him when he goes though. |  |
| "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." | | Poll: | Who will be the winner? |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 11:22 - Jan 26 with 1012 views | DJR |
I thought he did very well last night, and in my view was the pick of the three starting forward players. I think there is a player there, and McKenna clearly feels the same. He may not be here for the long term but so long as he can do a job for us, I just wish people would keep off his back. |  | | |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 11:25 - Jan 26 with 991 views | wkj |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 11:22 - Jan 26 by DJR |
I thought he did very well last night, and in my view was the pick of the three starting forward players. I think there is a player there, and McKenna clearly feels the same. He may not be here for the long term but so long as he can do a job for us, I just wish people would keep off his back. |
I agree. Jackson has never been shy on the effort front. He just didn't seem to have what we needed in a 1 striker formation. Last night he seemed to be instructed to play out wide, and he actually did pretty well there.
I believe his job last night was to pull the backline out of shape more than attacking the goal . If that was the case, he nailed it. | |
| |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 11:34 - Jan 26 with 969 views | noggin |
| Assume Jacko started last night so that he could be in the shop window?! on 08:56 - Jan 26 by SaleAway |
wasn't even the worst forward on the pitch |
Not even the worst Ipswich forward on the pitch. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
