Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Kane to Man City for 160million 23:43 - Jul 22 with 6413 viewsIllinoisblue

Facking hell

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 10:00 - Jul 23 with 800 viewsCheltenham_Blue

Kane to Man City for 160million on 09:50 - Jul 23 by chicoazul

He’ll pay 40% in tax though which pays for many many George Smileys.


I wonder how much of that will be offset against his other business interests?
People earning 400k a week don't employ accountants to ensure they are paying all of that.

Poll: Is it more annoying when builders

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 10:07 - Jul 23 with 789 viewsvapour_trail

Kane to Man City for 160million on 07:31 - Jul 23 by CaptainAhab

Which player though? They were talking about Sterling before the Euros, but surely not now?


Laporte was also mentioned. Both players that Spurs could use.

Pep hardly used Sterling in big games in the second half of last season. Foden and Mahrez were his preferred options wide.

Trailing vapour since 1999.
Poll: Should Gav and Phil limiti the number of polls?

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 10:13 - Jul 23 with 774 viewschicoazul

Kane to Man City for 160million on 10:00 - Jul 23 by Cheltenham_Blue

I wonder how much of that will be offset against his other business interests?
People earning 400k a week don't employ accountants to ensure they are paying all of that.


Don’t all footballers in this country pay PAYE on their salaries? Things like image rights FIFA Pepsi etc will be different sure, but I think their basic pay from their employer is paid like any other salary with deductions at source.

In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
Poll: With Evans taking 65% in Huddersfield, is the Banter Era over?

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 10:15 - Jul 23 with 765 viewstractorboy1978

Kane to Man City for 160million on 10:13 - Jul 23 by chicoazul

Don’t all footballers in this country pay PAYE on their salaries? Things like image rights FIFA Pepsi etc will be different sure, but I think their basic pay from their employer is paid like any other salary with deductions at source.


Yes, correct.
0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 10:34 - Jul 23 with 736 viewstractordownsouth

Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:57 - Jul 22 by C_HealyIsAPleasure

Yeah, same here

For all the talk of Man City splashing the cash their record signing is still KDB for £68m. They also tend to buy up and coming players hitting their peak - 8 of their top 10 fees were for players aged 25 or under. Kane just doesn’t fit the profile that they’ve typically gone after, and that’s before you factor in that Pep finally got his long-desired strikerless setup to gel last season

File under believe it when I see it, but as you say I’ve long ceased being surprised by football!


It was reported back when Pep signed his new contract in the autumn that one of the conditions was that the Man City board would seriously pursue Kane. And as for the striker-less thing, Kane suits the false 9 role pretty well. He just needs fast wingers either side of him, which City have in Sterling and Torres.

Poll: Preferred Lambert replacement?
Blog: No Time to Panic Yet

1
Kane to Man City for 160million on 10:37 - Jul 23 with 729 viewstractordownsouth

Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:39 - Jul 23 by tractorboy1978

Don't know why any player would want to swap City for Spurs. A club, much like Arsenal, that is drifting further away from the elite by the season.


I agree, but it depends who it is. If it’s someone like Ake or Mendy then fair enough as they’re unlikely to get in the City starting 11 and will still have the chance at winning some (albeit smaller) trophies at Spurs.

Poll: Preferred Lambert replacement?
Blog: No Time to Panic Yet

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 12:31 - Jul 23 with 681 viewsGeoffSentence

Kane to Man City for 160million on 09:50 - Jul 23 by chicoazul

He’ll pay 40% in tax though which pays for many many George Smileys.


Bet he doesnt though. A player of his profile can get away with image rights and other ta avoidance weezes.

Don't boil a kettle on a boat.
Poll: The best Williams to play for Town

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 12:47 - Jul 23 with 655 viewschicoazul

Kane to Man City for 160million on 12:31 - Jul 23 by GeoffSentence

Bet he doesnt though. A player of his profile can get away with image rights and other ta avoidance weezes.


Not on his basic pay from his employer.

In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
Poll: With Evans taking 65% in Huddersfield, is the Banter Era over?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Kane to Man City for 160million on 14:03 - Jul 23 with 594 viewsCheltenham_Blue

Kane to Man City for 160million on 10:13 - Jul 23 by chicoazul

Don’t all footballers in this country pay PAYE on their salaries? Things like image rights FIFA Pepsi etc will be different sure, but I think their basic pay from their employer is paid like any other salary with deductions at source.


In certain circumstances, you can offset PAYE payments against SAE declarations if you operate a business separately to having tax deducted at source under an employment outside of your own limited company.

Poll: Is it more annoying when builders

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 14:10 - Jul 23 with 594 viewsTractorWood

Kane to Man City for 160million on 09:50 - Jul 23 by chicoazul

He’ll pay 40% in tax though which pays for many many George Smileys.


United will pay Employers NI too. It's a cracking deal for the exchequer.

I know that was then, but it could be again..
Poll: At present who do you think you'll vote for?

