By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:41 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
Nope. Nor am I saying I would hurt him. Nor am I saying it's because he's on the left.
OMG people. He's one of the most annoying people on the TV who actively goads those who protest him. Do you not think that by going out of his way to goad and taunt right wing men he is going to at some time come unstuck?
That is all I am saying.
He has made a habit out of goading that population. They are highly likely to stick on on him when they get the chance.
It's an observation FFS!
Blimey. I really do worry. Some posters here take every word as a statement of literal intent.
If I said 'go play with the traffic', would you accuse me of encouraging motoring carnage?
Take a break from being so fragile. You'll do yourself a mischief......this is for all those who've piled into my post.
By your own logic, you were asking TWTDers to "pile into" you/your post because of your "actively goading those who protest" against you.
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 11:59 - Jul 25 by J2BLUE
If I was in a pub and someone was in there who had been 'goading' me over something political I would pick up my beer and move to another table.
It's pretty sad that you see it as inevitable that someone will have a 'pop'.
Says a lot about you and potentially the company you keep.
As would I, most people and in all likelihood the poster in question. However there are some that wouldn’t. Recognising this doesn’t condone such behaviour or even imply that some of the company one keeps would behave like this. Again an unfair conclusion.
0
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 13:19 - Jul 25 with 4212 views
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 11:59 - Jul 25 by J2BLUE
If I was in a pub and someone was in there who had been 'goading' me over something political I would pick up my beer and move to another table.
It's pretty sad that you see it as inevitable that someone will have a 'pop'.
Says a lot about you and potentially the company you keep.
I would do the same, change table if they came too close and were annoying me.
It's pretty sad that you see it as inevitable that someone will have a 'pop'.
That is an observation on the demographic of people he winds-up. Nowt to do with me.
Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:41 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
Nope. Nor am I saying I would hurt him. Nor am I saying it's because he's on the left.
OMG people. He's one of the most annoying people on the TV who actively goads those who protest him. Do you not think that by going out of his way to goad and taunt right wing men he is going to at some time come unstuck?
That is all I am saying.
He has made a habit out of goading that population. They are highly likely to stick on on him when they get the chance.
It's an observation FFS!
Blimey. I really do worry. Some posters here take every word as a statement of literal intent.
If I said 'go play with the traffic', would you accuse me of encouraging motoring carnage?
Take a break from being so fragile. You'll do yourself a mischief......this is for all those who've piled into my post.
I'm far from fragile pal, your whole post was about why someone would attack him, and not about condeming it. You're always going on about dishing out violence, perhaps you're the fragile one if violence is always your first response.
[Post edited 25 Jul 2020 16:13]
1
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 13:25 - Jul 25 with 4189 views
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 10:57 - Jul 25 by SouthBucksBlue
I should have read the rest of the thread before replying to the specific post and I take your point but let’s put it this way. This poster has become a target for a number of collaborating board participants who routinely gang up to attempt to vilify any post that proposes a different perspective to theirs, generally culminating in unnecessary personal insults. His views seem to be more extreme than mine but in my opinion not deserving of the treatment they’re receiving.
This little but vocal group have taken to an incorrect interpretation of anything said in my posts.
They fail to accept that people use language differently and even when told in clear english, refuse to accept the context or meaning of a statement. They prefer to lay their own over the top.
Example: We have a joke at work. It's about the stupidity of people. "When do we start shooting!". It's a comment on the utter stupidity of people since lockdown. We are not taking up arms. However, regardless of how many times it is said they STILL think it's a call to arms.
The same with most other things said of that ilk.
I find it amusing tbh and have said before that the more they insult me the more they are turning the mirror on themselves. They have been told the context and meaning, they refuse to listen.
Their insults on this don't make a jot of difference. I stood-up for the Met CT teams the other day and was hammered. Just for standing-up for a group of professionals whom they called 'murders and working in full hunt mode'.
Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 13:29 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
This little but vocal group have taken to an incorrect interpretation of anything said in my posts.
They fail to accept that people use language differently and even when told in clear english, refuse to accept the context or meaning of a statement. They prefer to lay their own over the top.
Example: We have a joke at work. It's about the stupidity of people. "When do we start shooting!". It's a comment on the utter stupidity of people since lockdown. We are not taking up arms. However, regardless of how many times it is said they STILL think it's a call to arms.
The same with most other things said of that ilk.
I find it amusing tbh and have said before that the more they insult me the more they are turning the mirror on themselves. They have been told the context and meaning, they refuse to listen.
Their insults on this don't make a jot of difference. I stood-up for the Met CT teams the other day and was hammered. Just for standing-up for a group of professionals whom they called 'murders and working in full hunt mode'.
