Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird 12:28 - Jul 18 with 4971 viewsIllinoisblue

Weirder still to fundraise for it. Usually see gofundme and just giving pages raising money for cancer patients or funeral expenses. New Town kit doesn’t seem quite as important. Each to their own I guess.

https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/kits4kids-ITFC?utm_id=66&utm_term=GV

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

3
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 12:30 - Jul 18 with 4108 viewsNedPlimpton

So many questions about this

But most importantly....

Who is he and how is he deciding who gets a town kit?
0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 12:36 - Jul 18 with 4061 viewsIllinoisblue

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 12:30 - Jul 18 by NedPlimpton

So many questions about this

But most importantly....

Who is he and how is he deciding who gets a town kit?


This is the bloke behind it.


62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 12:44 - Jul 18 with 3975 viewsSwansea_Blue

They’re certainly not a necessity. However, the concept could be no different than people buying or donating Christmas presents for kids who’ve got nothing. It all depends on the detail. How are people means tested? How’s he handling data? Ethically, that must be a minefield. Most Xmas donations are done through accountable organisations. Who’s holding him to account? Etc., etc.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

3
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 12:47 - Jul 18 with 3932 viewsNedPlimpton

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 12:44 - Jul 18 by Swansea_Blue

They’re certainly not a necessity. However, the concept could be no different than people buying or donating Christmas presents for kids who’ve got nothing. It all depends on the detail. How are people means tested? How’s he handling data? Ethically, that must be a minefield. Most Xmas donations are done through accountable organisations. Who’s holding him to account? Etc., etc.


Also, not saying this guy is a crook, but what's to stop someone else seeing this and doing something similar only to keep the money to themselves or just buy shirts for their friends and family

This is a nice idea but terribly executed
1
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 12:48 - Jul 18 with 3909 views_clive_baker_

4
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 13:39 - Jul 18 with 3651 viewsIllinoisblue

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 12:44 - Jul 18 by Swansea_Blue

They’re certainly not a necessity. However, the concept could be no different than people buying or donating Christmas presents for kids who’ve got nothing. It all depends on the detail. How are people means tested? How’s he handling data? Ethically, that must be a minefield. Most Xmas donations are done through accountable organisations. Who’s holding him to account? Etc., etc.


A minefield indeed. And imagine if the bloke raising funds had just the day before said what a struggle it is to buy kits and tickets for his kids.

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

1
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 13:48 - Jul 18 with 3586 viewsSteve_M

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 13:39 - Jul 18 by Illinoisblue

A minefield indeed. And imagine if the bloke raising funds had just the day before said what a struggle it is to buy kits and tickets for his kids.


I'm surprised to see [redacted] supporting this.....

It's an odd campaign, to take your point further, who does decide which kids benefit from the generosity of other fans? It's very different to the campaign a few years back to give unused, and sellable, tickets to kids in the Town who would not get to go otherwise. That was properly targeted.

Poll: When are the squad numbers out?
Blog: Cycle of Hurt

3
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 13:56 - Jul 18 with 3534 viewsFrimleyBlue

So the fella moans about the cost of football including the kits
then set ups a page to make money to donate kits to people, which isn't means tested and no explanation on how people are chosen..

a niche perspective
Poll: We've had Kuqi v Pablo.. so Broadhead or Celina?
Blog: Marcus Evans Needs Our Support Not to Be Hounded Out

0
Login to get fewer ads

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 13:58 - Jul 18 with 3530 viewsZx1988

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 13:39 - Jul 18 by Illinoisblue

A minefield indeed. And imagine if the bloke raising funds had just the day before said what a struggle it is to buy kits and tickets for his kids.


On top of that, Cruncher himself is supporting/promoting it, so that's the absolute gold seal of legitimacy...

You ain't a beauty but, hey, you're alright.
Poll: Stone Island - immediate associations

0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 14:01 - Jul 18 with 3493 viewswkj

It is easy to be suspicious, but there is the possibility it is someone wanting a nice thing to do.

Come On England
Poll: Is the B word actually swearing? (Bob Locks)
Blog: The Identity Crisis of Modern Football

2
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 14:06 - Jul 18 with 3452 viewsblueasfook

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 13:48 - Jul 18 by Steve_M

I'm surprised to see [redacted] supporting this.....

It's an odd campaign, to take your point further, who does decide which kids benefit from the generosity of other fans? It's very different to the campaign a few years back to give unused, and sellable, tickets to kids in the Town who would not get to go otherwise. That was properly targeted.


Agree. It needs to be transparent and fairly done. I would not donate to this cause not knowing how the beneficiaries will be chosen. For all we know, it could be to kit out his own family and friends (I am sure that's not the case but by not being transparent you open yourself up to such suspicion). He'd be better off raising money and then giving to a children's charity who can buy and distribute the kit.

