| Realistic McKenna replacements? 15:05 - Nov 3 with 6561 views | ChampionsofInnsbruck |
I don't know if this one has been done before, and obviously this is just "for fun" speculation and I am not assuming he is going to leave but lets say the worst does happen and say Manchester United swoop in, who do we get?
Some names for me would be:
Mark Robins (Coventry)
Nigel Clough (Mansfield)
Dave Challinor (Stockport)
Steven Schumacher (Plymouth)
Michael Carrick (Middlesborough)
Liam Manning (Oxford)
Darren Moore (Huddersfield)
I have included a couple of people in there that may be unexpected, such as Clough, the job Clough has done at both Burton and Mansfield suggests he's a good manager despite never really doing it in the Championship, Challinor has been superb at Stockport, Manning has had a good record in the lower leagues and obviously knows the club and stylistically would match what we're doing now.
Carrick is probably the least realistic target but you'd hope he could slot into our system with our existing coaches. Robins is a manager I really rate and you can't ignore the work Schumacher has done at Plymouth either. Darren Moore although stylistically isn't the best suited, I do think he's a good manager and deserves a crack with a decent club. [Post edited 3 Nov 2023 15:06]
|  | | |  |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 16:59 - Nov 3 with 2119 views | jontysnut |
You've missed out Big Sam, Harry Redknapp and Ron Atkinson |  | | |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 17:13 - Nov 3 with 2072 views | BlueBadger |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 16:53 - Nov 3 by ChampionsofInnsbruck |
What form? Other than you lot making up a lie that I support Norwich, or that I am some sort of woke race-baiter looking for attention? Which lie is it this week? |
Would you say that you like Talking Blues then? |  |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 17:14 - Nov 3 with 2070 views | Herbivore |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 16:53 - Nov 3 by ChampionsofInnsbruck |
What form? Other than you lot making up a lie that I support Norwich, or that I am some sort of woke race-baiter looking for attention? Which lie is it this week? |
I've said it's a stupid thread and that you have form. Join the dots, there's literally two of them and you only need to draw a straight line. |  |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 17:16 - Nov 3 with 2058 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 16:43 - Nov 3 by RobTheMonk |
I think we'd be looking at a similar appointment to Mckenna. Young prem couch looking to manage.
People coming in just to abuse the OP... Sigh.
There's nothing negative in the post. It's a valid, longterm hypothetical for a discussion. |
As if. 2nd in the league. 9 points clear. Game in hand. And they continue to find negative things to post about. How you are being duped into thinking this is a genuine post is beyond me.
As soon as this nonsense is up, it's time to be the victim. Had enough. Div listing them. Let me know when they get banned for taking it too far. |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 17:30 - Nov 3 with 2033 views | Ryorry |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 16:43 - Nov 3 by RobTheMonk |
I think we'd be looking at a similar appointment to Mckenna. Young prem couch looking to manage.
People coming in just to abuse the OP... Sigh.
There's nothing negative in the post. It's a valid, longterm hypothetical for a discussion. |
Sorry Rob, but there's so much absolutely ghastly sh1t going on in the world, and the one bright spot generally for ITFC fans (outside of family stuff) is the way KM has us playing so brilliantly after 13-14 years of dross.
For someone to, not just once but several times now, puncture that & deliberately spoil our joy & try to turn the mood back to negativity & depression, is actually quite a serious matter I think in terms of the mental health of board members generally. |  |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 17:45 - Nov 3 with 2015 views | RobTheMonk |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 17:30 - Nov 3 by Ryorry |
Sorry Rob, but there's so much absolutely ghastly sh1t going on in the world, and the one bright spot generally for ITFC fans (outside of family stuff) is the way KM has us playing so brilliantly after 13-14 years of dross.
For someone to, not just once but several times now, puncture that & deliberately spoil our joy & try to turn the mood back to negativity & depression, is actually quite a serious matter I think in terms of the mental health of board members generally. |
But this thread is actually fine... It's a "When someone comes for Mckenna" if anything.
Disagreeing is fine but the way some people go at people with 'hot takes'... Frimmers gets it in the neck the same way.
I can't be arsed with this place any more.
Have fun everyone. Let's hope for promotion. |  | | |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 17:57 - Nov 3 with 1999 views | Ryorry |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 17:45 - Nov 3 by RobTheMonk |
But this thread is actually fine... It's a "When someone comes for Mckenna" if anything.
