| Disappointed 11:07 - Jun 21 with 19112 views | bluebare |
Hi I have generally enjoyed the banter on the forum but the bunch of up their own ass bell ends that have taken it upon themselves to belittle anyone that dont agree with. So I will make it as simple as their views and delete my profile and move on. I have a low tolerance of self superiority and idiots congratulations |  | | |  |
| Disappointed on 15:24 - Jun 21 with 670 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:21 - Jun 21 by SpruceMoose |
What issue Trekkie? That you didn't read the thread but thought, 'gosh darn it my opinion is just so super special who needs all that context business?'
You were lazy. You incorrectly thought your post has some kind of merit. Now you're embarrassed.
Those are the facts! |
The only 'fact' is that I haven't read every post on this thread. The 'opinion' is whether one is obliged to before commenting. There are some threads on here that scroll down for miles.
And I would go further to suggest, that as i have said already to you, i play the man not the ball, so i don't really care what angle the person is coming from, my comment is directly related to the post i was commenting on. |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:24 - Jun 21 with 668 views | Libero |
| Disappointed on 15:21 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
I read the whole op and it struck a chord saw the post count and made my comment. All very simple.
I don't really understand what is contained in these other pages that would change my mind on that anyway. If someone has said something racist surely it would have been removed? |
I appreciate your engagement.
I’m sorry to ask again but have you read the thread in question?
Various people have since in this thread offered solid rationale and reasoning as to how and why the claims made in the OP in this post are undermined by the fact they’re in reaction to be challenged on ignorance being displayed in the original thread in question. |  | | |
| Disappointed on 15:26 - Jun 21 with 661 views | SpruceMoose |
| Disappointed on 15:24 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
The only 'fact' is that I haven't read every post on this thread. The 'opinion' is whether one is obliged to before commenting. There are some threads on here that scroll down for miles.
And I would go further to suggest, that as i have said already to you, i play the man not the ball, so i don't really care what angle the person is coming from, my comment is directly related to the post i was commenting on. |
Cool.
This is like debating with a pot plant. My advice to you is do some reading. Any reading.
I'm oot. |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:26 - Jun 21 with 664 views | Wacko |
| Disappointed on 14:45 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
hmmm a net score of 8 uppies at this moment. It seems those that howl the loudest and wave imaginary yellows may not be in the majority. |
Now the net score is -1, your evidence has gone in the direction of your arguing skills | |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:27 - Jun 21 with 651 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:17 - Jun 21 by SpruceMoose |
Mate,
You waded in, didn't bother to read anything, sprouted bollox and cosied up to a blubbing racist, and had a blub yourself when you got called out.
What kind of reaction to that level of laziness and ignorance were you hoping for? This isn't Mumsnet you know. |
It is not lazy to read every reply in a thread, it is not an obligation.
And also, i read that he deleted his account as soon as he posted, so why would i think he would have contributed further? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Disappointed on 15:28 - Jun 21 with 646 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Disappointed on 15:22 - Jun 21 by SpruceMoose |
I'm glad someone else can see through his utter BS. |
Frankly, I'm embarrassed for them. Their continuation after such an omission shows no shame.
No doubt I'll get lumped in 'your gang', even though I've argued with your points many times in the past and will do again in the future. |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:28 - Jun 21 with 638 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
| Disappointed on 14:04 - Jun 21 by PhilTWTD |
I'm not sure you should have been surprised that your post would receive short shrift given the use of a loaded phrase like "all lives matter" and subsequently appeared unwilling to defend your position when called out.
While I agree that there can sometimes be an element of people 'piling on' in some discussions in a manner which I feel sometimes does go over the top, I'm not sure this was such an occasion and if any poster is going to post something which they should be aware might be inflammatory they ought to be able and willing to present a defence when challenged. |
"there can sometimes be an element of people 'piling on' in some discussions in a manner which I feel sometimes does go over the top"
That's the understatement of the century.
Currently on my second bag of popcorn reading this ever growing thread. |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:30 - Jun 21 with 634 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:24 - Jun 21 by Libero |
I appreciate your engagement.
I’m sorry to ask again but have you read the thread in question?
Various people have since in this thread offered solid rationale and reasoning as to how and why the claims made in the OP in this post are undermined by the fact they’re in reaction to be challenged on ignorance being displayed in the original thread in question. |
Don't be sorry, you are engaging rationally and that is always appreciated by me, i missed your question.
No i read the op only. I read the board in thread mode i think it is called, as i can see who has replied to who has replied to who so i saw the op and commented. | |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:30 - Jun 21 with 625 views | jas0999 |
| Disappointed on 15:00 - Jun 21 by Herbivore |
If you think people protesting against Black people being killed because of the colour of their skin is an overreaction then I'm afraid that is a dodgy opinion. In fact it's a racist one. If you don't stand against racism, which very obviously you don't, you are tacitly siding with the racists. |
Great post. Completely agree. | | | |
| Disappointed on 15:31 - Jun 21 with 616 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:26 - Jun 21 by SpruceMoose |
Cool.
