| VAR 19:02 - Feb 1 with 650 views | vapour_trail |
Hopefully this will be a thing for us again next season.
Quick poll. Do you think the game is better or worse for its introduction?
I’m negative. Goal line tech is fine, the rest is shite. |  |
| |  |
| VAR on 19:06 - Feb 1 with 613 views | Cafe_Newman |
It's a tricky one. I personally hate VAR. But I hate incompetent refereeing (like we saw yesterday) too.
In short, I'm for any solution that's fair and rules in our favour consistently.
I expect that's not really much help to your poll though. |  | | |
| VAR on 19:07 - Feb 1 with 610 views | Sarge |
It’s worse.
Yes the referee yesterday was a total clown who got so many decisions wrong it was extraordinary. But with VAR we’d be having that kind of feeling every week. It’s total crap, it’s one of the nails in football’s coffin. |  | | |
| VAR on 19:11 - Feb 1 with 585 views | Swansea_Blue |
Agree with the concept, despair with the way it’s been implemented and the numpties who use it. |  |
| |
| VAR on 19:12 - Feb 1 with 579 views | Dennyx4 |
I am in favour for goal line technology and offsides - factual decisions with no interpretation. Wouldn’t want VAR to be involved on subjective offsides, go with on field decision for those.
I really don’t rate VAR, all you get is another referee giving their version of events. One incompetent referee is enough, don’t need two.
I do feel there is an unconscious bias towards the bigger teams, and that is why I would say we didn’t get our fair share of decisions, and also why I would be much happier without VAR. |  | | |
| VAR on 19:13 - Feb 1 with 576 views | gtsb1966 |
It's shite. It wont be a problem for us next season unless we find a manager who can adapt. So no, it won't be a problem. |  | | |
| VAR on 19:20 - Feb 1 with 545 views | ITFC_Forever |
Agree with you.
Goal line tech is fine, it’s quick and everyone accepts the results.
The rest is awful.
We don’t need VAR to adjudicate on yesterday’s penalties - just competent officials. |  |
| |
| VAR on 19:53 - Feb 1 with 509 views | pointofblue |
Anyone watching the Women's Champions Cup final and can explain to me how VAR just gave a penalty? [Post edited 1 Feb 19:58]
| |
| |
| VAR on 20:00 - Feb 1 with 481 views | bournemouthblue |
VAR is needed but the way the FA implement it is pants |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| VAR on 20:18 - Feb 1 with 430 views | jas0999 |
IF a big IF it’s used to cut our clear and obvious errors … fine. But deliberately over an offside by a blade of grass for five minutes … no. | | | |
| VAR on 20:27 - Feb 1 with 393 views | Basuco |
It is very good and is a help for referees, but the way the PL has implemented it is rubbish, I say keep it as I feel even the PL referees will eventually understand the rules of the game apply them consistently, to both teams, something they are not able to do at the moment. |  | | |
| VAR on 20:32 - Feb 1 with 370 views | FrimleyBlue |
This is ridiculous.
.. |  |
| |
| VAR on 20:37 - Feb 1 with 364 views | SomethingBlue |
It's for petty pen-pushers who don't like football very much. | |
| |
| VAR on 20:57 - Feb 1 with 307 views | skinnybob72 |
Regardless of penalties / non penalties yesterday I still don't want VAR anywhere near a game I am attending.
It can get to f***, and when it gets there it can get further to f***. Just to be clear. | | | |
| VAR on 21:45 - Feb 1 with 242 views | ArchiRob |
Yes but only for a captains challenge.
That would remove claims of incompetence and bias |  |
| |
| VAR on 21:55 - Feb 1 with 220 views | bluelagos |
For me it's worse. The delays in the stadium have reduced the euphoria of a goal knowing some bloke a 100 miles away may be about to draw lines or spot an infringement no one even thought about.
I'd give the ref the ability to ask for a review for any decision he wants to and the captain one review which the referee would do, Var only providing pictures.
Any offside, let var review but if they need to draw a line it's onside as its level in old language.
Might they miss some mistakes? Yep, such is life. |  |
| |
| VAR on 21:56 - Feb 1 with 218 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| VAR on 20:27 - Feb 1 by Basuco |
It is very good and is a help for referees, but the way the PL has implemented it is rubbish, I say keep it as I feel even the PL referees will eventually understand the rules of the game apply them consistently, to both teams, something they are not able to do at the moment. |
Easiest fix for me is you put a 60 second timer on VAR.
If they can’t make a decision in that time, it can’t be a clear and obvious error. |  |
| |
| VAR on 23:16 - Feb 1 with 157 views | Mark |
I don't like watching games with VAR, in fact for the first time in my adult life I am no longer watching Premier League matches on TV. I just don't like what the game has become. |  | | |
| VAR on 23:19 - Feb 1 with 147 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
Probably good if you’re chasing promotion or champions league football and not so good if you’re fighting relegation and on the back foot a lot.
We probably get 3 penalties yesterday. No chance less than 2! |  |
| |
| VAR on 23:43 - Feb 1 with 108 views | Whos_blue |
Worse.
It's moved one ref's subjectivity to another's.
It's brought nothing to the game.
I would rather walk home bemoaning a poor ref than put up with VAR ruining the game. |  |
| Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness. |
| |
| VAR on 00:35 - Feb 2 with 66 views | armchaircritic59 |
Was a big fan initially, now say get rid for everything except offsides. Goal line technology has nothing to do with VAR and that's fine too. I don't care if refs make mistakes, they are human and it all usually evens itself out in the end. VAR still makes mistakes and that's after 4/5 minutes of reviewing something about 20 times or more from every conceivable angle. While we're at it, bring in an official timekeeper for all games at professional level. One thing less for a ref to think about. | | | |
| VAR on 01:00 - Feb 2 with 49 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
I was all for it. Anything that improves decisions made had to be a positive.
Now I am against it. The problem is that it doesn't improve decisions, it just makes it take longer to get similar inconsistency.
Take two incidents today alone. It appears as if Solanke kicks Guehi's foot when scoring even to the extent they were talking for quite a while about it being an own goal! But they don't give the foul at all. Then there is the slight foul outside the area before Cunha goes down inside the area for a penalty awarded. This one is rightly reviewed and overturned. But instead of a goal kick as the ball comes off Cunha and goes out, they go back to the foul that wasn't awarded before he got anywhere near the area which isn't VAR's jurisdiction to award. Even then, instead of giving that foul where it occurred, they award a free kick right on the edge of the area instead.
Those of us who were for it just got sucked in by the pundits' analysis always suggesting they knew better than the officials. Instead, there is always subjectivity and error and VAR has simply added another level to that and further delayed that error being implemented.
I think we just have to accept officials make mistakes, just like players and managers, and that it's part of the game. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
