| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? 19:27 - Sep 29 with 25236 views | hampstead_blue |
It seems the Gov can be slammed 24/7
People can be vile toward Tory MP's.
Who else? Norwich are fair game. That's a given.
However, when I dared to criticize a muslim the post was removed and a few people showed a dislike.
Why?
I guess I stepped on a 'woke' landmine.
It's sad when you can't offer-up genuine and polite criticism of a religion. Especially after that religion had screamed and screamed at a cricket club for celebrating a victory.
So, Essex CCC are allowed to be slammed by a person of religion but said person isn't allowed to be criticized?
|  |
| Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
| | Poll: | Best Blackpool goal |
| |  |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:19 - Sep 29 with 6376 views | SpruceMoose |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:18 - Sep 29 by 26_Paz |
And you are interested in genuine discussion are you? You replied with pretty much the same comment to everything I’ve written on here for months now ... |
I don't chit chat with racist homophobes. I call them out. |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:33 - Sep 29 with 6308 views | 26_Paz |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:19 - Sep 29 by SpruceMoose |
I don't chit chat with racist homophobes. I call them out. |
Pretty strong accusation there mate ... have you ever considered that the kind of unfounded accusations you make towards me on a pretty much daily basis may contribute to the kinds of attitudes shown in the OP? |  |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:40 - Sep 29 with 6320 views | N2_Blue |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 20:41 - Sep 29 by jeera |
Who all happen to drink alcohol too apparently.
I have known a lot of Muslims in my time, through work especially, and none of those I have ever known drink.
That's not to suggest no Muslims drink, but certainly not those who are strong in their religion, and most definitely not most, or even many. Many find it an affront to be around, let alone have some poured over their head.
That would be like sneaking pork into their food and calling them 'woke' for doing their nut...
I have however, known an awful lot of Hindus and especially Sikhs who like a drink, but I guess it's hard to tell the difference. [Post edited 29 Sep 2020 20:43]
|
Completely agree. I know a good number of Muslims through work and my football and cricket teams and i can definitely say not a single one of them drinks. |  |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:46 - Sep 29 with 6300 views | SpruceMoose |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:33 - Sep 29 by 26_Paz |
Pretty strong accusation there mate ... have you ever considered that the kind of unfounded accusations you make towards me on a pretty much daily basis may contribute to the kinds of attitudes shown in the OP? |
No because that would be ridiculous.
I'm just judging you by your own words. If you don't like the judgement, change the words. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:49 - Sep 29 with 6266 views | 26_Paz |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:46 - Sep 29 by SpruceMoose |
No because that would be ridiculous.
I'm just judging you by your own words. If you don't like the judgement, change the words. |
Nefarious claims of racism and homophobia like the ones that you make towards me fuel the whole ‘the world’s gone mad, can’t say anything these days’ mindset. You should think about that. | |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:52 - Sep 29 with 6278 views | SpruceMoose |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:49 - Sep 29 by 26_Paz |
Nefarious claims of racism and homophobia like the ones that you make towards me fuel the whole ‘the world’s gone mad, can’t say anything these days’ mindset. You should think about that. |
It says a lot that you think refusing to admit that calling people bumboys and picaninnies is offensive constitutes a nefarious racism claim. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:56 - Sep 29 with 6267 views | eireblue |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:33 - Sep 29 by 26_Paz |
Pretty strong accusation there mate ... have you ever considered that the kind of unfounded accusations you make towards me on a pretty much daily basis may contribute to the kinds of attitudes shown in the OP? |
I think it fair to say both you and the OP disagree with the view that it is, for instance a minority group that can decide what is racist or abusive.
I think you like to use the term, context.
Unfortunately it is accepted that it is the abused group that gets to decide what is racist, not a majority or a group in power that get that.
That is why Jewish people get to decide what is anti-Semitic.
A person can choose to ignore the definition, but that would make that person a racist, in the sub-group labelled anti-Semite.
See, also homophobia and islamaphobia.
Yes you are correct, adopting such a position is polarising.
People can choose to be anti-racist or racist.
Many people don’t like being called racist or homophobic.
