| This is just one example of why he has to go 16:32 - Mar 28 with 5734 views | jasondozzell |
|  | | |  |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 16:33 - Mar 28 with 3778 views | jasondozzell |
Only just seen your post Frimley, sorry.
This is exactly why the club's reputation is in tatters until he's gone. | | | |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 16:47 - Mar 28 with 3669 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
That particular one says far more about Reform than anyone at the club.
Light engagement in copyright theft for a start. |  |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 16:54 - Mar 28 with 3605 views | urbanpenguin |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 16:47 - Mar 28 by Cheltenham_Blue |
That particular one says far more about Reform than anyone at the club.
Light engagement in copyright theft for a start. |
But it says a lot about a person at the club who invited Reform in, lied about it, has still not answered questions about it and, in a statement, not mentioned the concerns or issues once. Ashton,I presume, condones this. |  | | |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 16:59 - Mar 28 with 3553 views | mrshallisfit |
The more I think about the saga the more certain and angry I get. To do what he has done shows complete arrogance and a runaway ego. To use the clubs name and facilities in such a wanton way clearly shows how he believes he has complete control and power over the running of the club. A complete disregard of other people's views and feelings, both the players, staff and fans. The non-apology that was choked from him after several days of silence. I cannot see how he can stay but I don't have endless faith in perhaps 30 to 50% of our fan base. They are either apathetic but even worse compliant, though I will eagerly eat humble pie if that is proved wrong. Ashton I'm sure counted on that. Get the 2-week gap to neutralise enough ill-feeling. It may have to be the players and the manager who wield the knife. |  | | |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:02 - Mar 28 with 3521 views | homer_123 |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 16:59 - Mar 28 by mrshallisfit |
The more I think about the saga the more certain and angry I get. To do what he has done shows complete arrogance and a runaway ego. To use the clubs name and facilities in such a wanton way clearly shows how he believes he has complete control and power over the running of the club. A complete disregard of other people's views and feelings, both the players, staff and fans. The non-apology that was choked from him after several days of silence. I cannot see how he can stay but I don't have endless faith in perhaps 30 to 50% of our fan base. They are either apathetic but even worse compliant, though I will eagerly eat humble pie if that is proved wrong. Ashton I'm sure counted on that. Get the 2-week gap to neutralise enough ill-feeling. It may have to be the players and the manager who wield the knife. |
At best a shockingly poor decision for a CEO.
In reality a dereliction of duty. |  |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:03 - Mar 28 with 3509 views | TheMoralMajority |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 16:59 - Mar 28 by mrshallisfit |
The more I think about the saga the more certain and angry I get. To do what he has done shows complete arrogance and a runaway ego. To use the clubs name and facilities in such a wanton way clearly shows how he believes he has complete control and power over the running of the club. A complete disregard of other people's views and feelings, both the players, staff and fans. The non-apology that was choked from him after several days of silence. I cannot see how he can stay but I don't have endless faith in perhaps 30 to 50% of our fan base. They are either apathetic but even worse compliant, though I will eagerly eat humble pie if that is proved wrong. Ashton I'm sure counted on that. Get the 2-week gap to neutralise enough ill-feeling. It may have to be the players and the manager who wield the knife. |
No, but move on. He's said he's sorry. Doesn't matter that no one knows what for. It's just more lefty woke nonsense and you are scuppering the team's chance of promotion. It is definitely not the lying pos at the head of the organisation who has divided the fan base. I mean he said himself, we all need to pull together, so just get over yourself. |  |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:03 - Mar 28 with 3486 views | StokieBlue |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 16:47 - Mar 28 by Cheltenham_Blue |
That particular one says far more about Reform than anyone at the club.
Light engagement in copyright theft for a start. |
Wouldn't have happened without the last weeks events all caused by the club.
SB |  |
| Avatar - M101 - Pinwheel Galaxy |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:05 - Mar 28 with 3452 views | homer_123 |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:03 - Mar 28 by TheMoralMajority |
No, but move on. He's said he's sorry. Doesn't matter that no one knows what for. It's just more lefty woke nonsense and you are scuppering the team's chance of promotion. It is definitely not the lying pos at the head of the organisation who has divided the fan base. I mean he said himself, we all need to pull together, so just get over yourself. |
More to the point...he doesn't know what he's apologising for either. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:06 - Mar 28 with 3423 views | mrshallisfit |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:02 - Mar 28 by homer_123 |
At best a shockingly poor decision for a CEO.
In reality a dereliction of duty. |
But its his fiefdom. Any and all his decisions are good ones, because they come from him. [Post edited 28 Mar 17:07]
| | | |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:08 - Mar 28 with 3384 views | Ipswich_Crazy |
Why is that in the program?  |  |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:14 - Mar 28 with 3289 views | StokieBlue |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:08 - Mar 28 by Ipswich_Crazy |
Why is that in the program? |
What do you mean?
