| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:33 - Jul 25 with 5837 views | hampstead_blue |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 20:37 - Jul 24 by Swansea_Blue |
I very much doubt he was asking for it (to paraphrase). From what I’ve heard about the incident he was disgustingly targeted by cowards.
I can see why people find him annoying, but I don’t understand why anyone would want to externalise any such feelings through violence. Stupid tvvats. |
I can see why people find him annoying, but I don’t understand why anyone would want to externalise any such feelings through violence. Stupid tvvats.
I agree.
He often does go out of his way to wind-up protesters. He may have been spotted by those who he has goaded before who wanted to have a pop back.
Doesn't make it right and it's not. |  |
| Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
| | Poll: | Best Blackpool goal |
|  |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:35 - Jul 25 with 5825 views | Herbivore |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:33 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
I can see why people find him annoying, but I don’t understand why anyone would want to externalise any such feelings through violence. Stupid tvvats.
I agree.
He often does go out of his way to wind-up protesters. He may have been spotted by those who he has goaded before who wanted to have a pop back.
Doesn't make it right and it's not. |
You've managed to both climb down and double down in in the same post, pretty standard for you. Take your hate elsewhere for a bit though, people are getting tired of it. |  |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:41 - Jul 25 with 5818 views | hampstead_blue |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 21:34 - Jul 24 by eastangliaisblue |
So you're sticking up for the racist football hooligan, and not the victim? |
Nope. Nor am I saying I would hurt him. Nor am I saying it's because he's on the left.
OMG people.
He's one of the most annoying people on the TV who actively goads those who protest him. Do you not think that by going out of his way to goad and taunt right wing men he is going to at some time come unstuck?
That is all I am saying.
He has made a habit out of goading that population. They are highly likely to stick on on him when they get the chance.
It's an observation FFS!
Blimey. I really do worry. Some posters here take every word as a statement of literal intent.
If I said 'go play with the traffic', would you accuse me of encouraging motoring carnage?
Take a break from being so fragile. You'll do yourself a mischief......this is for all those who've piled into my post. | |
| Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
| | Poll: | Best Blackpool goal |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:45 - Jul 25 with 5799 views | Herbivore |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:41 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
Nope. Nor am I saying I would hurt him. Nor am I saying it's because he's on the left.
OMG people.
He's one of the most annoying people on the TV who actively goads those who protest him. Do you not think that by going out of his way to goad and taunt right wing men he is going to at some time come unstuck?
That is all I am saying.
He has made a habit out of goading that population. They are highly likely to stick on on him when they get the chance.
It's an observation FFS!
Blimey. I really do worry. Some posters here take every word as a statement of literal intent.
If I said 'go play with the traffic', would you accuse me of encouraging motoring carnage?
Take a break from being so fragile. You'll do yourself a mischief......this is for all those who've piled into my post. |
Literally everyone thinks you're a jeb-end. There's a reason for that. | |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:46 - Jul 25 with 5803 views | footers |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:41 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
Nope. Nor am I saying I would hurt him. Nor am I saying it's because he's on the left.
OMG people.
He's one of the most annoying people on the TV who actively goads those who protest him. Do you not think that by going out of his way to goad and taunt right wing men he is going to at some time come unstuck?
That is all I am saying.
He has made a habit out of goading that population. They are highly likely to stick on on him when they get the chance.
It's an observation FFS!
Blimey. I really do worry. Some posters here take every word as a statement of literal intent.
If I said 'go play with the traffic', would you accuse me of encouraging motoring carnage?
Take a break from being so fragile. You'll do yourself a mischief......this is for all those who've piled into my post. |
You're basically saying he was asking for it.
I'll remember the stuff about goading the next time I see a Tory MP. Then, in your eyes at least, it would be justified to tvvat them.
You're unhinged, fella. |  |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:47 - Jul 25 with 5800 views | Libero |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:41 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
Nope. Nor am I saying I would hurt him. Nor am I saying it's because he's on the left.
OMG people.
He's one of the most annoying people on the TV who actively goads those who protest him. Do you not think that by going out of his way to goad and taunt right wing men he is going to at some time come unstuck?
That is all I am saying.
He has made a habit out of goading that population. They are highly likely to stick on on him when they get the chance.
It's an observation FFS!
Blimey. I really do worry. Some posters here take every word as a statement of literal intent.
If I said 'go play with the traffic', would you accuse me of encouraging motoring carnage?
