opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 18:37 - May 14 with 974 views | J2BLUE | It's good, but could have used a different background colour. I can't imagine it's one he will hang in his office. | |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 18:38 - May 14 with 966 views | Plums |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 18:37 - May 14 by J2BLUE | It's good, but could have used a different background colour. I can't imagine it's one he will hang in his office. |
Was he at a bus welcome somewhere? | |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 18:38 - May 14 with 967 views | giant_stow |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 18:37 - May 14 by J2BLUE | It's good, but could have used a different background colour. I can't imagine it's one he will hang in his office. |
I know jack about Art, but I think the colour is the clever bit, along with his kindly face. | |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 18:40 - May 14 with 961 views | BlueBadger | Looks like a character portrait from 'Disco Elysium'... | |
| |
I think it's a rather.... on 18:48 - May 14 with 917 views | Bloots | ...excellent piece of art. GSTK. | |
| Enduringly lovable, intelligent and thunderingly exquisite. |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 18:48 - May 14 with 917 views | dickie | They've captured his sausage digits remarkably well | | | |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 18:51 - May 14 with 897 views | NthQldITFC | I... like it. Makes it look like the world is on fire which, frankly, it pretty much is. [Post edited 14 May 18:54]
| |
| # WE ARE STEALING THE FUTURE FROM OUR CHILDREN --- WE MUST CHANGE COURSE # | Poll: | It's driving me nuts |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:00 - May 14 with 814 views | GlasgowBlue | Lovely jubly. God Save The King. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:01 - May 14 with 812 views | MattinLondon | I really like it. Think it’s really effective - bravo to the artist for being brave and Charles deserves praise for not demanding a more traditional portrait. Oh, abolish the monarch, bring on the republic. | | | |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:11 - May 14 with 756 views | giant_stow |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 18:51 - May 14 by NthQldITFC | I... like it. Makes it look like the world is on fire which, frankly, it pretty much is. [Post edited 14 May 18:54]
|
There's definitely a 'fire' thing going on. Wonder if you're actually right or partially right at least? | |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:13 - May 14 with 742 views | NthQldITFC |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:11 - May 14 by giant_stow | There's definitely a 'fire' thing going on. Wonder if you're actually right or partially right at least? |
To be honest, partially right is very good for me, so I'll take that, ta! | |
| # WE ARE STEALING THE FUTURE FROM OUR CHILDREN --- WE MUST CHANGE COURSE # | Poll: | It's driving me nuts |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:17 - May 14 with 727 views | tcblue | Not sure it represents good value for the taxpayer. But the portrait is okay | | | |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:21 - May 14 with 712 views | wischip | It's a bit red, innit. | | | |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:23 - May 14 with 702 views | Swansea_Blue |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 18:38 - May 14 by giant_stow | I know jack about Art, but I think the colour is the clever bit, along with his kindly face. |
Apparently the red of his jacket would have stolen the eye had it been a bland background. So in that respect I suppose it’s quite clever, as his face is very much the focal point. I know jack about art too. It amazes me that a few brush strokes can capture expressions perfectly. If I tried he’d be unrecognisable as a person. Best picture of an adulterer I’ve even seen . GSTK | |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:38 - May 14 with 658 views | Swansea_Blue |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:17 - May 14 by tcblue | Not sure it represents good value for the taxpayer. But the portrait is okay |
This probably is good value, as unlike a lot of public procurement lately I bet it wasn’t done through a middle man from his local pub or men’s club who added a 500% markup. There’s also something fit for purpose at the end to. | |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:51 - May 14 with 616 views | Tangledupin_Blue | If the portrait were for a rock singer's album cover... okay. As a one-off portrait of the king... awful. | |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:58 - May 14 with 592 views | Ryorry | Great picture, and agree with others about the clever background colour, but to me his appearance is made rather more attractive than it is in reality. I suppose you could say that conforms historically with portraits of the monarchy, but to me it detracts from the success of the painting. | |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 20:30 - May 14 with 549 views | factual_blue |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:21 - May 14 by wischip | It's a bit red, innit. |
To emphasise the blood-soaked history of Our Glorious Empire? | |
| |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 20:31 - May 14 with 545 views | Buhrer | Even with the 2 for 1 deal on the ruby red dulux at homebase, I'm still glad the public didn't pay for this back patting. | | | |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 20:32 - May 14 with 541 views | Buhrer |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:38 - May 14 by Swansea_Blue | This probably is good value, as unlike a lot of public procurement lately I bet it wasn’t done through a middle man from his local pub or men’s club who added a 500% markup. There’s also something fit for purpose at the end to. |
Paid for by the Drapers Company | | | |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 20:58 - May 14 with 481 views | tcblue |
opinions on Charles' new portrait? on 19:38 - May 14 by Swansea_Blue | This probably is good value, as unlike a lot of public procurement lately I bet it wasn’t done through a middle man from his local pub or men’s club who added a 500% markup. There’s also something fit for purpose at the end to. |
My value statement had nothing to do with the painting | | | |
| |