| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" 16:01 - Jun 21 with 4457 views | bobbyramsey |
Is it because PB are too gobby............?
Seems strange to end it so abruptly after such a long time.
|  | | |  |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:04 - Jun 21 with 3871 views | Metal_Hacker |
Quite rightly we only want players who want to be here and perhaps he's said something to the contrary ....or we're simply pi55ed off with Boro's negotiation tactics |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:11 - Jun 21 with 3792 views | portmanking |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:04 - Jun 21 by Metal_Hacker |
Quite rightly we only want players who want to be here and perhaps he's said something to the contrary ....or we're simply pi55ed off with Boro's negotiation tactics |
Essentially, we have a 'take it or leave it' offer left on the table with Posh. Below the 7-figure price MacAnthony is still demanding. We haven't ended our interest, but we have made it clear we won't wait around forever. Taylor and his representatives are getting increasingly irritable at the lack of progress in a sale, given that he was promised a move in the close season if Posh didn't get promoted.
As for the user that said Taylor is desperate to sign for Millwall, the Lions may be the only other club to show more than a fleeting interest, but I can assure you his heart is set on playing at FPR.
Def. Fecking. Info. |  | | |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:14 - Jun 21 with 3750 views | Pinewoodblue |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:04 - Jun 21 by Metal_Hacker |
Quite rightly we only want players who want to be here and perhaps he's said something to the contrary ....or we're simply pi55ed off with Boro's negotiation tactics |
Perhaps we have raised the bar and he no longer meets our requirements. Other players, now closer to contract expiry, may represent better value.
Peterborough have an excellent record of getting good money for players, and we look to find added value which may no longer be there. |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:17 - Jun 21 with 3692 views | Naylorsrightboot |
Because he isn't that good....... |  | | |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:17 - Jun 21 with 3698 views | DanTheMan |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:14 - Jun 21 by Pinewoodblue |
Perhaps we have raised the bar and he no longer meets our requirements. Other players, now closer to contract expiry, may represent better value.
Peterborough have an excellent record of getting good money for players, and we look to find added value which may no longer be there. |
Phil said earlier...
"Don't think the player is the issue, getting a deal with Posh is the sticking point and Town have decided to move on." |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:19 - Jun 21 with 3667 views | itfcjoe |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:11 - Jun 21 by portmanking |
Essentially, we have a 'take it or leave it' offer left on the table with Posh. Below the 7-figure price MacAnthony is still demanding. We haven't ended our interest, but we have made it clear we won't wait around forever. Taylor and his representatives are getting increasingly irritable at the lack of progress in a sale, given that he was promised a move in the close season if Posh didn't get promoted.
As for the user that said Taylor is desperate to sign for Millwall, the Lions may be the only other club to show more than a fleeting interest, but I can assure you his heart is set on playing at FPR.
Def. Fecking. Info. |
You think Ipswich being happy to have the Knight story out (i.e. they haven't ruled it out to EADT or Phil here) is them trying to exert pressure on Posh? |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:21 - Jun 21 with 3634 views | portmanking |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:19 - Jun 21 by itfcjoe |
You think Ipswich being happy to have the Knight story out (i.e. they haven't ruled it out to EADT or Phil here) is them trying to exert pressure on Posh? |
Absolutely, Joe.
We hold all the aces in the JT deal. | | | |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:32 - Jun 21 with 3503 views | cressi |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:21 - Jun 21 by portmanking |
Absolutely, Joe.
We hold all the aces in the JT deal. |
Like a house you know how far you want to go price wise if they get greedy move on | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:35 - Jun 21 with 3469 views | portmanking |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:32 - Jun 21 by cressi |
Like a house you know how far you want to go price wise if they get greedy move on |
Agreed, but we are in control. As per my opening post. MacAnthony doesn't like it, but he knows this is one player he won't milk millions in profit from through player trading.
If JT doesn't come here, Posh will have reneged on their gentleman's agreement at the end of Jan. MacAnthony is one of the biggest narcissists in the EFL, so it's possible they do so. | | | |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:41 - Jun 21 with 3359 views | hype313 |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:35 - Jun 21 by portmanking |
Agreed, but we are in control. As per my opening post. MacAnthony doesn't like it, but he knows this is one player he won't milk millions in profit from through player trading.
If JT doesn't come here, Posh will have reneged on their gentleman's agreement at the end of Jan. MacAnthony is one of the biggest narcissists in the EFL, so it's possible they do so. |
Don't they have big financial issues too?
And from what I've seen, not been much talk of their other cash cow JCH. |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:46 - Jun 21 with 3308 views | Illinoisblue |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:41 - Jun 21 by hype313 |
Don't they have big financial issues too?
And from what I've seen, not been much talk of their other cash cow JCH. |
JCH… the player who couldn’t clear a ball more than a few yards when it really really mattered. |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:46 - Jun 21 with 3299 views | homer_123 |
Not really. If we have a figure that we are willing to pay for him and 'boro want more, then we are done.
Or if we have agreed a fee and can't agree personal terms, that's it.
