| Broja to Everton. (n/t) 23:13 - Aug 30 with 8995 views | SitfcB |
|  |
| |  |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:14 - Aug 30 with 6279 views | itfckenty |
Something just doesn't add up with this one. Will be interesting to see what the deal was and the situation is with Broja himself. |  | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:16 - Aug 30 with 6204 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:14 - Aug 30 by itfckenty |
Something just doesn't add up with this one. Will be interesting to see what the deal was and the situation is with Broja himself. |
He'll probably play a full 90 in a fortnight. |  |
| |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:17 - Aug 30 with 6120 views | PhilTWTD |
Gather Town walked away after being unable to agree a revised deal.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:21 - Aug 30 with 5940 views | itfckenty |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:17 - Aug 30 by PhilTWTD |
Gather Town walked away after being unable to agree a revised deal.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
Seems to be the case, but it just states for Everton is an "option" so technically don't need to buy at the end. If that is the case, why was the deal different for us? If we didn't need to technically buy if, then surly the risk is much lower. | | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:23 - Aug 30 with 5886 views | Blue_Heath |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:21 - Aug 30 by itfckenty |
Seems to be the case, but it just states for Everton is an "option" so technically don't need to buy at the end. If that is the case, why was the deal different for us? If we didn't need to technically buy if, then surly the risk is much lower. |
Good he can go down with them. He clearly didn't want to be here and was just using us to try and get a 'better' club. |  | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:24 - Aug 30 with 5800 views | itfckenty |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:23 - Aug 30 by Blue_Heath |
Good he can go down with them. He clearly didn't want to be here and was just using us to try and get a 'better' club. |
Highly probable tbh. As we just see with Nelson. | | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:24 - Aug 30 with 5782 views | victorysquad |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:21 - Aug 30 by itfckenty |
Seems to be the case, but it just states for Everton is an "option" so technically don't need to buy at the end. If that is the case, why was the deal different for us? If we didn't need to technically buy if, then surly the risk is much lower. |
I think if you negotiate too hard you
Can end up butting heads, not suggesting this has happened here but everton might have benefitted from our tough stance | |
| |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:26 - Aug 30 with 5711 views | SitfcB |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:17 - Aug 30 by PhilTWTD |
Gather Town walked away after being unable to agree a revised deal.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
Walked away from that to get Nelson…that failed meanwhile the other target Édouard signed for Leicester and Latte wasn’t available…? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:28 - Aug 30 with 5632 views | PhilTWTD |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:26 - Aug 30 by SitfcB |
Walked away from that to get Nelson…that failed meanwhile the other target Édouard signed for Leicester and Latte wasn’t available…? |
I don't believe Édouard was ever a target. Nelson talks broke down, they then moved on to talk to Fulham, who evidently got it over the line - or near enough over the line to mae the deadline - very quickly. | | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:29 - Aug 30 with 5605 views | PhilTWTD |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:28 - Aug 30 by PhilTWTD |
I don't believe Édouard was ever a target. Nelson talks broke down, they then moved on to talk to Fulham, who evidently got it over the line - or near enough over the line to mae the deadline - very quickly. |
Boro I think made it clear Latte Lath wasn't available, to him as much as anyone else.
This post has been edited by an administrator | | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:29 - Aug 30 with 5574 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:21 - Aug 30 by itfckenty |
Seems to be the case, but it just states for Everton is an "option" so technically don't need to buy at the end. If that is the case, why was the deal different for us? If we didn't need to technically buy if, then surly the risk is much lower. |
If it was only an option and not an obligation then what did we have to lose by signing him injured? Did Chelsea call our bluff? |  |
| |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:29 - Aug 30 with 5553 views | Churchman |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:24 - Aug 30 by victorysquad |
I think if you negotiate too hard you
Can end up butting heads, not suggesting this has happened here but everton might have benefitted from our tough stance |
Given he was poor at Fulham last season, we might benefit and Everton might be lumbered with a bad deal. Time will tell. |  | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:30 - Aug 30 with 5493 views | WestStanderLaLaLa |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:26 - Aug 30 by SitfcB |
Walked away from that to get Nelson…that failed meanwhile the other target Édouard signed for Leicester and Latte wasn’t available…? |
And before the dust has settled on that merry go round, Everton nip in and get option to buy rather than the obligation . |  |
| |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:57 - Aug 30 with 5293 views | SitfcB |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:29 - Aug 30 by PhilTWTD |
Boro I think made it clear Latte Lath wasn't available, to him as much as anyone else.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
One to revisit in January maybe, depending on circumstances.
