| The new norm appears to be 10:57 - Jun 19 with 3612 views | Bluefish |
anti anti racism
What a world 🌎 |  |
| |  |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:27 - Jun 19 with 1820 views | StokieBlue |
Where did the other thread go?
No idea what happened later but that should have been left for the total blub that it was.
I also posted a rather excellent post which the majority will now be denied from seeing.
Maybe have the rest of the day off?
SB |  | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:29 - Jun 19 with 1794 views | Kieran_Knows |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:27 - Jun 19 by StokieBlue |
Where did the other thread go?
No idea what happened later but that should have been left for the total blub that it was.
I also posted a rather excellent post which the majority will now be denied from seeing.
Maybe have the rest of the day off?
SB |
I had just clicked to read page 4 and I was taken back to the forum page. Still, the 3 pages that I did read were eye opening. Just needed Bluebadger to way in with his Beattie 'joke' and it would've topped it off.
What a forum.
 |  |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:29 - Jun 19 with 1793 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:27 - Jun 19 by StokieBlue |
Where did the other thread go?
No idea what happened later but that should have been left for the total blub that it was.
I also posted a rather excellent post which the majority will now be denied from seeing.
Maybe have the rest of the day off?
SB |
Sorry for caring. I will go away as you have told me to | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:30 - Jun 19 with 1791 views | Libero |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:27 - Jun 19 by StokieBlue |
Where did the other thread go?
No idea what happened later but that should have been left for the total blub that it was.
I also posted a rather excellent post which the majority will now be denied from seeing.
Maybe have the rest of the day off?
SB |
I believe I was the last post on it and I didn't see anything abuse worthy other than Blubbers calling me a "moron" which didn't bother me in the slightest.
It's probably for the best it was pulled though, Blubbers position as governor would have been at risk if it was still available for public consumption. |  | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:30 - Jun 19 with 1782 views | Swansea_Blue |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:29 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
Sorry for caring. I will go away as you have told me to |
Nothing wrong with the caring. It was the sharing wot dunnit. |  |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:37 - Jun 19 with 1749 views | PhilTWTD |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:27 - Jun 19 by StokieBlue |
Where did the other thread go?
No idea what happened later but that should have been left for the total blub that it was.
I also posted a rather excellent post which the majority will now be denied from seeing.
Maybe have the rest of the day off?
SB |
Bluefish asked me to remove it. |  | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:39 - Jun 19 with 1733 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:30 - Jun 19 by Libero |
I believe I was the last post on it and I didn't see anything abuse worthy other than Blubbers calling me a "moron" which didn't bother me in the slightest.
It's probably for the best it was pulled though, Blubbers position as governor would have been at risk if it was still available for public consumption. |
The modern way is to throw about complaints with comments like ofsted or gdpr with no context to whether they apply or the rules behind them. I am sorry I offended you with your interpretation of what the rules should be. Perhaps you could let me know where the gdpr breach is or apologise or just let it go | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The new norm appears to be on 11:40 - Jun 19 with 1733 views | Libero |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:37 - Jun 19 by PhilTWTD |
Bluefish asked me to remove it. |
Wise move, despite what Blubbers saying that it was "public knowledge" he would have at the very least have broken the School's social media policy, they would have been well within their right to suspend him from duty and investigate.
Potential GDPR and Safeguarding issue too. | | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:41 - Jun 19 with 1717 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:37 - Jun 19 by PhilTWTD |
Bluefish asked me to remove it. |
Probably sensible on his part. |  |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:41 - Jun 19 with 1716 views | footers |
You cheeky monkey. |  |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:41 - Jun 19 with 1709 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:40 - Jun 19 by Libero |
Wise move, despite what Blubbers saying that it was "public knowledge" he would have at the very least have broken the School's social media policy, they would have been well within their right to suspend him from duty and investigate.
Potential GDPR and Safeguarding issue too. |
Indeed. | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:41 - Jun 19 with 1711 views | Pinewoodblue |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:30 - Jun 19 by Libero |
I believe I was the last post on it and I didn't see anything abuse worthy other than Blubbers calling me a "moron" which didn't bother me in the slightest.
It's probably for the best it was pulled though, Blubbers position as governor would have been at risk if it was still available for public consumption. |
Agreed hopefully no one involved in the incident was identifiable. If they were think there is a school due to be looking for a new governor.