Whether you accept it or not, this post had a real undercurrent of "he probably deserved it".
The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett)
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 13:29 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
This little but vocal group have taken to an incorrect interpretation of anything said in my posts.
They fail to accept that people use language differently and even when told in clear english, refuse to accept the context or meaning of a statement. They prefer to lay their own over the top.
Example: We have a joke at work. It's about the stupidity of people. "When do we start shooting!". It's a comment on the utter stupidity of people since lockdown. We are not taking up arms. However, regardless of how many times it is said they STILL think it's a call to arms.
The same with most other things said of that ilk.
I find it amusing tbh and have said before that the more they insult me the more they are turning the mirror on themselves. They have been told the context and meaning, they refuse to listen.
Their insults on this don't make a jot of difference. I stood-up for the Met CT teams the other day and was hammered. Just for standing-up for a group of professionals whom they called 'murders and working in full hunt mode'.
You really do talk b0llocks. Your words are there for all to see, no spin or misinterpretation is required in order to conclude you're a rather unpleasant individual.
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 09:48 - Jul 25 by Dubtractor
I've previously given you the benefit of the doubt on here, but you're just a w@nker aren't you?
That last point nails it. Calling others fragile after spending a thread whining about how someone with a different view to you is basically asking for a beating. So delicate is your world view that any threat to it inspires ideas of violence - this isn't the first time is it?
Well this. I think Bully probably has a point re people jumping on things that he hasn’t actually said, but regardless he’s clearly a d*ckhead
I’m pretty sure it’s all just an act mind, and not really sure why anyone bothers replying as he’s probably just disappear if not
Highlighting crass stupidity since sometime around 2010
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 13:29 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
This little but vocal group have taken to an incorrect interpretation of anything said in my posts.
They fail to accept that people use language differently and even when told in clear english, refuse to accept the context or meaning of a statement. They prefer to lay their own over the top.
Example: We have a joke at work. It's about the stupidity of people. "When do we start shooting!". It's a comment on the utter stupidity of people since lockdown. We are not taking up arms. However, regardless of how many times it is said they STILL think it's a call to arms.
The same with most other things said of that ilk.
I find it amusing tbh and have said before that the more they insult me the more they are turning the mirror on themselves. They have been told the context and meaning, they refuse to listen.
Their insults on this don't make a jot of difference. I stood-up for the Met CT teams the other day and was hammered. Just for standing-up for a group of professionals whom they called 'murders and working in full hunt mode'.
What the f**k are you talking about?
2
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 14:06 - Jul 25 with 4091 views
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 13:51 - Jul 25 by MattinLondon
What the f**k are you talking about?
Basically he's a great guy who would never dare say anything out of order, but because we're all such mean bullies we interpret his words to mean something completely different from what he intended to try to make him look bad. It's pretty shameful from him, it's basically an attempt to gaslight us all.
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 13:29 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
This little but vocal group have taken to an incorrect interpretation of anything said in my posts.
They fail to accept that people use language differently and even when told in clear english, refuse to accept the context or meaning of a statement. They prefer to lay their own over the top.
Example: We have a joke at work. It's about the stupidity of people. "When do we start shooting!". It's a comment on the utter stupidity of people since lockdown. We are not taking up arms. However, regardless of how many times it is said they STILL think it's a call to arms.
The same with most other things said of that ilk.
I find it amusing tbh and have said before that the more they insult me the more they are turning the mirror on themselves. They have been told the context and meaning, they refuse to listen.
Their insults on this don't make a jot of difference. I stood-up for the Met CT teams the other day and was hammered. Just for standing-up for a group of professionals whom they called 'murders and working in full hunt mode'.
“Would be interesting to see if he was giving the blokes that smug grin and wind-up attitude he does all the time. “
“...goading...”
Explain the context.
3
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 14:19 - Jul 25 with 4054 views
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 13:32 - Jul 25 by sparks
Whether you accept it or not, this post had a real undercurrent of "he probably deserved it".
It did but I'm not saying it's what I think.
I don't think he 'deserved' it at all. I think it was inevitable.
'bloke winds-up right wing voters gets punched in a pub by a right wing voter'. Inevitable not deserved.
Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 14:19 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
It did but I'm not saying it's what I think.
I don't think he 'deserved' it at all. I think it was inevitable.
'bloke winds-up right wing voters gets punched in a pub by a right wing voter'. Inevitable not deserved.
It isn't inevitable. That's the whole point.
People like this should be made examples of for basically threatening press freedom. But then again we've got a PM who organised for a journalist to be beaten up, so maybe that's just the country we're living in now.
Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 14:19 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
It did but I'm not saying it's what I think.
