| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because 10:41 - Jun 5 with 2847 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
"it’s time for a new challenge."
He's only been here a season.
(When I say annoying, it doesn't really bother me, I mean annoying for Ashton, as if he doesn't already have enough to do). [Post edited 5 Jun 10:44]
|  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |  |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 10:47 - Jun 5 with 2489 views | WeWereZombies |
There was always a 43.9862% chance it would happen. |  |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 10:51 - Jun 5 with 2426 views | textbackup |
perhaps he’s bored of counting 81736 passes a game. |  |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 10:52 - Jun 5 with 2420 views | bsw72 |
It may have been the plan - come in, setup the structure with a view to setting up his own consultancy, which ITFC may well be leveraging rather than having a full-time analysis lead considering that we are back in the Championship.
We just don't know. |  | | |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 10:56 - Jun 5 with 2353 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 10:52 - Jun 5 by bsw72 |
It may have been the plan - come in, setup the structure with a view to setting up his own consultancy, which ITFC may well be leveraging rather than having a full-time analysis lead considering that we are back in the Championship.
We just don't know. |
Wouldn't he say in his message, "Having gone in to set up ITFC's analysis structure..." if that were the case? Would be an added bit of kudos/publicity for his new venture. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 10:59 - Jun 5 with 2316 views | textbackup |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 10:56 - Jun 5 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Wouldn't he say in his message, "Having gone in to set up ITFC's analysis structure..." if that were the case? Would be an added bit of kudos/publicity for his new venture. |
Find him on LinkedIn and ask him direct | |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:01 - Jun 5 with 2286 views | homer_123 |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 10:47 - Jun 5 by WeWereZombies |
There was always a 43.9862% chance it would happen. |
But what's the confidence interval on that? |  |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:08 - Jun 5 with 2197 views | SE1blue |
I wouldn’t over-analyze it. |  |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:15 - Jun 5 with 2106 views | blueasfook |
Im sure we're very very well protected |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:19 - Jun 5 with 2057 views | WeWereZombies |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:01 - Jun 5 by homer_123 |
But what's the confidence interval on that? |
I was thinking more in terms of Poisson distribution...I guess it depends what you plaice importance upon. | |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:22 - Jun 5 with 2013 views | tazdac |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 10:51 - Jun 5 by textbackup |
perhaps he’s bored of counting 81736 passes a game. |
Worst episode of Mastermind ever! ;o) |  | | |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:30 - Jun 5 with 1897 views | homer_123 |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:19 - Jun 5 by WeWereZombies |
I was thinking more in terms of Poisson distribution...I guess it depends what you plaice importance upon. |
Not to skate around the issue but my preference is negative binomial distribution. | |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:37 - Jun 5 with 1849 views | flykickingbybgunn |
To my mind what we want is upwardly mobile people at the club. This bloke has moved on up, hopefully.
Lee Grant has gone to The Terriers.
That is good and shows we are getting the right sort in. |  | | |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:48 - Jun 5 with 1778 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Maybe it wasnt his choice!! |  |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:49 - Jun 5 with 1768 views | BondiBlue |
I'm enjoying the irony that 10 mimutes before the announcement i was (tongue-in-cheek) complaining that we have no scouts.
Now we literally have no scouts. | |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:52 - Jun 5 with 1742 views | _clive_baker_ |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:49 - Jun 5 by BondiBlue |
I'm enjoying the irony that 10 mimutes before the announcement i was (tongue-in-cheek) complaining that we have no scouts.
Now we literally have no scouts. |
He's not a scout. |  | | |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:53 - Jun 5 with 1722 views | homer_123 |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:52 - Jun 5 by _clive_baker_ |
He's not a scout. |
Seems Bondi's posts are being completely misread and interpreted today.... | |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:55 - Jun 5 with 1707 views | _clive_baker_ |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:53 - Jun 5 by homer_123 |
Seems Bondi's posts are being completely misread and interpreted today.... |
He's on his 19th coffee to be fair to him | | | |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 12:04 - Jun 5 with 1642 views | BondiBlue |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:55 - Jun 5 by _clive_baker_ |
He's on his 19th coffee to be fair to him |
Third time lucky. Let me try starting a thread that simply cannot be misinterpreted. | |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 12:38 - Jun 5 with 1461 views | bluelagos |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:19 - Jun 5 by WeWereZombies |
I was thinking more in terms of Poisson distribution...I guess it depends what you plaice importance upon. |
Sounds like a load of Weibull to me.
(This has to be the most niche distribution of posts ever) |  |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 12:44 - Jun 5 with 1432 views | fabian_illness |
There's definitely an opportunity to provide goalkeeping analysis. The last lot we used were rubbish. |  | | |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 13:12 - Jun 5 with 1307 views | OldFart71 |
Perhaps he was asked to analyse his terms ? | | | |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 13:37 - Jun 5 with 1212 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 11:08 - Jun 5 by SE1blue |
I wouldn’t over-analyze it. |
Edit: Just realised your joke, well played! [Post edited 5 Jun 13:39]
| |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 13:40 - Jun 5 with 1191 views | petieboy2011 |
He had a relegation clause in his contract I reckon... |  | | |
| Bit annoying the analysis bloke is off because on 13:56 - Jun 5 with 1096 views | JammyDodgerrr |
Did he have to scrutinise the decision? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
