| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 19:21 - Jan 4 with 5219 views | BloomBlue |
The way Brighton have been slowly slipping down the league, who knows.... |  | |  |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 19:40 - Jan 4 with 4989 views | berkstractorboy |
Where does it suggest he might not be a target of ours? |  | | |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:00 - Jan 4 with 4786 views | NeverSayDie |
I didn’t read the article, but I noticed that the BHA manager, a couple of days ago, confirmed that Ferguson was injured, no idea of the extent of the injury, but sadly we can’t afford another project right now, we need fit bodies. |  | | |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:03 - Jan 4 with 4708 views | FrimleyBlue |
Ignore. Was thinking of doak. Or philogene. Someone else other than the one I put! [Post edited 4 Jan 22:23]
|  |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:06 - Jan 4 with 4674 views | NeedhamChris |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:03 - Jan 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Ignore. Was thinking of doak. Or philogene. Someone else other than the one I put! [Post edited 4 Jan 22:23]
|
Did you miss the bit where Godfrey plays for Atalanta in Italy? | |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:07 - Jan 4 with 4669 views | Parky |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:03 - Jan 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Ignore. Was thinking of doak. Or philogene. Someone else other than the one I put! [Post edited 4 Jan 22:23]
|
Why? | | | |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:08 - Jan 4 with 4642 views | football |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:03 - Jan 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Ignore. Was thinking of doak. Or philogene. Someone else other than the one I put! [Post edited 4 Jan 22:23]
|
He is based abroad so doesn't count as English loans - at the moment we only have Phillips and can have two | | | |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:14 - Jan 4 with 4541 views | StokieBlue |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:03 - Jan 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Ignore. Was thinking of doak. Or philogene. Someone else other than the one I put! [Post edited 4 Jan 22:23]
|
Care to show your working?
I know you claim not to be negative but you are relentlessly negative.
You're either doing it on purpose or are just constantly unwilling to do any research at all before posting. Far from the first time you've jumped in without actually checking the facts.
SB |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:18 - Jan 4 with 4457 views | Blooos |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:14 - Jan 4 by StokieBlue |
Care to show your working?
I know you claim not to be negative but you are relentlessly negative.
You're either doing it on purpose or are just constantly unwilling to do any research at all before posting. Far from the first time you've jumped in without actually checking the facts.
SB |
Whenever his posts pop up can tell he never goes to any of our games or watches any football. [Post edited 4 Jan 20:21]
| | | |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:32 - Jan 4 with 4209 views | bournemouthblue |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:06 - Jan 4 by NeedhamChris |
Did you miss the bit where Godfrey plays for Atalanta in Italy? |
I made the same mistake when he was mentioned a while back
His move to Atalanta totally passed me by |  |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:06 - Jan 4 with 3826 views | NeedhamChris |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:14 - Jan 4 by StokieBlue |
Care to show your working?
I know you claim not to be negative but you are relentlessly negative.
You're either doing it on purpose or are just constantly unwilling to do any research at all before posting. Far from the first time you've jumped in without actually checking the facts.
SB |
It's quite obvious he made a mistake, one that me and a couple of others have politely called him out for - without bringing up historic complaints.
This response is unnecessary though - you come across as a petty bully who became overcome with excitement at the chance to have another pop at this poster based on past posts.
I've never been one of the better and balanced posters on here, but you have - the demise to this level of pettiness is sad to see. | |
| |
| You give him too much credit.... on 21:08 - Jan 4 with 3777 views | Bloots |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:06 - Jan 4 by NeedhamChris |
It's quite obvious he made a mistake, one that me and a couple of others have politely called him out for - without bringing up historic complaints.
This response is unnecessary though - you come across as a petty bully who became overcome with excitement at the chance to have another pop at this poster based on past posts.
I've never been one of the better and balanced posters on here, but you have - the demise to this level of pettiness is sad to see. |
....he's been doing this routine for years. |  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:09 - Jan 4 with 3778 views | Illinoisblue |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:18 - Jan 4 by Blooos |
Whenever his posts pop up can tell he never goes to any of our games or watches any football. [Post edited 4 Jan 20:21]
|
SB or Frimmers? |  |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:09 - Jan 4 with 3763 views | itfc_jg |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:06 - Jan 4 by NeedhamChris |
It's quite obvious he made a mistake, one that me and a couple of others have politely called him out for - without bringing up historic complaints.
This response is unnecessary though - you come across as a petty bully who became overcome with excitement at the chance to have another pop at this poster based on past posts.