SB | |
| Avatar - M101 - Pinwheel Galaxy |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:14 - Mar 28 with 3286 views | ITFC_Forever |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:08 - Mar 28 by Ipswich_Crazy |
Why is that in the program? |
I’m hazarding a guess it’s an AI amend of Louise’s fine work. |  |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:21 - Mar 28 with 3205 views | NedPlimpton |
A good chairman would come out and say how deplorable it is for a political party with questionable views about women to hijack a brilliant painting of our fantastic woman's team for their own means
Ours probably gave permission for reform to do so along with a few more gifted shirts
Get him out of our club [Post edited 28 Mar 17:35]
|  | | |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 18:37 - Mar 28 with 2942 views | redrickstuhaart |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:21 - Mar 28 by NedPlimpton |
A good chairman would come out and say how deplorable it is for a political party with questionable views about women to hijack a brilliant painting of our fantastic woman's team for their own means
Ours probably gave permission for reform to do so along with a few more gifted shirts
Get him out of our club [Post edited 28 Mar 17:35]
|
That is clear copyright infringement so steps can be taken. I'm assuming ashton won't have the decency to call reform out on it. Which speaks volumes. | |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 18:41 - Mar 28 with 2896 views | urbanpenguin |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 18:37 - Mar 28 by redrickstuhaart |
That is clear copyright infringement so steps can be taken. I'm assuming ashton won't have the decency to call reform out on it. Which speaks volumes. |
To be 100% honest I think there's a very good claim of copyright infringement from the photographers of the original images that Cobbold dutifully copies as photorealistic paintings, it's an interesting area with some case law but unless she had explicit permission I am not totally sure she can claim to be changing the original images to sufficient extent.
That said, yes, there is a very strong case from her to Reform's abuse, and that could extend to personal damages as well as copyright. [Post edited 28 Mar 18:49]
| | | |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 19:00 - Mar 28 with 2741 views | redrickstuhaart |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 18:41 - Mar 28 by urbanpenguin |
To be 100% honest I think there's a very good claim of copyright infringement from the photographers of the original images that Cobbold dutifully copies as photorealistic paintings, it's an interesting area with some case law but unless she had explicit permission I am not totally sure she can claim to be changing the original images to sufficient extent.
That said, yes, there is a very strong case from her to Reform's abuse, and that could extend to personal damages as well as copyright. [Post edited 28 Mar 18:49]
|
I suspect there is permission given it is a club thing. No personal damages... But Ashton should be calling this out. Perfect opportunity to show distance from reform and demonstrate principles and support of our values...
He won't. | |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 19:15 - Mar 28 with 2617 views | ernie |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 18:41 - Mar 28 by urbanpenguin |
To be 100% honest I think there's a very good claim of copyright infringement from the photographers of the original images that Cobbold dutifully copies as photorealistic paintings, it's an interesting area with some case law but unless she had explicit permission I am not totally sure she can claim to be changing the original images to sufficient extent.
That said, yes, there is a very strong case from her to Reform's abuse, and that could extend to personal damages as well as copyright. [Post edited 28 Mar 18:49]
|
Thanks for pointing that out, genius. | | | |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 19:20 - Mar 28 with 2553 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
She can't have agreed to that, can she?
I hope she engages a top legal firm and gets top rate compensation for defamation of character and misuse of her image.
That is utterly disgraceful from Reform. [Post edited 28 Mar 19:24]
|  |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 19:21 - Mar 28 with 2532 views | urbanpenguin |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 19:00 - Mar 28 by redrickstuhaart |
I suspect there is permission given it is a club thing. No personal damages... But Ashton should be calling this out. Perfect opportunity to show distance from reform and demonstrate principles and support of our values...
He won't. |
The club likely do not own the license to the photos. That *can* be assigned to another than the photographer, but it's relatively unusual. If images are by an in house photographer it's more likely, but images by PA or freelance photographers will nearly always retain their licence, and it would not be in the gift of the club to award them to any third party. [Post edited 28 Mar 19:22]
| | | |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 19:23 - Mar 28 with 2485 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:08 - Mar 28 by Ipswich_Crazy |
Why is that in the program? |
Come on. Fill the dots.
There is the original image. A top artist holding a wonderful picture she has drawn for the matchday programme for a women's football match.
Above it is the same photo edited by a racist to show a racist who hates women's football holding a shirt on the hallowed Portman Road turf and laughing. | |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 19:23 - Mar 28 with 2470 views | ReusersTown |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 17:05 - Mar 28 by homer_123 |
More to the point...he doesn't know what he's apologising for either. |
All the 'hurt' he's feeling of course! | | | |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 19:25 - Mar 28 with 2427 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 19:23 - Mar 28 by ReusersTown |
All the 'hurt' he's feeling of course! |
For being caught out lying about the extent of his involvement. | |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 20:05 - Mar 28 with 2155 views | PhilTWTD |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 19:21 - Mar 28 by urbanpenguin |
The club likely do not own the license to the photos. That *can* be assigned to another than the photographer, but it's relatively unusual. If images are by an in house photographer it's more likely, but images by PA or freelance photographers will nearly always retain their licence, and it would not be in the gift of the club to award them to any third party. [Post edited 28 Mar 19:22]
|
I don't know but I assume they're owned by Matchday Images, who work as official photographers, so there wouldn't be an issue there. |  | | |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 21:12 - Mar 28 with 1731 views | MalcolmBlue |
I’ll be amazed if we have a back of shirt sponsor again after that farage pic |  |
| |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 21:15 - Mar 28 with 1703 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| This is just one example of why he has to go on 20:05 - Mar 28 by PhilTWTD |
I don't know but I assume they're owned by Matchday Images, who work as official photographers, so there wouldn't be an issue there. |
I would assume that you have some fairly strong opinions on the whole situation yourself but probably feel in a situation where you can't particularly articulate them as you need to remain dispassionate from it and simply report on the facts surrounding it. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
