By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Did I? Or is this the second time you've claimed I said something I didn't?
Odd how he pops up as soon as the word Corbyn is typed.
Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country."
Most people given the opportunity to design their perfect immigration system would be in the middle of the extremes though surely? A common sense immigration policy combined with plenty of opportunity for refugees to be welcomed. Would we also throw out the people who want the borders thrown open and free movement in and out for all? Or is their extreme nicer and therefore better?
Even i'm not sure what i'm arguing for here, other than their right to be bellends and the fact we can't just selectively choose which people aren't allowed to hold legal opinions.
Even when on the receiving end of racial abuse MrsNewcy says these people have the right to have such an opinion, even when they are telling her to F off back to her own country.
Personally I think that having such an opinion makes them unfit to be in public.
I’m not a good man, and am happy to respond to such people in a physical manner. If that’s the only way I can intimidate them as they do to others then it is just.
I also realise that makes me no better than those bellends that shouted at the Mogg children.
Please, keep your Momentuming to Official Glassers Endorsed Corbyn Threads.
The hypocrisy of your ignorant shouting-down of anyone with a different opinion to you with nothing more than sh1t jokes and avoidance of the discussion is embarrassing.
The hypocrisy of your ignorant shouting-down of anyone with a different opinion to you with nothing more than sh1t jokes and avoidance of the discussion is embarrassing.
Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country."
Did I? Or is this the second time you've claimed I said something I didn't?
Yes. Page 1:
“The next election will cause chaos. Especially if Corbyn loses. The radical element who think he has the right to power regardless of the result will riot if he's beaten. Especially if it's by BJ, Rees-Mogg or similar.
It could quickly get a lot worse.“
That was in response to somebody saying the referendum really did open Pandora’s box - a point clearly about how nuts these people are. You linked it to Corbyn and said it would be worse if he lost the next GE.
“The next election will cause chaos. Especially if Corbyn loses. The radical element who think he has the right to power regardless of the result will riot if he's beaten. Especially if it's by BJ, Rees-Mogg or similar.
It could quickly get a lot worse.“
That was in response to somebody saying the referendum really did open Pandora’s box - a point clearly about how nuts these people are. You linked it to Corbyn and said it would be worse if he lost the next GE.
So yes, you made out this was Corbyn’s Britain.
The Corbyn's Britain bit is your spin. I said the next election will cause chaos, especially if he loses. Also if he wins. The other side won't accept that result either.
I don't think this incident is Corbyn's Britain. I think it's one gobsh1te, apparently a 'lifelong anarchist' who needs to grow up.
Even when on the receiving end of racial abuse MrsNewcy says these people have the right to have such an opinion, even when they are telling her to F off back to her own country.
Personally I think that having such an opinion makes them unfit to be in public.
I’m not a good man, and am happy to respond to such people in a physical manner. If that’s the only way I can intimidate them as they do to others then it is just.
I also realise that makes me no better than those bellends that shouted at the Mogg children.
I think it's entirely different when people attack someone specifically. Like the Rees-Mogg incident, who would care if they stood in the middle of London with a banner against the rich? It's the targeting which is wrong.
The Corbyn's Britain bit is your spin. I said the next election will cause chaos, especially if he loses. Also if he wins. The other side won't accept that result either.
I don't think this incident is Corbyn's Britain. I think it's one gobsh1te, apparently a 'lifelong anarchist' who needs to grow up.
Okay, glad you’ve cleared that up.
Sorry for assuming that your Corbyn’s rioting radicals comment had something to do with this thread.
No, they wouldn't have a clue that was intended to be hostile just by looking at it.
Sorry let me try to understand your point. It looks hostile? They come from an area where people get beheaded, young children have guns. bombs going off everywhere, poison gas raining down everywhere but a poster looks hostile?
Yep, J2Blue made out that this was Corbyn’s Britain. Obviously the people behind this weird and pointless badgering of Mogg’s kids have nothing to do with Corbyn and even have a similar hatred for him:
FUCK LABOUR! FUCK CORBYN! WE ARE CLASS WAR! RED AND BLACK OKTOBER IS COMING TEN DAYS THT WILL SHAKE LONDON WE SALUTE THE HEROIC RUSSIANS pic.twitter.com/fVp2mnW76h
Well after watching it, having a fag and watching it again I think it really sums up a certain type of people, and the people that either condone it or can laugh about it can bed down in the same sty as far as I am concerned.
JRM is a religious man with religious beliefs - which personally I don't agree with, he is however entitled to them and has been shown again to be a mild mannered man in the face of provocation.
Better man than I Gunga Din. I, along with many others I am sure, would not have felt so restrained with my family being under such verbal attack in front of me.
Each to their own I suppose.
“Hello, I'm your MP. Actually I'm not. I'm your candidate. Gosh.”
Boris Johnson canvassing in Henley, 2005.
Even when on the receiving end of racial abuse MrsNewcy says these people have the right to have such an opinion, even when they are telling her to F off back to her own country.
Personally I think that having such an opinion makes them unfit to be in public.
I’m not a good man, and am happy to respond to such people in a physical manner. If that’s the only way I can intimidate them as they do to others then it is just.
I also realise that makes me no better than those bellends that shouted at the Mogg children.
Do you believe your wife feels that way due to rising above it/not being bothered or do you think there’s an element of social conditioning in play where that stuff has been so historically normalised she has to accept rights to such opinions?
Well after watching it, having a fag and watching it again I think it really sums up a certain type of people, and the people that either condone it or can laugh about it can bed down in the same sty as far as I am concerned.
JRM is a religious man with religious beliefs - which personally I don't agree with, he is however entitled to them and has been shown again to be a mild mannered man in the face of provocation.
Better man than I Gunga Din. I, along with many others I am sure, would not have felt so restrained with my family being under such verbal attack in front of me.
Each to their own I suppose.
Like you say, like or loathe, he handled it well.
And in the face of all that, all those cretins will have achieved, is to increase his popularity.
The hypocrisy of your ignorant shouting-down of anyone with a different opinion to you with nothing more than sh1t jokes and avoidance of the discussion is embarrassing.
Well after watching it, having a fag and watching it again I think it really sums up a certain type of people, and the people that either condone it or can laugh about it can bed down in the same sty as far as I am concerned.
JRM is a religious man with religious beliefs - which personally I don't agree with, he is however entitled to them and has been shown again to be a mild mannered man in the face of provocation.
Better man than I Gunga Din. I, along with many others I am sure, would not have felt so restrained with my family being under such verbal attack in front of me.
Each to their own I suppose.
I don't like violence and some could argue that volence is a form of ignorance which in this case would play right into the protagonists hands but, I would have lumped the fkr.
Well after watching it, having a fag and watching it again I think it really sums up a certain type of people, and the people that either condone it or can laugh about it can bed down in the same sty as far as I am concerned.
JRM is a religious man with religious beliefs - which personally I don't agree with, he is however entitled to them and has been shown again to be a mild mannered man in the face of provocation.
Better man than I Gunga Din. I, along with many others I am sure, would not have felt so restrained with my family being under such verbal attack in front of me.
Each to their own I suppose.
I would have got the old fk by the swallow pipe and shook him about a bit.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