Good, there is an easy solution. |  | | |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:57 - Sep 29 with 6240 views | 26_Paz |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:52 - Sep 29 by SpruceMoose |
It says a lot that you think refusing to admit that calling people bumboys and picaninnies is offensive constitutes a nefarious racism claim. |
I’m not having the context debate again. I get called a racist and a homophobe by you most days, a conclusion you’ve come to just from our interactions on here. That’s clearly not the case as if I was I wouldn’t still be on here or other posters may occasionally support you ... | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:58 - Sep 29 with 6263 views | eireblue |
What is ‘woke’ vs woke.
Is ‘woke’ the new woke, which was the new PC gone mad?
I see you are still posing questions to the board, whilst not having the decency to respond to questions put to you. | | | |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:58 - Sep 29 with 6258 views | SpruceMoose |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:57 - Sep 29 by 26_Paz |
I’m not having the context debate again. I get called a racist and a homophobe by you most days, a conclusion you’ve come to just from our interactions on here. That’s clearly not the case as if I was I wouldn’t still be on here or other posters may occasionally support you ... |
Just. Admit. It. Is. Wrong. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:01 - Sep 29 with 6252 views | jeera |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 21:58 - Sep 29 by eireblue |
What is ‘woke’ vs woke.
Is ‘woke’ the new woke, which was the new PC gone mad?
I see you are still posing questions to the board, whilst not having the decency to respond to questions put to you. |
I don't get this woke thing either. Any more than the constant leftie and marxist and all the other rubbish.
It's become really popular though on many platforms and all those using these terms seem to have one thing in common. None of them seem to know what they mean when they say them. |  |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:09 - Sep 29 with 6208 views | J2BLUE |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:01 - Sep 29 by jeera |
I don't get this woke thing either. Any more than the constant leftie and marxist and all the other rubbish.
It's become really popular though on many platforms and all those using these terms seem to have one thing in common. None of them seem to know what they mean when they say them. |
I've stopped using it because it's become one of those 'insults' where it's used on anyone who shows any consideration for others. However in the past I understood it to be those people who went out of their way to look for offence where none was intended to prove something to themselves or others. Like Chutney's response to me if he was being genuine and not just looking to own me for some real or imagined slight when he posted under his old username.
Now it's become one of those overdone words which has pretty much lost all meaning and like you say, most using it have no idea why. |  |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:10 - Sep 29 with 6206 views | HARRY10 |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:01 - Sep 29 by jeera |
I don't get this woke thing either. Any more than the constant leftie and marxist and all the other rubbish.
It's become really popular though on many platforms and all those using these terms seem to have one thing in common. None of them seem to know what they mean when they say them. |
They are not meant to
any more than the sheep who bleat out whatever is written on the barn wall |  | | |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:13 - Sep 29 with 6195 views | Dubtractor |
You are just embarrassing yourself on here recently, really pretty dismal stuff from you. |  |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:19 - Sep 29 with 6175 views | syntaxerror |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:10 - Sep 29 by HARRY10 |
They are not meant to
any more than the sheep who bleat out whatever is written on the barn wall |
Its just the new 'Libtard'
If someone cant handle a move to a more tolerant society, then they need a label against which to focus their vitriol.
See also:
Defund the BBC
BLM is racist
White men are being discriminated against
etc etc |  | | |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:21 - Sep 29 with 6170 views | jeera |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:09 - Sep 29 by J2BLUE |
I've stopped using it because it's become one of those 'insults' where it's used on anyone who shows any consideration for others. However in the past I understood it to be those people who went out of their way to look for offence where none was intended to prove something to themselves or others. Like Chutney's response to me if he was being genuine and not just looking to own me for some real or imagined slight when he posted under his old username.
Now it's become one of those overdone words which has pretty much lost all meaning and like you say, most using it have no idea why. |
I keep saying this because it's true.
Chutney, whoever he was before, came onto the forum earlier this year, claiming to be a new poster and immediately leapt onto some 7 posters within his first week or so.
You, matt and a few others, then me. All the attention was unwarranted and it was just online bullying nonsense. He then played some line about being nice and managed a few normal threads, before then looking to stir the moment Callis left the board briefly in June.
This new poster has deliberately targeted certain others time and again. He clearly has nothing better to do than to be an arse.
