By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
They are only considering suing Hawkeye according to reports.
So if it had given that Sheffield United goal then maybe Villa go on to draw anyway. Why assume they lose with 50 mins left when they’d then need to score.
That didn’t relegate Bournemouth. That was Bournemouth and in part Villa taking 7 points from their last 9.
Oh **** off Bournemouth. on 17:34 - Jul 28 by Funge
Well, in the event that the PL fancy a meta-argument on the concept of logic, perhaps they will ask you to come and mediate between them and Bournemouth.
The concept of 'whinging' is implicit on Bournemouth's part in this instance, as you are well aware.
Watford could doubtless point to numerous decisions that failed to go their way this year, resulting in their relegation - but they haven't. THey acknowledge that when all is said and done, they weren't quite good enough. Fair enough, right?
Although I still say the cheating scum that was Van Nistelrooy played a significant part in our demise.
Oh **** off Bournemouth. on 17:43 - Jul 28 by jeera
Although I still say the cheating scum that was Van Nistelrooy played a significant part in our demise.
I don't care that we were crap all season.
It was still his fault, the ****.
I still point the finger at the very soft penalty given at Sunderland on opening day - had that not been given and, of course the game finished 0-0 we would have been above Sunderland on goal difference heading into final day. Would we have shipped five at Liverpool knowing we had more of a real chance of survival? Probably but we’ll never know.
I know you have a reputation to keep up, but that is certainly enough evidence to express an opinion on a forum, even if it wouldn't stand up in court.
Oh **** off Bournemouth. on 16:29 - Jul 28 by sparks
Course they would. Can't libel a club as a whole, especially with such vague assertions as "according to reports". And the only reports I have seen say they are discussing with their lawyers and the PL- which is a hell of a long way from sueing anyone.
[Post edited 28 Jul 2020 16:29]
It certainly is. Which is why all articles have clarified the position.
You like Bournemouth, we get it. But this is desperate by any measure. Why not do an audit of all dubious reffing and VAR decisions for the entire season? It's ridiculous, as is your defence of Bournemouth.
They were sh1t and got relegated. Soz.
Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Oh **** off Bournemouth. on 16:37 - Jul 28 by TheTrueBlue1878
VAR's parameters don't allow for goal line decisions...
Which is mindbogglingly stupid, if true.
Can you imagine; 'Let's analyse a marginal offside for five minutes and use five different lines to work out if Aguero's toe is in front of Ming's shoulder, but if the ball goes over the line and Hawkeye misses it, we'll just ignore it.'
Oh **** off Bournemouth. on 13:40 - Jul 28 by ElderGrizzly
Not just Hawkeye, but this table shows an interesting impact of VAR. Do we sue that too?
That link doesn’t give a direct quote from Bournemouth that that they are considering any action. Just from a lawyer who says they may have a case for compensation.
Oh **** off Bournemouth. on 09:24 - Jul 29 by GlasgowBlue
That link doesn’t give a direct quote from Bournemouth that that they are considering any action. Just from a lawyer who says they may have a case for compensation.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