Take a break from being so fragile. You'll do yourself a mischief......this is for all those who've piled into my post. |
You’re a proper weirdo. |  | | |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:48 - Jul 25 with 5798 views | Dubtractor |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:41 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
Nope. Nor am I saying I would hurt him. Nor am I saying it's because he's on the left.
OMG people.
He's one of the most annoying people on the TV who actively goads those who protest him. Do you not think that by going out of his way to goad and taunt right wing men he is going to at some time come unstuck?
That is all I am saying.
He has made a habit out of goading that population. They are highly likely to stick on on him when they get the chance.
It's an observation FFS!
Blimey. I really do worry. Some posters here take every word as a statement of literal intent.
If I said 'go play with the traffic', would you accuse me of encouraging motoring carnage?
Take a break from being so fragile. You'll do yourself a mischief......this is for all those who've piled into my post. |
I've previously given you the benefit of the doubt on here, but you're just a w@nker aren't you?
That last point nails it. Calling others fragile after spending a thread whining about how someone with a different view to you is basically asking for a beating. So delicate is your world view that any threat to it inspires ideas of violence - this isn't the first time is it? |  |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:55 - Jul 25 with 5777 views | tractordownsouth |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:33 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
I can see why people find him annoying, but I don’t understand why anyone would want to externalise any such feelings through violence. Stupid tvvats.
I agree.
He often does go out of his way to wind-up protesters. He may have been spotted by those who he has goaded before who wanted to have a pop back.
Doesn't make it right and it's not. |
Need another spade to dig that hole with? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:00 - Jul 25 with 5762 views | Libero |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:48 - Jul 25 by Dubtractor |
I've previously given you the benefit of the doubt on here, but you're just a w@nker aren't you?
That last point nails it. Calling others fragile after spending a thread whining about how someone with a different view to you is basically asking for a beating. So delicate is your world view that any threat to it inspires ideas of violence - this isn't the first time is it? |
No, it’s not, there’s been several posts of this nature from him lately. I think the most notable was the rather disturbing description he gave about how he would torture Jeremy Corbyn if given the chance. | | | |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:01 - Jul 25 with 5761 views | eireblue |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:41 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
Nope. Nor am I saying I would hurt him. Nor am I saying it's because he's on the left.
OMG people.
He's one of the most annoying people on the TV who actively goads those who protest him. Do you not think that by going out of his way to goad and taunt right wing men he is going to at some time come unstuck?
That is all I am saying.
He has made a habit out of goading that population. They are highly likely to stick on on him when they get the chance.
It's an observation FFS!
Blimey. I really do worry. Some posters here take every word as a statement of literal intent.
If I said 'go play with the traffic', would you accuse me of encouraging motoring carnage?
Take a break from being so fragile. You'll do yourself a mischief......this is for all those who've piled into my post. |
I want to make sure I get the context correct, so there is no ambiguity.
You are a complete and utter ignorant tw@t.
The process of someone getting wound up is not, a function of the person doing something, it is the act of someone that disapproves of something.
There is no difference between your description above, to someone justifying a person getting back at an “uppity” person of a different race.
Yea you wouldn’t beat someone up, but you can understand how the person getting beat up, brought it upon themselves.
You utter, utter tw@t.
I would happily say this all to your tw@tty face, tw@t.
I know you are big on context, and sometimes you struggle with comprehension.
To further explain my thinking here, you are a tw@t. |  | | |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:11 - Jul 25 with 5735 views | SouthBucksBlue |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 22:31 - Jul 24 by jeera |
"OJ goes out of his way to be as annoying as possible."
Said with no sense of irony or self-awareness whatsoever.
"Would be interesting to see if he was giving the blokes that smug grin and wind-up attitude he does all the time."
You have literally just invented a scenario in which you think it acceptable for him to be assaulted, with no consideration that he was more likely out for a drink and minding his own business. |
Where did he say he thinks it would be acceptable for the bloke to be assaulted in that scenario? |  | | |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:16 - Jul 25 with 5714 views | sparks |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:11 - Jul 25 by SouthBucksBlue |
Where did he say he thinks it would be acceptable for the bloke to be assaulted in that scenario? |
He doesn't. And people once again assume thats what he means.
On this occasion however, they appear to have some grounds for that. The juxtaposition of comments about OJ being irritating (which he is) with "not surprised" regarding an assault, plainly gives rise to the inference of some culpability. "If you behave like that you have to expect that reaction." That in itself is a difficult and charged issue. Many would claim (wrongly imo) that giving a woman advice not to walk home alone late at night is "victim blaming".