This is like debating with a pot plant. My advice to you is do some reading. Any reading.
I'm oot. |
I wrote it rationally and this is the reply i get. FFS | |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:33 - Jun 21 with 595 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:21 - Jun 21 by Kropotkin123 |
You didn't even read what the issue was about.
Proof that you argue the person and not the issue. |
Saying the word proof doesn't mean something is proof. This makes no sense whatsoever. | |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:34 - Jun 21 with 590 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:28 - Jun 21 by Kropotkin123 |
Frankly, I'm embarrassed for them. Their continuation after such an omission shows no shame.
No doubt I'll get lumped in 'your gang', even though I've argued with your points many times in the past and will do again in the future. |
What i have omitted? | |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:36 - Jun 21 with 574 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:17 - Jun 21 by SpruceMoose |
Mate,
You waded in, didn't bother to read anything, sprouted bollox and cosied up to a blubbing racist, and had a blub yourself when you got called out.
What kind of reaction to that level of laziness and ignorance were you hoping for? This isn't Mumsnet you know. |
I have just scrolled down and
a) the thread is massive it would take ages to read that
b) bluebare doesn't appear again does he, he did delete his account. was i supposed to have read another thread? | |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:36 - Jun 21 with 576 views | footers |
| Disappointed on 15:34 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
What i have omitted? |
Context. Which you would gain by reading but for some odd reason you refuse. |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:37 - Jun 21 with 574 views | 26_Paz |
| Disappointed on 15:34 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
What i have omitted? |
It’s not worth it mate, they’ll shout you down. This forum belongs to them. Better to make your peace with that ... |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:38 - Jun 21 with 563 views | Oldsmoker |
| Disappointed on 15:28 - Jun 21 by TheTrueBlue1878 |
"there can sometimes be an element of people 'piling on' in some discussions in a manner which I feel sometimes does go over the top"
That's the understatement of the century.
Currently on my second bag of popcorn reading this ever growing thread. |
So while we were hoarding loo roll you hoarded popcorn.
Words fail me. |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:40 - Jun 21 with 549 views | Ryorry |
| Disappointed on 15:23 - Jun 21 by Enigma_Blue |
That's fair enough ryorry. You have to remember though that I didn't start that McCann thread. At the start i simply provided links to to facts that some appeared not to be aware of then later on i gave my opinion.
I get what you are saying about trial by social media. No hard feelings |
Appreciate you coming back with that Enigma, thanks, & I'd forgotten who the starter of the McCann thread was. Absolutely no hard feelings of course - I wish all disputes on here could be resolved in such a friendly way! |  |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:41 - Jun 21 with 550 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:26 - Jun 21 by Wacko |
Now the net score is -1, your evidence has gone in the direction of your arguing skills |
Clearly that is a reaction to my post but nevertheless I have to admit I may not be in the majority. That is ok.
My arguing skills are fine in my opinion. It is me attempting to engage with every post, others are not. I only resort to negative comments when they are first directed at me. | |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:42 - Jun 21 with 529 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:37 - Jun 21 by 26_Paz |
It’s not worth it mate, they’ll shout you down. This forum belongs to them. Better to make your peace with that ... |
I am not allowed to agree with you until i have studied your posting history apparently. | |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:43 - Jun 21 with 525 views | footers |
| Disappointed on 15:41 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
Clearly that is a reaction to my post but nevertheless I have to admit I may not be in the majority. That is ok.
My arguing skills are fine in my opinion. It is me attempting to engage with every post, others are not. I only resort to negative comments when they are first directed at me. |
"My arguing skills are fine in my opinion."
Agree to disagree here. Evidence: you've been posting for an hour on a subject you know nothing about and refuse to understand why.
Funny way to spend a Sunday. | |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:43 - Jun 21 with 519 views | Trequartista |
| Disappointed on 15:36 - Jun 21 by footers |
Context. Which you would gain by reading but for some odd reason you refuse. |
Where have i refused? I said i hadn't read it, not that i refused to it. I don't even know where it is. I assumed it was in this thread, but as the OP made good on his comment to delete his account, i now assume not. So i was supposed to be aware of another thread? | |
| |
| Disappointed on 15:44 - Jun 21 with 518 views | footers |
| Disappointed on 15:43 - Jun 21 by Trequartista |
Where have i refused? I said i hadn't read it, not that i refused to it. I don't even know where it is. I assumed it was in this thread, but as the OP made good on his comment to delete his account, i now assume not. So i was supposed to be aware of another thread? |
It's all one page one. As has been pointed out to you.
P.S. "a) the thread is massive it would take ages to read that" seems like you refusing to read the thread. Because you can't be arsed. So why spend an hour posting about it? [Post edited 21 Jun 2020 15:46]
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