Disagreeing is fine but the way some people go at people with 'hot takes'... Frimmers gets it in the neck the same way.
I can't be arsed with this place any more.
Have fun everyone. Let's hope for promotion. |
Sorry to lose you as you're usually a great poster, but I find it rather ironic that you said "have fun everyone".
That's exactly what were doing, football-wise, till the OP decided to puncture it with a(nother) post implying that the fun will be short-lived because KM's likely to be off. The OP's planting of negative suggestions, Derren Brown style, is quite insidious. | |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 18:16 - Nov 3 with 1980 views | wkj |
So my dear old pal from Hasketon University (not Mel Hazlewood the other one) taught me this game called Spot the difference...
Cook has to go by Burns7 1 Nov 2021 11:01Where is your proof hes a Norwich supporter? If you are going to make these claims you have to back them up. Trying to use lies to defame people is a form of bullying so either apologise or prove it.
You related to this previously banned poster by chance? He also had a penchant for hitting the abuse button. [Post edited 3 Nov 2023 19:08]
|  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 18:26 - Nov 3 with 1958 views | RobTheMonk |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 17:57 - Nov 3 by Ryorry |
Sorry to lose you as you're usually a great poster, but I find it rather ironic that you said "have fun everyone".
That's exactly what were doing, football-wise, till the OP decided to puncture it with a(nother) post implying that the fun will be short-lived because KM's likely to be off. The OP's planting of negative suggestions, Derren Brown style, is quite insidious. |
I'll probably be back. Been in a funny mood today. Think a break will do me some good. | | | |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 18:29 - Nov 3 with 1950 views | wkj |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 18:26 - Nov 3 by RobTheMonk |
I'll probably be back. Been in a funny mood today. Think a break will do me some good. |
I get your point and certainly understand your action. Please don't be gone long - you (and madge) are one of the good'ens | |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 20:01 - Nov 3 with 1878 views | GavTWTD |
Please stop |  |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 20:49 - Nov 3 with 1847 views | Churchman |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 20:01 - Nov 3 by GavTWTD |
Please stop |
I suggest this thread is pulled. When I see words like bullying, harassment, stalking, shut up and abuse is reported by the OP when it isn’t warranted it is both wrong and makes the thread even more pointless than the opening post already reads.
Before the opening poster concerned says I am bullying, harassing etc, I am not. I am offering an opinion. I am perfectly entitled to do this as that’s what a forum is for. He doesn’t need to respond as I’ll now put him on ignore. I hate doing that as it can destroy the integrity of a thread but there it is.
Just a view. [Post edited 3 Nov 2023 21:01]
|  | | |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 20:53 - Nov 3 with 1842 views | Trequartista |
It must be exhausting always rooting for the anti-hero. |  |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 21:38 - Nov 3 with 1786 views | BlueBadger |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 20:01 - Nov 3 by GavTWTD |
Please stop |
You have the power to make this happen. | |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 21:39 - Nov 3 with 1783 views | BlueBadger |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 20:53 - Nov 3 by Trequartista |
It must be exhausting always rooting for the anti-hero. |
That's a very convuluted way of saying 'N******h* | |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 23:39 - Nov 3 with 1723 views | Ryorry |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 18:16 - Nov 3 by wkj |
So my dear old pal from Hasketon University (not Mel Hazlewood the other one) taught me this game called Spot the difference...
Cook has to go by Burns7 1 Nov 2021 11:01Where is your proof hes a Norwich supporter? If you are going to make these claims you have to back them up. Trying to use lies to defame people is a form of bullying so either apologise or prove it.
You related to this previously banned poster by chance? He also had a penchant for hitting the abuse button. [Post edited 3 Nov 2023 19:08]
|
A couple of COI's posts on this thread remind me a lot of another poster who's a constant on here, while the said poster's serial alt egos keep on getting serially banned. | |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 00:14 - Nov 4 with 1697 views | TresBonne |
Not sure why this got so many downvotes, is it really that big of a deal? It's a realistic discussion which will need to be had at some point, unfortunately...
Can't believe people can still be arsed to argue with strangers over the internet, let alone ITFC fans. |  | | |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 00:32 - Nov 4 with 1687 views | FoghornGleghorn |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 00:14 - Nov 4 by TresBonne |
Not sure why this got so many downvotes, is it really that big of a deal? It's a realistic discussion which will need to be had at some point, unfortunately...
