| For What it's worth 15:28 - Jan 20 with 2724 views | chrismakin |
I couldn't care less who signs players
But can there be a little bit of thought about them....
New loanee sounds like a right gem
Excellent work KM
* Obviously it's an Ashton signing, but to keep the peace, i'll go along with KM being the one who wanted him [Post edited 20 Jan 2022 15:37]
|  |
| |  |
| For What it's worth on 15:47 - Jan 20 with 2011 views | BiGDonnie |
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |  |
| |
| For What it's worth on 15:48 - Jan 20 with 2007 views | Herbivore |
Such a bell piece. |  |
| |
| For What it's worth on 15:49 - Jan 20 with 1998 views | Fixed_It |
You really don't help yourself, do you?!  |  |
| |
| For What it's worth on 15:50 - Jan 20 with 1989 views | footers |
He just needs three pre-seasons. |  |
| |
| For What it's worth on 16:34 - Jan 20 with 1892 views | DropCliffsNotBombs |
Out of interest, are you part-amoeba on your father or mother's side? |  | | |
| For What it's worth on 16:39 - Jan 20 with 1866 views | BiGDonnie |
| For What it's worth on 16:34 - Jan 20 by DropCliffsNotBombs |
Out of interest, are you part-amoeba on your father or mother's side? |
I googled part-amoeba and now know less about it than 5 minutes ago. | |
| |
| For What it's worth on 16:51 - Jan 20 with 1827 views | Zapers |
What is the point, what are you trying to prove. |  | | |
| For What it's worth on 17:11 - Jan 20 with 1791 views | N2_Blue |
You've really lost it recently.
You previously came across as just a very enthusiastic fan that just had a unfortunate posting style that rubbed people up the wrong way. I actually didn't mind and thought you made decent contributions occasionally
But ever since that ridiculous post about McKenna when he first spoke you've gone proper weird analysing everything that you don't actually know the details about and making ridiculous assumptions as fact and it's really annoying now. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| For What it's worth on 17:15 - Jan 20 with 1773 views | StokieBlue |
Why did you start another thread to just put basically what you put in the other thread?
The best way to "keep the peace" is for you to stop posting ridiculous nonsense all the time and to not think that everyone wants to hear your every thought.
They could make a new watch movement based on the frequency of your posts and it'd be more accurate than an atomic clock.
SB |  | | |
| For What it's worth on 17:15 - Jan 20 with 1777 views | wkj |
| For What it's worth on 17:11 - Jan 20 by N2_Blue |
You've really lost it recently.
You previously came across as just a very enthusiastic fan that just had a unfortunate posting style that rubbed people up the wrong way. I actually didn't mind and thought you made decent contributions occasionally
But ever since that ridiculous post about McKenna when he first spoke you've gone proper weird analysing everything that you don't actually know the details about and making ridiculous assumptions as fact and it's really annoying now. |
This might be the final stage of the cycle before we're all called d1ckheads and the admins are called dictators again. |  |
| |
| For What it's worth on 17:19 - Jan 20 with 1739 views | chrismakin |
| For What it's worth on 17:15 - Jan 20 by wkj |
This might be the final stage of the cycle before we're all called d1ckheads and the admins are called dictators again. |
I think you're all excellent posters with various contributions to the forum of good quality. Some I don't agree with, some I do. So no, no problems here. | |
| |
| For What it's worth on 17:21 - Jan 20 with 1721 views | footers |
| For What it's worth on 17:19 - Jan 20 by chrismakin |
I think you're all excellent posters with various contributions to the forum of good quality. Some I don't agree with, some I do. So no, no problems here. |
And the good thing about that is you can both agree and disagree with the same post within minutes. Endless fun. | |
| |
| For What it's worth on 17:22 - Jan 20 with 1720 views | wkj |
| For What it's worth on 17:19 - Jan 20 by chrismakin |
I think you're all excellent posters with various contributions to the forum of good quality. Some I don't agree with, some I do. So no, no problems here. |
No need to tell me. When you've been downvoted by DaveU as much as I have - you come to accept the curse of excellence. | |
| |
| For What it's worth on 17:23 - Jan 20 with 1707 views | StokieBlue |
| For What it's worth on 17:19 - Jan 20 by chrismakin |
I think you're all excellent posters with various contributions to the forum of good quality. Some I don't agree with, some I do. So no, no problems here. |
I think that's a bit of a smarmy reply.
Best to be honest, this is just transparent. You'll be talking about other forums you've posted on soon and how you can bring that knowledge to this one.
SB | | | |
| For What it's worth on 17:29 - Jan 20 with 1670 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| For What it's worth on 17:23 - Jan 20 by StokieBlue |
I think that's a bit of a smarmy reply.
Best to be honest, this is just transparent. You'll be talking about other forums you've posted on soon and how you can bring that knowledge to this one.