I've never been one of the better and balanced posters on here, but you have - the demise to this level of pettiness is sad to see. |
Totally agree mate, shame how these sorts of comments are becoming a regularity :/ | | | |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:21 - Jan 4 with 3601 views | SitfcB |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:06 - Jan 4 by NeedhamChris |
It's quite obvious he made a mistake, one that me and a couple of others have politely called him out for - without bringing up historic complaints.
This response is unnecessary though - you come across as a petty bully who became overcome with excitement at the chance to have another pop at this poster based on past posts.
I've never been one of the better and balanced posters on here, but you have - the demise to this level of pettiness is sad to see. |
It’s been mentioned on here a lot over the last few days though. |  |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:24 - Jan 4 with 3544 views | SitfcB |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:09 - Jan 4 by Illinoisblue |
SB or Frimmers? |
Back of the net. | |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:25 - Jan 4 with 3532 views | NeedhamChris |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:21 - Jan 4 by SitfcB |
It’s been mentioned on here a lot over the last few days though. |
Don't disagree - it's fine to call him out.
It's the baiting based on the historic stuff that's just pointless, but there are a couple of posters who prefer to stroke their own egos and intellect - and feel obliged to get stuck in.
It's the same play on repeat over and over again. | |
| |
| If it was any other poster.... on 21:29 - Jan 4 with 3471 views | Bloots |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:21 - Jan 4 by SitfcB |
It’s been mentioned on here a lot over the last few days though. |
....old Stokie wouldn't even comment.
You know that really. | |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:37 - Jan 4 with 3342 views | Illinoisblue |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:24 - Jan 4 by SitfcB |
Back of the net. |
It’s sat up for me nicely and I’ve just tucked it in. Delighted to be on the scoresheet | |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:52 - Jan 4 with 3142 views | StokieBlue |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:25 - Jan 4 by NeedhamChris |
Don't disagree - it's fine to call him out.
It's the baiting based on the historic stuff that's just pointless, but there are a couple of posters who prefer to stroke their own egos and intellect - and feel obliged to get stuck in.
It's the same play on repeat over and over again. |
Thanks for your input.
You've also got quirks where you often post about McKenna then have to roll it back later. Why do you continue to do that but feel you can take the moral stance and criticise other posters?
You call it a mistake but it's in every article, he knows exactly what he's doing
SB | |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:53 - Jan 4 with 3114 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
They might come to regret loaning him out.
Surely he could fill a role with them? |  |
| |
| If it was any other poster.... on 21:54 - Jan 4 with 3101 views | StokieBlue |
| If it was any other poster.... on 21:29 - Jan 4 by Bloots |
....old Stokie wouldn't even comment.
You know that really. |
Must be a slow evening, been a while since you've turned your pathetic posting in my direction.
Fill your bloots.
SB [Post edited 4 Jan 21:55]
| |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:55 - Jan 4 with 3082 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:06 - Jan 4 by NeedhamChris |
Did you miss the bit where Godfrey plays for Atalanta in Italy? |
Oh yeah lol. Sorry I was thinking of doak and Liverpool. | |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:57 - Jan 4 with 3049 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 20:14 - Jan 4 by StokieBlue |
Care to show your working?
I know you claim not to be negative but you are relentlessly negative.
You're either doing it on purpose or are just constantly unwilling to do any research at all before posting. Far from the first time you've jumped in without actually checking the facts.
SB |
Calm down sb. Actually it wasn't even doak I was thinking of. Must have been philiogene as I remember discussing his loan the other day and thst if we loaned him it would mean not getting Evans.
So no. Not negative. Not baiting anyone. Just a genuine mistake. Apologies it caused you much anger and disturbed your evening. [Post edited 4 Jan 22:00]
| |
| |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 22:01 - Jan 4 with 2989 views | StokieBlue |
| Would appear that we are not in for an Evan loan on 21:57 - Jan 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Calm down sb. Actually it wasn't even doak I was thinking of. Must have been philiogene as I remember discussing his loan the other day and thst if we loaned him it would mean not getting Evans.
So no. Not negative. Not baiting anyone. Just a genuine mistake. Apologies it caused you much anger and disturbed your evening. [Post edited 4 Jan 22:00]
|
As you say, that's a permanent transfer though so it still doesn't make sense.
You say it's a genuine mistake so I apologise for saying it was deliberate but to me it's hard to internally reconcile how you can get the two things confused given how much you read and know about Town and the transfer market. You're knowledgeable on the subject.
SB [Post edited 4 Jan 22:02]
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