However- the key here is the context. The Judge, who heard the evidence, very clearly found that the assault was a result of his positions / views on politics and sexuality. She did not find that he had acted in some provocative manner. To introduce the suggestion (albeit obliquely and in a plausibly deniable manner) that OJ was provocative and had some culpability clearly demonstrates a rather unpleasant and troubling agenda.
On this occasion, therefore, I agree with the "pile on" to borrow Callis's phrase. |  |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:18 - Jul 25 with 5714 views | hampstead_blue |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:48 - Jul 25 by Dubtractor |
I've previously given you the benefit of the doubt on here, but you're just a w@nker aren't you?
That last point nails it. Calling others fragile after spending a thread whining about how someone with a different view to you is basically asking for a beating. So delicate is your world view that any threat to it inspires ideas of violence - this isn't the first time is it? |
How about this.......
OJ, through goading, pulls the tail of a very short tempered dog.
Dog growls....
OJ pulls tail
Dog bites.
My point is that it's inevitable that someone from that group will bump into him and have a pop.
That's it.
I'm not condoning it at all. There is a habit to read into things which are simply not there. | |
| Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
| | Poll: | Best Blackpool goal |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:26 - Jul 25 with 5687 views | Darth_Koont |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:18 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
How about this.......
OJ, through goading, pulls the tail of a very short tempered dog.
Dog growls....
OJ pulls tail
Dog bites.
My point is that it's inevitable that someone from that group will bump into him and have a pop.
That's it.
I'm not condoning it at all. There is a habit to read into things which are simply not there. |
No, you're saying the victim has some responsibility for being attacked. And you already have a habit of bringing physical violence into an alarming number of discussions.
Your views are frankly awful. |  |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:28 - Jul 25 with 5682 views | eireblue |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:18 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
How about this.......
OJ, through goading, pulls the tail of a very short tempered dog.
Dog growls....
OJ pulls tail
Dog bites.
My point is that it's inevitable that someone from that group will bump into him and have a pop.
That's it.
I'm not condoning it at all. There is a habit to read into things which are simply not there. |
“...goading...”
What a stupid, ignorant analogy.
Disgraceful.
OJ has a point of view and is gay.
He should be able to express himself, in whatever way he likes, and not be cowed by the conduct of bullies.
You have basically just said, people that you don’t like, gay, intelligent vocal lefties, should conduct themselves in a manner that is acceptable to ignorant violent bullies.
You are an ignorant tw@t. | | | |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:33 - Jul 25 with 5669 views | sparks |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:28 - Jul 25 by eireblue |
“...goading...”
What a stupid, ignorant analogy.
Disgraceful.
OJ has a point of view and is gay.
He should be able to express himself, in whatever way he likes, and not be cowed by the conduct of bullies.
You have basically just said, people that you don’t like, gay, intelligent vocal lefties, should conduct themselves in a manner that is acceptable to ignorant violent bullies.
You are an ignorant tw@t. |
You were wrong on the other thread- based on what was actually written.
You are absolutely right here, though, to note the word "goading" which clearly implies culpability. Your comments on this thread appear fair. | |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:44 - Jul 25 with 5633 views | Libero |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:18 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
How about this.......
OJ, through goading, pulls the tail of a very short tempered dog.
Dog growls....
OJ pulls tail
Dog bites.
My point is that it's inevitable that someone from that group will bump into him and have a pop.
That's it.
I'm not condoning it at all. There is a habit to read into things which are simply not there. |
 | | | |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:49 - Jul 25 with 5619 views | hampstead_blue |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:33 - Jul 25 by sparks |
You were wrong on the other thread- based on what was actually written.
You are absolutely right here, though, to note the word "goading" which clearly implies culpability. Your comments on this thread appear fair. |
This is a problem with a 1 dimensional forum.
My interpretation may be different and others have clearly read into what I said.
At no point am I condoning the thugs. What they did was wrong.
It's nothing to do with his politics or sexuality.
Was he culpable? Based on what the judge said, no.
Should he goad the right and expect to be warmly welcomed everywhere he goes? No. He will get push back. | |
| Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
| | Poll: | Best Blackpool goal |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:54 - Jul 25 with 5604 views | WeWereZombies |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:49 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
This is a problem with a 1 dimensional forum.
My interpretation may be different and others have clearly read into what I said.
At no point am I condoning the thugs. What they did was wrong.
It's nothing to do with his politics or sexuality.
Was he culpable? Based on what the judge said, no.
Should he goad the right and expect to be warmly welcomed everywhere he goes? No. He will get push back. |
Would your comments also apply to Nigel Farage if he had been assaulted?
