Social Media sources 17:20 - Jun 1 with 9115 views | chrismakin | Apparently, itfc player links isnt wanted on this forum for people to discuss, from the owners of the site itself "most Twitter sources are nonsense and I think people get fed up of them being posted." so enjoy your forum, fk knows what you want to talk about during the summer, remember kids, only 'certain' sources are allowed to be posted about, so ensure you find out if you're allowed. offski, enjoy |  |
| |  |
Social Media sources on 17:22 - Jun 1 with 4099 views | DanTheMan | A good 7/10 on the flounce-o-meter. See you soon. |  |
|  |
Social Media sources on 17:23 - Jun 1 with 4088 views | chicoazul | chrismakin you seem like a nice guy and a true Ipswich fan. Nobody wants you to leave I don’t believe? So stick around brother but just try to reign in the constant endless sources from Twitter maybe. |  |
|  |
Social Media sources on 17:25 - Jun 1 with 4077 views | SitfcB | You link tweets from accounts that have 6 followers, it’s a bit different posting that sh’t compared to tweets from Watson/Warren. |  |
|  |
Social Media sources on 17:27 - Jun 1 with 4031 views | BlueBlueBluex2 | Keep posting what you want, when you want. People can use the ignore function if they wish. |  | |  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:29 - Jun 1 with 4024 views | Bloots | |  |
| "Great to see you back on here mate, I was considering deactivating my account if you hadn’t returned" - TWTD User (Aug 2025) |
|  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:30 - Jun 1 with 4009 views | chrismakin |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:29 - Jun 1 by Bloots | |
Not this time, "most Twitter sources are nonsense and I think people get fed up of them being posted." not from a poster! so if the owners of the site don't want itfc content discussed, absolutely fine |  |
|  |
Social Media sources on 17:31 - Jun 1 with 3986 views | Swailsey | Are you quoting a PM from an admin, or something they’ve said in a thread? |  |
| Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA |
|  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:31 - Jun 1 with 3968 views | saffers12 |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:30 - Jun 1 by chrismakin | Not this time, "most Twitter sources are nonsense and I think people get fed up of them being posted." not from a poster! so if the owners of the site don't want itfc content discussed, absolutely fine |
If Phil has said that I think it is disappointing Keep posting mate |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:35 - Jun 1 with 3954 views | Metal_Hacker |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:30 - Jun 1 by chrismakin | Not this time, "most Twitter sources are nonsense and I think people get fed up of them being posted." not from a poster! so if the owners of the site don't want itfc content discussed, absolutely fine |
You big fanny No need to run off , just adhere to the advise a few I’ve seen given before as in reign it in a bit I’m not a massive Twitter user but as Sitters states , if they’ve got a massive following of 6 people it’s hardly credible stuff Not sure what the answer is to be fair. The forum would be a lesser forum without you but ..... Love the enthusiasm |  |
|  |
Social Media sources on 17:36 - Jun 1 with 3927 views | clive_baker | Why so serious? |  |
|  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:37 - Jun 1 with 3901 views | saffers12 |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:35 - Jun 1 by Metal_Hacker | You big fanny No need to run off , just adhere to the advise a few I’ve seen given before as in reign it in a bit I’m not a massive Twitter user but as Sitters states , if they’ve got a massive following of 6 people it’s hardly credible stuff Not sure what the answer is to be fair. The forum would be a lesser forum without you but ..... Love the enthusiasm |
It is no better then people saying all week what the team will be and 95% get it wrong Or when will PL get sacked etc Keep posting |  | |  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:37 - Jun 1 with 3939 views | PhilTWTD |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:31 - Jun 1 by saffers12 | If Phil has said that I think it is disappointing Keep posting mate |
I did say it but it is slightly out of context. I said that that was why he was getting grief in another thread. Obviously discussing rumours is very much the forum's stock in trade. The ITK Twitter accounts with seven followers linking with player X and Y are what I was on about. |  | |  |
Social Media sources on 17:39 - Jun 1 with 3892 views | DropCliffsNotBombs | Look mate, we've sparred a bit but you've also had a lot of support in different quarters, especially regarding your father in law and his health issues. Nobody has ever said don't post on here and that they want you gone. All people are asking is that you listen to the growing number of people who are getting exasperated with every rumour from every no-mark on twitter getting posted on here. I know you say to use the ignore function, but it isn't feasible and there are going to be hundreds of these over the next months. Take this eve off, reflect on what posters (and apparently admin) have said and I hope you do continue to post. Just please take on board what people are saying. |  | |  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:43 - Jun 1 with 3802 views | saffers12 |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:37 - Jun 1 by PhilTWTD | I did say it but it is slightly out of context. I said that that was why he was getting grief in another thread. Obviously discussing rumours is very much the forum's stock in trade. The ITK Twitter accounts with seven followers linking with player X and Y are what I was on about. |
