| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 with 3141 views | Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |  | |  |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:35 - Dec 5 with 3083 views | JeanManuelThetis |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |
What do you mean by 'they' ? |  | | |
| Beat me to it! (n/t) on 10:36 - Dec 5 with 3064 views | Bloots |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:35 - Dec 5 by JeanManuelThetis |
What do you mean by 'they' ? |
|  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:36 - Dec 5 with 3062 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |
how have you got that so wrong?
It's not about promoting it, it's about the discrimination against those of the LGBTQ+ community ( BTW I hate using the word community as it puts them in a category so I apologise for this, but not quite sure of better wording to use here to make my point), not sure why you'd need an H or s in there when we're not the ones being discriminated against [Post edited 5 Dec 2024 10:41]
|  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:22 - Dec 5 with 2860 views | Bucklebury_blue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:36 - Dec 5 by FrimleyBlue |
how have you got that so wrong?
It's not about promoting it, it's about the discrimination against those of the LGBTQ+ community ( BTW I hate using the word community as it puts them in a category so I apologise for this, but not quite sure of better wording to use here to make my point), not sure why you'd need an H or s in there when we're not the ones being discriminated against [Post edited 5 Dec 2024 10:41]
|
Every time a public institution employs/promotes someone because they are from a so-called minority to fill a quota or tick a box, 'we' (your word) are being discriminated against. It's even called positive discrimination. | | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:30 - Dec 5 with 2791 views | BarcaBlue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:22 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
Every time a public institution employs/promotes someone because they are from a so-called minority to fill a quota or tick a box, 'we' (your word) are being discriminated against. It's even called positive discrimination. |
So-called minority? If a minority wasn't a minority it would be called something else. |  | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 with 2786 views | Bucklebury_blue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:35 - Dec 5 by JeanManuelThetis |
What do you mean by 'they' ? |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. | | | |
| Eh? on 11:47 - Dec 5 with 2679 views | Dyland |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:22 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
Every time a public institution employs/promotes someone because they are from a so-called minority to fill a quota or tick a box, 'we' (your word) are being discriminated against. It's even called positive discrimination. |
Heterosexuals aren't discrimnated against though ya big wally.
Except maybe at the odd militant gay club night.* But most straight folk probably don't want to go anyway.
*I'm being facetious before anyonge gets offended. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| lolerama on 11:49 - Dec 5 with 2656 views | Dyland |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
nftffs | |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:49 - Dec 5 with 2645 views | MattinLondon |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
Can you please show your working out for your first sentence? |  | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:57 - Dec 5 with 2595 views | JeanManuelThetis |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
I have literally no idea what you're going on about. | | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:01 - Dec 5 with 2566 views | BlueBadger |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:22 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
Every time a public institution employs/promotes someone because they are from a so-called minority to fill a quota or tick a box, 'we' (your word) are being discriminated against. It's even called positive discrimination. |
Give over you enormous fanny. |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:02 - Dec 5 with 2565 views | BlueBadger |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:30 - Dec 5 by BarcaBlue |
So-called minority? If a minority wasn't a minority it would be called something else. |
Will no-one think of the truly persecuted people here, straight white blokes. | |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:03 - Dec 5 with 2545 views | BlueBadger |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
Go home and sober up, lad. | |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:51 - Dec 5 with 2393 views | homer_123 |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:02 - Dec 5 by BlueBadger |
Will no-one think of the truly persecuted people here, straight white blokes. |
None left innit |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 13:00 - Dec 5 with 2326 views | bsw72 |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:22 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
Every time a public institution employs/promotes someone because they are from a so-called minority to fill a quota or tick a box, 'we' (your word) are being discriminated against. It's even called positive discrimination. |
I'm going out on a limb here, but have you been watching GB News recently? |  | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 13:35 - Dec 5 with 2184 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |
It looks like you do indeed need more clarity! He’s talking about campaigning for equality and freedom from discrimination for LGBTQ+ people. Homosexuality is obviously included in that (it can be in the G, B or Q bits I imagine). |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 13:46 - Dec 5 with 2146 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
You haven’t read the article linked in the OP have you? Otherwise you’d know that’s nonsense that you’re being forced to do anything. Or indeed followed much of the discussion on here about this topic where there’s been quite a lot of considered and neutral discussion of the various elements. | |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 13:50 - Dec 5 with 2126 views | Swansea_Blue |
I really like Hitzlsperger‘s stance on this btw. A really positive way to look at the progress made. It’s a sensible stance to take regarding Sam and Guehi as well - there’s no point being over critical and you do have to believe they would be supportive of a gay footballer in their dressing room. We’ve seen Sam abstain from celebrating with alcohol despite supporting those colleagues who drink. I doubt this would be any different based on what everyone in the club says about his character. | |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 13:52 - Dec 5 with 2104 views | blueasfook |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 12:02 - Dec 5 by BlueBadger |
Will no-one think of the truly persecuted people here, straight white blokes. |
Says a straight (presumably) white bloke. |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:15 - Dec 5 with 1956 views | cressi |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |
Fed up with all of it can't say anything I love things like love thy neighbour etc people need to grow a backbone what I was told when I was young. | | | |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:18 - Dec 5 with 1934 views | Mullet |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 11:31 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
They = LGBTQ+ people who insist you are either for them by wearing rainbows or against them if you don't and there is no middle ground where people can be neutral. I don't wear rainbows but I want them* to be able to live their lives as they* want without fear and I expect the same respect from them*.
* 'them/they' definition: see first two words of this reply. |
When have you been disrespected by the rainbow people? |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:21 - Dec 5 with 1904 views | vapour_trail |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 10:32 - Dec 5 by Bucklebury_blue |
If he believes what he says ('To be clear - if clarity is in fact needed - the rainbow armband's objective is not to promote homosexuality. It is supposed to help fight discrimination.') then there needs to be a reset. I don't know anyone who thinks the rainbow represents anyone but the LGBTQ+ people. If it did why isn't there an H in there for heterosexual or S for straight? Seems to me they want tolerance for everyone except people who don't agree with them. |
Won’t somebody think of the heterosexuals.
‘They’ and ‘them’ FFS |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:23 - Dec 5 with 1896 views | J2BLUE |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:18 - Dec 5 by Mullet |
When have you been disrespected by the rainbow people? |
Almost choked on my cheese roll then.
Superb stuff. |  |
| |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:38 - Dec 5 with 1822 views | NedPlimpton |
| Hitzlsperger has his say on 14:15 - Dec 5 by cressi |
Fed up with all of it can't say anything I love things like love thy neighbour etc people need to grow a backbone what I was told when I was young. |
When were you young? Because gay marriage has only been legal since 2014 so we probably don't want things to go back to pre-2014 days |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