Apart from the goading the right bit, you can switch that around if you like. |  |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:57 - Jul 25 with 5594 views | SouthBucksBlue |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:16 - Jul 25 by sparks |
He doesn't. And people once again assume thats what he means.
On this occasion however, they appear to have some grounds for that. The juxtaposition of comments about OJ being irritating (which he is) with "not surprised" regarding an assault, plainly gives rise to the inference of some culpability. "If you behave like that you have to expect that reaction." That in itself is a difficult and charged issue. Many would claim (wrongly imo) that giving a woman advice not to walk home alone late at night is "victim blaming".
However- the key here is the context. The Judge, who heard the evidence, very clearly found that the assault was a result of his positions / views on politics and sexuality. She did not find that he had acted in some provocative manner. To introduce the suggestion (albeit obliquely and in a plausibly deniable manner) that OJ was provocative and had some culpability clearly demonstrates a rather unpleasant and troubling agenda.
On this occasion, therefore, I agree with the "pile on" to borrow Callis's phrase. |
I should have read the rest of the thread before replying to the specific post and I take your point but let’s put it this way.
This poster has become a target for a number of collaborating board participants who routinely gang up to attempt to vilify any post that proposes a different perspective to theirs, generally culminating in unnecessary personal insults.
His views seem to be more extreme than mine but in my opinion not deserving of the treatment they’re receiving. | | | |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:59 - Jul 25 with 5582 views | footers |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:57 - Jul 25 by SouthBucksBlue |
I should have read the rest of the thread before replying to the specific post and I take your point but let’s put it this way.
This poster has become a target for a number of collaborating board participants who routinely gang up to attempt to vilify any post that proposes a different perspective to theirs, generally culminating in unnecessary personal insults.
His views seem to be more extreme than mine but in my opinion not deserving of the treatment they’re receiving. |
He was asking for it.
There was push back.
And so on. | |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 11:00 - Jul 25 with 5574 views | eireblue |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:49 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
This is a problem with a 1 dimensional forum.
My interpretation may be different and others have clearly read into what I said.
At no point am I condoning the thugs. What they did was wrong.
It's nothing to do with his politics or sexuality.
Was he culpable? Based on what the judge said, no.
Should he goad the right and expect to be warmly welcomed everywhere he goes? No. He will get push back. |
“1 dimensional forum”
Apart from the swear filter, which is quite easy to get around, what part of the English language that can be fully utilised on this forum, in much the same way that philosophers have used over the years to express quite complex concepts, is “1 dimensional”? | | | |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 11:05 - Jul 25 with 5560 views | Libero |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:57 - Jul 25 by SouthBucksBlue |
I should have read the rest of the thread before replying to the specific post and I take your point but let’s put it this way.
This poster has become a target for a number of collaborating board participants who routinely gang up to attempt to vilify any post that proposes a different perspective to theirs, generally culminating in unnecessary personal insults.
His views seem to be more extreme than mine but in my opinion not deserving of the treatment they’re receiving. |
Maybe you should read the rest of his posts, never mind the rest of the thread before replying.
In the last month this individual has made a wide range of sh1tty comments and shown zero humility. I was completely unaware of his existence until he used the term “window licker” and attempted to claim a nonexistent alternative context to his disgusting bigotry and ignorance.
Since then his tw@ttery has gone from strength to strength.
I appreciated that in these unprecedented times different people react in different ways, but the Hampster has reacted by coming in here daily and writing weird passive aggressive posts, day-in-day-out.
His posts aren’t being “vilified” they’re genuinely unpleasant and borderline concerning. [Post edited 25 Jul 2020 11:06]
| | | |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 11:35 - Jul 25 with 5508 views | Herbivore |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:18 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue |
How about this.......
OJ, through goading, pulls the tail of a very short tempered dog.
Dog growls....
OJ pulls tail
Dog bites.
My point is that it's inevitable that someone from that group will bump into him and have a pop.
That's it.
I'm not condoning it at all. There is a habit to read into things which are simply not there. |
Total bellend. Keep digging. | |
| |
| Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 11:56 - Jul 25 with 5475 views | giant_stow |
I both love and hate Owen Jones - read him all the time, including his twitter feed and he's always at least interesting. I certainly don;t always agree with him though.
Without sounding too like Hamsptead (boo etc), I do certainly worry that he makes himself a target, not that anyone should be for expressing opinions - just in the real world, there seems to be a surplus of right-wing nutjobs out there. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
