| TEAM 14:00 - Jan 1 with 5968 views | SitfcB |
[Post edited 1 Jan 2024 14:00]
|  |
| |  |
| No subject on 14:00 - Jan 1 with 4432 views | NthQldITFC |
38s and no title! |  |
| |
| TEAM on 14:01 - Jan 1 with 4277 views | Illinoisblue |
Fridge back in from the cold |  |
| |
| TEAM on 14:02 - Jan 1 with 4188 views | Metal_Hacker |
Who’s gonna play LB then. |  |
| |
| TEAM on 14:02 - Jan 1 with 4151 views | Guthrum |
That's an interesting lineup at the back. |  |
| |
| TEAM on 14:02 - Jan 1 with 4152 views | pointofblue |
Who's playing left back? Clarke with Tuanzebe at right back? Speaks volumes that's seen as preferable to Williams.
Burgess ill or is he with Australia?
|  |
| |
| No subject on 14:02 - Jan 1 with 4147 views | catch74 |
| No subject on 14:00 - Jan 1 by NthQldITFC |
38s and no title! |
My life story. |  |
| |
| TEAM on 14:02 - Jan 1 with 4117 views | StokieBlue |
So is that a back 3 with WB or Axel playing LB?
SB |  | | |
| TEAM on 14:03 - Jan 1 with 4077 views | Whos_blue |
3 at the back with wing backs or Fridge at LB? |  |
| Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| TEAM on 14:03 - Jan 1 with 4060 views | SitfcB |
| No subject on 14:00 - Jan 1 by NthQldITFC |
38s and no title! |
Page refreshed as I copied the link on for some reason. | |
| |
| TEAM on 14:03 - Jan 1 with 4045 views | blueislander |
| TEAM on 14:02 - Jan 1 by Metal_Hacker |
Who’s gonna play LB then. |
Presumably Edmundson | | | |
| TEAM on 14:03 - Jan 1 with 4024 views | WicklowBlue |
| TEAM on 14:02 - Jan 1 by Metal_Hacker |
Who’s gonna play LB then. |
Fridge I assume? Unless a back 3... |  | | |
| TEAM on 14:03 - Jan 1 with 3989 views | NthQldITFC |
Is that:
Woolf - Tuanzebe - Edmundson - Clarke
or
Clarke - Woolf - Tuanzebe - Edmundson
?
Surprised no Humphreys | |
| |
| TEAM on 14:04 - Jan 1 with 3895 views | strikalite |
That actually is a lot stronger than I thought it would be.. |  | | |
| TEAM on 14:04 - Jan 1 with 3871 views | Guthrum |
| TEAM on 14:03 - Jan 1 by Whos_blue |
3 at the back with wing backs or Fridge at LB? |
I was wondering that, Clarke in a more advanced role.
Mind you, don't think McKenna is afraid of playing a team unbalanced left to right. | |
| |
| TEAM on 14:05 - Jan 1 with 3772 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| TEAM on 14:02 - Jan 1 by Metal_Hacker |
Who’s gonna play LB then. |
I make it Clarke or Woolf But I hadn't considered Humphreys for it on Saturday so who knows?
EDIT: And it appears Woolf is a RB not a LB! Doh! What do I know? [Post edited 1 Jan 2024 14:17]
|  |
| |
| TEAM on 14:06 - Jan 1 with 3709 views | DarkBrandon |
| TEAM on 14:03 - Jan 1 by NthQldITFC |
Is that:
Woolf - Tuanzebe - Edmundson - Clarke
or
Clarke - Woolf - Tuanzebe - Edmundson
?
Surprised no Humphreys |
I’m not surprised Humphries isn’t playing. We aren’t going to be dominating this one like we did the second half against QPR. I think he could struggle defensively.
I thought Williams was really poor last time out, and am somewhat surprised he’s even made the bench this time. [Post edited 1 Jan 2024 14:07]
|  | | |
| TEAM on 14:07 - Jan 1 with 3655 views | Vic |
We’ll, on paper that team looks strong enough to get a result. Surprised that Humph doesn’t get another run out - thought he grew into the LB role as the game went on the other night and expected him to play today.
It’s a big ol back line that. |  |
| |
| TEAM on 14:07 - Jan 1 with 3640 views | WeWereZombies |
Trifley stifley, eh ?
My guess is that we are playing a back three in the centre plus Clarke and Burns as wing backs...or out and out wingers if the Stoke midfield is not up to much. |  |
| |
| TEAM on 14:08 - Jan 1 with 3522 views | Nutkins_Return |
| TEAM on 14:07 - Jan 1 by Vic |
We’ll, on paper that team looks strong enough to get a result. Surprised that Humph doesn’t get another run out - thought he grew into the LB role as the game went on the other night and expected him to play today.
It’s a big ol back line that. |
Just played his first 90 in about a year 3 days ago. Had nothing left in the tank. Zero surprise. | |
| |
| TEAM on 14:09 - Jan 1 with 3480 views | DublinBlue84 |
| TEAM on 14:06 - Jan 1 by DarkBrandon |
I’m not surprised Humphries isn’t playing. We aren’t going to be dominating this one like we did the second half against QPR. I think he could struggle defensively.
I thought Williams was really poor last time out, and am somewhat surprised he’s even made the bench this time. [Post edited 1 Jan 2024 14:07]
|
Humpheries was knackered at the end of the last match, bear in mind it was his first Championship 90 minutes and there was little time between games. | |
| |
| TEAM on 14:10 - Jan 1 with 3446 views | muhrensleftfoot |
Weak on the left without Davis or Burgess |  | | |
| TEAM on 14:10 - Jan 1 with 3442 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| TEAM on 14:06 - Jan 1 by DarkBrandon |
I’m not surprised Humphries isn’t playing. We aren’t going to be dominating this one like we did the second half against QPR. I think he could struggle defensively.
I thought Williams was really poor last time out, and am somewhat surprised he’s even made the bench this time. [Post edited 1 Jan 2024 14:07]
|
The main reason Humphreys is not playing is because he played 90 minutes on Saturday having not even been in the squad before. Deservedly keeps a place on the bench. | |
| |
| TEAM on 14:11 - Jan 1 with 3306 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| TEAM on 14:03 - Jan 1 by NthQldITFC |
Is that:
Woolf - Tuanzebe - Edmundson - Clarke
or
Clarke - Woolf - Tuanzebe - Edmundson
?
Surprised no Humphreys |
Has to be the top one for sure. |  |
| |
| TEAM on 14:11 - Jan 1 with 3302 views | WicklowBlue |
| TEAM on 14:08 - Jan 1 by Nutkins_Return |
Just played his first 90 in about a year 3 days ago. Had nothing left in the tank. Zero surprise. |
Sorry accidental down vote, agree Humphries was dead on his feet. | | | |
| TEAM on 14:16 - Jan 1 with 3080 views | burnbudgiesburn |
| TEAM on 14:11 - Jan 1 by JammyDodgerrr |
Has to be the top one for sure. |
Tuanzebe more likely at RB given he did it for Villa | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