A most unwise “look at me” post. |  |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:42 - Jun 19 with 1719 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:37 - Jun 19 by PhilTWTD |
Bluefish asked me to remove it. |
I normally take anything that is thrown at me on here which I think most would agree is at the higher end of the twtd spectrum but as I have already seen posters openly requesting and sharing my photo on the site in the past week i didn't trust that one of you wouldn't be weird enough to start looking me up further | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:42 - Jun 19 with 1700 views | Libero |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:39 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
The modern way is to throw about complaints with comments like ofsted or gdpr with no context to whether they apply or the rules behind them. I am sorry I offended you with your interpretation of what the rules should be. Perhaps you could let me know where the gdpr breach is or apologise or just let it go |
No offence was caused, I was more concerned that you'd just shafted yourself. I've worked in School environments and seen people face disciplinary for exactly the kind of post you made.
I'm glad you saw sense and asked Phil to remove the thread, would have been a shame for you to suffer a real life consequence for a single daft post on a football forum. | | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:43 - Jun 19 with 1695 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:41 - Jun 19 by Pinewoodblue |
Agreed hopefully no one involved in the incident was identifiable. If they were think there is a school due to be looking for a new governor.
A most unwise “look at me” post. |
I think it was obvious to everyone on the site the names of the pupils involved and their addresses. It is just a shame that it meant pulling your comment that people receiving racial abuse are not victims | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:44 - Jun 19 with 1684 views | GlasgowBlue |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:42 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
I normally take anything that is thrown at me on here which I think most would agree is at the higher end of the twtd spectrum but as I have already seen posters openly requesting and sharing my photo on the site in the past week i didn't trust that one of you wouldn't be weird enough to start looking me up further |
Who did this? |  |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:45 - Jun 19 with 1682 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:40 - Jun 19 by Libero |
Wise move, despite what Blubbers saying that it was "public knowledge" he would have at the very least have broken the School's social media policy, they would have been well within their right to suspend him from duty and investigate.
Potential GDPR and Safeguarding issue too. |
you keep saying gdpr. Do you understand that gdpr is about protected personal information and none was used. Social media policy is highly probable because it is such a catch all policy but to keep quoting gdpr shows that you don't understand it | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:46 - Jun 19 with 1674 views | StokieBlue |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:43 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
I think it was obvious to everyone on the site the names of the pupils involved and their addresses. It is just a shame that it meant pulling your comment that people receiving racial abuse are not victims |
You posted some fairly unpleasant stuff on there yourself which you should probably be happy isn't there for the masses to see.
SB | | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:47 - Jun 19 with 1667 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:44 - Jun 19 by GlasgowBlue |
Who did this? |
Multiple users of the forum openly did, they didn't remotely try and hide it | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:49 - Jun 19 with 1652 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:46 - Jun 19 by StokieBlue |
You posted some fairly unpleasant stuff on there yourself which you should probably be happy isn't there for the masses to see.
SB |
What about the bit where you admitted to kicking puppies and touching goats?
Obviously that didn't happen either but I thought I'd join in the nonsense | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:50 - Jun 19 with 1637 views | StokieBlue |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:49 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
What about the bit where you admitted to kicking puppies and touching goats?
Obviously that didn't happen either but I thought I'd join in the nonsense |
So you didn't call sparks Yaxley-Lennon for no reason then?
SB [Post edited 19 Jun 2020 11:51]
| | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:52 - Jun 19 with 1625 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:50 - Jun 19 by StokieBlue |
So you didn't call sparks Yaxley-Lennon for no reason then?
SB [Post edited 19 Jun 2020 11:51]
|
sorry I thought you were capable enough to understand a tongue in cheek comment. Top work for being offended by proxy | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:52 - Jun 19 with 1624 views | sparks |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:49 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
What about the bit where you admitted to kicking puppies and touching goats?
Obviously that didn't happen either but I thought I'd join in the nonsense |
You called me "Stephen Yaxley-Lennon" and then went on to make general accusations that people were playing down racism when they were plainly not doing anything of the sort... |  |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:52 - Jun 19 with 1622 views | footers |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:50 - Jun 19 by StokieBlue |
So you didn't call sparks Yaxley-Lennon for no reason then?
SB [Post edited 19 Jun 2020 11:51]
|
I prefer the unedited version, SB. A very apt description! | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