Do you think we agreed for Harness to go because Nelson was coming or would he have gone anyway? | |
| |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:02 - Aug 31 with 5181 views | pointofblue |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:28 - Aug 30 by PhilTWTD |
I don't believe Édouard was ever a target. Nelson talks broke down, they then moved on to talk to Fulham, who evidently got it over the line - or near enough over the line to mae the deadline - very quickly. |
Ah interesting, so we couldn't strike an agreement with Arsenal, rather than it being Nelson's choice? | |
| |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:06 - Aug 31 with 5128 views | berkstractorboy |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:21 - Aug 30 by itfckenty |
Seems to be the case, but it just states for Everton is an "option" so technically don't need to buy at the end. If that is the case, why was the deal different for us? If we didn't need to technically buy if, then surly the risk is much lower. |
What I don't think we know in the Everton deal is wages. With our deal weren't Chelsea paying the wages so the obligation may have been a way to recoup some of the wages money. Maybe Everton are paying a proportion of the wages and that meant CFC were happy to give them an option at the end, so in essence it could be seen as a straight season loan if Everton see this as cover for the coming season only. | | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:14 - Aug 31 with 5017 views | SWBlue22 |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:17 - Aug 30 by PhilTWTD |
Gather Town walked away after being unable to agree a revised deal.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
Why did we peruse a dud deal then ? Seems odd. Seemed obvious to us fans with the info we had this was a pointless deal. |  | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:26 - Aug 31 with 4913 views | PhilTWTD |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:14 - Aug 31 by SWBlue22 |
Why did we peruse a dud deal then ? Seems odd. Seemed obvious to us fans with the info we had this was a pointless deal. |
I assume it was felt he was better than the other options. Obviously the short-term injury made it a less attractive prospect but long-term he was someone I presume they felt was better than anyone else they might get in. However, I do agree, we did seem to spend too long on it. | | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:27 - Aug 31 with 4888 views | PhilTWTD |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:02 - Aug 31 by pointofblue |
Ah interesting, so we couldn't strike an agreement with Arsenal, rather than it being Nelson's choice? |
That I don't know, just that it wasn't a gazumping; Fulham didn't come in and offer a better deal trumping us. | | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:29 - Aug 31 with 4853 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:26 - Aug 31 by PhilTWTD |
I assume it was felt he was better than the other options. Obviously the short-term injury made it a less attractive prospect but long-term he was someone I presume they felt was better than anyone else they might get in. However, I do agree, we did seem to spend too long on it. |
I'm surprised we didn't go for latte. He seemed keen according to local journos. |  |
| |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:33 - Aug 31 with 4800 views | berkstractorboy |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:27 - Aug 31 by PhilTWTD |
That I don't know, just that it wasn't a gazumping; Fulham didn't come in and offer a better deal trumping us. |
I think you reported it as talks with the player were the cause of the breakdown not talks with Arsenal? We must have agreed payment of wages etc with Arsenal to be able to talk to Nelson, so something the player didn't like the sound of? | | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:33 - Aug 31 with 4790 views | pointofblue |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:27 - Aug 31 by PhilTWTD |
That I don't know, just that it wasn't a gazumping; Fulham didn't come in and offer a better deal trumping us. |
Thanks. Sounds like it was Nelson's choice. I think they are slightly more stretched for wingers than we are so perhaps he saw more opprotunities to start with them. | |
| |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:48 - Aug 31 with 4714 views | berkstractorboy |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:33 - Aug 31 by pointofblue |
Thanks. Sounds like it was Nelson's choice. I think they are slightly more stretched for wingers than we are so perhaps he saw more opprotunities to start with them. |
Agreed read Ornstein's tweets fully now and defo sounds like Nelson decided the project was not for him. I think we'd have known that early enough we could have gone back to CFC if we wanted but suspect we had already walked away by then as well. | | | |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 01:47 - Aug 31 with 4481 views | Ryorry |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 00:26 - Aug 31 by PhilTWTD |
I assume it was felt he was better than the other options. Obviously the short-term injury made it a less attractive prospect but long-term he was someone I presume they felt was better than anyone else they might get in. However, I do agree, we did seem to spend too long on it. |
KM must really have wanted him.
I gather that Nelson's a winger, so wouldn't have been as important a target to us as Broja?
Anyway, I'm glad this window's over & we can all get back to focussing on actual football 
All those stickies & keeping up must have taken it out of you Phil, hope you're getting some much-needed beauty sleep now ;) |  |
| |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 06:41 - Aug 31 with 3941 views | Europablue |
| Broja to Everton. (n/t) on 23:14 - Aug 30 by itfckenty |
Something just doesn't add up with this one. Will be interesting to see what the deal was and the situation is with Broja himself. |
It's really odd for a player to go from potentially playing KM's style of football to playing for Dyche.
There are also a lot of questions around financial discipline, Everton have a bad track record of overpaying and Everton were probably more desperate than us.
We didn't really need Nelson, so we will see how we go. Hopefully Hirst will be back soon and we can look at our options in January. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