Threads like NFL, horses, wrestling don't interest most of us and are a bit niche so the polite thing to do is to let those interested get on with it. Not him. His attention seeking is more important and he has to take an unneeded jibe. Absolute waste of space and should be removed asap.
Yesterday he pounced on you, despite having shown no previous interest in the thread, today it was the NFL thread, then turns his usual sh1t onto me. People like him are of no use to any forum.
I swear at him and people complain. Some people need to get their priorities right. [Post edited 29 Sep 2020 22:22]
| |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:27 - Sep 29 with 6147 views | eireblue |
By the way, Vapours, you know when you suggested Hampy should stick to cricket.
Ummmm, was this the sort of thing you were thinking off? | | | |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:29 - Sep 29 with 6135 views | jeera |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:27 - Sep 29 by eireblue |
By the way, Vapours, you know when you suggested Hampy should stick to cricket.
Ummmm, was this the sort of thing you were thinking off? |
Heh. | |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:37 - Sep 29 with 6110 views | vapour_trail |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:27 - Sep 29 by eireblue |
By the way, Vapours, you know when you suggested Hampy should stick to cricket.
Ummmm, was this the sort of thing you were thinking off? |
I’ve just popped along for the first time today, good timing eh.
I’m assuming hampstead has somehow contrived to have a pop at the Muslim Essex cricketer who had the beer tipped on his head on the lords balcony. What an embarrassment.
This is clearly my fault, I did suggest he stick to cricket. |  |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:38 - Sep 29 with 6101 views | jeera |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:37 - Sep 29 by vapour_trail |
I’ve just popped along for the first time today, good timing eh.
I’m assuming hampstead has somehow contrived to have a pop at the Muslim Essex cricketer who had the beer tipped on his head on the lords balcony. What an embarrassment.
This is clearly my fault, I did suggest he stick to cricket. |
This is all your doing, going around giving him ideas. | |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:39 - Sep 29 with 6098 views | Dubtractor |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:37 - Sep 29 by vapour_trail |
I’ve just popped along for the first time today, good timing eh.
I’m assuming hampstead has somehow contrived to have a pop at the Muslim Essex cricketer who had the beer tipped on his head on the lords balcony. What an embarrassment.
This is clearly my fault, I did suggest he stick to cricket. |
He fully lost his sh1t about it.
The daft bellend. | |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:41 - Sep 29 with 6090 views | vapour_trail |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:39 - Sep 29 by Dubtractor |
He fully lost his sh1t about it.
The daft bellend. |
I missed out on that. Thing is, I can’t even begin to imagine how he managed this one. | |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:42 - Sep 29 with 6085 views | jeera |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:41 - Sep 29 by vapour_trail |
I missed out on that. Thing is, I can’t even begin to imagine how he managed this one. |
Where's there's a racist, there's a way. | |
| |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:44 - Sep 29 with 6080 views | lightuser |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 20:41 - Sep 29 by jeera |
Who all happen to drink alcohol too apparently.
I have known a lot of Muslims in my time, through work especially, and none of those I have ever known drink.
That's not to suggest no Muslims drink, but certainly not those who are strong in their religion, and most definitely not most, or even many. Many find it an affront to be around, let alone have some poured over their head.
That would be like sneaking pork into their food and calling them 'woke' for doing their nut...
I have however, known an awful lot of Hindus and especially Sikhs who like a drink, but I guess it's hard to tell the difference. [Post edited 29 Sep 2020 20:43]
|
99% of the muslims i've ever known drink. Men and women. But 99% of them won't touch pork and have a belief in god (although also 99% don't pray). Lol. Work that out.
In fact I'm sitting with a couple of "them" now having a few tinnies, bottles of wine and vodka cokes. Cheers peeps. | | | |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:51 - Sep 29 with 6055 views | noggin |
| In the modern age who are we allowed to critisize? on 22:44 - Sep 29 by lightuser |
99% of the muslims i've ever known drink. Men and women. But 99% of them won't touch pork and have a belief in god (although also 99% don't pray). Lol. Work that out.
In fact I'm sitting with a couple of "them" now having a few tinnies, bottles of wine and vodka cokes. Cheers peeps. |
So not practicing muslims? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