I don't think he 'deserved' it at all. I think it was inevitable.
'bloke winds-up right wing voters gets punched in a pub by a right wing voter'. Inevitable not deserved.
Owen Jones isn't there to wind up right-wing voters. He has genuine and legitimate left-wing views that aren't especially radical either.
The "inevitability" is caused by people like you thinking he's targeting them and getting themselves wound up as a result.
You talk about violence far too much and the perpetrator acted on it, but both of you need to take responsibility for your own views a hell of a lot more. Because you are definitely part of the problem rather than the solution.
Pronouns: He/Him
2
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 14:47 - Jul 25 with 3980 views
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 13:29 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
This little but vocal group have taken to an incorrect interpretation of anything said in my posts.
They fail to accept that people use language differently and even when told in clear english, refuse to accept the context or meaning of a statement. They prefer to lay their own over the top.
Example: We have a joke at work. It's about the stupidity of people. "When do we start shooting!". It's a comment on the utter stupidity of people since lockdown. We are not taking up arms. However, regardless of how many times it is said they STILL think it's a call to arms.
The same with most other things said of that ilk.
I find it amusing tbh and have said before that the more they insult me the more they are turning the mirror on themselves. They have been told the context and meaning, they refuse to listen.
Their insults on this don't make a jot of difference. I stood-up for the Met CT teams the other day and was hammered. Just for standing-up for a group of professionals whom they called 'murders and working in full hunt mode'.
But you too have been "told the context and meaning" and "refuse(d) to listen", multiple times.
As for "an incorrect interpretation of anything said in my posts", does it not occur to you that if so many people (actually just about everybody who's read your posts) are "misinterpreting" you, then there's something wrong with either your thought procsses, the English you're using* to express them, or both? I mean you could just stop posting in that way for a day & take the time to stand back & consider it all objectively.
*One example being your reply to J2 at 13.19 on this page - if you'd used quotation marks for your middle para it would have at least clarified what you meant there.
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 14:37 - Jul 25 by Darth_Koont
Owen Jones isn't there to wind up right-wing voters. He has genuine and legitimate left-wing views that aren't especially radical either.
The "inevitability" is caused by people like you thinking he's targeting them and getting themselves wound up as a result.
You talk about violence far too much and the perpetrator acted on it, but both of you need to take responsibility for your own views a hell of a lot more. Because you are definitely part of the problem rather than the solution.
Regardless of what we think HE DOES wind-up loads of people and does so deliberately.
The inevitability is nothing to do with me at all.
Look at the end of this clip and also the way he continually talks down to and patronises Portillo and AN.
What do you think of him in this interview? Do you find him annoying? Does anyone?
Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 15:20 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
Regardless of what we think HE DOES wind-up loads of people and does so deliberately.
The inevitability is nothing to do with me at all.
Look at the end of this clip and also the way he continually talks down to and patronises Portillo and AN.
What do you think of him in this interview? Do you find him annoying? Does anyone?
My guy, stop posting now.
Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country."
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 15:20 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
Regardless of what we think HE DOES wind-up loads of people and does so deliberately.
The inevitability is nothing to do with me at all.
Look at the end of this clip and also the way he continually talks down to and patronises Portillo and AN.
What do you think of him in this interview? Do you find him annoying? Does anyone?
inevitable /ɪnˈɛvɪtəb(ə)l/ adjective certain to happen; unavoidable.
Why do you keep insisting this was inevitable? It wasn't. He was attacked by far-right thugs.
So far as I'm aware, many right-wing journalists and authors are also incredibly annoying but yet it isn't inevitable that they're attacked by the left.
You'd do yourself a lot of favours if you'd stop playing this Army 'ard nut act. noggin served too but he doesn't go around talking about violence all the time, nor his time served.
Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Man tries to claim nonexistent alternative context to disgusting bigotry. on 15:20 - Jul 25 by hampstead_blue
Regardless of what we think HE DOES wind-up loads of people and does so deliberately.
The inevitability is nothing to do with me at all.
Look at the end of this clip and also the way he continually talks down to and patronises Portillo and AN.
What do you think of him in this interview? Do you find him annoying? Does anyone?
I think it's annoying that he's right.
People like Portillo and indeed Neil have been complicit in letting living standards slide and making life difficult for ordinary folk in the UK while immigrants have been blamed for the resulting disillusionment and disenfranchisement. Neil's own Spectator is one of the worst at defending the status quo and deflecting/directing blame onto others.
But that's by the by. Owen Jones "deliberately" holds these views because that's what he thinks. It's not some calculating wind-up. That's in your mind to give you some justification for believing he is deliberately asking for trouble.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