I think most of us know the reliability of sources on information and can make the judgment . The KOA podcast the other day from the journalists was so informative in terms of validity and reliability of information. So most can look at the source and make a decision about the credibility, for example EADT, TWTD, Athletic etc are very close to the money but most twitter is not but does at least invite discussion As always people can ingorne what they want |  | |  |
Social Media sources on 17:43 - Jun 1 with 3813 views | RobTheMonk | Maybe just have one rumour thread rather than a new one for every bit of twitter rumour? |  | |  |
Social Media sources on 17:45 - Jun 1 with 3766 views | saffers12 |
Social Media sources on 17:43 - Jun 1 by RobTheMonk | Maybe just have one rumour thread rather than a new one for every bit of twitter rumour? |
Not a bad idea, maybe pinned |  | |  |
Social Media sources on 17:46 - Jun 1 with 3765 views | footers | See ya. |  |
|  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:47 - Jun 1 with 3748 views | Illinoisblue |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:30 - Jun 1 by chrismakin | Not this time, "most Twitter sources are nonsense and I think people get fed up of them being posted." not from a poster! so if the owners of the site don't want itfc content discussed, absolutely fine |
Out of interest, how old are you? |  |
|  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:52 - Jun 1 with 3687 views | SitfcB |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:30 - Jun 1 by chrismakin | Not this time, "most Twitter sources are nonsense and I think people get fed up of them being posted." not from a poster! so if the owners of the site don't want itfc content discussed, absolutely fine |
Give over you fanny. |  |
|  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:52 - Jun 1 with 3670 views | SitfcB |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:47 - Jun 1 by Illinoisblue | Out of interest, how old are you? |
He reckons he’s 30 |  |
|  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:54 - Jun 1 with 3657 views | SitfcB |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:43 - Jun 1 by saffers12 | I think most of us know the reliability of sources on information and can make the judgment . The KOA podcast the other day from the journalists was so informative in terms of validity and reliability of information. So most can look at the source and make a decision about the credibility, for example EADT, TWTD, Athletic etc are very close to the money but most twitter is not but does at least invite discussion As always people can ingorne what they want |
‘So most can look at the source and make a decision about the credibility‘ Exactly, obviously chrismakin can’t |  |
|  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:57 - Jun 1 with 3613 views | DanTheMan |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:43 - Jun 1 by saffers12 | I think most of us know the reliability of sources on information and can make the judgment . The KOA podcast the other day from the journalists was so informative in terms of validity and reliability of information. So most can look at the source and make a decision about the credibility, for example EADT, TWTD, Athletic etc are very close to the money but most twitter is not but does at least invite discussion As always people can ingorne what they want |
I mean we can but it's a waste of time, right? Why post it in the first place if it's obviously not real? What is the point of discussing something which is obviously false? There has to be some minimum standard to aspire to. [Post edited 1 Jun 2021 17:58]
|  |
|  |
Social Media sources on 17:57 - Jun 1 with 3602 views | bobbyramsey | Post to your hearts content my friend, I don't use twitbook so I'm always interested in a bit of frivolity..... |  | |  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 18:00 - Jun 1 with 3517 views | Keno |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:57 - Jun 1 by DanTheMan | I mean we can but it's a waste of time, right? Why post it in the first place if it's obviously not real? What is the point of discussing something which is obviously false? There has to be some minimum standard to aspire to. [Post edited 1 Jun 2021 17:58]
|
sorry Manny, what is this minimum standard we should be aspiring to? Have we ever had one of those before? |  |
|  |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 18:00 - Jun 1 with 3493 views | saffers12 |
See you tomorrow. (n/t) on 17:57 - Jun 1 by DanTheMan | I mean we can but it's a waste of time, right? Why post it in the first place if it's obviously not real? What is the point of discussing something which is obviously false? There has to be some minimum standard to aspire to. [Post edited 1 Jun 2021 17:58]
|
That's a fairl point but myself included until and past Slater reporting the takeover and until it happened believed it was not happening , so sometimes the rumours have to start from somewhere |  | |  |
| |