| Disappointed 11:07 - Jun 21 with 19084 views | bluebare |
Hi I have generally enjoyed the banter on the forum but the bunch of up their own ass bell ends that have taken it upon themselves to belittle anyone that dont agree with. So I will make it as simple as their views and delete my profile and move on. I have a low tolerance of self superiority and idiots congratulations |  | | |  |
| Disappointed on 16:02 - Jun 21 with 826 views | textbackup |
| Disappointed on 15:59 - Jun 21 by Libero |
I do love when you wade in towards the end of a lengthy thread with a non point like this. |
spot on, imagine i'd actually wasted my life posting non points to win (in my head) an internet argument. real super hero over there aren't ya |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:03 - Jun 21 with 823 views | textbackup |
| Disappointed on 15:59 - Jun 21 by SpruceMoose |
Why the fook is this post in the general section?!?! |
should be a "total bo11cks" section for things like this. i'll police it, for free | |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:04 - Jun 21 with 820 views | Libero |
| Disappointed on 15:56 - Jun 21 by NthQldITFC |
Crikey, this is a long thread. Is it any good? |
I’m a key contributor, so in short,no. |  | | |
| Disappointed on 16:04 - Jun 21 with 818 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:54 - Jun 21 by Libero |
Sorry, I caught myself and amended it.
I believe there is a link to the other thread within post 6 of this thread.
Anyway, thanks for being open to the idea of having a read of it, even if you still disagree you are at least being reasonable. I do think it’s a pertinent point that if you’re going to comment on something it’s good to know exactly what it is you’re commenting on but I also appreciate you’re point about how you read the forum doesn’t really allow that with ease. |
Is it the McGoldrick link by factual_blue? |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:04 - Jun 21 with 817 views | SpruceMoose |
| Disappointed on 16:03 - Jun 21 by textbackup |
should be a "total bo11cks" section for things like this. i'll police it, for free |
I shall consider your application fairly my man. Although your prior confession that you don't 'talk politics' may impact the success of your application. [Post edited 21 Jun 2020 16:05]
|  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:05 - Jun 21 with 810 views | NthQldITFC |
| Disappointed on 16:01 - Jun 21 by Oldsmoker |
Started off with a forum poster flouncing off the site and then a battle between good and evil but it lost its way a bit at the start of season 2. |
Thanks. I'll probably save it for a box set binge during the second wave then. Hopefully no spoilers. |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:06 - Jun 21 with 801 views | SpruceMoose |
| Disappointed on 16:05 - Jun 21 by NthQldITFC |
Thanks. I'll probably save it for a box set binge during the second wave then. Hopefully no spoilers. |
The sex scene between Facters and Footers is quite something. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:07 - Jun 21 with 791 views | Wacko |
| Disappointed on 15:53 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
But i was commenting on the op. i wasn't commenting on other parts of the thread, otherwise i'd have joined that area of the thread.
And where has this person been a bigot if they don't appear elsewhere on the thread? |
You were supporting the op. It wasn't an unbiased comment, you were firmly putting yourself on his side. And not only that, you were having a go at his detractors at the same time.
I've been on this site for less than half an hour today and have managed to deduce that the op previously made a bigoted inflammatory post (on another thread), got called up on it by others, then flounced about it. You just supported that flounce, indirectly supporting a bigot. And not in a measured, reasoned way, but fairly antagonistically. Did you mean to do that?
Therefore, this and other reasons make me believe your arguing skills are below average. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Disappointed on 16:08 - Jun 21 with 780 views | textbackup |
| Disappointed on 16:04 - Jun 21 by SpruceMoose |
I shall consider your application fairly my man. Although your prior confession that you don't 'talk politics' may impact the success of your application. [Post edited 21 Jun 2020 16:05]
|
if i fail on that only it'll make me happy | |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:08 - Jun 21 with 780 views | NthQldITFC |
| Disappointed on 16:06 - Jun 21 by SpruceMoose |
The sex scene between Facters and Footers is quite something. |
Well I would certainly class that as a spoiler, thank you VERY much! | |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:10 - Jun 21 with 768 views | Ryorry |
| Disappointed on 15:44 - Jun 21 by Libero |
Sorry if this is a bit brief or jumbled, I just typed out a lengthy response only from my iPad to die before I could hit post so I’ve had to login on my phone which isn’t a great way to read or write on the forum.
I can see that I made an error when my eyes brushed across your post, I interpreted your original comment to be a signal that you were about to block me and that you requested I did the same to you. I was wrong, please accept my sincere apologies for this.
I won’t be blocking you as I don’t agree with that kind of censorship. I’m not sure it’s particularly adult to just ignore people when you don’t like what they say.
I will still be pointing out whenever I think you or any other poster has been a berk or made a spurious comment, however I fully expect other posters to correct me when I’m a berk or have got my facts wrong, just as you have here.
I reserve the right to not engage when I see fit but in my opinion everyone should have the right to at least put something to someone and be heard.