Can't believe people can still be arsed to argue with strangers over the internet, let alone ITFC fans. |
What's the point of it though? It's like some tit popping up straight after full time when we've won and posting "guys, just wondering precisely how you reckon we'll all die when climate change destroys the earth?" Can we not just revel in having some good stuff happening around Town for the first time in god knows how long? Or at least not bring down those who are? |  | | |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 00:37 - Nov 4 with 1674 views | MK1 |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 00:32 - Nov 4 by FoghornGleghorn |
What's the point of it though? It's like some tit popping up straight after full time when we've won and posting "guys, just wondering precisely how you reckon we'll all die when climate change destroys the earth?" Can we not just revel in having some good stuff happening around Town for the first time in god knows how long? Or at least not bring down those who are? |
Exactly this. We have had such a rubbish time of it, so let us just enjoy what we have for as long as we have it. |  |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 00:50 - Nov 4 with 1667 views | Vegtablue |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 17:57 - Nov 3 by Ryorry |
Sorry to lose you as you're usually a great poster, but I find it rather ironic that you said "have fun everyone".
That's exactly what were doing, football-wise, till the OP decided to puncture it with a(nother) post implying that the fun will be short-lived because KM's likely to be off. The OP's planting of negative suggestions, Derren Brown style, is quite insidious. |
Hear, hear you're one of the great ones Rob! In fact I positively refuse to lose you permanently on account of this mindless thread. And I agree with you that the OP's post as a standalone contribution doesn't merit some of the responses it's received. I think it's very possible for us to discuss such topics without fomenting pessimism or harming the mental health of fellow users, but sensitivity is key and even more so for users with such a chequered posting past. I can't criticize people for responding with the OP's perceived agenda and previous behaviour in the forefront of their minds, best condensed in Gav's heartfelt plea for it to stop. The opening three lines needed to be worded very differently for this thread to have taken a different course, and I've no doubt many believe the course it took is the one that was originally intended. | | | |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 01:37 - Nov 4 with 1643 views | Ryorry |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 00:14 - Nov 4 by TresBonne |
Not sure why this got so many downvotes, is it really that big of a deal? It's a realistic discussion which will need to be had at some point, unfortunately...
Can't believe people can still be arsed to argue with strangers over the internet, let alone ITFC fans. |
"It's a realistic discussion which will need to be had at some point, unfortunately..."
Yes, in maybe 3 years' time (or further away I hope) - there's zero need to repeatedly puncture everyone's euphoric mood right now, whilst we're riding the crest of a wave for the first time in over 20 years.
"Can't believe people can still be arsed to argue with strangers over the internet, let alone ITFC fans".
Yet that's exactly what you're doing yourself. If you don't want to join in discussions including inevitable disagreements with other ITFC fans on the primary *fans' forum* which is used by people all over the world, the majority of whom are strangers to each other, then you know what to do. | |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 01:54 - Nov 4 with 1635 views | Ryorry |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 00:50 - Nov 4 by Vegtablue |
Hear, hear you're one of the great ones Rob! In fact I positively refuse to lose you permanently on account of this mindless thread. And I agree with you that the OP's post as a standalone contribution doesn't merit some of the responses it's received. I think it's very possible for us to discuss such topics without fomenting pessimism or harming the mental health of fellow users, but sensitivity is key and even more so for users with such a chequered posting past. I can't criticize people for responding with the OP's perceived agenda and previous behaviour in the forefront of their minds, best condensed in Gav's heartfelt plea for it to stop. The opening three lines needed to be worded very differently for this thread to have taken a different course, and I've no doubt many believe the course it took is the one that was originally intended. |
"as a standalone contribution".
The problem is that it isn't a standalone - it's just the latest one of numerous similar posts/threads over the past 3(?) weeks or so, and people are now understandably fed up with the number of tedious repetitions sprouting up.
Indeed they've been so frequent, and the OP of this one is so frequently on here, that on reflection I've come to the conclusion that his supposedly innocent "I don't know if this one has been done before" claim is fake, and that he was just trolling in starting this thread. | |
| |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 02:01 - Nov 4 with 1631 views | Zapers |
| Realistic McKenna replacements? on 16:46 - Nov 3 by Ryorry |
You're about as much fun as a still active robotic hoover overflowing with dog diarrhoea. |
Haha! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