"Blueas is a great guy, one of the best." - Donald Trump
Poll: Should Frimmers be allowed back?

1
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 14:08 - Jul 18 with 3418 viewsReuser_is_God

I see that the Ipswich Bob Geldof is getting involved too.

Imagine my shock.

Evans out
Poll: Are Burgers the new Cheese?

6
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 14:53 - Jul 18 with 3249 viewsNedPlimpton

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 14:01 - Jul 18 by wkj

It is easy to be suspicious, but there is the possibility it is someone wanting a nice thing to do.


I'm sure that's the case. But there are legitimate child poverty charities based in Ipswich that might be able to support him with this. His first port of call (and anyone considering donating) should be to reach out to them with his idea. They might be able to set up a dedicated GoFundMe type page

Instead anyone who slides into his DMs with a sob story is potentially taking away a charitable donation from those who genuinely need it

Again, nice idea but terribly executed
0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 15:00 - Jul 18 with 3188 viewsITFCson

Completely made up numbers. Claiming an infant kit is £70. It’s not, it’s £48
1
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 15:08 - Jul 18 with 3115 viewsParsley

Better off donating to the ITFC Foundation
3
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 15:23 - Jul 18 with 3051 viewsBuhrer

That he says it isn't means tested, is discretionary at his nod..... actually makes me quite angry. £1000 could do a lot of real good. He should take all the money and give it to a proper charity, not his friends kids.
2
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 15:37 - Jul 18 with 2981 viewsJon_456

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 15:00 - Jul 18 by ITFCson

Completely made up numbers. Claiming an infant kit is £70. It’s not, it’s £48


If you add the badge, name and number it does total £68 in fairness.
[Post edited 18 Jul 2024 15:37]
0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 15:40 - Jul 18 with 2918 viewstractorboy1978

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 15:37 - Jul 18 by Jon_456

If you add the badge, name and number it does total £68 in fairness.
[Post edited 18 Jul 2024 15:37]


Yes and that is obviously essential.
0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 15:41 - Jul 18 with 2918 viewsitfcjoe

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 15:37 - Jul 18 by Jon_456

If you add the badge, name and number it does total £68 in fairness.
[Post edited 18 Jul 2024 15:37]


I've bought my kids kits from (literally) the day they were born, and spent far too much on them - but hard to see why an U6 would need one for the reasons in the justgiving, they are at an age where they aren't going to be mocked, or victimised for having an out of date kit

Can just about understand why some older children may need a new one if putting pressure on parents who can't afford to but it seems like something which is ripe for abuse.

A better idea would be trying to get people to donate older kits and distribute them rather than asking for cash

Poll: Club vs country? What would you choose
Blog: What is Going on With the Academy at Ipswich Town?

0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 16:18 - Jul 18 with 2774 viewstextbackup

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 12:36 - Jul 18 by Illinoisblue

This is the bloke behind it.



The same bloke crying over the cost of kits, memberships, pre season ticket costs and food at games?!

We’ll be good again... one day
Poll: How many home games do you get to a season

0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 16:27 - Jul 18 with 2723 viewsbluelagos

Rather than anyone insinuating it's a bit dubious, why not simply ask the bloke how he will decide who gets any kits?

The idea of helping out needy kids hardly makes him a wrongun - even if a lack of transparency does make people wonder how it will be administered.

Poll: This new lockdown poll - what you reckon?

0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 16:35 - Jul 18 with 2681 viewsBuhrer

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 16:27 - Jul 18 by bluelagos

Rather than anyone insinuating it's a bit dubious, why not simply ask the bloke how he will decide who gets any kits?

The idea of helping out needy kids hardly makes him a wrongun - even if a lack of transparency does make people wonder how it will be administered.


No insinuations. He says its not means tested and at his discretion. He can fack off.
0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 16:38 - Jul 18 with 2661 viewsblueasfook

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 16:35 - Jul 18 by Buhrer

No insinuations. He says its not means tested and at his discretion. He can fack off.


Not only that. If it was done through a proper charity, I dare say the club would help out and do the kit at a reduced price. if it's just some Joe from the street then I doubt they'll be so forthcoming.

"Blueas is a great guy, one of the best." - Donald Trump
Poll: Should Frimmers be allowed back?

1
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 16:38 - Jul 18 with 2652 viewsReus30

Sod it, I will say it.

Are these just kits for his kids?

People do brilliant things for charity but normally when they do, they provide a clear beneficiary whereas that link does not.
0
Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 16:38 - Jul 18 with 2649 viewsZx1988

Treating a new football kit as a necessity is a bit weird on 16:35 - Jul 18 by Buhrer

No insinuations. He says its not means tested and at his discretion. He can fack off.


Far too much wiggle room for him to spend all the money on those known to him, whilst keeping within his 'distribution policy'.

You ain't a beauty but, hey, you're alright.
Poll: Stone Island - immediate associations

1




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025