SB |
Ah but what is the considered view of "everybody?" |  |
| |
| For What it's worth on 17:53 - Jan 20 with 1605 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| For What it's worth on 17:29 - Jan 20 by BanksterDebtSlave |
Ah but what is the considered view of "everybody?" |
Why the downvote Stokie, you have after all pointed out to me what "everybody" thinks in the past. | |
| |
| For What it's worth on 18:02 - Jan 20 with 1565 views | StokieBlue |
| For What it's worth on 17:53 - Jan 20 by BanksterDebtSlave |
Why the downvote Stokie, you have after all pointed out to me what "everybody" thinks in the past. |
Given I've said I don't want to reply to you I think it's a bit weird that you keep calling me out.
I pointed out previously that if you're only response is to semantically select one word and cling to it then you've not got a very good argument. I corrected it to "most people" and I think that is true.
Your posting over the last 2 years has gone right off the rails.
I won't be replying anymore, please stop calling me out and trying to get me to reply as I have no interest in engaging. A real shame but something you've brought on entirely yourself with your posts. If the the old DBS ever returns then perhaps I will reconsider.
You seem comfortable in your new edge-lord position though so I hope it serves you well.
SB | | | |
| For What it's worth on 18:05 - Jan 20 with 1558 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Good god, you're the worst, yet most obvious troll we've ever had on here.
And we've lived through Fishers. |  |
| |
| For What it's worth on 18:09 - Jan 20 with 1523 views | chrismakin |
| For What it's worth on 18:05 - Jan 20 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Good god, you're the worst, yet most obvious troll we've ever had on here.
And we've lived through Fishers. |
You do realise not agreeing with the forum police, doesn't automatically make it trolling. We are all entitled to our opinions. If you wish to believe KM is solely in charge of transfers. That's fine. I don't. If you wish to believe this is a good use of a transfer window and a loan space. That's fine. I don't. | |
| |
| For What it's worth on 18:10 - Jan 20 with 1512 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| For What it's worth on 18:02 - Jan 20 by StokieBlue |
Given I've said I don't want to reply to you I think it's a bit weird that you keep calling me out.
I pointed out previously that if you're only response is to semantically select one word and cling to it then you've not got a very good argument. I corrected it to "most people" and I think that is true.
Your posting over the last 2 years has gone right off the rails.
I won't be replying anymore, please stop calling me out and trying to get me to reply as I have no interest in engaging. A real shame but something you've brought on entirely yourself with your posts. If the the old DBS ever returns then perhaps I will reconsider.
You seem comfortable in your new edge-lord position though so I hope it serves you well.
SB |
Oh you edited it did you....probably as well!
Edit... DBS ain't ever coming back. [Post edited 20 Jan 2022 18:12]
| |
| |
| For What it's worth on 18:12 - Jan 20 with 1491 views | ITFC_1988 |
| For What it's worth on 18:09 - Jan 20 by chrismakin |
You do realise not agreeing with the forum police, doesn't automatically make it trolling. We are all entitled to our opinions. If you wish to believe KM is solely in charge of transfers. That's fine. I don't. If you wish to believe this is a good use of a transfer window and a loan space. That's fine. I don't. |
If Makin thinks this isn’t a good signing, then I think we can all put the doubts from Pearson and the Bristol City fans out of our minds and be assured that he is going to be a world beater.
Just my opinion of course. | | | |
| For What it's worth on 18:16 - Jan 20 with 1473 views | Dyland |
| For What it's worth on 18:05 - Jan 20 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Good god, you're the worst, yet most obvious troll we've ever had on here.
And we've lived through Fishers. |
Makers is no troll. Don't be mean :)
Excellent reason why thread mode is great and you don't need to use the ignore feature though.
THREAD MODE THREAD MODE THREAD MODE
(runs away) |  |
| |
| Mullers = tablemodebellend on 18:21 - Jan 20 with 1452 views | Dyland |
| For What it's worth on 18:16 - Jan 20 by Dyland |
Makers is no troll. Don't be mean :)
Excellent reason why thread mode is great and you don't need to use the ignore feature though.
THREAD MODE THREAD MODE THREAD MODE
(runs away) |
nfft | |
| |
| For What it's worth on 18:22 - Jan 20 with 1445 views | Ryorry |
| For What it's worth on 18:09 - Jan 20 by chrismakin |
You do realise not agreeing with the forum police, doesn't automatically make it trolling. We are all entitled to our opinions. If you wish to believe KM is solely in charge of transfers. That's fine. I don't. If you wish to believe this is a good use of a transfer window and a loan space. That's fine. I don't. |
Asking us to believe your football "wisdom" is greater than KM's and/or Ashton's is defo a stretch too far for me I'm afraid. |  |
| |
| Mullers = tablemodebellend on 18:23 - Jan 20 with 1436 views | Mullet |
| Mullers = tablemodebellend on 18:21 - Jan 20 by Dyland |
nfft |
Mullers = the cool young dude you wish you had become innit |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