I haven’t changed my opinion on how on this occasion you’re on the wrong side of the debate and for rather odd reasons you’re siding with some of the most unpleasant posters on the board, but I do 100% concede with apologies that I misread your post re: ignoring me. My bad and well highlighted. [Post edited 21 Jun 2020 15:48]
|
OK, appreciate all of that Libero, thanks - I would now like to shake hands (or should it be bump elbows!) draw a line under our previous hostilities and move on, you up for that?
I would also like just to clarify tho that I was not intentionally siding with "some of the most unpleasant posters on the board" (because of their racist or any other kind of bigoted attitudes, or general abusiveness). I was simply replying to what I thought was a general comment in the OP about what happens *generally* sometimes on the board, which comment I still think stands in its own right if taken purely on its own, without the need to refer to any other context - though of course I can see that that other context obviously applies *as well*, now it's been explained to me. You are of course free to disagree with any of the above!  |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:12 - Jun 21 with 742 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:54 - Jun 21 by Libero |
Sorry, I caught myself and amended it.
I believe there is a link to the other thread within post 6 of this thread.
Anyway, thanks for being open to the idea of having a read of it, even if you still disagree you are at least being reasonable. I do think it’s a pertinent point that if you’re going to comment on something it’s good to know exactly what it is you’re commenting on but I also appreciate you’re point about how you read the forum doesn’t really allow that with ease. |
Taking a break now. If it is the McGoldrick thread and bluebare comment on all lives matter
a) my opinion is 'black lives matter' is correct not 'all lives matter' in the context of what the situation is in this world today, it would only be 'all lives matter' in utopia
b) i don't really think it's racist to say otherwise, although it may be something a racist would say
c) i cannot believe how hidden away that is and how i am expected to not just read this thread but a link to another thread.
d) i stand by the point made by the op , playing the ball not the man, and this thread proves that singular point
if it is not that then will have a look later. [Post edited 21 Jun 2020 16:12]
| |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:14 - Jun 21 with 726 views | Libero |
| Disappointed on 16:02 - Jun 21 by textbackup |
spot on, imagine i'd actually wasted my life posting non points to win (in my head) an internet argument. real super hero over there aren't ya |
I just enjoy the fuss you make about these threads, you cried about a few of them making their way into the football chat yet you appear to always pop your bonce up at the end to make a snide remark in them even when placed in general.
I’ve had a pretty decent day enjoying my first Fathers Day drinking Ghost Ship like water, playing FM/Xbox and chatting to my mates via the headset and posting on the forum most of the day.
Missus is cooking me one of my favourite meals tonight too!
I certainly feel like a “super hero” right now buh. | | | |
| Disappointed on 16:17 - Jun 21 with 707 views | Libero |
| Disappointed on 16:10 - Jun 21 by Ryorry |
OK, appreciate all of that Libero, thanks - I would now like to shake hands (or should it be bump elbows!) draw a line under our previous hostilities and move on, you up for that?
I would also like just to clarify tho that I was not intentionally siding with "some of the most unpleasant posters on the board" (because of their racist or any other kind of bigoted attitudes, or general abusiveness). I was simply replying to what I thought was a general comment in the OP about what happens *generally* sometimes on the board, which comment I still think stands in its own right if taken purely on its own, without the need to refer to any other context - though of course I can see that that other context obviously applies *as well*, now it's been explained to me. You are of course free to disagree with any of the above! |
There were no “hostilities” in my book, you made a bit of a tit out of yourself, I and other posters highlighted it and you doubled down.
I’m aware of your stance, I still disagree with it, I just have no issues with admitting when I’m wrong and made sure I gave you the courtesy of an apology for my misread. [Post edited 21 Jun 2020 18:16]
| | | |
| Disappointed on 16:22 - Jun 21 with 693 views | textbackup |
| Disappointed on 16:14 - Jun 21 by Libero |
I just enjoy the fuss you make about these threads, you cried about a few of them making their way into the football chat yet you appear to always pop your bonce up at the end to make a snide remark in them even when placed in general.
I’ve had a pretty decent day enjoying my first Fathers Day drinking Ghost Ship like water, playing FM/Xbox and chatting to my mates via the headset and posting on the forum most of the day.
Missus is cooking me one of my favourite meals tonight too!
I certainly feel like a “super hero” right now buh. |
you've spent your first fathers day playing the computer and arguing online..... cool buh
point of order - I made reference to 2 threads being in the football section previously, 2. | |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:23 - Jun 21 with 690 views | Libero |
| Disappointed on 16:12 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
Taking a break now. If it is the McGoldrick thread and bluebare comment on all lives matter
a) my opinion is 'black lives matter' is correct not 'all lives matter' in the context of what the situation is in this world today, it would only be 'all lives matter' in utopia
b) i don't really think it's racist to say otherwise, although it may be something a racist would say
c) i cannot believe how hidden away that is and how i am expected to not just read this thread but a link to another thread.
d) i stand by the point made by the op , playing the ball not the man, and this thread proves that singular point
if it is not that then will have a look later. [Post edited 21 Jun 2020 16:12]
|
You have the correct thread, tried to signify that to you earlier with an upvote.
Thanks for taking the time to inform yourself. Appreciate we don’t fully agree and don’t have any desire to further debate the merits of our separate views.
