| Smash and Grab on 20:09 - Dec 9 with 2742 views | noggin |
lol. |  |
|  |
| Smash and Grab on 20:10 - Dec 9 with 2740 views | MJallday |
I’m not entirely sure they were watching the same game as the rest of us |  |
| |
| Smash and Grab on 20:11 - Dec 9 with 2722 views | GeoffSentence |
Now that is partisan reporting. |  |
| |
| Smash and Grab on 20:18 - Dec 9 with 2647 views | benrhyddingblue |
| Smash and Grab on 20:10 - Dec 9 by MJallday |
I’m not entirely sure they were watching the same game as the rest of us |
That is a bizarre match report. We could have scored three or four in the 2nd half on top of Hutchinson’s goal. The game felt like a home game for me. We were pretty much in control from start to finish. Michael Duff came out with similar nonsense after the Swansea game and I said if he thinks this he’ll be out of a job soon. The writer of this better be updating his or her CV. |  | | |
| Smash and Grab on 20:22 - Dec 9 with 2602 views | gainsboroughblue |
Would've been a believable match report had the match stats not been at the bottom of it. |  |
| |
| Smash and Grab on 20:24 - Dec 9 with 2586 views | GeoffSentence |
| Smash and Grab on 20:22 - Dec 9 by gainsboroughblue |
Would've been a believable match report had the match stats not been at the bottom of it. |
And this admission in the middle of it all "Ipswich goalkeeper Hladky was called upon first time on the hour-mark", which also happened to be their only effort he had to save. | |
| |
| Smash and Grab on 20:25 - Dec 9 with 2550 views | Swansea_Blue |
lol. They may have got away with that if they hadn’t included the match stats at the end  . |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Smash and Grab on 20:35 - Dec 9 with 2423 views | NthQldITFC |
'Boro were looking far and away the more dangerous of the two sides, yet Ipswich doubled their advantage with only their second shot on target of the afternoon.' |  |
| |
| Smash and Grab on 20:39 - Dec 9 with 2401 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Smash and Grab on 20:35 - Dec 9 by NthQldITFC |
'Boro were looking far and away the more dangerous of the two sides, yet Ipswich doubled their advantage with only their second shot on target of the afternoon.' |
I completely missed that on first read! Does that mean we had 8 attempts on target after that despite them being the more attacking? Sounds are far more breathless last 23 minutes than I thought I listened to. | |
| |
| Smash and Grab on 20:44 - Dec 9 with 2311 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
To all our upcoming opponents, this is spot on, Town have been lucky and the bubble is bound to burst, ignore our league position, you won't need to break into a sweat to beat us. You can even rest all your best players. |  |
| |
| Smash and Grab on 07:58 - Dec 10 with 1666 views | itfcserbia |
"despite Michael Carrick’s Boro creating the better chances, they were unable to find a way past Vaclav Hladky"
LOL what chances? Their best chance was Woolfie's header. Delusional reporting really. |  |
| |
| Smash and Grab on 08:10 - Dec 10 with 1596 views | marvellous |
| Smash and Grab on 07:58 - Dec 10 by itfcserbia |
"despite Michael Carrick’s Boro creating the better chances, they were unable to find a way past Vaclav Hladky"
LOL what chances? Their best chance was Woolfie's header. Delusional reporting really. |
That's a bit blue-tinted!
There was that one where Boro's attacker picked the ball up on the left, came inside and curled a shot just outside the right post (which he really should've hit the target with). Then Vaz had to make two good saves as well. I suppose, technically, Boro did have the better chances as we didn't really create very much but we were clinical with our shots on target.
But we completely dominated the game with and without the ball so that match report is absolute bunkham! | | | |
| Smash and Grab on 08:14 - Dec 10 with 1570 views | Kropotkin123 |
Smash and grab... But we scored more goals than they had shots in target 😂 |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Smash and Grab on 08:26 - Dec 10 with 1511 views | TrumptonBlue |
Club website in partial report shocker. |  | | |
| Smash and Grab on 08:32 - Dec 10 with 1480 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Smash and Grab on 08:10 - Dec 10 by marvellous |
That's a bit blue-tinted!
There was that one where Boro's attacker picked the ball up on the left, came inside and curled a shot just outside the right post (which he really should've hit the target with). Then Vaz had to make two good saves as well. I suppose, technically, Boro did have the better chances as we didn't really create very much but we were clinical with our shots on target.
But we completely dominated the game with and without the ball so that match report is absolute bunkham! |
We had equally as many clear chances imo. Hirst fluffed one with a clear shot 8 yards out. He was denied a goal by a fantastic last ditch block. Broady was denied one with a last ditch block. And there were several other good chances including the one Taylor put narrowly over. They had some for sure, and we rode our luck a bit, but we were without doubt more creative. Even if there weren’t as many chances as we normally create. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