Hardly abrupt given we've clearly been on this a while. |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:48 - Jun 21 with 3281 views | FrimleyBlue |
Perhaps luongo staying for another year rather than going to Oz has changed KMs thoughts.. |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:50 - Jun 21 with 3261 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
Is it not becaues he wants to join his mate at Millwall?
Club has said you need to be 100% on joining or we move on |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:55 - Jun 21 with 3199 views | blueasfook |
I think they may regret playing hardball. If they are asking silly money for Taylor, nobody will buy him and they'll have a demotivated player on their books next season. I am sure the player himself won't be happy knowing he could move up to a Championship club but will be stuck with Play-Off losers Peterborough because they are asking an unrealistic fee for him. |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 17:24 - Jun 21 with 3040 views | Skip_Intro |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:50 - Jun 21 by BlueandTruesince82 |
Is it not becaues he wants to join his mate at Millwall?
Club has said you need to be 100% on joining or we move on |
the issue is with the club not the player...let's not burn potential signings at the stake before a deal is even done...jeez |  | | |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 17:28 - Jun 21 with 2985 views | Keno |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 17:24 - Jun 21 by Skip_Intro |
the issue is with the club not the player...let's not burn potential signings at the stake before a deal is even done...jeez |
 |  |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 17:49 - Jun 21 with 2830 views | monty_radio |
You can never tell whether something has been an "abrupt" break (as suggested earlier in this thread) unless you are on the inside. This holds for all human dealings and relationships. Whether the two sides were ever really close, you can only discover if there is a leak or a whistleblower. Perhaps the break came after gradual disenchantment, but, if you're not on the inside, any break, when it comes, can be perceived as abrupt. [Post edited 21 Jun 2023 18:28]
| |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 18:14 - Jun 21 with 2655 views | Illinoisblue |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:55 - Jun 21 by blueasfook |
I think they may regret playing hardball. If they are asking silly money for Taylor, nobody will buy him and they'll have a demotivated player on their books next season. I am sure the player himself won't be happy knowing he could move up to a Championship club but will be stuck with Play-Off losers Peterborough because they are asking an unrealistic fee for him. |
It’s Peterborough; of course they’ll be asking silly money. | |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 18:15 - Jun 21 with 2654 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 17:24 - Jun 21 by Skip_Intro |
the issue is with the club not the player...let's not burn potential signings at the stake before a deal is even done...jeez |
Not burning anyone, just asking.... the clue is this is thing at the end >?
Ashton has said if you're not 100% on joining town we will (and have) walk away from deals we have heard (all hearsay I accept) that Milwall would be his choice so it seems a pretty fair question to me | |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 18:22 - Jun 21 with 2594 views | tractorboy1978 |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 18:15 - Jun 21 by BlueandTruesince82 |
Not burning anyone, just asking.... the clue is this is thing at the end >?
Ashton has said if you're not 100% on joining town we will (and have) walk away from deals we have heard (all hearsay I accept) that Milwall would be his choice so it seems a pretty fair question to me |
You've got someone posting on this thread that has consistently known about the ins and outs of this deal telling you otherwise. | | | |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 18:24 - Jun 21 with 2586 views | Skip_Intro |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 18:15 - Jun 21 by BlueandTruesince82 |
Not burning anyone, just asking.... the clue is this is thing at the end >?
Ashton has said if you're not 100% on joining town we will (and have) walk away from deals we have heard (all hearsay I accept) that Milwall would be his choice so it seems a pretty fair question to me |
"Club has said you need to be 100% on joining or we move on "
sorry I must have missed the invisible question mark... | | | |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 18:31 - Jun 21 with 2497 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 18:24 - Jun 21 by Skip_Intro |
"Club has said you need to be 100% on joining or we move on "
sorry I must have missed the invisible question mark... |
Look again, its right after the word Millwall | |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 18:36 - Jun 21 with 2441 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:11 - Jun 21 by portmanking |
Essentially, we have a 'take it or leave it' offer left on the table with Posh. Below the 7-figure price MacAnthony is still demanding. We haven't ended our interest, but we have made it clear we won't wait around forever. Taylor and his representatives are getting increasingly irritable at the lack of progress in a sale, given that he was promised a move in the close season if Posh didn't get promoted.
As for the user that said Taylor is desperate to sign for Millwall, the Lions may be the only other club to show more than a fleeting interest, but I can assure you his heart is set on playing at FPR.
Def. Fecking. Info. |
Hope that's case. Posh always negotiate hard so no surprise on that front.
Edit... money and ceiling wise we should blow Milwall out of the water shouldn't we [Post edited 21 Jun 2023 18:39]
| |
| |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 19:23 - Jun 21 with 2131 views | Matt_Netherlands |
| Why did we "end Taylor persuit" on 16:21 - Jun 21 by portmanking |
Absolutely, Joe.
We hold all the aces in the JT deal. |
Wonder if we are trying to include any players in the deal?
Piggott
Harper
El Mix (Loan)
Ball
Camara (Loan)
Baggott or Ndaba (Loan)
Any of those could fit the bill if so |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