I will however say that I do always attempt to play the ball while in discussion, I enjoy the discourse and it doesn’t matter to me what people’s politics are but that they are making pertinent points, with that said I’m not immune from a snide p1ss taking comment, so I get where you’re coming from.
Enjoy the rest of your Sunday mate. [Post edited 21 Jun 2020 16:24]
| | | |
| Disappointed on 16:28 - Jun 21 with 674 views | Libero |
| Disappointed on 16:22 - Jun 21 by textbackup |
you've spent your first fathers day playing the computer and arguing online..... cool buh
point of order - I made reference to 2 threads being in the football section previously, 2. |
Thanks mate, It’s been lovely having a relaxing day doing whatever I want.
I wouldn’t say I’m arguing with anyone, I’m having discussions with people, not everything has to be so aggressively charged. I know some people aren’t as verbose and are a bit monosyllabic but I enjoy talking to people, even when I don’t agree with them.
How have you spent yours? Maybe next year I can hit the dizzy heights of texters! | | | |
| Disappointed on 16:29 - Jun 21 with 668 views | gordon |
| Disappointed on 16:05 - Jun 21 by NthQldITFC |
Thanks. I'll probably save it for a box set binge during the second wave then. Hopefully no spoilers. |
It's rather difficult to ascertain what actual substance there is to the whole thread. I do get a distinct sense that Trequartista is on the brink of winning though, if he just keeps plugging away for 30 or so more posts. |  | | |
| Disappointed on 16:38 - Jun 21 with 636 views | GaryCooper |
| Disappointed on 11:37 - Jun 21 by LankHenners |
These are the undefeated types of flounce posts but it's especially funny that this comes after the OP said 'all lives matter' then told people to 'watch noughts and crosses' when called out for saying something so daft. |
Nearly as stupid as wearing medical gloves in public? Pr1ck. |  | | |
| Disappointed on 16:40 - Jun 21 with 620 views | SpruceMoose |
| Disappointed on 16:38 - Jun 21 by GaryCooper |
Nearly as stupid as wearing medical gloves in public? Pr1ck. |
Jesus man. Are you OK? Your last dozen posts have been nothing but spittle flecked bile.
Seriously, are you OK? [Post edited 21 Jun 2020 16:45]
| |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Disappointed on 16:53 - Jun 21 with 564 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
| Disappointed on 15:38 - Jun 21 by Oldsmoker |
So while we were hoarding loo roll you hoarded popcorn.
Words fail me. |
I went a little left field at the time, however moments like this, moments like this on TWTD, I know I made the correct decision. |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 17:05 - Jun 21 with 543 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Disappointed on 16:12 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
Taking a break now. If it is the McGoldrick thread and bluebare comment on all lives matter
a) my opinion is 'black lives matter' is correct not 'all lives matter' in the context of what the situation is in this world today, it would only be 'all lives matter' in utopia
b) i don't really think it's racist to say otherwise, although it may be something a racist would say
c) i cannot believe how hidden away that is and how i am expected to not just read this thread but a link to another thread.
d) i stand by the point made by the op , playing the ball not the man, and this thread proves that singular point
if it is not that then will have a look later. [Post edited 21 Jun 2020 16:12]
|
Point D, if I understand you correctly, is nonsense. In this thread you played the man, not the issue.
Others in this thread, who argued against your points, had read the thread in question and were arguing about the issue.
You have not proven anything to a singular point.
The OP, even without the context, is rude, hypocritical and not in the spirit of a forum which exists to share and discuss opinions. |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Disappointed on 17:15 - Jun 21 with 520 views | BlueBadger |
| Disappointed on 14:45 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
hmmm a net score of 8 uppies at this moment. It seems those that howl the loudest and wave imaginary yellows may not be in the majority. |
Yeah, but look at the company you're keeping there. |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 17:17 - Jun 21 with 506 views | NewcyBlue |
| Disappointed on 14:42 - Jun 21 by 26_Paz |
Dodgy views on race and corona? I think the BLM protests are an over-reaction, especially so in the context of corona, not sure that’s a ‘dodgy’ opinion |
I’ve only just seen this
You’re more than welcome to present your argument, until you’ve had to stop someone from racially abusing the woman you love, I suggest you keep your opinion on the matter to yourself.
Over-reaction. You’re a bloody idiot. Your life hasn’t been made harder because of the colour of your skin or the country you are from, and you dare say the BLM is an over-reaction.
I would welcome introducing you to my son, just so I can “don’t grow up to be such a person, with such insular views.” Not that I ever think he would.
You’re a disgrace. |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 17:26 - Jun 21 with 479 views | Ryorry |
| Disappointed on 17:05 - Jun 21 by Kropotkin123 |
Point D, if I understand you correctly, is nonsense. In this thread you played the man, not the issue.
Others in this thread, who argued against your points, had read the thread in question and were arguing about the issue.
You have not proven anything to a singular point.
The OP, even without the context, is rude, hypocritical and not in the spirit of a forum which exists to share and discuss opinions. |
I re-read the OP in the light of your last para, and you're right, it's quite a bit ruder than I remembered from a first reading. Re the comments not being in "spirit of the forum", he's hardly the only one though is he, even on this thread alone. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
