| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 with 3142 views | Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |  | |  |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:35 - Dec 5 with 3084 views | JeanManuelThetis |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |
What do you mean by 'they' ? |  | | |
| Beat me to it! (n/t) on 10:36 - Dec 5 with 3065 views | Bloots |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:35 - Dec 5 by JeanManuelThetis |
What do you mean by 'they' ? |
|  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:36 - Dec 5 with 3063 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |
how have you got that so wrong?
It's not about promoting it, it's about the discrimination against those of the LGBTQ+ community ( BTW I hate using the word community as it puts them in a category so I apologise for this, but not quite sure of better wording to use here to make my point), not sure why you'd need an H or s in there when we're not the ones being discriminated against [Post edited 5 Dec 2024 10:41]
|  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:22 - Dec 5 with 2861 views | Bucklebury_blue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:36 - Dec 5 by FrimleyBlue |
how have you got that so wrong?
It's not about promoting it, it's about the discrimination against those of the LGBTQ+ community ( BTW I hate using the word community as it puts them in a category so I apologise for this, but not quite sure of better wording to use here to make my point), not sure why you'd need an H or s in there when we're not the ones being discriminated against [Post edited 5 Dec 2024 10:41]
|
Every time a public institution employs/promotes someone because they are from a so-called minority to fill a quota or tick a box, 'we' (your word) are being discriminated against. It's even called positive discrimination. | | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:30 - Dec 5 with 2792 views | BarcaBlue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:22 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
Every time a public institution employs/promotes someone because they are from a so-called minority to fill a quota or tick a box, 'we' (your word) are being discriminated against. It's even called positive discrimination. |
So-called minority? If a minority wasn't a minority it would be called something else. |  | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 with 2787 views | Bucklebury_blue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:35 - Dec 5 by JeanManuelThetis |
What do you mean by 'they' ? |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. | | | |
| Eh? on 11:47 - Dec 5 with 2680 views | Dyland |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:22 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
Every time a public institution employs/promotes someone because they are from a so-called minority to fill a quota or tick a box, 'we' (your word) are being discriminated against. It's even called positive discrimination. |
Heterosexuals aren't discrimnated against though ya big wally.
Except maybe at the odd militant gay club night.* But most straight folk probably don't want to go anyway.
*I'm being facetious before anyonge gets offended. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| lolerama on 11:49 - Dec 5 with 2657 views | Dyland |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
nftffs | |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:49 - Dec 5 with 2646 views | MattinLondon |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
Can you please show your working out for your first sentence? |  | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:57 - Dec 5 with 2596 views | JeanManuelThetis |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
I have literally no idea what you're going on about. | | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:01 - Dec 5 with 2567 views | BlueBadger |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:22 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
Every time a public institution employs/promotes someone because they are from a so-called minority to fill a quota or tick a box, 'we' (your word) are being discriminated against. It's even called positive discrimination. |
Give over you enormous fanny. |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:02 - Dec 5 with 2566 views | BlueBadger |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:30 - Dec 5 by BarcaBlue |
So-called minority? If a minority wasn't a minority it would be called something else. |
Will no-one think of the truly persecuted people here, straight white blokes. | |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:03 - Dec 5 with 2546 views | BlueBadger |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
Go home and sober up, lad. | |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:51 - Dec 5 with 2394 views | homer_123 |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:02 - Dec 5 by BlueBadger |
Will no-one think of the truly persecuted people here, straight white blokes. |
None left innit |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 13:00 - Dec 5 with 2327 views | bsw72 |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:22 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
Every time a public institution employs/promotes someone because they are from a so-called minority to fill a quota or tick a box, 'we' (your word) are being discriminated against. It's even called positive discrimination. |
I'm going out on a limb here, but have you been watching GB News recently? |  | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 13:35 - Dec 5 with 2185 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |
It looks like you do indeed need more clarity! He’s talking about campaigning for equality and freedom from discrimination for LGBTQ+ people. Homosexuality is obviously included in that (it can be in the G, B or Q bits I imagine). |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 13:46 - Dec 5 with 2147 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
You haven’t read the article linked in the OP have you? Otherwise you’d know that’s nonsense that you’re being forced to do anything. Or indeed followed much of the discussion on here about this topic where there’s been quite a lot of considered and neutral discussion of the various elements. | |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 13:50 - Dec 5 with 2127 views | Swansea_Blue |
I really like Hitzlsperger‘s stance on this btw. A really positive way to look at the progress made. It’s a sensible stance to take regarding Sam and Guehi as well - there’s no point being over critical and you do have to believe they would be supportive of a gay footballer in their dressing room. We’ve seen Sam abstain from celebrating with alcohol despite supporting those colleagues who drink. I doubt this would be any different based on what everyone in the club says about his character. | |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 13:52 - Dec 5 with 2105 views | blueasfook |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:02 - Dec 5 by BlueBadger |
Will no-one think of the truly persecuted people here, straight white blokes. |
Says a straight (presumably) white bloke. |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:15 - Dec 5 with 1957 views | cressi |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |
Fed up with all of it can't say anything I love things like love thy neighbour etc people need to grow a backbone what I was told when I was young. | | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:18 - Dec 5 with 1935 views | Mullet |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
When have you been disrespected by the rainbow people? |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:21 - Dec 5 with 1905 views | vapour_trail |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |
Won’t somebody think of the heterosexuals.
‘They’ and ‘them’ FFS |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:23 - Dec 5 with 1897 views | J2BLUE |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:18 - Dec 5 by Mullet |
When have you been disrespected by the rainbow people? |
Almost choked on my cheese roll then.
Superb stuff. |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:38 - Dec 5 with 1823 views | NedPlimpton |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:15 - Dec 5 by cressi |
Fed up with all of it can't say anything I love things like love thy neighbour etc people need to grow a backbone what I was told when I was young. |
When were you young? Because gay marriage has only been legal since 2014 so we probably don't want things to go back to pre-2014 days |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