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 15:30 - Jul 23 with 547 viewsjaykay

Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:54 - Jul 22 by Illinoisblue

Not sure The Sun would splash it on the front page if they weren’t sure. Insane money. And ever more reason to despise Man City


you mean the has sun learnt its lesson and only telling the truth

forensic experts say footers and spruces fingerprints were not found at the scene after the weekends rows

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 19:05 - Jul 23 with 497 viewsJ2BLUE

Son signs new 4 year deal. If ever a deal screamed "brace yourselves!" to a set of fans...

Bit disappointed. Son is brilliant and deserves some medals.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 19:06 - Jul 23 with 495 viewsArnoldMoorhen

Kane to Man City for 160million on 05:51 - Jul 23 by textbackup

160m for a bloke who froze in the euro final, stayed as far from the 2 CBs as he could and sat in CM for 80% of the game.....


That's how he played throughout the tournament. Very, very effectively.
0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 19:13 - Jul 23 with 477 viewsDurovigutum

Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:48 - Jul 23 by Marshalls_Mullet

De Bruyne is already on that, and Sterling not far off.

...it is obscene though.


I love my football.

I don't like Boris Johnson.

There is no way in the world a footballer should be paid almost four times the PMs annual salary in ONE WEEK.

It's no wonder the calibre of the recent PMs, imagine if we paid £400k a week - we might get someone truly world class.
0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 19:40 - Jul 23 with 455 viewsjas0999

Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:51 - Jul 22 by Marshalls_Mullet

Seen the reports, but not sure I would take it at face value.

Can't see city paying 160m for 28 year old Kane.

...but it is football, so who knows.


If true, great work by Spurs!
0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 20:07 - Jul 23 with 433 viewshype313

Kane to Man City for 160million on 19:40 - Jul 23 by jas0999

If true, great work by Spurs!


Yet again Daniel Levy extracts the most from his deals, after the Euros his stock was probably at its highest.

Problem Spurs have is that when they get the cash they are dreadful at spending it.

Saw a piece in the paper earlier, after they got £89m for Bale and brought in 8 new signings, not one of them is still there.

Poll: Should Muric be dropped?

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 21:13 - Jul 23 with 416 viewsC_HealyIsAPleasure

Kane to Man City for 160million on 20:07 - Jul 23 by hype313

Yet again Daniel Levy extracts the most from his deals, after the Euros his stock was probably at its highest.

Problem Spurs have is that when they get the cash they are dreadful at spending it.

Saw a piece in the paper earlier, after they got £89m for Bale and brought in 8 new signings, not one of them is still there.


Eriksen aside their signings that Summer were terrible, however it’s hardly surprising none of them are still there seeing as Bale left 8 years ago

Highlighting crass stupidity since sometime around 2010
Poll: Would you want Messi to sign?

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 21:18 - Jul 23 with 401 viewsJ2BLUE

Kane to Man City for 160million on 21:13 - Jul 23 by C_HealyIsAPleasure

Eriksen aside their signings that Summer were terrible, however it’s hardly surprising none of them are still there seeing as Bale left 8 years ago


I was going to say it was 2013! What a daft comment.

Also, wasn't Lamela signed as his replacement? He was there last season.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 21:18 - Jul 23 with 401 viewsvapour_trail

Kane to Man City for 160million on 20:07 - Jul 23 by hype313

Yet again Daniel Levy extracts the most from his deals, after the Euros his stock was probably at its highest.

Problem Spurs have is that when they get the cash they are dreadful at spending it.

Saw a piece in the paper earlier, after they got £89m for Bale and brought in 8 new signings, not one of them is still there.


That was a long time ago.

But that wasn’t overly well invested, apart from Eriksen.

They do pick up good buys though. I think Son was around 18m? Delle Alli about 1m!

Trailing vapour since 1999.
Poll: Should Gav and Phil limiti the number of polls?

0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 21:23 - Jul 23 with 392 viewsWD19

Kane to Man City for 160million on 21:13 - Jul 23 by C_HealyIsAPleasure

Eriksen aside their signings that Summer were terrible, however it’s hardly surprising none of them are still there seeing as Bale left 8 years ago


Erikson plus Erik Lamela is still (just about) there and they doubled their money on Chadli too I think.

But yeah, was all a bit like rushing around the local petrol station looking to buy presents on Christmas Eve.
0
Kane to Man City for 160million on 21:24 - Jul 23 with 387 viewshype313

Kane to Man City for 160million on 21:23 - Jul 23 by WD19

Erikson plus Erik Lamela is still (just about) there and they doubled their money on Chadli too I think.

But yeah, was all a bit like rushing around the local petrol station looking to buy presents on Christmas Eve.


And ending up with Richard Clayderman and Voices of the Andes.

Poll: Should Muric be dropped?

1
Kane to Man City for 160million on 21:27 - Jul 23 with 377 viewsvapour_trail

Kane to Man City for 160million on 21:24 - Jul 23 by hype313

And ending up with Richard Clayderman and Voices of the Andes.


Classic Clayderman.

Nacer Chadli was on double bass, fact fans.

Trailing vapour since 1999.
Poll: Should Gav and Phil limiti the number of polls?

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025